Divalent 135 #351 August 28, 2012 QuoteWhich, in a nutshell, is why it doesn't work. 0ft/sec x 7 sec = 0 ft: all the watermelons land on each other. I must be missing something here, because he clearly was advocating using ground speed to determine exit separation (the "7 sec" was his example), which is the right way to do it, yes? [by that I mean, of course, you have to rearrange the equation to be: X = Z / Y Where X is exit interval time in secs, Z is desired separation distance in ft, and Y is the ground speed of the plane in ft/sec] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #352 August 28, 2012 >I must be missing something here, because he clearly was advocating using ground >speed to determine exit separation (the "7 sec" was his example), which is the right >way to do it, yes? Yes, sorry, should have said "which in a nutshell is why the 45 degree thing doesn't work." >Where X is exit interval time in secs, Z is desired separation distance in ft, and Y >is the ground speed of the plane in ft/sec I think the full form is distance = time between groups x (groundspeed of airplane + winds at opening altitude) Speeds are in feet per second, time is in seconds, airplane is assumed to be flying into the wind, winds all the way down are assumed to be roughly the same direction. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NWPoul 1 #353 August 28, 2012 QuoteYou don't seem to have the concept of separation. How much separation do you get if you drop jumpers with 7 seconds of delay, the plane flies with 80kts into the wind and the wind is 10, 40, 70 kts?Horizontal Separation at the moment of opening? It should be the same for all the casesWhy drink and drive, if you can smoke and fly? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FastRon 0 #354 August 28, 2012 Bill- I'm pretty sure that's what I meant. Airspeed plus or minus the vector of winds aloft parallel to that airspeed= the ground speed along jump run? If that is zero then everything ends up on top of everything else? If it's not zero then isn't there SOME built in separation by allowing whatever time between groups is appropriate? (I only suggested 7 seconds becasue someone else cited it.) I am sort of aware we usually don't try to open at ground level... I personally prefered about 2500 feet or so. :-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stayhigh 2 #355 August 28, 2012 45 degree does not work. but I tell my students. if there is no information available, and pilot just tells you fuck off, when you ask him for the upper wind. only then apply 45 degree rule because it is better than none.Bernie Sanders for President 2016 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #356 August 28, 2012 Quote only then apply 45 degree rule because it is better than none. But I thought that video tests*, and analysis, show that jumpers may or may not pass through the 45 degree line, or hover around it, depending on aircraft speed. In typical circumstances, a jumper will go out the door and be at a relatively steep angle (relative to a line to the horizon), get to a shallower angle as they get decelerated horizontally but haven't picked up much vertical speed, and later in the fall get to a steeper angle again when they're dropping vertically faster than the typical jump aircraft is travelling horizontally. The angle has to do with the jumper's body position to some degree (low or high drag), and largely to do with the aircraft's speed. But unless there is wind shear in the altitudes not far below the plane where the jumpers are being watched, the angle has nothing at all to do with upper vs. lower winds. Small amounts of wind shear will have only a small effect on angle. Aircraft speed will affect it, but then one can use easier to measure time rather than trying to discern 45 degrees vs 50 degrees or the like. So instead of the 45 degree rule, you'd be better served by just using a 7-10 second rule -- OK in a lot of cases but not in some. -------------- *Von Novak's classic video test results once again: http://www.dropzone.com/content/Detailed/628.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #357 August 28, 2012 Quote Aircraft speed will affect it, but then one can use easier to measure time rather than trying to discern 45 degrees vs 50 degrees or the like. So instead of the 45 degree rule, you'd be better served by just using a 7-10 second rule -- OK in a lot of cases but not in some. -------------- *Von Novak's classic video test results once again: http://www.dropzone.com/content/Detailed/628.html I've got a pretty good eye for angles, but a lot of people couldn't tell 45 degrees if it bit them in the ass. Besides, it's meaningless. Use time to separate the groups. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #358 August 28, 2012 >only then apply 45 degree rule because it is better than none. I agree. But that's because if you used it you would never get out. (Which is inconvenient but does ensure adequate separation.) Most groups never cross the 45 degree line. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #359 August 28, 2012 Quote > But that's because if you used it you would never get out. (Which is inconvenient but does ensure adequate separation.) Most groups never cross the 45 degree line. just ask the pilot for MORE speed scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #360 August 28, 2012 Quote45 degree does not work. but I tell my students. if there is no information available, and pilot just tells you fuck off, when you ask him for the upper wind. only then apply 45 degree rule because it is better than none. There are an infinite number of incorrect ways to ensure separation. Why choose that one?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #361 August 28, 2012 Quote > If we dropped say 4 same sized/weight watermelons 7 seconds apart, shouldn't they >impact in a rough line parallel jump run about aircraft ground speed (in ft./sec.) times >7 seconds apart? They will impact about 7 seconds apart. Now take the case where the wind is 70kts at altitude and the plane is flying straight into it. Your groundspeed is zero. Winds on the ground are light and variable. Now you do the experiment again. How far apart will the watermelons be when they hit the ground? You should have used an AN-2 in nearly any wind conditions. Our separation was....when the guy before you opens and flies out from under you, then you can go. Or, AS Pissfish said....tell the pilot to crank it up to 120 knots and then calculate. My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #362 August 28, 2012 If the pilot, for some strange reason, won't give you ground speed or headwind, stick your head outside the airplane and jump when you've moved .2 over the ground. It is not hard."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #363 August 28, 2012 Quote Quote only then apply 45 degree rule because it is better than none. But I thought that video tests*, and analysis, show that jumpers may or may not pass through the 45 degree line, or hover around it, depending on aircraft speed. Which is why telling the group behind you to use the 45-degree rule gives you PLENTY of separation. (just joking 45-degree rule proponents...just joking.)My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DBCOOPER 5 #364 August 28, 2012 The solution is to change the name to the 45 degree myth...Replying to: Re: Stall On Jump Run Emergency Procedure? by billvon If the plane is unrecoverable then exiting is a very very good idea. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #365 October 21, 2015 At an event last week I was talking to a recently USPA certified AFF instructor (certified at well known California DZ) who said he was told by the AFF examiner to teach his students the "45 degree rule". So I'll resurrect this thread which, like a zombie, refuses to die.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Napalm_C 0 #366 October 21, 2015 I was shocked though over the summer when we visited one of the biggest and most well known DZs in Southern Europe that even there they insisted on the 45 degree rule. As a visiting jumper it was not my place to question this approach but I made sure to ask at least 4 different people there and each and every one insisted on the 45 degree rule. On one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 45 degree rule doesn't work but it is still being widely used and TAUGHT... Personally I'd like your permission to John to show your presentation at my local DZ, it won't be easy though to convince people with triple my jump numbers and years in sport that this concept needs to be eradicated. P.s. Typed this on mobile so apologies for typos Quote Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,026 #367 October 21, 2015 Napalm_C I was shocked though over the summer when we visited one of the biggest and most well known DZs in Southern Europe that even there they insisted on the 45 degree rule. As a visiting jumper it was not my place to question this approach but I made sure to ask at least 4 different people there and each and every one insisted on the 45 degree rule. On one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 45 degree rule doesn't work but it is still being widely used and TAUGHT... Personally I'd like your permission to John to show your presentation at my local DZ, it won't be easy though to convince people with triple my jump numbers and years in sport that this concept needs to be eradicated. P.s. Typed this on mobile so apologies for typos Certainly.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites BIGUN 1,307 #368 October 21, 2015 Please share with them the Professor's web page, animations, white papers and presentations also. http://mypages.iit.edu/~kallend/skydive/Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sundevil777 102 #369 October 21, 2015 QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites JWest 0 #370 October 22, 2015 sundevil777QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds? Thats what I was thinking. If 45 degrees gave your 14 seconds I would say that supports it. I was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mark 107 #371 October 22, 2015 JWestI was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. What exactly were you taught, and how well does it work for you? Mark Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,026 #372 October 22, 2015 JWest***QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds? Thats what I was thinking. If 45 degrees gave your 14 seconds I would say that supports it. I was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. There's a protractor on the tail of the plane you jump from?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,026 #373 October 22, 2015 Bill, can you re-post your video showing that no-one ever reaches 45 degrees?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites yoink 321 #374 October 22, 2015 kallendAt an event last week I was talking to a recently USPA certified AFF instructor (certified at well known California DZ) who said he was told by the AFF examiner to teach his students the "45 degree rule". Did he say what he did? Did he refuse and try to educate the examiner, or did he nod and smile to get the rating then ignore him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wasatchrider 0 #375 October 23, 2015 am I the only one that does not know what the 45 degree rule is?BASE 1519 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next Page 15 of 19 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kallend 2,026 #367 October 21, 2015 Napalm_C I was shocked though over the summer when we visited one of the biggest and most well known DZs in Southern Europe that even there they insisted on the 45 degree rule. As a visiting jumper it was not my place to question this approach but I made sure to ask at least 4 different people there and each and every one insisted on the 45 degree rule. On one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 45 degree rule doesn't work but it is still being widely used and TAUGHT... Personally I'd like your permission to John to show your presentation at my local DZ, it won't be easy though to convince people with triple my jump numbers and years in sport that this concept needs to be eradicated. P.s. Typed this on mobile so apologies for typos Certainly.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,307 #368 October 21, 2015 Please share with them the Professor's web page, animations, white papers and presentations also. http://mypages.iit.edu/~kallend/skydive/Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #369 October 21, 2015 QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JWest 0 #370 October 22, 2015 sundevil777QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds? Thats what I was thinking. If 45 degrees gave your 14 seconds I would say that supports it. I was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mark 107 #371 October 22, 2015 JWestI was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. What exactly were you taught, and how well does it work for you? Mark Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #372 October 22, 2015 JWest***QuoteOn one lift, our group (3 way flat) left 14s after the group before us (4 way flat) and on breakoff I literally had to pull 2s into my breakoff track because I could see a canopy open just off to the side. 14 seconds should have been plenty of time, unless there were real strong upper winds? Thats what I was thinking. If 45 degrees gave your 14 seconds I would say that supports it. I was taught the 45 rule as measured away from the tail but that would take forever. There's a protractor on the tail of the plane you jump from?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #373 October 22, 2015 Bill, can you re-post your video showing that no-one ever reaches 45 degrees?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yoink 321 #374 October 22, 2015 kallendAt an event last week I was talking to a recently USPA certified AFF instructor (certified at well known California DZ) who said he was told by the AFF examiner to teach his students the "45 degree rule". Did he say what he did? Did he refuse and try to educate the examiner, or did he nod and smile to get the rating then ignore him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wasatchrider 0 #375 October 23, 2015 am I the only one that does not know what the 45 degree rule is?BASE 1519 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites