ryoder 1,590 #76 February 7, 2023 Apparently, Jr has a sense of humor. I screen-grabbed this directly from his Twitter account: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,198 #77 February 10, 2023 And today the US shot down "something" at 40,000 ft over Alaska. Word on the street is that China will soon protest by launching 99 red balloons over Disney World in CA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #78 February 10, 2023 Is there a bag limit on these? US shoots down another ‘high-altitude object’ over Alaska Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #79 February 10, 2023 So MTG has the vapors over this balloon. She is angry that no one shot it down and that we now look "weak" - we should have retaliated somehow. She further is portraying the balloon as some kind of combination space telescope/Xray device, one that can "gather intel from all our military bases, our food factories, our cities, our critical infrastructure to send it back to China." But this one is in a balloon, not on the satellites that actually have great optics for just that purpose. She blamed Biden, the DOD and the Pentagon (not sure where she draws the line between the last two) for not acting more aggressively, asking "why our government is afraid of China." And then she tweeted the lyrics to that Nena song. First she overreacts to a few balloons and calls for retaliation, then manages to find the only popular song in existence that explicitly warns people against overreacting and retaliating when balloons drift over their country. And something tells me she isn't even aware of the irony. Reminds me of all the republicans who were playing "Born in the USA" for their ultra-patriotism rallies: Born down in a dead man's town The first kick I took was when I hit the ground You end up like a dog that's been beat too much Till you spend half your life just covering up . . . . Down in the shadow of the penitentiary Out by the gas fires of the refinery I'm ten years burning down the road Nowhere to run ain't got nowhere to go Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #80 February 10, 2023 I'm not sure who is worse, MTG or the imbeciles who voted for her. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #81 February 11, 2023 3 hours ago, kallend said: I'm not sure who is worse, MTG or the imbeciles who voted for her. I'm thinking about certain persons who post here and have not been able to de-tribe for 2 seconds to say out loud, and without encouragement, that she's a disaster of republican construct. But they won't because they can not without admitting that how they have voted for years is why she exists. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #82 February 11, 2023 3 hours ago, kallend said: I'm not sure who is worse, MTG or the imbeciles who voted for her. You mean that clueless fool who was just berating Twitter execs for "violating her first amendment rights"? People who have never read the Constitution have no business in the House nor the Senate. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #83 February 11, 2023 56 minutes ago, ryoder said: People who have never read the Constitution have no business in the House nor the Senate. That's a problem, sure, but the USSC justices who have read it but do not understand it is the real problem. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #84 February 11, 2023 6 hours ago, JoeWeber said: That's a problem, sure, but the USSC justices who have read it but do not understand it is the real problem. Oh, they understand it just fine. They simply distort it to meet their own ends. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #85 February 11, 2023 22 hours ago, gowlerk said: And today the US shot down "something" at 40,000 ft over Alaska. Word on the street is that China will soon protest by launching 99 red balloons over Disney World in CA. On another forum, some wag started a thread about this, titled: US shoots down Santa's sleigh, during a routine maintenance flight LOL! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #86 February 12, 2023 It sounds like yet another "object" has been shut down today over the Yukon: Norad shoots down 'unidentified object' over Yukon, PM Trudeau says Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #87 February 12, 2023 1 hour ago, ryoder said: It sounds like yet another "object" has been shut down today over the Yukon: Norad shoots down 'unidentified object' over Yukon, PM Trudeau says See, that answers perfectly Joe's concerns about the lack of Canada's spending on defense. The F-22 pilot can paint a red balloon kill under his cockpit canopy. Both Canada and the US can feel good about it all. The money Canada saved on deferring the purchase of new F-35s. Can pay for some new hip replacements of Canadian seniors. A win all around! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #88 February 12, 2023 Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds. I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lippy 918 #89 February 12, 2023 7 minutes ago, kallend said: Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds. I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 By my count that's 3 luftballoons down, 96 to go Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #90 February 12, 2023 1 hour ago, kallend said: Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds. I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 Well, if it happened a bunch of times, I'd be more suspicious of Raytheon, rather than 'some hostile nation'. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #91 February 12, 2023 Number 4, (assuming I haven't lost count): US fighter jet shoots down airborne object over Lake Huron on Sunday At least the F-16s are getting in on the action now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #92 February 13, 2023 NYT seems to have dug up the backstory on the Chinese balloons: China’s Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,364 #93 February 13, 2023 3 hours ago, ryoder said: NYT seems to have dug up the backstory on the Chinese balloons: China’s Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above Hi Robert, It would seem as though he has been a very busy boy: Top general says suspected Chinese spy balloons have flown over Middle East - POLITICO Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #94 February 14, 2023 Why it's a bad idea to shoot down UFOs over the continental US. From the BBC: In the Lake Huron strike, the first Sidewinder missile fired by the US F-16 warplane missed its target and exploded in an unknown location, US media reported, citing military sources. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #95 February 14, 2023 I wonder why they missile down those things. They should cannon/gun them down, would make for a slower fall and ease the research of the bits and pieces. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #96 February 15, 2023 1 hour ago, piisfish said: I wonder why they missile down those things. They should cannon/gun them down, would make for a slower fall and ease the research of the bits and pieces. Altitude. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #97 February 15, 2023 10 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: Altitude. In all fairness, that was the reason for the balloon. A few of the subsequent objects were at reported altitudes well within the range of the engaging fighter jets. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,720 #98 February 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: In all fairness, that was the reason for the balloon. A few of the subsequent objects were at reported altitudes well within the range of the engaging fighter jets. The gentlemen was interested in knowing why missiles were used and not gunnery. I believe the answer is that at those altitudes gunnery is substantially less effective. I'll defer to your better understanding and await someone asking why it was the Chinese. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #99 February 15, 2023 1 minute ago, JoeWeber said: I believe the answer is that at those altitudes gunnery is substantially less effective. At 40,000 and 20,000 feet gunnery is less effective than at what altitude? What exactly makes it less effective? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,198 #100 February 15, 2023 7 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: The gentlemen was interested in knowing why missiles were used and not gunnery. I believe the answer is that at those altitudes gunnery is substantially less effective. I'll defer to your better understanding and await someone asking why it was the Chinese. Most likely the object look a lot like a nail. Therefore they did the logical thing and took the hammer to it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites