brenthutch 444 #1 Posted May 4, 2021 Materials Acquisition for Global Industrial Change 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,307 #3 May 4, 2021 1 hour ago, brenthutch said: Materials Acquisition for Global Industrial Change It's improper to not cite the source: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/05/04/materials-acquisition-for-global-industrial-change-magic/ Author: "Guest Blogger" But, guess who the writing is - "Say her name." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #4 May 4, 2021 15 minutes ago, BIGUN said: It's improper to not cite the source: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/05/04/materials-acquisition-for-global-industrial-change-magic/ Author: "Guest Blogger" But, guess who the writing is - "Say her name." Paul Driessen? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,307 #5 May 4, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, brenthutch said: Paul Driessen? No. That's her pseudonym. Edited May 4, 2021 by BIGUN Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #6 May 4, 2021 15 minutes ago, BIGUN said: No. That's her pseudonym. She is ugly https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/paul-driessen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,307 #7 May 4, 2021 3 minutes ago, brenthutch said: She is ugly Apologies. I thought it was "more bullshit" day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #8 May 4, 2021 1 minute ago, BIGUN said: Apologies. I thought it was "more bullshit" day. On Speakers Corner that only happens on days that end in y. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #9 May 4, 2021 47 minutes ago, BIGUN said: No. That's her pseudonym. “A former member of the Sierra Club and Zero Population Growth, he abandoned their cause when he recognized that the environmental movement had become intolerant in its views, inflexible in its demands, unwilling to recognize our tremendous strides in protecting the environment, and insensitive to the needs of billions of people who lack the food, electricity, safe water, healthcare and other basic necessities that we take for granted.” Sounds like a real monster. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #10 May 4, 2021 1 hour ago, BIGUN said: Apologies. I thought it was "more bullshit" day. Kind of, Paul Driessen is another adherent to “Global average temperatures peaked in 1998". 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #11 May 4, 2021 4 hours ago, brenthutch said: Widespread adaptation of EVs will require lots of . . . Conversion kits. Workers. Jobs, in other words. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #12 May 4, 2021 28 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: Kind of, Paul Driessen is another adherent to “Global average temperatures peaked in 1998". According to NOAA is is currently no warmer than in 1998. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #13 May 4, 2021 Another troll thread. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #14 May 4, 2021 34 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: Kind of, Paul Driessen is another adherent to “Global average temperatures peaked in 1998". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,190 #15 May 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, kallend said: Another troll thread. I believe the term you are looking for is "successful troll thread". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #16 May 4, 2021 Meanwhile in the Arctic https://images.app.goo.gl/PfUeUR6izQ9pyEUG7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olofscience 480 #17 May 4, 2021 29 minutes ago, brenthutch said: Meanwhile in the Arctic https://images.app.goo.gl/PfUeUR6izQ9pyEUG7 Meanwhile in the Arctic, a common strawman is observed. FIFY Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #18 May 4, 2021 1 hour ago, brenthutch said: According to NOAA is is currently no warmer than in 1998. You are as correct as you ever are! NOAA data: 1998 anomaly: +2.21°F 2020 anomaly: +2.34°F https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series/110/tavg/ann/3/1980-2021?base_prd=true&begbaseyear=1901&endbaseyear=2000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #19 May 4, 2021 12 minutes ago, billvon said: You are as correct as you ever are! NOAA data: 1998 anomaly: +2.21°F 2020 anomaly: +2.34°F https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series/110/tavg/ann/3/1980-2021?base_prd=true&begbaseyear=1901&endbaseyear=2000 Currently, IOW year to date. Currently is NOT last year. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #20 May 4, 2021 2 hours ago, kallend said: mine is more current Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
