Coreece 190 #51 July 30, 2020 8 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: Even if I am confused, and I'll look to Coreece for further clarification Yes, you are confused. Does that clarify it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,823 #52 July 30, 2020 13 minutes ago, Coreece said: Yes, you are confused. Does that clarify it? Excellent, so you don't have me blocked. What a relief. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #53 July 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: 17 minutes ago, Coreece said: Yes, you are confused. Does that clarify it? Excellent, so you don't have me blocked. What a relief. I don't do that. I thinks it displays cowardice and only exacerbates the problem given that the blocker now only sees selected quotes of the blocked out of context. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,436 #54 July 30, 2020 5 hours ago, BIGUN said: There's too many veterans who sleep with the constitution to allow that to happen. Hi Keith, I agree. However, there is a fair number of people in this country who do not; and are very afraid of this very thing. Jerry Baumchen 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,409 #55 July 30, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, JoeWeber said: You wouldn't happen to have data on how the officers voted versus enlisted, would you? Seems to me that might have a few clues in it. I have no knowledge or information on this, Joe. Edited July 30, 2020 by BIGUN Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,409 #56 July 30, 2020 (edited) deleted Edited July 30, 2020 by BIGUN double post Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #57 July 30, 2020 7 hours ago, ryoder said: If he really doesn't want the job, he is free to resign at any time. No one is forcing him to stay. But as a narcissist, he is addicted to power. He is making heaps of money with campaign funds flowing back to his businesses. No reason to walk away from that. Trump’s tweet this morning had only one purpose: take attention away from the absolutely disastrous economic numbers that came out a few minutes after. Worst quarter in US history. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #58 July 30, 2020 44 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: He is making heaps of money with campaign funds flowing back to his businesses. No reason to walk away from that. Trump’s tweet this morning had only one purpose: take attention away from the absolutely disastrous economic numbers that came out a few minutes after. Worst quarter in US history. Not to forget that US COVID-19 deaths in 6 months are more than 1/3 of US deaths in all of WW2, and long surpassed US deaths in WW1. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,436 #59 July 31, 2020 Hi folks, A little update on things here in Portland: 'Portland protesters gather peacefully Thursday as federal officers depart' 'The determination of the protesters seemed to wear down the Trump administration this week, leading DHS acting secretary Chad Wolf to agree to the deal pulling out federal officers' https://www.opb.org/article/2020/07/31/portland-protesters-gather-peacefully-thursday-as-federal-officers-depart/ To Donald Trump: Sometimes things do not work out as you want them to. Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #60 July 31, 2020 At least Fox coverage has been consistent over the years on federal intervention in Oregon. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,436 #61 July 31, 2020 38 minutes ago, headoverheels said: At least Fox coverage has been consistent over the years on federal intervention in Oregon. Hi heels, Typical of Faux News, speaking out of both sides of their mouth. Hmmm, now who else does that? Could it possibly someone who gets their news from Faux? Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,436 #62 August 2, 2020 Hi folks, IMO, this is good news: 'The Department of Homeland Security has reassigned its top intelligence official, . . . following news that his office compiled intelligence reports on journalists and protesters in Portland, OR.' https://www.npr.org/2020/08/02/898242662/dhs-reassigns-official-following-intelligence-reports-on-journalists-protesters Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #63 August 2, 2020 Hi Jerry, While it certainly isn't 'bad' news, really good news would be him getting fired. Or perhaps facing criminal civil rights violation charges. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #64 August 2, 2020 1 hour ago, JerryBaumchen said: Hi folks, IMO, this is good news: 'The Department of Homeland Security has reassigned its top intelligence official, . . . following news that his office compiled intelligence reports on journalists and protesters in Portland, OR.' https://www.npr.org/2020/08/02/898242662/dhs-reassigns-official-following-intelligence-reports-on-journalists-protesters Jerry Baumchen Well his boss has previously stated that protestors are terrorists and journalists guilty of treason. Must have been an upward promotion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #65 August 3, 2020 On 7/24/2020 at 10:44 AM, wmw999 said: I have a young relative who's involved with the current spate of activism. They are not vandalizing anything. They were arrested a couple of months ago on a protest-related charge, booked, and released without a charge. They were picked up at home last night by officers who refused to show a warrant; taken downtown and strip-searched, and placed in a cell. Officers made too much noise (i.e. whistles, banging bars, etc) for any sleep to happen. Then late at night they were given their clothes back and told to walk home. No charge, no appearance, no nothing. Their main point in saying this was "if they have enough time on their hands to do this, why not invest a litlte more in health care and housing?" This is not acceptable. I'm seeing the other side of the story. Do we want to spend more of our society's money controlling people, or providing for them? If freedom is so important, I'd imagine that controlling should be a last, rather than a first, resort. Wendy P. That's incredible. Keep us posted. That is some seriously Nazi shit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites