Recommended Posts
Doug Pasternack is the one who spent 2 hours with the artist who did the original composites in the beginning and there was NO mention of a peak. There was a mention of a motion the artist found himself unable to depict on the composites. I have kept pretty quiet about what that was and someone suggested a pursing of the lips but that is not it. It was an express Duane made and which can be seen in some of his pictures and if he was upset or very serious it was more exaggerated.
This artist spent hours with the witnesses and there are things said to him that were never told to the media. Sitting with the artist the witnesses tended to be more relaxed which helps the memory.
This artist had detail the FBI did not have.
georger 244
QuoteThat composite has to be a promo thing for Cook's book as it has the chin and lines adjusted to fit Gossett. The widows peak was NEVER part of the description.
Doug Pasternack is the one who spent 2 hours with the artist who did the original composites in the beginning and there was NO mention of a peak. There was a mention of a motion the artist found himself unable to depict on the composites. I have kept pretty quiet about what that was and someone suggested a pursing of the lips but that is not it. It was an express Duane made and which can be seen in some of his pictures and if he was upset or very serious it was more exaggerated.
This artist spent hours with the witnesses and there are things said to him that were never told to the media. Sitting with the artist the witnesses tended to be more relaxed which helps the memory.
This artist had detail the FBI did not have.
Have you even seen the video? Talked to the
maker? Probably not.
I know nothing about it. Just what I saw and heard
at Youtube.
The script does stick very closely to the old FBI
profile and expands it only slightly.
Just go see the video before making 200,000
judgements which will roll up at Tina Bar 2 days
later ?
georger 244
I have more data, not sure what it adds up to.
Sluggo does rely on Pasternak for the seating
numbers (at least I think he does.). He refers to
Pasternak's citations on this, in any event.
I am now beginning to wonder if the whole series BOEING 727-51. BOEING 727-51C. BOEING 727-59.
BOEING 727-61 ... were not all 727-100s ? They
were not 727-200s because that was a longer
version of the 727.
Every 727-51 at any Boeing site I have searched
says the 727-51 had a 134 seat capacity. Examples
below:
http://www.airport-data.com/manuf/BOEING;95.html
Tail Number Year Maker Model C/N Engine Seats Location
N463US 1964 Boeing 727-51 18799 3 134 FL, United States
N465US 0000 Boeing 727-51 18801 3 134 FL,
N467US 0000 Boeing 727-51 18803 3 134 FL,
http://www.taxiwayalpha.com/fleets/profile.php?aircraft=874
: N467US - Boeing 727-51 - Northwest Airlines :.
Registration N467US
View more images of N467US
Serial 18803
Line Number 137
Capacity 134 seat
First Flight 09.04.65
Delivery Date 22.04.65
Model 727-51
Airline Northwest Airlines
Status Left Fleet
All Registrations N467US Northwest Airlines
N838N Piedmont AL
N838N United Technologies lsd
N838N Flight Dynamics lsd
N838N Key AL
N29KA Key AL rr
N29KA AvSales-Key AL
N29KA WrldCpL-Key AL
Comments N407US NTU, involved in the D.B.Cooper hijack and parachute escape 24.11.71
Maybe NWA reconfigured the seats to the #94
reported by Pasternak/Sluggo ?
But, I still cannot find anmy seating charts for N467US or any other 727-51.
I will just put this out on the deck for anyone to
play with. I brought this up before but nobody
was interested. Traveling south ~V23 with the
direction west out Cooper's right hand window,
the Moon may have been visible above the cloud layer? The Moon's position out Cooper's west window
was a clock for Cooper if he could see it and
knew how to read it ... if he had any landmarks
and was familiar with the area Portland-
Vancouver, the Moon's position relative to his
viewing angle was also a clue as to his latitude
at points in time ... this is basic navigation.
A 727-51 is a 727-100 configured specifically for Northwest Orient Airlines.
I have never been able to find a seating chart that I felt was reliable.
Web Page
Blog
NORJAK Forum
377 22
There is another side door. See photo.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Syrianair_Boeing_727.jpg
Have you ever previously mentioned Duane explaining 727 stair deployment to you?
Describe the "wheel" in more detail.
377
georger 244
QuoteFrom Pocket-PC in motel so forgive errors.
A 727-51 is a 727-100 configured specifically for Northwest Orient Airlines.
I have never been able to find a seating chart that I felt was reliable.
Must be ESP because I came to that suspicion
about 5 mins ago after finding a number of FAA
directives about seating capacities allowed for
different 727-100 configurations, amongst the
airlines. Long lists of factors specific to each type
of 727-100 configuration, as per each airline.
So, it seems reasonable to assume we can
modify a standard seating chart to fit what we
know about where Cooper sat in18C at the back,
starboard side, near the stew's station (which
I have located on one chart I have), in front of
the rear galley and Lav area (also shown on
charts I have accumulated). Let me see if I can
put a graphic together and we can go from there ...
would be nice to have.
[edit additional note]: from wikipedia -
". . . he handed a note to a young flight attendant named Florence Schaffner,[11] who was seated in a jumpseat attached to the aft stair door, situated directly behind and to the left of Cooper's seat. "
The list was something that did survive the 1st marriage and we now know these guys are unrelated to Weber in any way.
The pocket Atlas DID belong to Duane because the first husband was NEVER in Colorado. I thought I was right about the list - but we had to verify it.
The reason I asked the question about the plane is this - Duane and I flew out of Miami to the Islands - one of the larger islands and then took a puddle jumper to St. Thomas because their airstrip was not large enough for the 727.
When we were on this 727 - we sat in row 17 or 18 at his request.
I have tried to envision that flight, but we were on the left side of the plane facing the cockpit. If you look at the picture of the 727 on the ground at at Sea-Tac the blinds are pulled forward of the wings (but maybe this was the division between 1st class and 2ed class). Where we were sitting on our plane in relation to that picture was just aft (behind the wing) of the wings - Duane explained to me what was happening with flaps as you could see them move from where we sat.
On this same plane - I would have to refer to earlier notations to remember if we were boarding or disembarking - we stood at the door to the aft stairs and he told me what it was and how it worked. The door and back on this particular plane was covered with a dark tan woven cloth fabric and there was this wheel type thing on it. He explained how it worked and how it lowered a stairway that went out of the belly of the plane. SO my next Question is there another door on any of the 727's on the side in the rear of the plane. I know there is a door near the pilots cabin - BUT is there another door on the side in the rear and which side is it on.
The only picture I have is the one in Norjak which shows the plane at the rear of the airport. In the back ground is a road and what looks like a motel in the back ground.
When Duane took me to Seattle he made a short cut (which really wasn't a short cut) that was in the back of the airport. He commented that not much had changed - except there was a high tall linked fence that wasn't there before. I noted today in that picture that the fence that was there in 1971 appears to be a wooden fence. I had not really took the time to study this before.
Behind this fence there is a building that appears to be a motel. Does anyone know what this motel looked like from the other side or the name of it and if it had a pool? All motels of the time looked the same to me, but take a look at the picture I am going to scan and then post.
It is old and faded and my daughter who saw it yrs ago -asked this question "What does he have on under his jacket?" The shoes are NOT loafers and it certainly looks like he has something under the jacket. At that time he was not portly as evidenced by the picture you saw of him in swimming trunks taken at the most 18 months earlier.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites