Possible order of events

[turtlespeed 226]

3 minutes ago, jakee said:

Oh, much more so. An organisation(s) called the Illuminati actually exist, and conspiracy theories are made up about them. Q is utterly fictitious from the ground up. I can't even explain it, it's just too batshit crazy.

Well, this can't be a coincidence . . . there are none!

[Stumpy 284]

On 5/2/2019 at 7:57 PM, Skwrl said:

That’s some weapons-grade magical thinking. 

Kind of the OPs specialty

[jakee 1,563]

9 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

Well, this can't be a coincidence . . . there are none!

What's not a coincidence/

 

Anyway, coincidence is just a word that describes things happening. Everything is a coincidence from the right perspective.

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

On 5/3/2019 at 4:39 PM, jakee said:

Oh, much more so. An organisation(s) called the Illuminati actually exist, and conspiracy theories are made up about them. Q is utterly fictitious from the ground up. I can't even explain it, it's just too batshit crazy.

Pfft. 

It's simple. A bunch of trolls on 4chan started posting 'mysterious' garbage that sounded like it was coming from 'deep insiders'. 

Gullible fools bought into it. 
As noted above, most people have decided that is wasn't real because they made 'date specific' predictions, NONE of which came even remotely close to being true. 
But there are still people out there, proving Barnum was right.

[Skwrl 56]

What's the latest on that WYSIWYG or whatever the dumb QAnon acronym is?  It sure doesn't look like much. 

For those who bought into the 4Chan nonsense known as Q - starting to feel as if you just might have been punked yet?

[jakee 1,563]

1 hour ago, Skwrl said:

What's the latest on that WYSIWYG or whatever the dumb QAnon acronym is?  It sure doesn't look like much. 

For those who bought into the 4Chan nonsense known as Q - starting to feel as if you just might have been punked yet?

Well, he said possible order of events, and that he was praying for a better outcome. Clearly the prayers worked, no further analysis required 

[RonD1120 62]

On 5/20/2019 at 3:52 PM, Skwrl said:

What's the latest on that WYSIWYG or whatever the dumb QAnon acronym is?  It sure doesn't look like much. 

For those who bought into the 4Chan nonsense known as Q - starting to feel as if you just might have been punked yet?

BOOM!

DECLAS...has happened

Panic in DC

Waterfall of Q proofs coming post DECLAS

https://www.oann.com/president-trump-attorney-general-barr-will-get-to-bottom-of-mueller-probe/

 

 

[normiss 851]

Ummmm......yeaaah.

 

[yobnoc 142]

OANN is literally worse than Breitbart.  Man, I feel really bad that you're under this spell.  I hope you come out the other end OK.

[RonD1120 62]

Over a week since POTUS issued [DECLAS]. Investigation by AG Barr underway to uncover [TREASON] by high ranking officials. Possibility of death penalties and no coverage by [FAKE NEWS].

The hammer of justice is coming down. [Panic in DC]. 

Enjoy the show

[JerryBaumchen 1,436]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

Enjoy the show

 

Hi Ron,

Over the years I have concluded that you do not live in the real world.

Jerry Baumchen

[yobnoc 142]

I just...Like even IF i granted that this stuff had a shred of truth (spoiler: it doesn't)...do you really believe that this country would stand for a former president to be put to death?  George W. Bush is regarded as a war criminal by much of the developed world, and by a not-insignificant number of US Citizens, but as a nation I don't believe for a second that we would tolerate or support putting him to death.  The very mentioning of it in your post is highly disturbing.  I'm with Jerry.

[turtlespeed 226]

1 hour ago, yobnoc said:

I just...Like even IF i granted that this stuff had a shred of truth (spoiler: it doesn't)...do you really believe that this country would stand for a former president to be put to death?  George W. Bush is regarded as a war criminal by much of the developed world, and by a not-insignificant number of US Citizens, but as a nation I don't believe for a second that we would tolerate or support putting him to death.  The very mentioning of it in your post is highly disturbing.  I'm with Jerry.

He posted the exact same type of story based in exactly as much fact and sincerity as the thread that was posted inferring to the death of a child that was in custody, even though the child wasn't, or the Ark replica being suggested to be damaged by rain . . .

 

[yobnoc 142]

13 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

He posted the exact same type of story based in exactly as much fact and sincerity as the thread that was posted inferring to the death of a child that was in custody, even though the child wasn't, or the Ark replica being suggested to be damaged by rain . . .

 

Oh, did I contribute to that hysteria?  The difference, I think, is that...WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!

 

But thank you for adding nothing useful, yet again, to the discourse.

[yobnoc 142]

20 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

He posted the exact same type of story based in exactly as much fact and sincerity as the thread that was posted inferring to the death of a child that was in custody, even though the child wasn't, or the Ark replica being suggested to be damaged by rain . . .

 

Also, nice false equivalence there.  Because speculating and/or encouraging that the previous president should be put to death is completely the same as poking a joke at the obvious headline irony of the Ark Park suing over flood insurance, or arguing over who's to blame (if anyone really is to blame at all) about aliens dying after trekking hundreds or thousands of miles to try to flee already-squalid conditions.

It's just the kind of intellectual dishonesty I've come to expect from your posts.  You're looking to stir the pot, not actually contribute.

[turtlespeed 226]

6 minutes ago, yobnoc said:

Oh, did I contribute to that hysteria?  The difference, I think, is that...WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!

 

But thank you for adding nothing useful, yet again, to the discourse.

So Ron posts, and you disagree, and do not find his rhetoric funny or amusing, so he gets berated.

While two other posters post in the same way and mind set - and they get a pass - because of what?

Bias?  Hypocrisy?  Because they bat for your team?

 

Why aren't you speaking out so vehemently in the other threads that are as misleading and untrue?

[turtlespeed 226]

2 minutes ago, yobnoc said:

 

It's just the kind of intellectual dishonesty I've come to expect from your posts.  You're looking to stir the pot, not actually contribute.

Wrong - I am not here to stir the pot as you say.  I am pointing out hypocrisy and dishonesty and bias.

I point it out on both sides - can you say the same?

[jakee 1,563]

36 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

or the Ark replica being suggested to be damaged by rain . . .

No-one suggested that. The linked story was explicitly clear that it wasn't.

 

Why do you feel the need to lie about it? Why is the Ark so important to you?

[turtlespeed 226]

32 minutes ago, jakee said:

No-one suggested that. The linked story was explicitly clear that it wasn't.

 

Why do you feel the need to lie about it? Why is the Ark so important to you?

I'm not lying.

Its not the ark that is important.  Rather how and why the headline was written like it was and why it was posted here.

[jakee 1,563]

15 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

I'm not lying.

You are lying. No one suggested the Ark was damaged. That's a lie. You're doing exactly what you claim to be standing against. Mote, meet beam.

 

Quote

Its not the ark that is important.  

So why do you care about any of it? Just your personal grudge against Kallend making you manipulate facts and misrepresent statements?

[yobnoc 142]

1 hour ago, turtlespeed said:

I'm not lying.

Its not the ark that is important.  Rather how and why the headline was written like it was and why it was posted here.

You're deflecting from the topic at hand.  Again. 

You still haven't managed to eek out a response about false equivalence.

Also, I'm not going to comment on everything.  Simple as that.  I have no comment on kids dying at the border, other than that I feel bad that they're dying.  They've made a long, arduous trek from squalid conditions to try to find safety, and ultimately died.  I'm not interested in finger pointing, although I believe the US could enact better policies to prevent the massive amounts of migration that are occurring.  As in, invest in helping their countries battle the cartels and gang violence, as well as end the fucking war on drugs.

I have no interest in the Ark Park.  I found the sensationalist articles written on it to have a funny headline, I smirked a little, and didn't bother reading because I don't care.  The place will be bankrupt within a few years at best. 

 

[RonD1120 62]

4chan is so 2017.

The Q movement has spread to other countries and utilizes other comm channels. The following is but one example.

https://twitter.com/Ph03n1x24

Learn the difference between Q, Q+, and QAnon.

Fantasy, maybe it is but there are millions of followers around the world. The fake news does not report on it so you are not aware. There is a change coming, equal justice under the law. I believe a major shake-up is just around the bend.

[DECLAS] > AG Barr investigation 

Comey investigation report is forthcoming as is the OIG report.

WWG1WGA

Edited May 26, 2019 by RonD1120
Added info documentation

[Coreece 190]

18 minutes ago, yobnoc said:

The place will be bankrupt within a few years at best. 

Good news!  Skydekker is itching to burn 5k on bankruptcy bets.  Maybe he'll give you some action.

[JerryBaumchen 1,436]

2 hours ago, yobnoc said:

 You're looking to stir the pot, not actually contribute.

Hi yobnoc,

I'm with you.

Jerry Baumchen

[yobnoc 142]

26 minutes ago, Coreece said:

Good news!  Skydekker is itching to burn 5k on bankruptcy bets.  Maybe he'll give you some action.

Hard pass.  I only "gamble" playing poker.