AP Exclusive: DHS weighed Nat Guard for immigration roundups

[rifleman 70]

airdvr

***Trump seems to be determined to re-enact one of America's more shameful historical acts - EO9066

http://www.sfgate.com/national/article/Executive-Order-9066-which-sent-my-family-to-a-10932741.php

Absolutely, comparing the roundup and deportation of illegals is comparable to the roundup and interment of US Citizens.

According to the 14th amendment, anyone within the borders of the US is entitled to the protection of due process whether their presence is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory." Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

EO9066 denied due process to US citizens of German, Italian and Japanese ancestry. Immigrants, illegal or not, are still entitled to due process under the law and constitution.

Atheism is a Non-Prophet Organisation

[correece 0]

quade

***I'm confused.

I'm sure you are.

Quote

Is your point that we considered National Guard?

"We"?

quade

***OK..I get it.

I don't believe you do.

How the fuck did you ever become a moderator?

You're fucking losing it bro.

As for the rest of your wild eyed tin foiled predictions, are you willing to put money on it like you normally do, or have you learned your lesson by now?

[airdvr 210]

rifleman

******Trump seems to be determined to re-enact one of America's more shameful historical acts - EO9066

http://www.sfgate.com/national/article/Executive-Order-9066-which-sent-my-family-to-a-10932741.php

Absolutely, comparing the roundup and deportation of illegals is comparable to the roundup and interment of US Citizens.

According to the 14th amendment, anyone within the borders of the US is entitled to the protection of due process whether their presence is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory." Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

EO9066 denied due process to US citizens of German, Italian and Japanese ancestry. Immigrants, illegal or not, are still entitled to due process under the law and constitution.

I think you're stretching the 14th a little. The 14th is dealing with born or naturalized. Sure the children born here are considered citizens but not their illegal parents.

The Zadvydas v. Davis case concerns detaining illegals past 90 days when no other country will accept them. Not sure why that would apply in this case.

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne