JoeWeber 2,810 #2851 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 1:50 AM, brenthutch said: He is already running for 2024. That aside, what Democrat rising stars will be able to take his mantle? Sherrod Brown with Gretchen Whitmer. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #2852 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:19 AM, JoeWeber said: Sherrod Brown with Gretchen Whitmer. On 1/14/2023 at 2:19 AM, JoeWeber said: Gretchen Whitmer. This. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2853 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:19 AM, JoeWeber said: Sherrod Brown with Gretchen Whitmer. Too white and not gay enough. You’ll end up getting Harris/Buttigieg. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #2854 January 14, 2023 The facts have yet to come out regarding deliberate vs. oversight, obstruction vs. cooperation, and I'm not going to speculate except to say that based on everything we know about the personae of Trump and Biden, it's hard to believe that Trump didn't have a nefarious purpose in mind for retaining documents, and it's hard to believe that Biden did. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2855 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 1:06 PM, kallend said: This. I'm thinking Ohio and Michigan. Like it or not D chances will be better with a white male at the top of the ticket. Then maybe, he'll do the right thing and fall over dead giving us our first female president showing all of the nincompoops that not only can women do the job but that we probably should have gone that way long ago. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2856 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 1:08 PM, brenthutch said: Too white and not gay enough. You’ll end up getting Harris/Buttigieg. That's a good one! I'll bet all of your female, black, and gay friends are just howling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,246 #2857 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 1:53 PM, JoeWeber said: not only can women do the job but that we probably should have gone that way long ago. As long as they dress in a way that the male establishment approves of. https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/13/politics/missouri-dress-code-lawmakers-house/index.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,558 #2858 January 14, 2023 On 1/13/2023 at 9:30 PM, brenthutch said: Some of the classified documents were “top secret,” the highest level. Top secret is not top secret SCI. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billeisele 130 #2859 January 14, 2023 Background infohttps://www.cnn.com/2023/01/12/politics/biden-documents-final-days-vice-president-aides-scramble/index.html?fbclid=IwAR1lYPMa4-Akvm9-Uf4ZqUuYHUPKnnjnSaN0MO8Jp6j7IRcNdirQ6rnnZ8U Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2860 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:23 PM, jakee said: Top secret is not top secret SCI. That remains to be determined Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2861 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:51 PM, brenthutch said: That remains to be determined Hope springs eternal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #2862 January 14, 2023 Karl Rove went on Fox to explain why Trump's issues with classified material is worse than Biden's. Karl Rove. On Fox. Of course, Trump is having a tantrum over it. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,521 #2863 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:51 PM, brenthutch said: That remains to be determined Well, no, those are two different classifications. But we don’t know which the documents are. Wendy P. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2864 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 3:21 PM, wmw999 said: Well, no, those are two different classifications. But we don’t know which the documents are. Wendy P. Nope, we don't. But for vastly different reasons than those prayed for by certain Pennsyltuckey Political Pundits we can, perhaps, ponder portentous, proffered, Presidential permutation possibilities. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,426 #2865 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 1:56 PM, gowlerk said: As long as they dress in a way that the male establishment approves of. https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/13/politics/missouri-dress-code-lawmakers-house/index.html Hi Ken, That one is so Dark Ages that, while I considered it, I did not send it on to my daughter. She would have responded with what she really thinks about this kind of BS. Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,426 #2866 January 14, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:59 PM, wolfriverjoe said: Karl Rove went on Fox to explain why Trump's issues with classified material is worse than Biden's. Karl Rove. On Fox. Of course, Trump is having a tantrum over it. Hi Joe, That begs the question: Who on here would expect something different? Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2867 January 15, 2023 https://fb.watch/i35aGk9ard/ then and now Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,558 #2868 January 15, 2023 On 1/14/2023 at 2:51 PM, brenthutch said: That remains to be determined Glad you agree Bill has no basis to say the documents had to be in a SCIF. Not sure why it took you so long to catch up though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #2869 January 15, 2023 On 1/15/2023 at 9:16 AM, jakee said: .... Not sure why it took you so long to catch up though. You're very kind. Everybody here knows why. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2870 January 15, 2023 On 1/15/2023 at 9:16 AM, jakee said: Glad you agree Bill has no basis to say the documents had to be in a SCIF. Not sure why it took you so long to catch up though. Top secret SCI vs top secret is a distinction without a difference. The statute does not differentiate between the two. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2871 January 15, 2023 On 1/15/2023 at 2:56 PM, brenthutch said: Top secret SCI vs top secret is a distinction without a difference. The statute does not differentiate between the two. Don't drool on your "I Heart Tucker" t-shirt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,810 #2873 January 15, 2023 On 1/15/2023 at 3:02 PM, brenthutch said: It's not OK, no matter how you attempt to reframe the issue. If Biden was simply careless, he was wrong. End of story. But the difference between Trump's documents transgressions and Biden's might be likened to the difference between rolling a stop sign in bum fuck Montana and doing 100mph through a school zone in downtown Philly. You know in your heart Trump did it for nefarious reasons and Biden, most likely, just fucked up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2874 January 15, 2023 (edited) On 1/15/2023 at 3:00 PM, JoeWeber said: Don't drool on your "I Heart Tucker" t-shirt. Is he the new boogie man for the Left? BTW they found more classified documents on Thursday Edited January 15, 2023 by brenthutch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #2875 January 15, 2023 (edited) On 1/15/2023 at 3:09 PM, JoeWeber said: It's not OK, no matter how you attempt to reframe the issue. If Biden was simply careless, he was wrong. End of story. But the difference between Trump's documents transgressions and Biden's might be likened to the difference between rolling a stop sign in bum fuck Montana and doing 100mph through a school zone in downtown Philly. You know in your heart Trump did it for nefarious reasons and Biden, most likely, just fucked up. Biden snuck classified documents into his private residence, Hunter sold the contents to the Chinese for drug money and gave Joe aka “The Big Guy” his cut. Edited January 15, 2023 by brenthutch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
