Slowest start to Atlantic hurricane season…

[kallend 2,106]

He's a troll.

You know he's a troll.

He knows he's a troll.

The Greenies know he's a troll.

He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)?

[Stumpy 284]

  On 9/2/2024 at 2:45 PM, kallend said:

who remembers Nippleboy

Actually no - and I've been here a long time!!!

[wmw999 2,541]

He was more on rec.skydiving

Google his name (and try it without an E also), and if Usenet is still accessible you’ll get some classic entertainment. Note you’ll also get a lot of porn  

Wendy P. 

[billvon 3,072]

  On 9/2/2024 at 2:45 PM, kallend said:

He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)?

Safety first, fun forever!

[wolfriverjoe 1,523]

  On 9/2/2024 at 2:45 PM, kallend said:

He's a troll.

You know he's a troll.

He knows he's a troll.

The Greenies know he's a troll.

He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)?

Nipp1eboy.

[brenthutch 444]

  On 8/31/2024 at 3:26 PM, tkhayes said:

NOAA predicted below average for the pacific , maybe 1-4, but they are already at 8 named tropical cyclones.  so much for your ability to observe or predict

And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled.

[olofscience 489]

  On 9/3/2024 at 2:26 PM, brenthutch said:

And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled.

Who's "they"? And was the prediction "there would be NO LULLS in activity"?

 

As far as I remember, all I predicted was that you'd start making this thread earlier in the year, which did happen 

[brenthutch 444]

  On 9/3/2024 at 2:50 PM, olofscience said:

Who's "they"? And was the prediction "there would be NO LULLS in activity"?

 

 

“NOAA National Weather Service forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. NOAA’s outlook for the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, which spans from June 1 to November 30, predicts an 85% chance of an above-normal season”

 

[tkhayes 348]

  On 9/3/2024 at 2:26 PM, brenthutch said:

And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled.

you said it was 'falsified'.  So  is it falsified only in this hemisphere or is falsified for the entire earth, or are you changing the goalposts again to deny that you said what you said, or believe what you believe....

[Phil1111 1,149]

  On 9/3/2024 at 3:10 PM, tkhayes said:

you said it was 'falsified'.  So  is it falsified only in this hemisphere or is falsified for the entire earth, or are you changing the goalposts again to deny that you said what you said, or believe what you believe....

A combination of changing the goalposts,together with a poor understanding of scientific estimation and theory.

[jakee 1,563]

  On 9/3/2024 at 2:26 PM, brenthutch said:

And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled.

Did they predict there would be no times without a storm?

[brenthutch 444]

  On 9/3/2024 at 3:56 PM, jakee said:

Did they predict there would be no times without a storm?

No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of)

[olofscience 489]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:12 PM, brenthutch said:

No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of)

The fact that you couldn't wait for the end of the season to proclaim this shows how insecure you are.

[tkhayes 348]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:12 PM, brenthutch said:

No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of)

AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you?

[billvon 3,072]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:54 PM, tkhayes said:

AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you?

He will become annoyed by those facts and change the subject.

"Hey, it was cold in Nevada last week.  Climate change is FALSIFIED!"

 

[olofscience 489]

  On 9/3/2024 at 2:57 PM, brenthutch said:

“NOAA National Weather Service forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. NOAA’s outlook for the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, which spans from June 1 to November 30, predicts an 85% chance of an above-normal season”

Yep, nothing there about having no lulls in hurricane activity. Thanks!

[jakee 1,563]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:12 PM, brenthutch said:

No 

So how does it falsify the theory that higher levels of CO2 would cause more hurricanes?

[billvon 3,072]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:50 PM, olofscience said:

The fact that you couldn't wait for the end of the season to proclaim this shows how insecure you are.

And will result in another one of his now-famous failed predictions.  But it allows him to say something against global warming, which is the important part.

Climate change deniers are often wrong, but they are never in doubt.

[brenthutch 444]

  On 9/3/2024 at 4:54 PM, tkhayes said:

AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you?

Above average yet well within the range of historical norms, AKA nothingburger. 

[brenthutch 444]

  On 9/3/2024 at 7:02 PM, jakee said:

So how does it falsify the theory that higher levels of CO2 would cause more hurricanes?

Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes 

 

[JoeWeber 2,828]

  On 9/4/2024 at 1:04 AM, brenthutch said:

Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes 

 

Who doesn’t like a Feyman lecture repeat, thank you. May I suggest that you not continue with trying 10-20-30?

[jakee 1,563]

  On 9/4/2024 at 1:04 AM, brenthutch said:

Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes 

One day without an active storm doesn’t say anything about whether there’s an increase in hurricanes though, does it? 

[tkhayes 348]

  On 9/4/2024 at 1:04 AM, brenthutch said:

Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes 

 

Except for the part where we just 'falsified' your statement - Changes in Hurricanes | National Climate Assessment (globalchange.gov)

[olofscience 489]

  On 9/4/2024 at 1:04 AM, brenthutch said:

Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes 

This is hilarious  not only do you not read your own sources, you don't even WATCH the YouTube videos you post!

 

It was getting really annoying how conservatives would post 2-hour long YouTube videos and tell people "tell me what in the video is wrong?" or "this is PROOF!".

Oh, and in case you were wondering how I was sure Brent hasn't watched the video - he's watched the first 1 minute at most  After the first minute, Feynman starts teaching other things that Brent doesn't follow AT ALL.

Edited September 4, 2024 by olofscience

[brenthutch 444]

  On 9/4/2024 at 5:02 AM, jakee said:

One day without an active storm doesn’t say anything about whether there’s an increase in hurricanes though, does it? 

No but a month+ without one during peak season in a year predicted to be very active just might. Don’t you think?