Indicted

[JerryBaumchen 1,422]

50 minutes ago, ryoder said:

Puzzling thing is the DOJ has had this audio for months -> but it didn't leak.

Trump's legal team gets the discovery material -> this gets leaked a couple days later.

WHY would they leak it???

Hi Robert,

There is your answer.  Trump's legal teams have not had a good track record..

Jerry Baumchen

PS)  And, include Bill's post also.

 

[Erroll 80]

9 hours ago, ryoder said:

WHY would they leak it???

Trump claimed on Fox that the recording exonerates him. In his feeble mind that is reason enough?

[Phil1111 1,149]

9 hours ago, JerryBaumchen said:

Hi Robert,

There is your answer.  Trump's legal teams have not had a good track record..

Jerry Baumchen

PS)  And, include Bill's post also.

 

Only recently has his legal team struck out. For three quarters of a century he has set up scam after scam. Sealing from students, employees, investors, etc. and never gone to jail. His recent sexual assault conviction is the first loss of substance. His political losses in his mind are the failings of others of the GOP party.

Look at his recent presidential history. Jared walked away with $2 billion in Saudi money and trump scamraisers never end. It looks as if he will get the GOP nomination. When no banks will lend to him he fundraisers from Fred and Wilma, FOX viewers in trump country.

Sometimes the best defense is to let the bad news out in advance in dribs and drabs. To acknowledge it so when dealing with it later its no surprise. Lying about its substance comes naturally to trump and his lawyers.

[jakee 1,556]

My first thought was ‘who on the team hasn’t been paid this month?’ 

But actually it might be a deliberate tactic. The tape’s going to come out during trial anyway, so is it better for Trump if the most explosive and embarrassing stuff comes out now, with as much time as possible left before the election for it to lose its shock value? 

[ryoder 1,590]

3 minutes ago, jakee said:

My first thought was ‘who on the team hasn’t been paid this month?’ 

But actually it might be a deliberate tactic. The tape’s going to come out during trial anyway, so is it better for Trump if the most explosive and embarrassing stuff comes out now, with as much time as possible left before the election for it to lose its shock value? 

That was one of the possibilities Youtuber Justin "Beau" King enumerated in one of his latest videos.

[kallend 2,099]

If any other ex-employee of the US Federal Government had kept and concealed classified documents he or she would not be released pending trial.

 

Truly we are not all equal under the law.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

15 hours ago, ryoder said:

Puzzling thing is the DOJ has had this audio for months -> but it didn't leak.

Trump's legal team gets the discovery material -> this gets leaked a couple days later.

WHY would they leak it???

Try and have it excluded for unfairly influencing the jury pool.

[jakee 1,556]

3 hours ago, ryoder said:

That was one of the possibilities Youtuber Justin "Beau" King enumerated in one of his latest videos.

It’s ironic that their strategy around Hillary’s emails was the opposite - get in early, keep talking about it for as long as possible and let the sheer weight of innuendo and suspicion distort the entire national conversation. 

But the Dems just aren’t anywhere near as good at working the outrage machine.

[JerryBaumchen 1,422]

1 hour ago, jakee said:

It’s ironic that their strategy around Hillary’s emails was the opposite - get in early, keep talking about it for as long as possible and let the sheer weight of innuendo and suspicion distort the entire national conversation. 

But the Dems just aren’t anywhere near as good at working the outrage machine.

Hi jakee,

There-in lies the problem.

Jerry Baumchen

[tkhayes 348]

On 6/28/2023 at 12:42 PM, jakee said:

It’s ironic that their strategy around Hillary’s emails was the opposite - get in early, keep talking about it for as long as possible and let the sheer weight of innuendo and suspicion distort the entire national conversation. 

But the Dems just aren’t anywhere near as good at working the outrage machine.

That might reflect on the level of intelligence of the audience each is pandering to.

[Phil1111 1,149]

On 6/28/2023 at 10:42 AM, jakee said:

...

But the Dems just aren’t anywhere near as good at working the outrage machine.

Dems have an outrage machine? Its supposed to work on republicans?? i.e. the poorly educated?

[JoeWeber 2,807]

On 7/14/2023 at 2:38 PM, Phil1111 said:

Dems have an outrage machine? Its supposed to work on republicans?? i.e. the poorly educated?

You need to get comfortable in your skin. If you can't afford several judges or a flock of sycophants or a gaggle of attorneys or, for that matter, a shaft of proctologists that isn't societies problem: it's your problem.