gowlerk 2,249 #76 April 24, 2017 SkyDekkerQuoteYou frequently post about the cost of renewable energy. No, I don't. ***Yes, what is important? Dollar costs, or deaths? Both, some of the most severe hurricanes had a relatively low death toll, but a very high dollar value in damage. Hard to not list that as a severe event. Sorry, misattribution. I was trying to type at brenthutch.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #77 April 24, 2017 billvon>How did it work out for her? Poorly. She didn't target the undereducated. And yet they still voted for her. She needed to expand her support groups."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 851 #78 April 24, 2017 Your skills of reviewing numerical data is lacking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,069 #79 April 24, 2017 >And yet they still voted for her. Alternative facts again? ===================== Behind Trump’s victory: Divisions by race, gender, education By Alec Tyson and Shiva Maniam Nov 9 Pew Research In the 2016 election, a wide gap in presidential preferences emerged between those with and without a college degree. College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. This is by far the widest gap in support among college graduates and non-college graduates in exit polls dating back to 1980. ========================== Education, Not Income, Predicted Who Would Vote For Trump By Nate Silver Sometimes statistical analysis is tricky, and sometimes a finding just jumps off the page. Here’s one example of the latter. . . . . In short, it appears as though educational levels are the critical factor in predicting shifts in the vote between 2012 and 2016. You can come to that conclusion with a relatively simple analysis, like the one I’ve conducted above, or by using fancier methods. In a regression analysis at the county level, for instance, lower-income counties were no more likely to shift to Trump once you control for education levels. And although there’s more work to be done, these conclusions also appear to hold if you examine the data at a more granular level, like by precinct or among individual voters in panel surveys. ===================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,434 #80 April 24, 2017 Hi rush, QuoteThe less informed the voter, the more likely he is to vote for Trump. QuoteHow did it work out for her? You should really pay attention. I do believe that he was referring to voters, not the electoral college. Uh, who again got more actual votes than that other guy? Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CygnusX-1 43 #81 April 25, 2017 QuoteUh, who again got more actual votes than that other guy? That is because there were 65,844,610 illegal votes cast for Clinton. If we throw all those out Trump won by a landslide. Get with the program, man... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #82 April 25, 2017 Wasn't the Trump administration supposed to deliver a report on this? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,069 #83 April 25, 2017 >Wasn't the Trump administration supposed to deliver a report on this? He'll get around to that after he finishes all that stuff he's going to do on his first day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,434 #84 April 25, 2017 Hi CygnusX-1, Quote65,844,610 illegal votes cast for Clinton I will never claim that I know all there is to know about any subject. However, everything that I have ever read ( except for some postings on here ) say that is not correct. What is/are your sources? Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 851 #85 April 25, 2017 I took it as tongue in cheek Jerry! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CygnusX-1 43 #86 April 26, 2017 Sources? I don't need sources. First of all I would not trust the data from the government run media or alternate right/left wing media. I did my own study and am my own source. And I will tell you again and this time with authority that these are the facts of the situation. If we throw out the 65,844,610 votes cast for Clinton, then Trump would have won by a landslide. So much so that it would be the greatest margin in US history. It would be a tremendous victory. Great, and stuff... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,069 #87 April 26, 2017 CygnusX-1If we throw out the 65,844,610 votes cast for Clinton, then Trump would have won by a landslide. So much so that it would be the greatest margin in US history. It would be a tremendous victory. Great, and stuff... Exactly. And all those Clinton votes - maybe all, some are saying all, at least one - are FRAUDULENT! And that's a real alternative FACT. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,434 #88 April 26, 2017 Hi CygnusX-1, Quote Sources? And I thank you for clearing that up. Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
