0
diverdriver

"Compressed Cabin" theory is not based on PHYSICS.

Recommended Posts

Those of you flying in Cessna 182s and 206s that don't even have seatbelts installed because "it's so crammed you can't move" have GOT to get your head out of the sand. This theory is JUST as bad as the 45 degree rule for obtaining exit seperation. It is NOT based on physics.

If your jump plane is not equipped or other jumpers refuse to use seatbelts in your jump plane DO NOT GET ON THAT PLANE! This is not a rant but a plee for you all to listen.

Look at these accident reports from a long time ago. We MUST learn from the past! You will use your buddies at the front of the plane as airbags to save your life if you are not wearing seatbelts.

16 Fatal in 1992: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X14468&key=1

12 Fatal in 1992: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X15678&key=1

Improper use of a seatbelt in a 182 that ejected a jumper during a crash this year: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20040226X00242&key=1
Chris Schindler
www.diverdriver.com
ATP/D-19012
FB #4125

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How snug do the seatbelts need to be to be useful? Is threading through a leg strap or main lift web effective if it still allows a lot of movement? In many planes, depending on where I am sitting and where the seatbelts are attached, I end up with what seems like a lot of potential motion anyway -- either from a long seatbelt tightened over my lower legs, or from a seatbelt where the bottom of each side of the belt attaches to the plane in the same place, and I attach it around my harness. I'll still use them because I get why they're important, but I wonder how much help they would be in a crash. (This is not just for 182's and 206's, but other planes as well.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Is threading through a leg strap or main lift web effective if it still allows a
>lot of movement?

It's more to protect others from your body than to protect you. A belt across your lap is going to be ideal; a system that connects to your harness in two places is going to come in second. The single-belt-through-the-lift-web will keep you from becoming a missile and will keep the CG within limits even during an impact, but is less useful for personal protection since an impact would generate high rotational rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This link for the ejected jumper connects to a report regarding a jump plane crash caused by contaminated fuel.

You're absolutely right though. Seat belts are mandatory, not just from a legal perspective, but, more importantly, from a safety perspective.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[reply
The single-belt-through-the-lift-web will keep you from becoming a missile and will keep the CG within limits even during an impact, but is less useful for personal protection since an impact would generate high rotational rates.



Thanks, that's what I was picturing. I might not become a missle but I imagined that with some restraint systems I could rotate far enough to slam into someone else pretty hard. In a small plane it seems I could still move half the length of the plane...Still better than unrestrained though, I guess, where there would be nothing to stop me and everyone else except the front cockpit wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My personal feeling is that threading a single strap through a lift web or leg strap is about the same as wearing no seatbelt. Here where I live there are no regulations requiring seatbelt wear by jumpers. The lawmaking bodies here mostly figure that if you're going to jump from the airplane it's on you to manage your safety. I don't mind not having seatbelts and I'm no more worried about getting killed in a crash wearing with no seatbelt as an aircraft where you simply put a strap through your harness. I've responded to enough light aircraft crashes during my search and rescue days to know that if you go in in a small plane (182, 206, PA23, etc.), seatbelt or not you have a high probability of injury or death. Not trying to undermine anyone here, but I believe the effectiveness of other than a standard lap belt to be very slim.
Blue Skies,
Adam
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . . — Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have never jumped from a porter equipped with belts, and some otters I've jumpe were not equipped either.
when a plane is equipped, i use the belts though.
same goes with helmets, on the head and closed or strapped to the chest strap.
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have never jumped from a porter equipped with belts



The one and only Porter I jumped from (Eloy holiday boogie, 2002) had seat belts for all positions. They actually made the ride quite uncomfortable, since the bolts on the floor were always jammed into my knee or ankle. I would still prefer seat belts, but that's the last time I plan to jump a Porter [:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>whose sole function is to restrict me in the event of an emergency exit.

Actually its sole function is to prevent you from being a missile and killing _me_. Wearing a seatbelt is not just for you.



True, but I'm not wearing one that doesn't do that either, or will allow me just enough leeway to kill those behind me and no more.

There's not many restraints out there that actually do a whole lot. In fact, one plane I was in had lap belts that you would have slid out of instantly if the plane had braked hard, let alone crashed. I've been in others where you can't do your own, you have to rely on the person behind to clip and unclip you. I'm not going to do that either. What If I'm by the door, and person behind me is incapacitated, and I'm blocking everyone else ?

Like I said, I'll wear any restraint capable of doing it's job correctly. It's a pity that there are so few of them out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Like I said, I'll wear any restraint capable of doing it's job correctly.

No problem with that, but please have the courtesy to tell both the pilot (who can be fined by the FAA) and the other passengers (who you put at risk) that you will not be wearing it. They have a right to know the additional risk you are putting them at. Once you tell them, they can make their own decisions as to whether they want to take that risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Like I said, I'll wear any restraint capable of doing it's job correctly.

No problem with that, but please have the courtesy to tell both the pilot (who can be fined by the FAA) and the other passengers (who you put at risk) that you will not be wearing it. They have a right to know the additional risk you are putting them at. Once you tell them, they can make their own decisions as to whether they want to take that risk.



I do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not only to protect you from becomming a missile. It's to protect everybody from becomming a misile.
If two people don't wear them, then the person behind them will be hit by two bodies.
The idea is to secure the cargo to as many points as possible.
Also I imagine that if the plane gets in trouble and rolls, enter a dive or simular, it will be a lot easier for the pilot to gain control of the plane without five skydivers in the cockpit....

There are only 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This link for the ejected jumper connects to a report regarding a jump plane crash caused by contaminated fuel.

You're absolutely right though. Seat belts are mandatory, not just from a legal perspective, but, more importantly, from a safety perspective.




Yes, and during that crash because of contaminated fuel the jumper was ejected from the plane. This jumper was the "serious injury" listed on the report. The report itself does not describe the ejection but it did happen and the person has posted here on DZ.com about it. It surves as a warning to all to check that they are using their seatbelts and restraints in a way that will maximize their survivability.
Chris Schindler
www.diverdriver.com
ATP/D-19012
FB #4125

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem is that the seat belts were designed for use in a seat.The FAA and the TSO process prevent the use of restraints that would be much more effective than the lap belts typically used for skydiving.I jumped a Caravan in Belgium that had restraints that had the equivalent to an RSL release (only bigger)that could be hooked right on to a hip ring or thru a leg strap/lift web that appeared to offer a much better restraining ability than a typical lap belt.
Replying to: Re: Stall On Jump Run Emergency Procedure? by billvon

If the plane is unrecoverable then exiting is a very very good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
exactly.

it seemed odd to see real 'seat belts' in aircraft with no seats, i always wondered why carabiners with locking gates and the proper webbing sewed to them were not used instead?? MUch more easily clipped on to hip rings and nearly bombproof unless dileberately removed.... till someone pointed out the legal certification process that would be nessesary first...:S>:(
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The problem is that the seat belts were designed for use in a seat.The FAA and the TSO process prevent the use of restraints that would be much more effective than the lap belts typically used for skydiving.I jumped a Caravan in Belgium that had restraints that had the equivalent to an RSL release (only bigger)that could be hooked right on to a hip ring or thru a leg strap/lift web that appeared to offer a much better restraining ability than a typical lap belt.




I never said you had to use a regular seat belt that came standard with the plane. Of course we have to modify things so they are actually safe to use in our type of operation. My bad for assuming that this would make sense.
Chris Schindler
www.diverdriver.com
ATP/D-19012
FB #4125

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0