More sacrifices to the 2nd Amendment

[Hissone 6]

5 hours ago, kallend said:

The United States has more than 20,000 gun laws at the local, state, and federal levels. 

I reckon about 19,900 of them are duplicative, contradictory or just superfluous.  Maybe more.

I agree with this

[JoeWeber 2,790]

Just now, Hissone said:

I’m curious how that would be implemented? Would it be like a phone app? Would there be any exceptions for example a victim of domestic violence? I ask because i have seen this scenario play out first hand.  Maggot wife beater bonds out of jail and immediately calls his battered wife that he is out and going to kill her, the kids and himself. Police cannot find maggot it’s the middle of the night and the victims brother gives her a pistol in case the maggot comes to the house.  How would a background check be secured for that pistol? 

You will never understand because folks like you are the problem. Try this, as an example give up your unneeded arsenal and tell people your did. Not here, but when you have a few jumps and are invited to hang at the real DZ bonfire (as I suggested previously) where you can then use your street cred to have the bully pulpit you sought here. But you won't because you believe more guns will solve the more gun problem. And that is the problem.

[Hissone 6]

46 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

You will never understand because folks like you are the problem. Try this, as an example give up your unneeded arsenal and tell people your did. Not here, but when you have a few jumps and are invited to hang at the real DZ bonfire (as I suggested previously) where you can then use your street cred to have the bully pulpit you sought here. But you won't because you believe more guns will solve the more gun problem. And that is the problem.

So no answer on how to implement this idea?  I have never  said more guns solve the more gun problem at all.  It’s so strange you seem very educated but cannot even keep on track of simple things i have posted or even answer basic questions without insults.  There doesn't seem to be a distinction between a legal gun owner and some maniac mass shooter to you they are the same thing.  I don’t think you are the problem with guns at all. You definitely are not the solution. You will never convince a gun owner to even think about expanded background checks or more regulations because you seem to think gun owners are beneath you.  Come to think of it your personality would probably sell more guns just out of disgust of your superiority complex.  Glock should hire you for their marketing team. 

[JoeWeber 2,790]

Just now, Hissone said:

So no answer on how to implement this idea?  I have never  said more guns solve the more gun problem at all.  It’s so strange you seem very educated but cannot even keep on track of simple things i have posted or even answer basic questions without insults.  There doesn't seem to be a distinction between a legal gun owner and some maniac mass shooter to you they are the same thing.  I don’t think you are the problem with guns at all. You definitely are not the solution. You will never convince a gun owner to even think about expanded background checks or more regulations because you seem to think gun owners are beneath you.  Come to think of it your personality would probably sell more guns just out of disgust of your superiority complex.  Glock should hire you for their marketing team. 

This is what happens when you join the party late: you know nothing about the other attendees and would have been wise to keep your counsel. You didn't. So you had a quadruple bypass, that's a big deal. Are you lean and mean or just another fat old retired cop?

[Hissone 6]

2 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

This is what happens when you join the party late: you know nothing about the other attendees and would have been wise to keep your counsel. You didn't. So you had a quadruple bypass, that's a big deal. Are you lean and mean or just another fat old retired cop?

No not fat pretty lean and mean and 55 if that’s old.  I just retired in may and went to work security at a nuclear plant.  It’s way less stress and more money.  It’s genetics I’m an avid  runner and weight lifter used to compete in BJJ. I was actually backpacking a section of the Appalachian Trail when i was 39 and had a heart attack had two stents put in and never had any problems until September. I was running on a treadmill had chest pains went to the ER and they wouldn’t let me leave. They did a heart cath and said my heart was functioning at around 6 percent and i was very close to dying. I had open heart the next day.  I’m healed up running and lifting again.  I’m at the point now i can do another tandem jump and hopefully ground school soon after that.  I am obsessed with skydiving. I knew the second i did it i was hooked. 

[turtlespeed 221]

12 hours ago, billvon said:

?? Simple.

If you lend someone a gun you have to get (and save) the results of the background check.  If you fail to do so, you go to jail.

How do you go about getting that info?  Then, how do you go about getting it vetted?

Here, I'll lend you one of my Marlins - You can give me every bit of information I need to steal your identity.  I'll then input that on line, or better yet, snail mail it, where it can get lost.

But then, I think you are also asking for a cerificate of training completed for that model.

Not reasonable.

Edited December 31, 2024 by turtlespeed

[turtlespeed 221]

6 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

You will never understand because folks like you are the problem. Try this, as an example give up your unneeded arsenal and tell people your did. Not here, but when you have a few jumps and are invited to hang at the real DZ bonfire (as I suggested previously) where you can then use your street cred to have the bully pulpit you sought here. But you won't because you believe more guns will solve the more gun problem. And that is the problem.

LOL - 

In other words - Fuck her - she dies because JW is scared of a pew pew.

 

 

[wmw999 2,507]

7 hours ago, Hissone said:

I’m curious how that would be implemented? Would it be like a phone app? Would there be any exceptions for example a victim of domestic violence? I ask because i have seen this scenario play out first hand.  Maggot wife beater bonds out of jail and immediately calls his battered wife that he is out and going to kill her, the kids and himself. Police cannot find maggot it’s the middle of the night and the victims brother gives her a pistol in case the maggot comes to the house.  How would a background check be secured for that pistol? 

Maybe the same way that you deal with a screaming child in your car on the way to the emergency room --- you speed like crazy and take the consequences.

Wendy P.

[kallend 2,094]

1 hour ago, turtlespeed said:

How do you go about getting that info?  Then, how do you go about getting it vetted?

Here, I'll lend you one of my Marlins - You can give me every bit of information I need to steal your identity.  I'll then input that on line, or better yet, snail mail it, where it can get lost.

But then, I think you are also asking for a cerificate of training completed for that model.

Not reasonable.

Would you lend your friend your airplane without first checking that she is legal to fly it?

[billvon 3,049]

10 hours ago, Hissone said:

I’m curious how that would be implemented? Would it be like a phone app? Would there be any exceptions for example a victim of domestic violence? I ask because i have seen this scenario play out first hand.  Maggot wife beater bonds out of jail and immediately calls his battered wife that he is out and going to kill her, the kids and himself. Police cannot find maggot it’s the middle of the night and the victims brother gives her a pistol in case the maggot comes to the house.  How would a background check be secured for that pistol? 

It would not.

If the wife does not need to use the gun that night, then she gets the background check approved and all is well.

If the wife needs to use the gun that night, the DA looks at the situation (wife applied for background check but did get approval yet) and most likely decides to not file charges.

On the off chance he does then the case goes to court, wife presents an affirmative defense, jury agrees and the wife walks.

 

[normiss 835]

On 12/30/2024 at 11:59 PM, Hissone said:

I’m curious how that would be implemented? Would it be like a phone app? Would there be any exceptions for example a victim of domestic violence? I ask because i have seen this scenario play out first hand.  Maggot wife beater bonds out of jail and immediately calls his battered wife that he is out and going to kill her, the kids and himself. Police cannot find maggot it’s the middle of the night and the victims brother gives her a pistol in case the maggot comes to the house.  How would a background check be secured for that pistol? 

Clearly it wouldn't, I would hope both side of the "transaction" would face severe penalties.

Maybe a dime for each?

[normiss 835]

On 12/31/2024 at 2:15 AM, Hissone said:

So no answer on how to implement this idea?  I have never  said more guns solve the more gun problem at all.  It’s so strange you seem very educated but cannot even keep on track of simple things i have posted or even answer basic questions without insults.  There doesn't seem to be a distinction between a legal gun owner and some maniac mass shooter to you they are the same thing.  I don’t think you are the problem with guns at all. You definitely are not the solution. You will never convince a gun owner to even think about expanded background checks or more regulations because you seem to think gun owners are beneath you.  Come to think of it your personality would probably sell more guns just out of disgust of your superiority complex.  Glock should hire you for their marketing team. 

Easily done. Like I have done EVERY gun transfer to or from me. At the local cop shop. They were VERY happy to assist to make sure the guns were clean, no criminal history, and both parties background checks were clear.

[nigel99 550]

Jan 6 rioter shot by police

Not sure if this counts, but being pardoned and then shot dead by police a week later sucks. Not that I feel sorry for him.

[normiss 835]

5 hours ago, nigel99 said:

Jan 6 rioter shot by police

Not sure if this counts, but being pardoned and then shot dead by police a week later sucks. Not that I feel sorry for him.

He finally achieved the Find Out status of the fuck around game.

[JerryBaumchen 1,415]

Hi folks,

While I am sure this does not put it to bed, it is a step forward:  The Oregon Court of Appeals on Wednesday found that Oregon’s voter-approved gun control Measure 114 is constitutional

Oregon gun control Measure 114 declared constitutional in major reversal by appeals court - oregonlive.com

Jerry Baumchen

[BIGUN 1,369]

4 hours ago, JerryBaumchen said:

The Oregon Court of Appeals on Wednesday found that Oregon’s voter-approved gun control Measure 114 is constitutional

Afternoon, Jerry. My suspicion is that it will head to the Supreme Court.

[JoeWeber 2,790]

4 minutes ago, BIGUN said:

Afternoon, Jerry. My suspicion is that it will head to the Supreme Court.

Absolutely. It'll go to the Oregon Supreme Court where our worthies will rule that copies of the law must be posted in every school bus and passed out on Halloween, too. Then off to the US Supreme Court where sanity rules and they will be rightly incredulous that any fool can't see that with only ten rounds in your magazine and a miss rate of just 80% it will take only three Fentanyl crazed MS-12 gang members to overwhelm any nice nanna so unfortunate as to be unable to defend her quilt collection. Thank God for God thanking.

[kallend 2,094]

Well, the Supreme Court upholds Biden Administration’s limits on ‘Ghost Guns’, 7-2.  Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion.

No prizes for guessing which two justices dissented.

[JerryBaumchen 1,415]

1 hour ago, kallend said:

Well, the Supreme Court upholds Biden Administration’s limits on ‘Ghost Guns’, 7-2.  Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion.

No prizes for guessing which two justices dissented.

Hi John,

When you were still teaching, were your Final Exam questions always this difficult?

Jerry Baumchen