President Biden, critics corner

[gowlerk 2,245]

24 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

Then I was right, you and I have a very different understanding of classy.

And I would be very surprised if you didn't. Apparently people don't have to be poorly educated to act as if they were ignorant.

[brenthutch 444]

39 minutes ago, ryoder said:

I find it very hard to condemn Pelosi for showing disrespect to a traitor.

No respect for the office 

[JoeWeber 2,808]

16 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

No respect for the office 

Salute the rank, not the man? In the age of Trumpism, that's mind control bullshit you need to shake.

[ryoder 1,590]

47 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

Salute the rank, not the man? In the age of Trumpism, that's mind control bullshit you need to shake.

No shit.

What Trump attempted was classifed as a "self coup", i.e. in which a nation's head, having come to power through legal means, tries to stay in power through illegal means. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d'état

Had everyone "respected the office", it would have succeeded.

[normiss 843]

5 hours ago, ryoder said:

I find it very hard to condemn Pelosi for showing disrespect to a traitor.

Best Speaker in history for that matter.

 

[winsor 236]

37 minutes ago, normiss said:

Best Speaker in history for that matter.

 

She doesn't hold a candle to John Reed.

[JoeWeber 2,808]

2 hours ago, winsor said:

She doesn't hold a candle to John Reed.

You mean Thomas Reed, yes? No matter can we all agree that our best comparisons happened in our adult lifetimes?

[brenthutch 444]

If you thought covfefe was funny, you’ll love this…

In Biden’s own words.

https://fb.watch/iDvBBrqGGI/

This little cartoon encapsulates Biden’s verbal and intellectual acumen very nicely.  I can’t wait for Biden ‘24

Edited February 11, 2023 by brenthutch

[olofscience 489]

2 hours ago, brenthutch said:

I can’t wait for Biden ‘24

Like your multiple 'red wave' predictions?

[brenthutch 444]

2 hours ago, olofscience said:

Like your multiple 'red wave' predictions?

Got two words for you 

Speaker McCarthy

[gowlerk 2,245]

2 hours ago, The Hundredth Monkey said:

 

 

2 hours ago, The Hundredth Monkey said:

It is a long game.

It is. And Russia has been losing at it for about 200 years now.

[billvon 3,058]

3 hours ago, The Hundredth Monkey said:

You may want to adhere to the scientific method yourself, before citing science.

The method is not optional, and the moment you fail it... you cease to become a scientist.

You missed the point of my post which comes as . . . . not a surprise at all.

[billvon 3,058]

6 hours ago, The Hundredth Monkey said:

The scientific method is not optional.

Sure it is.  Look at every post you've made.  

[olofscience 489]

13 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Speaker McCarthy

The laughing emoji is appropriate, given how long he took to get it 

[kallend 2,102]

I wonder what are the scientific credentials of the people pontificating about science and the scientific method.

[jakee 1,557]

18 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Got two words for you 

Speaker McCarthy

And that Chuck Schumer is SO red. 

[brenthutch 444]

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3850219-the-seven-biggest-lies-biden-told-this-week/
 

It is one thing to misspeak, it is another to pack the State of the Union with untruths, half truths and outright lies. This is not the incoherent ramblings of our feeble minded President, it is an orchestrated attempt by his administration to gaslight the entire country. 

[winsor 236]

19 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3850219-the-seven-biggest-lies-biden-told-this-week/
 

It is one thing to misspeak, it is another to pack the State of the Union with untruths, half truths and outright lies. This is not the incoherent ramblings of our feeble minded President, it is an orchestrated attempt by his administration to gaslight the entire country. 

'Twas ever thus.

[wmw999 2,515]

Interesting how much more valid fact checking is when it agrees with one. In an opinion piece, no less.

Wendy P. 

[brenthutch 444]

34 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

Interesting how much more valid fact checking is when it agrees with one. In an opinion piece, no less.

Wendy P. 

With which point/s do you take issue?

[Coreece 190]

1 hour ago, wmw999 said:

Interesting how much more valid fact checking is when it agrees with one.

I thought the lies were pretty obvious and didn't need fact checking to begin with. 

[brenthutch 444]

10 minutes ago, Coreece said:

I thought the lies were pretty obvious and didn't need fact checking to begin with. 

It begs the question why?

it is one thing to claim you had a conversation with the man who invented a way to produce insulin who died two years before you were born. It is a different thing altogether to have speech writers make false claim after false claim in a State of the Union address.

[brenthutch 444]

Biden 0

Stairs 2
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/02/23/joe-biden-falls-air-force-one-stairs-latest-stumble/

[Phil1111 1,149]

16 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Biden 0

Stairs 2
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/02/23/joe-biden-falls-air-force-one-stairs-latest-stumble/

President Biden’s visit to Kyiv vrs the way Donald trump retreated to the White House bunker in the face of unarmed protesters in Lafayette Park.

All you need to know about the US right.

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

11 hours ago, Phil1111 said:

President Biden’s visit to Kyiv vrs the way Donald trump retreated to the White House bunker in the face of unarmed protesters in Lafayette Park.

All you need to know about the US right.

Don't forget that Trump refused to go to the ceremony for the 100th anniversary of the end of World War 1 because...

It was raining.