Social Justice Warrior hook up strategy

[billvon 2,997]

1 hour ago, jakee said:

That's a clear lie, as your own link demonstrates.

Uh - surely you know BH by now?

[brenthutch 444]

4 hours ago, billvon said:

Uh - surely you know BH by now?

Is climate change something you are worried about? Do you believe it is an existential* threat? 

*An existential threat is a threat to a people's existence or survival.

 

Edited October 6, 2023 by brenthutch

[wmw999 2,452]

19 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

Is climate change something you are worried about? Do you believe it is an existential* threat? 

*An existential threat is a threat to a people's existence or survival.

 

It’s not an existential threat to middle-class Americans. But to subsistence farmers in many parts of the world (including Central America where many illegal immigrants come from), and in Africa, as well as some low-lying countries, yes it is. Do you consider those to be people?

Wendy P. 

[billvon 2,997]

2 hours ago, Slim King said:

How does it kill them? Are they unable to get other jobs? How exactly do they die? Suffocation? Starvation? Drowning? Crops are doing BETTER with more CO2.... Didn't you know?

Starvation, drowning, loss of water supplies, loss of home, parasites, disease and hyperthermia among others.  Tens of thousands of people died last year from heat waves alone.

[jakee 1,498]

4 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Is climate change something you are worried about? Do you believe it is an existential* threat? 

*An existential threat is a threat to a people's existence or survival.

“About two-thirds of Americans (66%) say they are at least “somewhat worried” about global warming. This includes 30% of Americans who say they are “very worried” about global warming,”

Quite some gradation.

Anyway, what does that have to do with you flat out lying about the contents of your first link? We both know you did it, so why don’t you just admit it?

Edited October 6, 2023 by jakee

[olofscience 480]

13 hours ago, Slim King said:

Ad Hominem attacks are not LOGICAL ... This says  even more about YOU!!!!

Go on then, what does it say about me?

And where's the ad hominem, war crimes supporter? (and that's not an ad hominem - since you don't deny it)

[olofscience 480]

13 hours ago, brenthutch said:

That’s all he’s got.

Well your original post, like always, had no substance about the contents of the link.

All I did was describe what you did (without clicking the link).

 

Did it strike a nerve? You're not even discussing your link anymore.

[Phil1111 1,149]

5 hours ago, billvon said:

Starvation, drowning, loss of water supplies, loss of home, parasites, disease and hyperthermia among others.  Tens of thousands of people died last year from heat waves alone.

Moot point. Requires a global or at least an extra-national consciousness. Which doesn't exist in conservative American DNA.

[brenthutch 444]

6 hours ago, billvon said:

Starvation, drowning, loss of water supplies, loss of home, parasites, disease and hyperthermia among others.  Tens of thousands of people died last year from heat waves alone.

Yeah, and none of that ever happened before the industrial age, people lived long and healthy lives and didn’t have to deal with natural disasters.  Just look at how climate related deaths has risen by +90% in the last hundred years. The world would be a much better place if we could just go back to the 1700s.

Edited October 6, 2023 by brenthutch

[brenthutch 444]

1 hour ago, olofscience said:

Well your original post, like always, had no substance about the contents of the link.

All I did was describe what you did (without clicking the link).

 

Did it strike a nerve? You're not even discussing your link anymore.

Ok, the OP described the dating strategy of Soy Boy lefties. Instead of looking it up I should have just asked you*

 

* not implying anything, it is just that you are so brilliant and you seem to know everything 

Edited October 6, 2023 by brenthutch

[Phil1111 1,149]

6 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

.... The world would be a much better place if we could just go back to the 1700s.

FINALLY the definitive statement of the conservative mind. But you know you couldn't have your AR-15s to go with that.

[brenthutch 444]

2 minutes ago, Phil1111 said:

FINALLY the definitive statement of the conservative mind. But you know you couldn't have your AR-15s to go with that.

No but I could own the day’s equivalent of a battleship, which would be much more fun 

Edited October 6, 2023 by brenthutch

[olofscience 480]

28 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

Ok, the OP described the dating strategy of Soy Boy lefties.

This sentence still has no substance to discuss...

[jakee 1,498]

1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

Ok, the OP described the dating strategy of Soy Boy lefties. Instead of looking it up I should have just asked you*

No, it really didn’t. 
 

Regardless of which, why did you then change the subject to something you flat out lied about?

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

2 hours ago, olofscience said:

This sentence still has no substance to discuss...

Sure it does.

His use of that term says a LOT about him.
Nothing that wasn't already known, but further confirmation is always interesting.

[Phil1111 1,149]

19 minutes ago, wolfriverjoe said:

Sure it does.

His use of that term says a LOT about him.
Nothing that wasn't already known, but further confirmation is always sad and disheartening.

FIFY.

[olofscience 480]

18 minutes ago, Phil1111 said:

FIFY.

No, I'm not really saddened nor disheartened to see how insecure brent is with his own masculinity...

[brenthutch 444]

16 minutes ago, olofscience said:

No, I'm not really saddened nor disheartened to see how insecure brent is with his own masculinity...

If I was insecure I would spell Olof with a small case O

[Phil1111 1,149]

9 minutes ago, olofscience said:

No, I'm not really saddened nor disheartened to see how insecure brent is with his own masculinity...

Well I did learn something. Prior to this I had never heard of "Soy Boy lefties"

Come on guys we have to give Brent some credit. He is trying to move onwards from traditional conservative female pick up techniques. He isn't trying to pick up underage girls like Matt Gaetz. He is trying to move onwards from traditional conservative "grab them by the Pu$$y" techniques and social interactions.

[olofscience 480]

8 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

If I was insecure I would

Yeah, you go tell everyone brent!

How people perceive you is definitely something you can impose on other people! Definitely! You're such a big man and not insecure at all, right?

 

[wmw999 2,452]

Grow up, guys. Neener neener is not a debate strategy

Wendy P. 

[olofscience 480]

2 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

Grow up, guys. Neener neener is not a debate strategy

Wendy P. 

There's nothing to debate here, the very first post had absolutely no substance whatsoever.

I suggest thread locking or deletion.

[gowlerk 2,200]

14 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

Grow up, guys. Neener neener is not a debate strategy

Wendy P. 

Denigrating the masculinity of men not in agreement is an ongoing and repeating theme of one of the posters on my kill list here. I'm sure there's a reason for that. 

[billvon 2,997]

3 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

Denigrating the masculinity of men not in agreement is an ongoing and repeating theme of one of the posters on my kill list here. I'm sure there's a reason for that. 

Yep.  And referring to someone as effeminate is a great way for such posters to show their misogyny.  If you think "woman-like" is an insult, you have some pretty deep problems with women.

[gowlerk 2,200]

When I think of the term "social justice warrior" I understand that some people think social justice is not something worth pursuing. Or that it is only a silly thing. But what it makes me think of mostly is people like this:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/06/world/nobel-peace-prize-winner-2023-intl/index.html