d16842 0 #26 January 7, 2003 The only reason I would support USPA's involvement in the museum would be if there were positive financial reasons for doing so. I can't imagine that being true however. There is no way a skydiving museum would generate enough revenue to support even the cost of the staff, let alone the facility cost. Put the most important gear in existing avaition museums. Tom B Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #27 January 7, 2003 QuoteThe only reason I would support USPA's involvement in the museum would be if there were positive financial reasons for doing so. The more I think about this the more I'm against it, even if there is a positive financial outcome. Let's keep the USPA doing what they were founded to do and that's keep skydivers skydiving. If we are to have a museum then let it be founded and operated by a separate group, either a spin off of the USPA, PIA, anyone but the USPA. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkymonkeyONE 4 #28 January 7, 2003 The "museum" is to be co-located with the new USPA headquarters, right off I-95 in Virginia. That part of the construction will be entirely privately funded, therefore not taking a penny of your (and my) dues. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #29 January 7, 2003 QuoteAfter reading in this months Parachutist about the new muesum that the USPA has planned I was wondering others opinions on this subject. Also if it is built, would you visit it? Rather than going to a museum, I need only go into my gear room. I have a good 60 years covered. Actually, I doubt if anyone is going to do much better than Bob Sinclair's bus. A tour of his collection of artifacts takes HOURS (no fooling), and the anecdotes behind each item make it time well spent. I think a museum is fine, but I can't see what it has to do with the business of tending to the needs of the club. I can see where having the museum joined at the hip to the club could do severe damage to our ability to function, should the museum prove to be a white elephant (it wouldn't be the first time such a thing has occurred). As a stand-alone entity, fine. As any part of USPA, not so good. Blue skies, Winsor Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #30 December 9, 2012 New guy here, 22 jumps, still in student status but almost to "A" license and enjoying every minute of it. A museum? Why not! In doing the arithmetic, approximately 1 out of every 10,000 people in the US have a USPA skydiving license. Perhaps the remaining 9,999 unfortunate souls who have not known the joy of freefall will get some, albeit very small semblance of this great sport. Skydiving has a history worth telling and I'll be donating to the museum as well! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites