Q

[JoeWeber 2,820]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

Q's last post was 3 Nov.

The Q analyzers were de-platformed on 6 Nov.

 

Any further news about the Easter Bunny?

[ryoder 1,590]

16 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

Any further news about the Easter Bunny?

WWH1WHA

[billvon 3,067]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

Q's last post was 3 Nov.

The Q analyzers were de-platformed on 6 Nov.

Well, de-motivated at least.

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

Q's last post was 3 Nov.

The Q analyzers were de-platformed on 6 Nov.

 

Wow. That's amazing.

Trump hasn't conceded. 
AG Barr is going against protocols by launching an 'investigation' before any states have officially certified the election results.
SecState Pompeo is pretending Trump will win.
Trump's minions are refusing to allow Biden to begin the transition.

Yet the "Deep State" [DS] has managed to shut up Q. 

It's a damned shame they can't 'De-Platform' all the idiots that want to pretend Trump won.

Although, the 'Main Stream Media' has started to show some integrity and is refusing to air the blatant lies that the Mango Mussolini and his Chief Obfuscator are spewing. 

[ryoder 1,590]

On the topic of Parler:

 

[headoverheels 333]

I'm a bit of an originalist, so I will continue to pronounce it correctly, as par-lay.

[Phil1111 1,149]

I got a copy of the latest deciphered breadcrumb.

TLSWAL SIAO

[JoeWeber 2,820]

4 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

Q's last post was 3 Nov.

The Q analyzers were de-platformed on 6 Nov.

 

It was a dark and stormy night, I lay awakened by the phantom twitch of an arm or a leg, and above me looking down with the gleam of an illiberal southern gentleman in his eye was the Boogie Man. The End.

Edited November 11, 2020 by JoeWeber

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

12 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

Q's last post was 3 Nov.

The Q analyzers were de-platformed on 6 Nov.

 

Wait a minute...

How would you know that Q was 'de-platformed' if there haven't been any posts?

And, again, what happened to your 'back channel comms'?

I would expect that all those 'former CIA' and "Spec-Ops" types would have had some sort of back up plan. 

They can't even shut up that idiot over on the Cooper thread who's gone completely bananas over some dude who sort of looks like the drawing. 
He's been banned about a zillion times, yet keeps on making sock puppets and posting porn. 
If that dude can get around a ban, why can't all those Q 'experts'?

[Skwrl 56]

6 hours ago, wolfriverjoe said:

Wait a minute...

How would you know that Q was 'de-platformed' if there haven't been any posts?

And, again, what happened to your 'back channel comms'?

I would expect that all those 'former CIA' and "Spec-Ops" types would have had some sort of back up plan. 

They can't even shut up that idiot over on the Cooper thread who's gone completely bananas over some dude who sort of looks like the drawing. 
He's been banned about a zillion times, yet keeps on making sock puppets and posting porn. 
If that dude can get around a ban, why can't all those Q 'experts'?

Ron is hair-splitting since that's all he has left.  Allow me to translate for you. 

"Q" (as in the purported secret agent who - according to Ron's fantasy - is providing us all the information that we need in order to piece together the story of how the "Satanic cabal" is going to be defeated) only posts on 8kun.  There have been no posts from "Q" on 8kun since before this election. 

However, there has been no "de-platforming" of Q: 8kun allows people to post literally anything on it (it's notorious for having child porn and all sorts of other creepy and illegal crap on some of it).  It's not changed one bit, at least based on its publicly announced policies.    

However, the reason for the silence is likely because the person who set up and runs 8kun - Jim Watson, a pig farmer who moved to the Philippines because of its lax sex laws - has been under investigation recently for a few things (including fraud and sex crimes, among other things), and probably doesn't want to risk posting and making his legal situation worse.  

Now, most people who follow the whole Q thing - even people who are deep into the cult - don't read 8kun (which is probably good, given how horrid the place is), and that allows the fraudsters to try to claim that it's a sort of spooky secret "dark web" (but it's literally a picture posting forum that you can get to it without any knowledge and using any browser).  But the Q devotees claim that this "deep web" element adds to its legitimacy, so just ignore the child porn, please!

Anyway, some people who read Q's posts (called "drops" by the Qcumbers, because that makes them sound "secret agent-ish") on 8Kun disseminate and interpret them for the cult, so the cultists don't have to go to creepy 8kun, and so that they can put their own spin on them.  These people are referred to by Ron as "Q Analyzers".  The Q Analyzers have been kicked off of Twitter, Facebook, and a few other platforms.  But they are still on some less popular platforms.

Now, if you find yourself reading this and thinking, "This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read", then yeah, congrats, you now understand the Q phenomenon!  None of it makes internally consistent sense. None of its purported "predictions" about anything - other than things were glaringly obvious to anyone who follows politics - have proven out.  There's no reason why a government operation would ever - ever - run this way.  But it's all backed by Fancy Bear, the Russian intelligence service, and honestly that's all the help you need when it aligns with the authoritarian hopes of the Q followers and maybe a dash of mental illness.  (In some cases, more like a dallop than a dash.)

I suspect even Ron is starting to have his doubts, though, because he's pivoted from talking about how it was "true" to "how it was helping to try to re-elect Donald Trump".  And he wouldn't be alone in that - you're seeing more and more people commenting on the forums - yep, I still know where to find them, so how "de-platformed" can they be? - about how they're losing faith in the hoax as time progresses. 

I guess we'll see who the last one is there to turn out the lights, or how it metastasizes into some other absurd revenge fantasy for the easily deluded. 

Edited November 11, 2020 by Skwrl
typos, typos.

[gowlerk 2,249]

35 minutes ago, Skwrl said:

or how it metastasizes into some other absurd revenge fantasy for the easily deluded. 

There will be a new movement of election deniers. Similar to birthers or Q adherents. Someone will come up with a new name for the movement. Any ideas? "Stop the steal" is gaining some traction, but I don't think it is short and punchy enough.

[RonD1120 62]

My three favorite news (Q) analyzers are back online.

All are focusing on the common denominator Dominion Voting Systems between the states, read swing, that have discrepancies.

Interesting facts RE: DVS

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/09/4-things-to-know-about-voting-machine-company-thats-causing-stir/

[Phil1111 1,149]

4 hours ago, gowlerk said:

There will be a new movement of election deniers. Similar to birthers or Q adherents. Someone will come up with a new name for the movement. Any ideas? "Stop the steal" is gaining some traction, but I don't think it is short and punchy enough.

“Save America.”  its the new trump PAC aka slush fund.  Trump asks for 'election defense' donations, but the money also benefits his new leadership PAC

Like anything else to do with trump just follow the money. But he will need money for "election defense" for sure. From Politico "Biden will have one tool, however, that allows him to pursue justice while also ensuring that the process doesn’t appear to be tainted by politics. That tool is the special counsel—a prosecutor appointed not by Biden, but by his attorney general,"

"Save America end the witch hunt" is probably close. So entrepreneurs poach those domain names.

[wmw999 2,532]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

My three favorite news (Q) analyzers are back online.

All are focusing on the common denominator Dominion Voting Systems between the states, read swing, that have discrepancies.

Interesting facts RE: DVS

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/09/4-things-to-know-about-voting-machine-company-thats-causing-stir/

Ron, the fact that some (and not all) swing states swung the other way should not be that surprising. That it is, says a lot about how you get information.

Wendy P.

[gowlerk 2,249]

1 hour ago, RonD1120 said:

Interesting facts RE: DVS

That is so cute. A story that has nothing but innuendo, and is even too shy to make an accusation. But somehow it manages to find a "connection" to the evil boogeyman Soros. A company that supplies a company has a board member who is a Lord and also a board member of a charity that gets some funding from the Prince of Darkness. Shit Ron, your people are getting pretty desperate now.

The chairman of Smartmatic is Mark Malloch-Brown, a member of the British House of Lords, who also is a member of the Global Board of the Soros-founded Open Society Foundations, The Associated Press reported.

[gowlerk 2,249]

A little more on the BS theory that Ron linked to.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-us-news-media-michigan-43bdaa186e3b8d9d897cae3bd0c6cdc0

[JoeWeber 2,820]

3 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

Interesting facts

Whenever have you provided a fact or claimed any position here that worked out to be true? Have you not recognized that you must go further and further afield to find anything to support your beliefs? You once claimed that people here don't think you are smart. Well, part of being smart is the ability to recognize when you are wrong. If you are smart it's time to show it.

[billvon 3,067]

17 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

My three favorite news (Q) analyzers are back online.

All are focusing on the common denominator Dominion Voting Systems between the states, read swing, that have discrepancies.

No discrepancies I can see between polling and results.  There's a 2-3 point "shy Trump voter" issue with polls because some Trump voters are ashamed to admit they support him.  Once you subtract that factor, the results match 538's predictions almost exactly.  (They predicted FL and NC for Biden but only by 1-2 points.)  The one standout is your state, interestingly enough.  Biden had a .9% lead there which should not have been enough to overcome the shy-voter effect.  

But to put a positive spin on it, maybe Trump supporters in Georgia are more honest.

[jakee 1,561]

7 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

My three favorite news (Q) analyzers are back online.

So they weren't deplatformed?

[Skwrl 56]

18 hours ago, gowlerk said:

There will be a new movement of election deniers. Similar to birthers or Q adherents. Someone will come up with a new name for the movement. Any ideas? "Stop the steal" is gaining some traction, but I don't think it is short and punchy enough.

Q Cucks Klan?

[wmw999 2,532]

"stop the steal" is what they call themselves. A punchy new name is normally one that someone else calls them; it could be considered mildly derogatory, but there are extra points if the group takes it on themselves.

I'd submit Election Deniers.

Wendy P.

[Phil1111 1,149]

10 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

Whenever have you provided a fact or claimed any position here that worked out to be true? Have you not recognized that you must go further and further afield to find anything to support your beliefs? You once claimed that people here don't think you are smart. Well, part of being smart is the ability to recognize when you are wrong. If you are smart it's time to show it.

The next step will be an electron microscope to find those straws that support Q.

[JerryBaumchen 1,432]

4 hours ago, wmw999 said:

"stop the steal" is what they call themselves. A punchy new name is normally one that someone else calls them; it could be considered mildly derogatory, but there are extra points if the group takes it on themselves.

I'd submit Election Deniers.

Wendy P.

Hi Wendy,

Nahhh, that is too hard for them to understand.  Short & simple or nothing.

Jerry Baumchen

[ryoder 1,590]

4 hours ago, wmw999 said:

"stop the steal" is what they call themselves. A punchy new name is normally one that someone else calls them; it could be considered mildly derogatory, but there are extra points if the group takes it on themselves.

I'd submit Election Deniers.

Wendy P.

I'll submit they have Electile Disfunction.

[JoeWeber 2,820]

5 minutes ago, JerryBaumchen said:

Hi Wendy,

Nahhh, that is too hard for them to understand.  Short & simple or nothing.

Jerry Baumchen

ED'rs?