0
gofast_ER

130,000???

Recommended Posts

Quote

Russian pressure suits are widely available nowadays. One went for $9000 a while back on Ebay, complete with spare seals.



Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.
Sometimes you eat the bear..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.



Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>The people who make the suits won’t sell them to civilians . . .

Russian pressure suits are widely available nowadays. One went for $9000 a while back on Ebay, complete with spare seals.



Thats the one I would want to wear if I was going high, the ebay special.:S
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.



Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?


Wingsuits use magic.
I really don't know what I'm talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Thats the one I would want to wear if I was going high, the ebay special.

Awe come on Michael, your a RIGGER, you don't need no stinking space suit!:P



As a matter of fact I am. And you are right, I don't need a space suit because I am not going to jump from above 62,000 feet.:)
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.



Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?



I think the question to be asked is about his fitness and ability to maintain form for that long.

If the SR71 can fly at triple digits, why can't he?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.



Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?



I think the question to be asked is about his fitness and ability to maintain form for that long.

If the SR71 can fly at triple digits, why can't he?



See above responce in bold.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

interesting that it's simply a question of raising the money... Very interesting...



I can see the look on your face now.....interestingED look indeed!

:)
Anvil Brother #69

Sidelined with a 5mm C5-C6 herniated disk...
Back2Back slammers and 40yr old fat guys don't mix!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


Does the suit have wings? I mean that anyone who does a 60,000 + ft. jump had better be wearing a wingsuit or it would be a complete waste of time/money.



Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?



I think the question to be asked is about his fitness and ability to maintain form for that long.

If the SR71 can fly at triple digits, why can't he?



Hehe . . .

Air density my boy . . . air density! Not a whole lot of air molecules up there.

The SR-71, U-2, ect., all fly on a -very- thin margin between level flight and stall. Just a few knots really. The U-2 does it with a very large wing and "some" thrust, the SR-71 does it with a very small wing and a LOT of thrust.

A guy in a wingsuit, practically no wing and absolutely no thrust. So, for a wingsuit there is going to be a practical limit and diminishing returns on altitude jumped vs distance flown.

In other words, at a certain point going higher just isn't going to make you glide any farther.

Using a Space Shuttle skydive analogy, imagine jumping out from 300 miles above the surface. You really wouldn't be gliding forward for -quite- some time.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Uh . . . how much do you know about atmospheric pressure and air density?



Plenty. But I still stand by my original remark. I jumped my old GTI from about 20k once. Time and distance weren't my goal. Just the high fun quotient.
Sometimes you eat the bear..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


See above responce in bold.



sheesh - did I miss the section about the humor ban in the forum guidelines? Or even whistful fantasy longing?

Drop him high enough to get enough speed to use those limited particles and he won't even need his suit heated. His wingsuit looks the right color already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Using a Space Shuttle skydive analogy, imagine jumping out from
>300 miles above the surface. You really wouldn't be gliding forward for
>-quite- some time.

Actually, you'd never come down. No way to add speed, but no way to lose it either - and the shuttle's in orbit by the time it gets to those altitudes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

t of us that have been around the block a couple times already know the story. You might wanna also look into what the Soviet Union did in that time period as well.



I was fascinated in hearing that Yuri Gargarian bailed out on reentry for the first flight. Not sure if it was before or after the chutes opened on the capsule, or how high up.

Cheaters. Presumably it wasn't that high up or they'd have made a claim on it.



The vostok wasn't designed to land with the pilot, it didn't have chutes. The pilots bailed out, Gagarin left at 7km, and landed under two canopies after his reserve deployed as well.

Eugene


"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of
people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... hate to hi-jack this thread, but what the heck... Mikey... do you know of anyone who's successfully banged out of an SR71 at high altitude and lived to tell about it? ... remember all, ejection seats are not guaranteed to save your life, they are just there to remove you from the airplane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not an SR-71, but definately at least one guy ejected from a U-2 and lived to tell about it; Francis Gary Powers.

Kinda started a bit of a bruhaha as I recall.

BTW, a lot of folks didn't think it was actually possible to survive it at the time (which was part of the bruhaha).

Kinda interesting reading here; http://www.foia.cia.gov/powers.asp
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>do you know of anyone who's successfully banged out of an SR71
>at high altitude and lived to tell about it?

When an SR-71 is cruising, its indicated airspeed is so low that it's not as big a problem (400kts) as ejecting from a lower-altitude aircraft at high true airspeeds (like an EF-111 or an F-14.)

The highest IAS scenario ever envisioned for an ejection seat was a max-Q ejection from the Space Shuttle during launch. (The first four flights used ejection seats.)

Some SR-71 ejections:

The highest speed one was probably in 1966. A mach 3.2, 79,000 foot turning test resulted in an engine unstart, rendering the plane instantly uncontrollable. Neither pilot was able to reach the ejection handles due to high G-loadings. The aircraft then disintegrated around the two pilots. The pilot's ejection seat functioned partially and deployed his parachute, allowing him to land safely. The other pilot was killed.

Also in 1966, an SR-71 was used to launch a drone, which immediately malfunctioned and flew back into the SR-71, breaking it in half. The crew actually rode the front half of the aircraft for a while before ejecting. They both lived.

A number of SR-71 ejections occurred after in-flight problems rendered the aircraft unlandable, but still controllable. In these cases, smart pilots generally descended and slowed the aircraft before ejecting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not only -did- they, they still do.

Generally speaking, anyone flying over 60,000 feet would since above that (or thereabouts) the pressure is so little that blood boils. A loss in cabin pressure, even with an oxygen mask forcing air down your lungs, wouldn't be enough to keep you from the grim reaper.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I seem to remember a guy that bailed out of a plane in a storm cloud and ended up going up to what some people say about 50,000 feet. he lived but was hurting really bad..B|

dam i love these faces i can make:D;)


The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I found an article on this site about "spacediving" In the article it said that someone was going to be attempting this in 2002. Anyone heard anything about that?

http://www.strongparachutes.com/stratoquest.html;)
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I found an article on this site about "spacediving" In the article it said that someone was going to be attempting this in 2002. Anyone heard anything about that?

http://www.strongparachutes.com/stratoquest.html;)



Cheryl's still planning on making the trip but has had many delays along the way.

Listen to her on Skydive Radio. She was interviewed a few weeks ago. Remarkable woman.

ltdiver

Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0