MakeItHappen 15 #1 April 20, 2010 Here is the latest decree from the court. Date changed - court made the ruling on the 14th, filed on 16th .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #2 April 20, 2010 $9,500,004 Anybody know why the odd $4? It's out of the "profits" section of the judgement ($2,500,004)."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanHarrop 42 #3 April 20, 2010 I am going to show my ignorance of the legal system.... How do they actually collect?"Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerpaul 1 #4 April 20, 2010 QuoteHere is the latest decree from the court. Date changed - court made the ruling on the 14th, filed on 16th . What happens to the obvious mistake in the last page? Quotethat Plaintiff Skydive Arizona, Inc. further recover of Defendant Ben Butler the further sum of one hundred and twenty dollars ($120,000), as damages on Plaintiff’s Lanham Act §43(d) claim, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. §1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full; Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #5 April 20, 2010 Quote$9,500,004 Anybody know why the odd $4? It's out of the "profits" section of the judgement ($2,500,004). See http://funjumper.com/skyride/trial.php verdict link for the breakdown of awards. .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #6 April 20, 2010 QuoteQuoteHere is the latest decree from the court. Date changed - court made the ruling on the 14th, filed on 16th . What happens to the obvious mistake in the last page? Quotethat Plaintiff Skydive Arizona, Inc. further recover of Defendant Ben Butler the further sum of one hundred and twenty dollars ($120,000), as damages on Plaintiff’s Lanham Act §43(d) claim, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. §1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full; I am pretty sure that can be fixed quickly and easily. Just for a FYI, the dollar amount typed into the SR v. USPA agreement was off a couple of decimals, but the text version was what was agreed upon and that was reconciled. .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #7 April 20, 2010 Collecting is the tricky part. You can attach tangible assets (machinery) and cash. Hard to imagine there is anywhere near that much in the companies. Since CQ and BB were found personally responsible they can go after any personal assets they have as well. More trips to court to accomplish that."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jumpdude 0 #8 April 20, 2010 Quote I am pretty sure that can be fixed quickly and easily. Just for a FYI, the dollar amount typed into the SR v. USPA agreement was off a couple of decimals, but the text version was what was agreed upon and that was reconciled. . Does the BOLD part mean that Cary agreed to pay? Did the new, higher judgment get his attention? And, honestly, does he really plan to pay up, or make his assets go away so he can avoid paying up? Over $9m sounds like a pretty expensive cost of doing business! Way to go Larry, Betsy and Jan!Refuse to Lose!!! Failure is NOT an option! 1800skyrideripoff.com Nashvilleskydiving.org Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #9 April 20, 2010 QuoteQuote I am pretty sure that can be fixed quickly and easily. Just for a FYI, the dollar amount typed into the SR v. USPA agreement was off a couple of decimals, but the text version was what was agreed upon and that was reconciled. . Does the BOLD part mean that Cary agreed to pay? Did the new, higher judgment get his attention? And, honestly, does he really plan to pay up, or make his assets go away so he can avoid paying up? Over $9m sounds like a pretty expensive cost of doing business! Way to go Larry, Betsy and Jan! Your reading comprehension needs improvement. A typo in the SR v. USPA agreement was fixed amicably. I'm pretty sure that a typo in the court order in the SDA v. SR will be fixed in the same civil manner. .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jumpdude 0 #10 April 20, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote I am pretty sure that can be fixed quickly and easily. Just for a FYI, the dollar amount typed into the SR v. USPA agreement was off a couple of decimals, but the text version was what was agreed upon and that was reconciled. . Does the BOLD part mean that Cary agreed to pay? Did the new, higher judgment get his attention? And, honestly, does he really plan to pay up, or make his assets go away so he can avoid paying up? Over $9m sounds like a pretty expensive cost of doing business! Way to go Larry, Betsy and Jan! Your reading comprehension needs improvement. A typo in the SR v. USPA agreement was fixed amicably. I'm pretty sure that a typo in the court order in the SDA v. SR will be fixed in the same civil manner. . Oh, ok, I thought you meant they agreed to the court order.Refuse to Lose!!! Failure is NOT an option! 1800skyrideripoff.com Nashvilleskydiving.org Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
