strop45 0 #26 September 18, 2009 QuoteIt was just so frustrating to hear them all agree about something that i KNOW is not true, but can't explain. Part of the problem might be that you are confusing size(drag) and mass(weight). QuoteThe entire class and teacher all agreed together that a smaller person when compared to a bigger person would fall fasterLooking back at your original post, a smaller skydiver does go faster than a larger one of the same mass (weight), so perhaps your classmates were thinking of skydivers of the same mass. Compare the short fat skydiver to a tall thin one of the same weight - which is faster?The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
format 1 #27 September 18, 2009 Quoteshort fat skydiver to a tall thin one of the same weight = short one. OP gets it (I beleive) Now for you: tear the peace of B5 paper, drop them both simultaneously from 10 ft (flat drop). A hint: there are no cubes hereWhat goes around, comes later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #28 September 18, 2009 Quote Compare the short fat skydiver to a tall thin one of the same weight - which is faster? ok Equal drag coefficients means equal body positions. .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #29 September 18, 2009 OP Do you understand calculus ? It's a differential equation. The only drag that matters is the surface area x-z plane. (horizontal) your head, shoulders , arm, legs that hits the air. What's vertical and in the streamline, you can neglect, unless you have lots and lots of material flapping along you. You are slicing fluid, let's leave it like that. So, yeah, body position. Head down and belly guess what the result is gonna be ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #30 September 18, 2009 QuoteOP Do you understand calculus ? It's a differential equation. I took calculus in high school. I took so many math classes in college that I had a double major in math. HS grad 74 BS grad physics Illinois State Univ. 76 with high honors MS grad physics Purdue Univ 78 with high honors Do you need an explanation on how to read graphs? .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #31 September 18, 2009 I'm fairly sure Kami-kaze's post was directed at the OP, despite clicking the reply button on your post. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #32 September 18, 2009 Quote I'm fairly sure Kami-kaze's post was directed at the OP, despite clicking the reply button on your post. Whatever. The fact is that the explanation does NOT involve calculus or differential equations. Simple algebra and reading graphs is all it takes. .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #33 September 18, 2009 Of course it does. It involves drag and air density. O.K I might be making it complicated myself. Let me think some more ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #34 September 19, 2009 QuoteOP Do you understand calculus ? It's a differential equation. The only drag that matters is the surface area x-z plane. (horizontal) your head, shoulders , arm, legs that hits the air. What's vertical and in the streamline, you can neglect, unless you have lots and lots of material flapping along you. You are slicing fluid, let's leave it like that. So, yeah, body position. Head down and belly guess what the result is gonna be ? ok assume equal weights and vary the body position .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
format 1 #35 September 19, 2009 I thought different body area I am sorry (poor excuse: poor getting English) Quotetear the peace of B5 paper, drop them both simultaneously from 10 ft (flat drop). It might be revealing to more than me (your answer I mean)What goes around, comes later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #36 September 19, 2009 I still think it is a D.E MakeItHappen. Cos when you jump from a plane you have horizontal velocity, so you have a parabolic trajectory. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MakeItHappen 15 #37 September 19, 2009 QuoteI still think it is a D.E MakeItHappen. Cos when you jump from a plane you have horizontal velocity, so you have a parabolic trajectory. The original post was talking about terminal velocities. Introductory physics classes do not get into studying jerks, aka the time rate of change of acceleration. In a nutshell you have 3 items to adjust fallrate: 1 - weight 2 - projected area 3 - drag coefficient Body position influences projected area and drag coefficient. From a practical standpoint, these are weight, trim (aka body position) and jumpsuit. See also What determines Fall Rate? .. Make It Happen Parachute History DiveMaker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dks13827 3 #38 September 19, 2009 invite all of em out to the DZ !! and those that want to.. can do a jump.. or even observer rides !! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjosparky 4 #39 September 19, 2009 I am going back and lay down again. SparkyMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #40 September 19, 2009 O.K so when it's head down : You have similar shape (profile) and assuming you are streamlined shape with arms and legs tucked in, Not much surface area (frontal area) difference in air resistance, assume similar material and the skin drag is negligible, less air density higher up means less drag coefficient and increases as you fall, you only got mass difference. Belly, you have lots of air resistance from surface, skin drag close to 0% , coeff has more effect, and we have mass difference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #41 September 19, 2009 It's 3 in the morning here, so my brain is a bit ... sorry about the confusion Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lost_n_confuzd 0 #42 September 19, 2009 KISS - Keep it simple, stupid. Weight = Penetrating Force: the more force, the faster you will fall. Surface area "counters" the weight, or penetrating force. A bowling ball will fall faster than a baseball. The weight of the bowling ball is greater than it's surface when compared to a baseball that, in lamens terms, could be considered weight/surface area proportional as opposed to the bowling ball that is heavy as hell. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #43 September 19, 2009 Okay, you're in the military. Explain it in terms of sectional density, same as used in firearms ballistics. The bigger skydiver, if you look at the cross section, is thicker than the smaller skydiver, resulting in a higher ballistic coefficient, meaning higher terminal velocity. I'm kind of shocked that a physics professor couldn't have thought his way through this one a little better. I've heard everything from whuffos, but I expect more from a PhD. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,032 #44 September 19, 2009 QuoteOf course it does. It involves drag and air density. O.K I might be making it complicated myself. Let me think some more ... There should be a law to prevent people from practicing physics without a license.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,032 #45 September 19, 2009 QuoteI still think it is a D.E MakeItHappen. Cos when you jump from a plane you have horizontal velocity, so you have a parabolic trajectory. No, you don't. AIR RESISTANCE causes significant deviation from a parabola.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kami-kaze 0 #46 September 19, 2009 Sure, I understand that. But we are not talking about shooting a cannon ball from the ground and calling it a parabola. Anyway, it's skewed and that's what I wanted to say, air resistance. No, i didn't need anything other than a university bridging course to study physics. But I didn't get my licence to practice, either. Thank goodess for that, it was taking up too much of my time and physics professors are social misfits. I thought I'd fit in. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #47 September 19, 2009 QuoteSure, I understand that. But we are not talking about shooting a cannon ball from the ground and calling it a parabola. Anyway, it's skewed and that's what I wanted to say, air resistance. No, i didn't need anything other than a university bridging course to study physics. But I didn't get my licence to practice, either. Thank goodess for that, it was taking up too much of my time and physics professors are social misfits. I thought I'd fit in. And don't forget about the arrogance and the undeserved feeling of self importance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LloydDobbler 2 #48 September 22, 2009 Quote I am going back and lay down again. Sparky +1Signatures are the new black. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #49 September 22, 2009 QuoteThere should be a law to prevent people from practicing physics without a license. +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites