JoeWeber 2,720 #176 September 24, 2018 billvon>Brett Kavanaugh and pals accused of gang rapes in high school, says lawyer Michael Avenatti While I would consider believing a victim who testified herself to such an assault, I trust Avenatti about as much as I trust Sean Hannity. He's an entertainer, not a reliable spokesperson. Avenatti is a lawyer. Hannity is a d-bag. I'm thinking that if Anenatti has nothing he has an ethics problem. Hannity, not so much. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #177 September 24, 2018 billvonKavanaugh said in a statement, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple." Quite frankly, that illogical train of thought should be sufficient to disqualify him from the bench. Any bench, not just SCOTUS.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #178 September 24, 2018 jcd11235***Kavanaugh said in a statement, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple." Quite frankly, that illogical train of thought should be sufficient to disqualify him from the bench. Any bench, not just SCOTUS. I'm not sure what there follow-up statemet would be, "Oh yeah, that night when Kav pulled his dick out...nope, that never happened. I wonder if he still has that John Belushi shirt he was wearing when he didn't do that.""I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FallsFast 0 #179 September 24, 2018 I have skepticism for this lady's story, and that is coming from the father of a 12 year old daughter. First she never went to the police then, or now that has been reported. Second she wants HIM to testify at the committee first before she does which goes against all norms going back to roman law. Third she doesn't want to do it under oath. Fourth she does not want any lawyers in the room, and lastly which I completely understand she doesn't want him in the room. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #180 September 24, 2018 FallsFastI have skepticism for this lady's story, and that is coming from the father of a 12 year old daughter. First she never went to the police then, or now that has been reported. Second she wants HIM to testify at the committee first before she does which goes against all norms going back to roman law. Third she doesn't want to do it under oath. Fourth she does not want any lawyers in the room, and lastly which I completely understand she doesn't want him in the room. I think that's an aspect of her being swept up in this rather than proof that she was lying. As for why she didn't go to the authorities think of all the reasons why if you were a 15-year-old female in 198X you would not have gone to the police or even your own parents."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #181 September 24, 2018 > As for why she didn't go to the authorities think of all the reasons why if you were >a 15-year-old female in 198X you would not have gone to the police or even your >own parents. "Hey Mom. You know how you told me never to go to those parties where there was drinking, and to not drink until I'm 18? Well, I went to one and had a beer, and then a drunk guy assaulted me. You won't give me any grief when I want to see my friends again, will you?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #182 September 24, 2018 FallsFast I have skepticism for this lady's story, and that is coming from the father of a 12 year old daughter. First she never went to the police then, or now that has been reported. I'm sorry, but if you think that's unusual then you're incredibly naiveDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FallsFast 0 #183 September 24, 2018 The first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? Why was this hidden for two months? Care to comment on the parts in the middle, or the fact that Booker wrote an article himself admitting to “stealing second base”? I’m an independent so im stuck in the middle point fingers at all of them. Wanna crucify Brett? Better throw booker and any others on the cross also. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #184 September 25, 2018 NYT: Kavanaugh’s Yearbook Page Is ‘Horrible, Hurtful’ to a Woman It Named https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html WTF? "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #185 September 25, 2018 FallsFastThe first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? The statute of limitations? What would be the point?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FallsFast 0 #186 September 25, 2018 There is no statute of limitations in Maryland for this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #187 September 25, 2018 FallsFastThere is no statute of limitations in Maryland for this. Ok, cool. In that case - how do you prove it? At this point, what is the realistic chance of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that something criminal happened? Besides, people move on. She may well think that what happened is no longer worth pursuing criminal punishment for, or that it would serve no useful purpose. Let’s face it, thinking that it justifies criminal proceedings after all this time is quite a high bar to pass. Thinking that it should disqualify him from being one of the 9 most important guardians of the nation’s laws is a much, much lower one.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #188 September 25, 2018 jakee***The first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? The statute of limitations? What would be the point? I wonder when Marc gets back from vacation because i don't subscribe to Fox news. I'm sure Fox has the trump cult talking points for Thursday, today. Ron? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #189 September 25, 2018 Phil1111******The first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? The statute of limitations? What would be the point? I wonder when Marc gets back from vacation because i don't subscribe to Fox news. I'm sure Fox has the trump cult talking points for Thursday, today. Ron? Jesus, Mary and Joseph! Phil, don't remind the Mod's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScottishJohn 25 #190 September 25, 2018 Quote Ok, cool. In that case - how do you prove it? At this point, what is the realistic chance of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that something criminal happened? Maybe if she had wrote it on a calendar and kept the calendar for 30 year then she would have all the proof she needs.---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think my attitude stinks you should smell my fingers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #191 September 25, 2018 FallsFastThe first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? Why was this hidden for two months? Care to comment on the parts in the middle, or the fact that Booker wrote an article himself admitting to “stealing second base”? I’m an independent so im stuck in the middle point fingers at all of them. Wanna crucify Brett? Better throw booker and any others on the cross also. Who says she wants to crucify him. maybe she just thinks that the actions she is aware of should preclude him from being a SC justice? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #192 September 25, 2018 >The first and last part I stated is somewhat excusable as a young scared girl did >not want to go to the police, what’s stopping her now? ?? Nothing. She did ask the FBI to investigate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #193 September 25, 2018 Meanwhile, Bill Cosby will be classified as a "sexually violent predator". Looks like he will die in prison. It's a real shame the women he assaulted couldn't just "move on" I guess. While the men who reported the Catholic sex abuse are seen as "brave". Wonder what the differences are in these cases? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #194 September 25, 2018 I'm not sure of the relevance to this particuar case. if your post is directed at me, I think you've misinterpreted something or missed the context of what I was saying.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #195 September 25, 2018 Your words: "Besides, people move on. She may well think that what happened is no longer worth pursuing criminal punishment for, or that it would serve no useful purpose. Let’s face it, thinking that it justifies criminal proceedings after all this time is quite a high bar to pass." That bar isn't all that high IMO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #196 September 25, 2018 Kavanaugh's former 'sherpa' won't commit to vote for him https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/25/kyl-wont-commit-vote-for-kavanaugh-840093 "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #197 September 25, 2018 normissYour words: "Besides, people move on. She may well think that what happened is no longer worth pursuing criminal punishment for, or that it would serve no useful purpose. Let’s face it, thinking that it justifies criminal proceedings after all this time is quite a high bar to pass." That bar isn't all that high IMO. Right. The other guy was casting doubt on her story because she isn't pursuing criminal charges. I suggested some pausible reasons as to why someone would not want to pursue charges for a historical sexual assault while still making it public. I did not, nor would I ever, declare which course of action a victim of such an assault should take, or offer an opinion on whether the course of action she is taking is right or wrong. Is there any part of that you have a problem with? QuoteThat bar isn't all that high IMO. I was thinking of the effort it would take on her part and the potential personal toll it could take in return for a very small chance of success. It's a much bigger undertaking than what she's doing now. Either decision is quite understandable.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #198 September 25, 2018 Trump today: "The second accuser has nothing. She admits that she was drunk. She admits time lapses. She said she was totally inebriated and she was all messed up, and she doesn't know it was him but it might've been him. 'Oh gee, let's not make him a Supreme Court judge because of that.' " As was inevitable for any Trump personnel issue, he has now reached the "all the women are lying!" phase. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #199 September 26, 2018 I think anyone who has suffered any type of abuse and especially sexual abuse, has already paid enough personal tolls. Remaining silent is not the way for us to try to end sexual assaults. I do understand it's a very tough, yet personal decision on how one deals with it though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nbpd610 0 #200 September 26, 2018 The law in MD at the time of the alleged offense is what matters: Statute of limitations: Based on Blasey Ford's account, prosecutors could have theoretically charged Kavanaugh with a crime like attempted rape or unwanted sexual touching over clothing. However, in 1982, those crimes had a one-year statute of limitations. In other words, Blasey Ford would have had to report the allegations to law enforcement by 1983. She did not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites