0
glgflyer

Michael Fournier Attempt

Recommended Posts

There was lots of discussion not that long ago:
http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=search_results&search_forum=all&search_string=fournier&search_type=AND&search_fields=sb&search_time=&search_user_username=&sb=post_time&mh=25
"Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
he tried to, and usual never went much above surface.

this year's problem was that his FXC12000 fired his reserve in a pressure chamber when they tried to simulate the pressures of the flight. (where is the Crash cymbal icon when you need it ? )
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

he tried to, and usual never went much above surface.

this year's problem was that his FXC12000 fired his reserve in a pressure chamber when they tried to simulate the pressures of the flight. (where is the Crash cymbal icon when you need it ? )



Seems odd that this whole attempt was grounded by a reserve firing. Would a repack on his gear be that much more than a normal rig?

Perhaps the cancellation due to reserve firing was indicative of more issues than we know.
"Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One big problem is that this test of the reserve was being done while the balloon was being inflated. Why all the testing wasn't done earlier, I will never know. Anyway, the balloon was only designed to be used once.

He never actually got off the ground. And yes, it was indicative of wider issues.
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My understanding is that there was some talk of him trying for the late fall window (I think October?).

The problem w/ that is that the balloon was one use only and though the crew tried very hard to deflate it without any stretching or tearing, the designer would still not certify it as safe to make another attempt. The balloons are very expensive so he either needs to buy another one, which he lacks the funding for, or he need to find a whole new balloon crew willing to put him up in a balloon that the designer won't say is safe.
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0