SkyDekker 1,465 #101 April 7, 2017 brenthutchLooks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #102 April 7, 2017 SkyDekker***Looks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. Russians are, in general, very good at chess.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #103 April 7, 2017 kallend ******Looks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. Russians are, in general, very good at chess. And they always have a plan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb0QLxcvowk"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #104 April 7, 2017 >Russians are, in general, very good at chess. Trump is the best at chess, big league. He's a master grand. There has never been a president as good as chess as Trump is; that's a medical fact. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #105 April 7, 2017 So now Jared Kushner is becoming Trump's most trusted advisor. Therefore it's a given that we find that he's lied about his Russian connections: ================================================ Kushner Omitted Meeting With Russians on Security Clearance Forms By JO BECKER and MATTHEW ROSENBERG APRIL 6, 2017 When Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, sought the top-secret security clearance that would give him access to some of the nation’s most closely guarded secrets, he was required to disclose all encounters with foreign government officials over the last seven years. But Mr. Kushner did not mention dozens of contacts with foreign leaders or officials in recent months. They include a December meeting with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, and one with the head of a Russian state-owned bank, Vnesheconombank, arranged at Mr. Kislyak’s behest. =================================================== I'm sure he just plain forgot that he met with the Russian ambassador. After all, it's not like Russia has been a problem for the administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #106 April 7, 2017 Well: "Jared Kushner's family's company to make $400M in new sweetheart deal with Chinese firm" http://www.vox.com/world/2017/3/15/14921720/kushner-conflict-interest-anbang That fell apart. Then he met with the Russian bankers to refinance a big existing obligation. Times are tough when you shop the four corners of the globe to roll over problem loans. But then you can just call "daddy" and wait for the next foreign entourage to visit Mar-a-Lago. Talk $400 million dollar loans before US vital interests are discussed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #107 April 7, 2017 Phil1111Well: "Jared Kushner's family's company to make $400M in new sweetheart deal with Chinese firm" http://www.vox.com/world/2017/3/15/14921720/kushner-conflict-interest-anbang That fell apart. Fortunately not all of the Trump family's China business has suffered. =================== Trump's 'Made in America' label doesn't fit Ivanka's clothing line John W. Schoen | Anna R. Schecter Thursday, 6 Apr 2017 | 7:00 AM ET CNBC.com Despite President Donald Trump's calls for American companies to manufacture their products in the U.S., shipments of his daughter's branded, Chinese-made dresses have continued to land on U.S. shores since he took office, documents reviewed by NBC News show. . . . "We can't continue to allow China to rape our country," Trump told his cheering supporters last year on the campaign trail in Indiana. "There are no jobs because China has our jobs." Some of those jobs are apparently still filled by Chinese workers assembling dresses for a licensee of Ivanka Trump's namesake clothing line. Since Election Day, the apparel brand run by Trump's daughter has imported 56 shipments of Ivanka Trump products from China and Singapore, part of a total of 215 shipments from Asia since Jan. 1, 2016. In his inaugural address, Trump promised that "from this moment on, it's going to be America first." =========================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #108 April 7, 2017 SkyDekker***Looks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their tanks did against US hardware. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #109 April 7, 2017 >They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their >tanks did against US hardware. Their missiles fared pretty well against US hardware on July 17, 2014. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ndege 0 #110 April 7, 2017 think he meant-- Trump first. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #111 April 8, 2017 billvon>They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their >tanks did against US hardware. Their missiles fared pretty well against US hardware on July 17, 2014. You being a civilian I can understand your confusion but a 777 is not a military aircraft. A 777 is large and flies at a high altitude. A cruise missile is small and flies at a low altitude. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #112 April 8, 2017 brenthutch******Looks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their tanks did against US hardware. Maybe. Or they knew the missiles weren't going to do too much damage: https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/850433158659047425 Syrian aircraft just took off from that same airport and did bombing runs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #113 April 8, 2017 SkyDekker*********Looks like Trump just tossed a few cruise missiles at his overlord's ally. Yup. Russia also had advance notice this was going to happen. Russia further has the capability to defend against cruise missiles in Syria and decided not to activate the system. They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their tanks did against US hardware. Maybe. Or they knew the missiles weren't going to do too much damage: https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/850433158659047425 Syrian aircraft just took off from that same airport and did bombing runs. So now you believe the Russians? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #114 April 8, 2017 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2TszIJX-F4U Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #115 April 8, 2017 Do you honestly think people click on your blind links? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #117 April 9, 2017 Nope, never do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #118 April 9, 2017 It is video of Trump getting peed on by Russian hookers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #119 April 9, 2017 >You being a civilian I can understand your confusion but a 777 is not a military aircraft. Since you are not a pilot or an engineer I can understand how you might not know that a Boeing 777 is US hardware. But it is; made right here in Seattle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #120 April 9, 2017 billvon>You being a civilian I can understand your confusion but a 777 is not a military aircraft. Since you are not a pilot or an engineer I can understand how you might not know that a Boeing 777 is US hardware. But it is; made right here in Seattle. "Assembled" in Seattle would be more accurate: The production process included substantial international content, an unprecedented level of global subcontracting for a Boeing jetliner, later exceeded by the 787. International contributors included Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (fuselage panels), Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. (center wing section), Hawker de Havilland (elevators), and Aerospace Technologies of Australia (rudder). An agreement between Boeing and the Japan Aircraft Development Corporation, representing Japanese aerospace contractors, made the latter risk-sharing partners for 20 percent of the entire development program. The initial 777-200 model was launched with propulsion options from three manufacturers, General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce, giving the airlines their choice of engines from competing firms. Each manufacturer agreed to develop an engine in the 77,000 lbf (340 kN) and higher thrust class (a measure of jet engine output) for the world's largest twinjet.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millertimeunc 0 #121 April 9, 2017 billvon>They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their >tanks did against US hardware. Their missiles fared pretty well against US hardware on July 17, 2014. A military SAM system fared well against a civilian airliner? What point are you trying to make here?The best things in life are dangerous. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #122 April 9, 2017 So Trump first notified the Russians but said nothing to congress? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #123 April 9, 2017 millertimeunc***>They did not try because their air defense missiles would have fared as well as their >tanks did against US hardware. Their missiles fared pretty well against US hardware on July 17, 2014. A military SAM system fared well against a civilian airliner? What point are you trying to make here? That killing civilians in commercial jetliners or on the ground in a hospital, a school ground, nursery,etc. is what Putin knows best? 2014 – Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, a Boeing 777, crashes near the border of Ukraine and Russia after being shot down. All 298 people on board are killed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #124 April 9, 2017 jclalorSo Trump first notified the Russians but said nothing to congress? Your hero Bill Clinton didn't either.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #125 April 9, 2017 airdvr***So Trump first notified the Russians but said nothing to congress? Your hero Bill Clinton didn't either. Ah, the old "two wrongs make a right" argument.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)