JoeWeber 2,720 #3076 February 3, 2023 1 hour ago, brenthutch said: Ok so Joe got his cut by other means. Good catch. I wonder why so many can not take you seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3077 February 3, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: I wonder why so many can not take you seriously. My post was a bit tongue in cheek. But only a bit. Just goes to prove lefties have no sense of humor. Prefer canceling to chuckling. Like Snopes fact checking the Babylon Bee In this example, I am the Babylon Bee and SkyDekker is Snopes Edited February 3, 2023 by brenthutch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #3078 February 3, 2023 22 hours ago, jakee said: Where did you look? Google Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #3079 February 3, 2023 35 minutes ago, RonD1120 said: Google Let me help you with that: https://lmgtfy.app/?q=2023+state+of+the+union+address Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #3080 February 4, 2023 19 hours ago, brenthutch said: My post was a bit tongue in cheek. But only a bit. Just goes to prove lefties have no sense of humor. Prefer canceling to chuckling. Like Snopes fact checking the Babylon Bee In this example, I am the Babylon Bee and SkyDekker is Snopes So even in this one post you’re claiming that you’re 1) completely satirical and 2) almost entirely serious in everything you’re saying about Hunter and Joe…. But if anyone dared to disagree with you it must be that they don’t get your jokes. Which are only jokes a little bit, because you also mean it. Anyway, nice diversion from having to admit you were totally wrong about the thing you’ve been banging on about for months. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #3081 February 4, 2023 19 hours ago, RonD1120 said: Google What did you Google? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #3082 February 4, 2023 5 minutes ago, jakee said: So even in this one post you’re claiming that you’re 1) completely satirical and 2) almost entirely serious in everything you’re saying about Hunter and Joe…. But if anyone dared to disagree with you it must be that they don’t get your jokes. Which are only jokes a little bit, because you also mean it. Anyway, nice diversion from having to admit you were totally wrong about the thing you’ve been banging on about for months. Trolls do not need to be either consistent, or logical. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #3083 February 4, 2023 5 hours ago, jakee said: But if anyone dared to disagree with you it must be that they don’t get your jokes. Which are only jokes a little bit Schrodinger's douchebag strikes again 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3084 February 4, 2023 7 hours ago, jakee said: So even in this one post you’re claiming that you’re 1) completely satirical and 2) almost entirely serious in everything you’re saying about Hunter and Joe…. But if anyone dared to disagree with you it must be that they don’t get your jokes. Which are only jokes a little bit, because you also mean it. Anyway, nice diversion from having to admit you were totally wrong about the thing you’ve been banging on about for months. The vehicle was satire the content (language from a classified document ending up in a Hunter Biden Email) was not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #3085 February 4, 2023 Biden's lawyers are saying the FBI found nothing. The FBI, of course, doesn't comment.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64488011 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #3086 February 5, 2023 9 hours ago, brenthutch said: The vehicle was satire the content (language from a classified document ending up in a Hunter Biden Email) was not. So when people disagree with the content, that has nothing whatsoever to do with sense of humour, does it? That was just you trying to distract from being absolutely wrong about Hunter’s rent, wasn’t it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,314 #3087 February 5, 2023 7 hours ago, Slim King said: "More than half the women in my administration are women". Is he suggesting that there are a bunch of women in his administration that aren't women??? He corrected himself less than a nanosecond later by saying more than half the people. People all around the country give speeches every day and make some kind of blunder. It's really not this great Ahh HAH or look look moment that people make it out to be. It happens. It's not on par with more serious issues. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #3088 February 5, 2023 1 hour ago, BIGUN said: He corrected himself less than a nanosecond later by saying more than half the people. People all around the country give speeches every day and make some kind of blunder. It's really not this great Ahh HAH or look look moment that people make it out to be. It happens. It's not on par with more serious issues. Agreed. I dislike him, as I do most politicians, but I'm comparatively indifferent to his verbal gaffes. If all one has is cheap shots, it doesn't do much to support their position. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bigfalls 111 #3089 February 5, 2023 On 2/1/2023 at 7:10 PM, SkyDekker said: At least we know who they are. Trump is refusing to disclose who actually found the confidential documents in his self storage unit. So if accessibility to documents by other people is the driving factor, both are "at risk" Would appear Pence less so. Realistically, the documents found in Trump's Self Storage unit are likely not going to be an issue for him, since it would be impossible to prove intent. I think Pence and from what I can see so far Biden are going to be in the same boat. Will be a lot harder for Trump to argue he never intended to have those documents. NARA has now sent a letter to all living former president's and vice-presidents to check if they inadvertently have information lying around too. All except Carter that is. Better check Mount Vernon for classified documents. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #3090 February 6, 2023 9 hours ago, Bigfalls said: Better check Mount Vernon for classified documents. I'd be more interested in what GWB and Dick Cheney may or may not have in their files. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #3091 February 6, 2023 20 hours ago, Bigfalls said: Better check Mount Vernon for classified documents. There is a reason Carter didn't get the letter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #3092 February 9, 2023 On 2/2/2023 at 12:32 PM, brenthutch said: Rs are too classy to pull a stunt like that, but if they did you can rest assured the MSM (and many on this forum) would go apoplectic. I wouldn't describe the Rs behaviour during the State of the Union as classy. But, I have a feeling you and I may have very different definitions of classy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3093 February 10, 2023 22 hours ago, SkyDekker said: I wouldn't describe the Rs behaviour during the State of the Union as classy. But, I have a feeling you and I may have very different definitions of classy. I suppose you would call this classy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #3094 February 10, 2023 23 hours ago, SkyDekker said: I wouldn't describe the Rs behaviour during the State of the Union as classy. But, I have a feeling you and I may have very different definitions of classy. I get the distinct feeling that many republicans would classify Roy Moore hitting on 14 year olds at a mall "classy" while the military service of Joe Biden's son would be seen as "a publicity stunt" - based purely on their party affiliations. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #3095 February 10, 2023 (edited) 53 minutes ago, brenthutch said: I suppose you would call this classy You said the Rs would be classier than that. You still stand by that? Edited February 10, 2023 by SkyDekker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3096 February 10, 2023 33 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: You said the Rs would be classier than that. You still stand by that? Absolutely Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #3097 February 10, 2023 1 hour ago, brenthutch said: I suppose you would call this classy Classy, probably not. Ballsy, absolutely. I liked it then and I think it's aged quite nicely. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3098 February 10, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: Classy, probably not. Ballsy, absolutely. I liked it then and I think it's aged quite nicely. Thank goodness we’ve seen the last of the Wicked Witch of the West Edited February 10, 2023 by brenthutch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #3099 February 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: Classy, probably not. Ballsy, absolutely. I liked it then and I think it's aged quite nicely. I find it very hard to condemn Pelosi for showing disrespect to a traitor. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #3100 February 10, 2023 20 minutes ago, brenthutch said: Absolutely Then I was right, you and I have a very different understanding of classy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites