1 1
kallend

Chinese spy balloon over USA

Recommended Posts

So MTG has the vapors over this balloon.  She is angry that no one shot it down and that we now look "weak" - we should have retaliated somehow.  She further is portraying the balloon as some kind of combination space telescope/Xray device, one that can "gather intel from all our military bases, our food factories, our cities, our critical infrastructure to send it back to China."  But this one is in a balloon, not on the satellites that actually have great optics for just that purpose.  She blamed Biden, the DOD and the Pentagon (not sure where she draws the line between the last two) for not acting more aggressively, asking "why our government is afraid of China."

And then she tweeted the lyrics to that Nena song.

First she overreacts to a few balloons and calls for retaliation, then manages to find the only popular song in existence that explicitly warns people against overreacting and retaliating when balloons drift over their country.  And something tells me she isn't even aware of the irony.

Reminds me of all the republicans who were playing "Born in the USA" for their ultra-patriotism rallies:

Born down in a dead man's town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up
 . . . .
Down in the shadow of the penitentiary
Out by the gas fires of the refinery
I'm ten years burning down the road
Nowhere to run ain't got nowhere to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, kallend said:

I'm not sure who is worse, MTG or the imbeciles who voted for her.

I'm thinking about certain persons who post here and have not been able to de-tribe for 2 seconds to say out loud, and without encouragement, that she's a disaster of republican construct. But they won't because they can not without admitting that how they have voted for years is why she exists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, kallend said:

I'm not sure who is worse, MTG or the imbeciles who voted for her.

You mean that clueless fool who was just berating Twitter execs for "violating her first amendment rights"?

People who have never read the Constitution have no business in the House nor the Senate.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, gowlerk said:

And today the US shot down "something" at 40,000 ft over Alaska. Word on the street is that China will soon protest by launching 99 red balloons over Disney World in CA. 

On another forum, some wag started a thread about this, titled:

US shoots down Santa's sleigh, during a routine maintenance flight

LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ryoder said:

It sounds like yet another "object" has been shut down today over the Yukon:

Norad shoots down 'unidentified object' over Yukon, PM Trudeau says

See, that answers perfectly Joe's concerns about the lack of Canada's spending on defense. The F-22 pilot can paint a red balloon kill under his cockpit canopy. Both Canada and the US can feel good about it all. The money Canada saved on deferring the purchase of new F-35s. Can pay for some new hip replacements of Canadian seniors.

A win all around!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds.

I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, kallend said:

Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds.

I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 

By my count that's 3 luftballoons down, 96 to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kallend said:

Thanks to the "just shoot 'em down" mentality of certain politicians it appears that a cheap way for some hostile nation to make us waste our $400,000 AIM-9X missiles is to launch car size helium balloons with some kind of dummy payload and let them drift over on the prevailing winds.

I reckon they could manage a cost/benefit ratio of around 1000:1 

Well, if it happened a bunch of times, I'd be more suspicious of Raytheon, rather than 'some hostile nation'.

 

;P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ryoder said:

NYT seems to have dug up the backstory on the Chinese balloons:

China’s Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above

Hi Robert,

It would seem as though he has been a very busy boy:  Top general says suspected Chinese spy balloons have flown over Middle East - POLITICO

Jerry Baumchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why it's a bad idea to shoot down UFOs over the continental US.

From the BBC:

In the Lake Huron strike, the first Sidewinder missile fired by the US F-16 warplane missed its target and exploded in an unknown location, US media reported, citing military sources.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

In all fairness, that was the reason for the balloon. A few of the subsequent objects were at reported altitudes well within the range of the engaging fighter jets.

The gentlemen was interested in knowing why missiles were used and not gunnery. I believe the answer is that at those altitudes gunnery is substantially less effective. I'll defer to your better understanding and await someone asking why it was the Chinese.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

The gentlemen was interested in knowing why missiles were used and not gunnery. I believe the answer is that at those altitudes gunnery is substantially less effective. I'll defer to your better understanding and await someone asking why it was the Chinese.

Most likely the object look a lot like a nail. Therefore they did the logical thing and took the hammer to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1