1 1
JoeWeber

She's Back!

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, SkyDekker said:

Which NATO obligation was the US afoul off prior to pulling out so fast the Russians have already taken over your bases in Syria?

I did some research after that post. Seems Turkey was brought in during the cold war to have more allies in the region. Not sure they still should be a member. 

Seems like we may be fighting against our own weapons. This is not the first time we gave/sold weapons to another country that ended up being used against us. 

I can see wanting to get out of Syria but once again we create a situation and bail out with it more fucked up than when we got there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Still waiting for Kallend to explain this one.

I understand what you're talking about but this is what he's talking about:

Turkey, Russia Reach Deal To Control Syrian Areas Once Patrolled By The U.S.

 https://www.npr.org/2019/10/22/772387023/turkey-russia-reach-deal-to-control-syrian-areas-once-patrolled-by-the-u-s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

I'm curious here - 

Does the left now believe we should be the police now?

Are we supposed to be the world police?

Are we NOT supposed to be the world police?

Which is it now?

Then it makes one ask, "When will that opinion change again?"  Will that only be after a more liberal president is in office?

 

Who is it here that refuses to see the hypocrisy and irony?

(Ha - come to think of it, it's kind of like tribalism, no?)

 

Edited by turtlespeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

That is a far cry from “gave up Syria to Putin“

Certainly but I get where he's coming from.  It's more like we gave up the Kurds and our own influence in the region to Putin, so I'd prefer to clarify his point.  It was always a tricky situation because what, were we going to stay there forever?  Lets say that the infighting entirely ceased, what then?  We had control of a faction that threatened our NATO ally and could use our influence to settle a long-standing issue in the region regarding them.  Instead we're leaving their fate and all diplomacy along the border of out NATO ally to Putin.  If anyone thought that regions went to shit after US intervention they know they go to shit after Russian intervention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Rick said:

or sometimes we take turns with Russia in fucking up a region

^^^This

I wonder if I'll get any responses regarding my questions about when and when not to be the world's police force.

Why is it OK sometimes in one place, but when the political climate changes, it is no longer acceptable?

Obviously the reverse is true as well.

I would find it refreshing to see those that have this line of thinking to at least admit it.

After all, it looks to me like it doesn't really matter who is doing what and why, nearly as much as it matters who is doing it and what side of center they hail from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When we're already policing, it's tacky to just get out. You broke it, you bought it, and all that.

We should consider carefully before policing if it's not our country. "Sphere of influence" is not our country. OTOH, if we are asked for help by an ally (i.e. someone with whom we have a treaty, not just our friend-du-jour), we should consider it carefully.

And if we're attacked on our soil, we should do proper detective work before just going off and wasting a few people or countries. Because we're unlikely ever again to be attacked a la Pearl Harbor; a 9-11 style attack is much more likely when you're the superpower.

Wendy P.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

^^^This

I wonder if I'll get any responses regarding my questions about when and when not to be the world's police force.

Why is it OK sometimes in one place, but when the political climate changes, it is no longer acceptable?

Obviously the reverse is true as well.

I would find it refreshing to see those that have this line of thinking to at least admit it.

After all, it looks to me like it doesn't really matter who is doing what and why, nearly as much as it matters who is doing it and what side of center they hail from.

Personally I’d like to see the US slower to get involved in world policing in the future. That’s different to ‘less’.

But also I think that if we’re already in a place and leaving will create a vacuum then we have an obligation to develop a plan for a real transition and contingencies for what happens if it goes to shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, turtlespeed said:

I wonder if I'll get any responses regarding my questions about when and when not to be the world's police force.

As a general rule, going in is something that has to be weighed up very carefully, however once you are in, leaving has to be done with even more care. Basically, you broke it you bought it. And when it comes to anything to do with ISIS, god damn did we ever break it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

I'm curious here - 

Does the left now believe we should be the police now?

Are we supposed to be the world police?

Are we NOT supposed to be the world police?

Which is it now?

 

 

I would put it more like "Don't stab your nation's allies in the back for your personal gain".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 8:45 AM, turtlespeed said:

Does the left now believe we should be the police now?

Are we supposed to be the world police?

Are we NOT supposed to be the world police?

Which is it now?

You are making 2 generalizations and assumptions here, that make it impossible to get the clear answer you want:
1) "that "the left" is a single entity that has a single opinion on all matters of foreign policy
2) That it is necessary to have such a black and white simplistic opinion on matters that are necessarily highly nuanced. ("which is it now?") If anything, I'd say that is what "the left" often criticizes about "the right".
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, mbohu said:

You are making 2 generalizations and assumptions here, that make it impossible to get the clear answer you want:
1) "that "the left" is a single entity that has a single opinion on all matters of foreign policy
2) That it is necessary to have such a black and white simplistic opinion on matters that are necessarily highly nuanced. ("which is it now?") If anything, I'd say that is what "the left" often criticizes about "the right".
 

Generalizations based on majority opinions, and statements released by like minded leaders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 7:11 AM, turtlespeed said:

Hmm - NOW - it seems the US being the world police is good . . . until its not, again.

Or, rather, I should put it this way - NOW - the US --NOT-- being the world police is BAD, until its not.

How old are you? Considering you are older than 12, I am surprised you just now are figuring out the world isn't black and white.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SkyDekker said:

How old are you? Considering you are older than 12, I am surprised you just now are figuring out the world isn't black and white.

That, my friend, depends on who's president and who's camp you reside in.

I'm not in either camp - That is what make it so amusing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1