billvon 2,989 #51 December 7, 2023 7 minutes ago, kallend said: How sad that a woman has to go to court in order to have control of her own body. . . . and the state plans to appeal, which may result in the woman being unable to have children in the future. Which is exactly how some Texan conservatives want it. They want to hold the reigns and decide who gets to reproduce - and who doesn't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,354 #52 December 7, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, billvon said: . . . and the state plans to appeal, which may result in the woman being unable to have children in the future. Which is exactly how some Texan conservatives want it. They want to hold the reigns and decide who gets to reproduce - and who doesn't. Hi Bill, Total insanity. They probably hate EV's also. Jerry Baumchen PS) Here is more insanity: Black Ohio woman’s arrest after pregnancy loss begs the question, ‘What do you do after a miscarriage?’ - oregonlive.com Edited December 7, 2023 by JerryBaumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #53 December 8, 2023 17 hours ago, billvon said: . . . and the state plans to appeal, which may result in the woman being unable to have children in the future. Which is exactly how some Texan conservatives want it. They want to hold the reigns and decide who gets to reproduce - and who doesn't. Texas AG Paxton is threatening to prosecute regardless of te court's order. Beto O'Rouke summed it up nicely: “This is Texas AG Ken Paxton saying he’ll throw a woman’s doctors in prison for life if they perform a *court-granted* abortion on a *nonviable* pregnancy that risks causing her permanent infertility and death,” he said. “Still think the GOP is pro-life?” O’Rourke added. 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #54 December 8, 2023 1 hour ago, kallend said: Texas AG Paxton is threatening to prosecute regardless of te court's order. Beto O'Rouke summed it up nicely: “This is Texas AG Ken Paxton saying he’ll throw a woman’s doctors in prison for life if they perform a *court-granted* abortion on a *nonviable* pregnancy that risks causing her permanent infertility and death,” he said. “Still think the GOP is pro-life?” O’Rourke added. Another demonstration of the ‘feature not a bug’ aspect of these GOP culture war laws that they are just vague on what exactly is legal and where the limits are. They rely on people being so worried about what a corrupt, criminal (in the Saul Goldman sense) AG like Paxton might be able to convict that they self censor their actions to a significantly greater degree than the law explicitly requires. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,354 #55 December 8, 2023 6 hours ago, jakee said: Another demonstration of the ‘feature not a bug’ aspect of these GOP culture war laws that they are just vague on what exactly is legal and where the limits are. They rely on people being so worried about what a corrupt, criminal (in the Saul Goldman sense) AG like Paxton might be able to convict that they self censor their actions to a significantly greater degree than the law explicitly requires. Hi John Kallend, Re: “Still think the GOP is pro-life?” O’Rourke added. The GOP has never been pro-life. It is just a stance to attract voters, nothing more. Jerry Baumchen PS) For some unknown reason I cannot respond to your last post in this thread. Another feature, I guess. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #56 December 9, 2023 Those lovely, caring Republicans in Texas: AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Supreme Court on Friday night put on hold a judge's ruling that approved an abortion for a pregnant woman whose fetus has a fatal diagnosis, throwing into limbo an unprecedented challenge to one of the most restrictive bans in the U.S. The order by the all-Republican court came more than 30 hours after Kate Cox, a 31-year-old mother of two from the Dallas area, received a temporary restraining order from a lower court judge that prevents Texas from enforcing the state's ban in her case. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #57 December 9, 2023 Texas GOP claims compassion for women but requires that their lives or a major bodily function be at imminent risk before a doctor can step in. And Texas GOP claims to protect life by forcing a woman like Kate Cox to carry a child who almost certainly won’t live while threatening her ability to have a child who will. Fucking hypocrites. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #58 December 9, 2023 Absolutely that. She wants to have a baby. The ‘pro life’ GOP won’t let her. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #59 December 14, 2023 The so-called "Alliance Defending Freedom" is one of the parties to the suit that the Supreme Court has just taken up over access to Mifepristone. They want to increase government restrictions. These are the restrictions that Judge Kacsmaryk — a Trump nominee with long-held anti-abortion views, put in place recently. Does anyone else find increasing government restrictions to be a strange way of defending freedom? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #60 December 14, 2023 2 hours ago, kallend said: The so-called "Alliance Defending Freedom" is one of the parties to the suit that the Supreme Court has just taken up over access to Mifepristone. They want to increase government restrictions. These are the restrictions that Judge Kacsmaryk — a Trump nominee with long-held anti-abortion views, put in place recently. Does anyone else find increasing government restrictions to be a strange way of defending freedom? You have to understand their point of view.THEY want the freedom to dictate how everyone else lives their lives. While, at the same time, insisting that THEY can do anything they want. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #61 January 11, 2024 Ohio grand jury ignores prosecutor and goes with common sense. Ohio woman who miscarried on home toilet is not criminally liable, grand jury says Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites