Recommended Posts
georger 247
Grandpa George
Quote
I have always wondered why Cooper did not disguise himself with a wig, mustache, hair dye, makeup etc. It has an "I don't care if I am identified because I am immune to capture" aspect that has always puzzled me. Could he have actually done a masterful disguise that was undetected?
I believe you already know the answer to that - but you have to be willing to accept what no one wants to believe.
georger 247
QuoteI was thinking of the perfect revenge.
Do something nasty based on inside knowledge shared only between you and your target.
Then if you're discovered or suspected, you also might have the "get out jail free card" because there's something about the inside knowledge used the target(s) might not want to reveal....
It might give you enough confidence that you wouldn't worry about disguises and such. And even if you die doing it, it reveals the inside knowledge, which could still enact the revenge even though you're dead. (public embarassment or ???)
We've mused how Boeing or NWA would be logical targets for revenge. The targets might be more fuzzy, like Congress/USA in general. We talked about Vietnam War motives, son KIA possibilities...
But a nice target would be the entity that destroyed your dream, whatever that might be.
Consult the I-Ching.
"Arrogance or unrealism. This man got "giddy" at receiving the money, was childlike (Tina said), offered Tina some of the money ........... these are very specific factual traits we can use. This is the kind of adult he was. Naive? Deprived? "
Snowman I promised you some photos but I have a terrible time scanning to fit the forum. Don't know how to do much with the photos.
Be sure to look at pictures of yourself and friends at high school graduation and then 30 yrs later.
The eyebrow thin out with age. He also learned to keep his eyebrows trimmed.
The Canon City was in a 1960 prison file and we don't know how it got there or when it was taken.
Age 25 was provided by the brother and we could only guess at the age.
Close-up is the polaroid shot made in 1971 with his hair dyed (per his wife of the time) and in a brown suit with Glasses.
Composite from FBI - actual scan of the composite they sent me. No alterations.
I will have to reduce the other pics and post later.
I have two photos taken at the same time without Glasses. But he is very GIDDY and CLOWNING around. These are the only kind of photos he alllowed with his glasses off.
In the first one he has been out all afternoon by himself in Seattle.
By the way - the shirt is really pink.
He loved silky shirts.
The second one with that stupid pipe.
The third will be the only photo besides what the news media has of the two of us together - I hate the photo, but it is essential to show the difference in the complexion. I am OLIVE and I tan easily, but his "olive" is golden - the latin look Tina and Florence described.
I have tried many times to explain to the site the complexion thing and this does it the best Olive was a catch all in the 60's.
QuoteYou can make a statement like that and yet you claimed that the FBI used 1944 prints to make a Master File for Duane L. Weber.
There's usable quality latent prints and there's AFIS quality prints. AFIS quality prints are good to tell you who belongs to a certain set of latent prints. Usable quality prints are good to tell who doesn't belong to a certain set of latent prints. So they (FBI crime lab) were able to positively state that the prints Cooper left behind at the crime scene were positively not Webers, but the latent prints were not of the quality to dump into AFIS and let the computer tell them who they belonged to.
A master set of prints are just that, a set that is a combination of various 10-print cards to give the best quality print for each digit. Nothing is made up, nothing is changed, its just that when you roll a 10-print on paper with ink, there are sometimes problems with the rolled print. e.g. the person you're printing is not very happy with you and the finger slides a little bit on the paper. Modern systems alleviate this to some extent using inkless systems, but this is still practiced today.
All in all this is basic police academy recruit stuff, I thought you'd have a better understanding of how this stuff worked after years of "research."
QuoteThere's usable quality latent prints and there's AFIS quality prints. AFIS quality prints are good to tell you who belongs to a certain set of latent prints. Usable quality prints are good to tell who doesn't belong to a certain set of latent prints. So they (FBI crime lab) were able to positively state that the prints Cooper left behind at the crime scene were positively not Webers, but the latent prints were not of the quality to dump into AFIS and let the computer tell them who they belonged to.
Guys,this person will not leave me alone and I made this persons
error in the above statement in bold because the FBI does not know if any of the prints on the plane belonged to Cooper.
I came on the site very late to do the photos that snowman requested and this person will not leave me alone.
Aggie - haven't you been into this forum long enough to know about the prints?
Quotebecause the FBI does not know if any of the prints on the plane belonged to Cooper.
If you really believed that then you wouldn't have made such a stink about the mast print card. Just because its yet another "smoking gun" that shows that Weber was a liar who pulled the wool over your eyes, then it doesn't mean that its not true.
QuoteAggie - haven't you been into this forum long enough to know about the prints?
I've been on DZ.com since May 22, of 2000, the day after my first skydive, I understand your doubt surrounding actual facts in this case. I'm also clear on wild and grand statements about Weber and how none of it proves he was even close enough to have had watched a news cast of the crime when it happened.
REPLY -
Arrogance or unrealism. This man got "giddy" at receiving the money, was childlike (Tina said), offered Tina some of the money ........... these are very specific factual traits we can use. This is the kind of adult he was. Naive? Deprived?
Whether that fits with him being a skilled person I dont know. In fact if you go to the DOT (Dictionary of
Occupational Titles) and match personality traits
(as measured by the MMPI) with occupational skills
Im not sure where naive people would wind up being
placed.
One other option is, he was mentally ill and semi-
delusional.
To date we have been looking into DBC's actions to profile him. His non-actions or omissions to act also say something. Example, he got very angry finally, sitting at SEA during fueling and wanted to "get this plane on the road". If he intended to bail at SEA and missed that, he did not get similarly angry. He went all the way to 20:12-16 before bailing and didnt get angry, apparently. He didnt seem angry at 20:05
when he said 'everything ok'. And he didnt act superior
and impersonal with Tina when she pleaded with him not to blow her and the plane up - he basically told her
he wouldnt, and he didnt.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites