Queer and Climate on NPR

[airdvr 210]

I would have to say it was in Boy Scouts when a camp counselor tried to get me to come back to his cabin to look at girly magazines.

[gowlerk 2,200]

1 hour ago, wolfriverjoe said:

The only ones with a fixation on 'steering' or 'grooming' are the Right wing extremists.

Somehow they imagine that popular culture and the advertising industry all heavily based on selling sex does not provide enough "steering" toward heterosexual behaviors to more than make up for the new levels of tolerance?

[billvon 2,997]

14 hours ago, airdvr said:

BTW I have no problem with any of it (LBTG) until it starts to be come "fashionable" and a choice made to be cool.

?? Is that true for everything?  Would you be OK with rock until it became "fashionable" and a way to be cool, and then you would oppose it?  Service in the Armed Forces?  Raising a family?  Owning a mobile device?

Or is it just LGBT?

[billvon 2,997]

2 hours ago, wolfriverjoe said:

The only ones with a fixation on 'steering' or 'grooming' are the Right wing extremists.

Yep.   And indeed they are often the ones doing the grooming.

After all, Ghislaine Maxwell groomed girls for sex trafficking from Mar-a-Lago, a place where the owner ogled ten year old girls and hoped to date them eventually.  And of course Joel Greenberg actually DID traffic in underage girls, and his wingman Matt Gaetz is under investigation for just that.  But Trump republicans support him 100%.

And for younger kids who need to be groomed into accepting the ways of conservative men, there are book series like the Tuttle Twins, advertised to instill conservative values in the very young.

There's an old saying that when you seen an extremist politician attacking someone else for doing something - safe bet that they are already doing it.

[brenthutch 444]

16 hours ago, airdvr said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/world/europe/spain-gender-change.html

They might be learned behaviors but once you've matured (except for rock of course) you kind of move on from that.  BTW I have no problem with any of it (LBTG) until it starts to be come "fashionable" and a choice made to be cool.

Unfortunately that is where we are, it is all the rage in our public high school.  

[billvon 2,997]

So now Ron DeSantis wants to arrest any parent who allows his child to watch a drag show, and then take their children away.

DeSantis himself has three kids.  We need an investigation into whether he has ever allowed them to watch M*A*S*H, an authentic Shakespearian play, Tootsie, or any Monty Python.  Or the "perverted adults" who do that.  Surely the public deserves to know if DeSantis - who wants to be president - allows his children to watch "perverted adults obsessed with sexualizing young children" like Terry Gilliam, John Cleese, Eric Idle and Dustin Hoffman.

[JoeWeber 2,722]

24 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

Unfortunately that is where we are, it is all the rage in our public high school.  

So what? It's about time we found out who is gay without measuring foot placement in public toilet stalls.

[kallend 2,027]

On 3/7/2023 at 3:22 PM, billvon said:

So now Ron DeSantis wants to arrest any parent who allows his child to watch a drag show, and then take their children away.

DeSantis himself has three kids.  We need an investigation into whether he has ever allowed them to watch M*A*S*H, an authentic Shakespearian play, Tootsie, or any Monty Python.  Or the "perverted adults" who do that.  Surely the public deserves to know if DeSantis - who wants to be president - allows his children to watch "perverted adults obsessed with sexualizing young children" like Terry Gilliam, John Cleese, Eric Idle and Dustin Hoffman.

DeSantis is competing with Trump for the poorly educated and bigot votes.

[brenthutch 444]

2 hours ago, kallend said:

DeSantis is competing with Trump for the poorly educated and bigot 

Maybe he thinks it is more important to focus on math and reading rather than waste limited time and resources on this
 

https://youtu.be/d4vHegf3WPU

 

[lippy 918]

33 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

Maybe he thinks it is more important to focus on math and reading rather than waste limited time and resources on this
 

https://youtu.be/d4vHegf3WPU

 

Yes, one would struggle quite a bit to find an example of DeSantis wasting limited time and resources....Florida paying to fly migrants from TX to Martha's Vineyard, or picking fights with Disney make all the sense.

[brenthutch 444]

14 minutes ago, lippy said:

Yes, one would struggle quite a bit to find an example of DeSantis wasting limited time and resources....Florida paying to fly migrants from TX to Martha's Vineyard, or picking fights with Disney make all the sense.

Bottom line 

“Statewide, 64 percent of Florida voters approve of the job DeSantis is doing, versus just 24 percent who disapprove. Support for DeSantis is broad across nearly all political and demographic groups.”

 

[olofscience 480]

52 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

Maybe he thinks it is more important to focus on math and reading

If only you did, too...

[jakee 1,498]

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

Maybe he thinks it is more important to focus on math and reading rather than waste limited time and resources on this
 

https://youtu.be/d4vHegf3WPU

But that’s the opposite of what he’s doing. He’s wasting time and resources on stuff like that, instead of focussing on education.

[brenthutch 444]

48 minutes ago, jakee said:

But that’s the opposite of what he’s doing. He’s wasting time and resources on stuff like that, instead of focussing on education.

He must be doing something right 

“Statewide, 64 percent of Florida voters approve of the job DeSantis is doing, versus just 24 percent who disapprove. Support for DeSantis is broad across nearly all political and demographic groups.”

[SkyDekker 1,465]

2 hours ago, lippy said:

or picking fights with Disney make all the sense.

I have been wondering really what the GOP's obsession with Disney is. But then I came across this:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bill-to-ban-child-marriage-in-west-virginia-defeated-by-republicans_n_6409fd91e4b09c5c6d6d569d

And now it all makes sense. The GOP is pissed off at Disney, because their wives prefer watching Disney movies over spending time with them.

[olofscience 480]

48 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

He must be doing something right 

“Statewide, 64 percent of Florida voters approve of the job DeSantis is doing, versus just 24 percent who disapprove. Support for DeSantis is broad across nearly all political and demographic groups.”

So what?

82% of Americans see climate change as a threat (according to Pew Research), you'll probably say they're "sheep" or misinformed, but when DeSantis is popular you suddenly use popularity as a beacon for truth and those people are suddenly perfectly informed. Can you guess what the difference is?

Look up "argumentum ad populum", you're welcome.

[billvon 2,997]

2 hours ago, jakee said:

But that’s the opposite of what he’s doing. He’s wasting time and resources on stuff like that, instead of focussing on education.

Yep.  If he spent all his time improving education instead of attacking Disney and trans people, Florida would be #1 in math scores instead of #50.

Imagine how bad you have to be at education to be dead last in math.

[jakee 1,498]

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

He must be doing something right 

But not that. You just said he’s doing that completely wrong. 

[billvon 2,997]

2 hours ago, brenthutch said:

He must be doing something right 

Indeed he is.  He is a great actor and huckster - and excels at using hate to garner support.  By making up "perverted adults obsessed with sexualizing young children" and then getting people to hate them, he creates allies in hate across the state.

And since Florida generally comes dead last in education, few people there understand history well enough to know the downsides to that.

[brenthutch 444]

2 hours ago, olofscience said:

So what?

82% of Americans see climate change as a threat (according to Pew Research), you'll probably say they're "sheep" or misinformed, but when DeSantis is popular you suddenly use popularity as a beacon for truth and those people are suddenly perfectly informed. Can you guess what the difference is?

Look up "argumentum ad populum", you're welcome.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 70 percent of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, want the United States to take “aggressive” action to combat climate change - but only a third would support an extra tax of $100 a year to help, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Wednesday.

 

So much of a threat that they are unwilling to spend 27 cents a day to do something about it.

[JoeWeber 2,722]

34 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 70 percent of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, want the United States to take “aggressive” action to combat climate change - but only a third would support an extra tax of $100 a year to help, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Wednesday.

 

So much of a threat that they are unwilling to spend 27 cents a day to do something about it.

So you’re in favor of taxes to combat climate change? Good on you, mate.

[brenthutch 444]

30 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

So you’re in favor of taxes to combat climate change? Good on you, mate.

No one is, that is why “Green New Deal Lite” was disguised as the Inflation Reduction Act.  I predict it will fail on both counts.

[JoeWeber 2,722]

Just now, brenthutch said:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 70 percent of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, want the United States to take “aggressive” action to combat climate change - but only a third would support an extra tax of $100 a year to help, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Wednesday.

 

So much of a threat that they are unwilling to spend 27 cents a day to do something about it.

If neighborhood dogs are shitting in peoples yards, pretty much 100% of people would be against it and want it to stop. Also, pretty much 100% of people wouldn't want to pay more tax to solve the problem. In fact, pretty much 100% of people would want the people whose dogs are shitting in yards to pay for the cleanup before they ever get handed a bill. Now, just like Superfund sites, sometimes the perpetrators can not be brought to justice soon enough and the problem is big enough that people are forced to pay for the problem. With Climate Change I think most people do not think we are there yet because the responsible parties are available and have loads of profits from causing the problem to help pay for the solution. 

[JerryBaumchen 1,365]

16 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

If neighborhood dogs are shitting in peoples yards, pretty much 100% of people would be against it and want it to stop. Also, pretty much 100% of people wouldn't want to pay more tax to solve the problem. In fact, pretty much 100% of people would want the people whose dogs are shitting in yards to pay for the cleanup before they ever get handed a bill. Now, just like Superfund sites, sometimes the perpetrators can not be brought to justice soon enough and the problem is big enough that people are forced to pay for the problem. With Climate Change I think most people do not think we are there yet because the responsible parties are available and have loads of profits from causing the problem to help pay for the solution. 

Hi Joe,

This is a great book:  A Civil Action is a 1995 non-fiction book by Jonathan Harr about a water contamination case in Woburn, Massachusetts, in the 1980s.

A Civil Action - Wikipedia

If you have not read it, I do recommend it.  It also was made into a very good movie.

Jerry Baumchen

 

[jakee 1,498]

7 hours ago, brenthutch said:

No one is,

You just said a third of all Americans are. Imagine how popular an action must be if a third of the population is happy for their tax bill to go up in order to support it.