Recommended Posts
377 22
Quotewe did SL so we only went to 3500', but you can clearly see the heartrate climbing presumably as the plane takes off, levels out a while then a sudden move higher (presumably as the door opened) and then an absolutely massive spike which must have been exit. I can't remember any of the actual numbers though....
I was never so scared as on those early S/L jumps. We had to climb out on a wing strut on an ancient Aeronca Sedan. It was terrifying to me, so damned LOW. I could see people and distinguish a Ford from a Chevy. I calmed down a lot when I got cleared for freefall and could go up high where everything looked like a mosaic.
The USAF hooked up experienced jumpers to cardio recorders and noted a huge pulse rate spike after ripcord pull and before successful deployment. As I recall some rates briefly came close to and might have exceeded 200 BPM. It was referred to in the USPA magazine long ago. I can't find it but I bet Snow could.
I still love freefall but these leisurely sky cruising HAHOs sure are fun. I imagine they wont be so fun when the cold WX sets in.
I am pinging some military radio chat groups trying to find out more about the beacons and direction finders used by SOG jumpers in Viet Nam to regroup after landing.
Although Tina may have been planning to go to a convent all along even before Norjack, I can't help but speculate that the radical change in lifestyle was caused by something that happened on the plane.
She sure knows how to stay out of the public eye. Thanks for trying with Tina Bruce. Hope you won't give up on Flo.
377
georger 244
"pop psychology" is an accurate description. Bruce speaks of his bretheren and sisters .... at the NY Times? Hardly. Plainly classified, it is pop psychology from non professionals attached to some further informal or madeup appendage which then claims a "media" credential.
Snoop Dog may play his version of some Bach
but this does not make Snoop Dog an expert on
Bach! Then if Snoop starts talking about Bach's
"mental state" only clarifies Snoop Dog's mental state.
These are precisely the associations which are threatening. Bruce may need to be careful he
doesnt wind up on some stalker list! Bruce began
with Barb Foreman and now he and Cook have
consulted and Bruce wishes to be known
as an expert on Mucklow's mental state in the
present tense?
Bruce may try to ride this "goose" to the carnival,
but he should not be surprised if he is stopped
on the premise of 'cruelty to animals' and a violation
of basic common sense?
Now if Bruce, 377, and Galen Cook all pile on the
goose to ride to the carnival - that could kill the
goose.
The Golden Goose has left the building. All
dumbasses should pile off !
Quote
I really wonder at all of this. It can’t be because I’m just a pesky journalist and folks are tired of the “Cooper nuisance.”
Maybe your and Sir Cook's assumptions were wrong?
Not to mention your approach which usually conveys intention! You just followed Galen Cook into a black
hole.
What justifies your statement:
"I gave the woman all the information I’ve uncovered about Tina and described my concern for her mental state."
How in hell can you make an appriasal of the mental
state of a person you dont even know and have never met and never will meet, and what in your own person do you think justfies such an approach based on huge assumptions?!
A 5 year old would have a better grasp of reality!
So, what is the five year old's assessment of Tina, and the reticence of the principles in the Cooper case to discuss its dynamics?
snowmman 3
the 5-year-old's view, is that there are no "principals in the Cooper case"
The Emperor Has No Clothes.
it's all fake..made up...etc.
It's just TV stuff. There is nothing underneath. No one behind the curtain.
It's all BS.
That's the thing. That's why everyone shuts up. Because it's all BS underneath.
Just nothing. No principals.
That's why I was able to take over the CSG. I am also now President-For-Life due to a bylaw change. If the media wants to know what the CSG is doing on the Cooper case, they have to contact me. But I won't respond. Because the CSG is more secretive than any govt. agency.
So it all makes sense.
377 22
President for life? You need to dress for the part. I hear Fidel's tailor is available. He has been longing to break free from Khaki and Cammo.
Tina's remarks about Cooper's sadness have a hint of sympathy. Perhaps she withheld some details when recounting their conversation to the FBI.
377
Bruce may try to ride this "goose" to the carnival,
but he should not be surprised if he is stopped on the premise of 'cruelty to animals' and a violation of basic common sense?
Now if Bruce, 377, and Galen Cook all pile on the goose to ride to the carnival - that could kill the goose.
The Golden Goose has left the building. All dumbasses should pile off !
Georger, YOU ARE GOOD!
Sorry Bruce, Georger summed up how I feel about Tina in the most hilarious way one could ever imagine. I see these tiny comical caricatures of Galen and Bruce and Grey on this Goose with a nun's habit...just where do they think they will get trying to ride that Goose?
Yes, I would love to talk to Tina again, but I have compassion for this young girl who has spent the best part of her life being hounded by the likes of us. She didn't even have a chance to be normal and go to 10 yr and 25 yr. class reunions...
I have always wanted to put the pictures in front of her (not the ones in the media) and ask some questions in person, but I know it is not fair to her and there will be nothing to gain by it. In my mind I stage this over and over, but this is as far as I go.
She was 22 yrs old and that was 38 yrs ago...she deserves her privacy - she has earned it. I will aways be grateful for that phone call and I will always have a deep desire to meet her and talk to her, but my compassion for others will supersede my own selfish desire.
Perhaps I will meet her one day and not even know who she is. You know , Georger - my heart wants to meet her, but my sense of decency and respect hope that Golden Goose flew the Cooper duh meant to say Coop and has met Mr. Right and is enjoying her Golden days under a new name.
I was going to bed early tonight, but after reading Georger's little story - I understood why I did NOT try to contact her again even though I could have gone to where she used to live and have knocked on her door. I had her phone number, but did not call her again. I knew she moved, but right now at this moment I only wish her well.
I have always believed if you live your life well - you can accomplish what you need to do without harm to others and without lies. There have been a lot of ANGELs (just a term for unexplained people bearing information) and I think maybe Tina has had something to with that...directly or indirectly.
There have been an awful lot of answers recently - things I didn't know, that explain the Grudge and the motive...I have actually began to feel like maybe I can finally bring this to an end in the next few months. This is not going to be at all what a lot of people nor myself expected should this research pan out.
No question about it - Duane was Cooper...but the real motive may come as a suprise.
georger 244
QuoteQuote
I really wonder at all of this. It can’t be because I’m just a pesky journalist and folks are tired of the “Cooper nuisance.”
Maybe your and Sir Cook's assumptions were wrong?
Not to mention your approach which usually conveys intention! You just followed Galen Cook into a black
hole.
What justifies your statement:
"I gave the woman all the information I’ve uncovered about Tina and described my concern for her mental state."
How in hell can you make an appriasal of the mental
state of a person you dont even know and have never met and never will meet, and what in your own person do you think justfies such an approach based on huge assumptions?!
A 5 year old would have a better grasp of reality!
So, what is the five year old's assessment of Tina, and the reticence of the principles in the Cooper case to discuss its dynamics?
Perhaps I was unclear. I didnt say anything about
a 5 year old's assesment of Tina Mucklow.
The issue at stake is not 'an assessment of Tina
Mucklow', or any other person, but your investigative methodology. Forget Ms. Mucklow!
She may never grant you an interview and she
does not owe anyone an explanation. Especially
since you have premised your introduction with the statement you think she is mentally ill and in
danger from herself. That is not a great intro, to
say the least. Most people would run as soon as
they heard those words or anything like them!
By making a statement like that you are putting
your credibility out front ahead of everything.
The comparison to a five year is this:
A normal five year old is dependent and quite
aware of the people in its life, their feelings and
moods, their strategies, and the normal five
year old has a fairly sophisticated sense of where
its own well being starts and ends and how to attain self satisfaction or not.
The normal five year old has already built a fairly
sophisticated strategy for self preservation ...
and is ready to learn from others as opposed to
teaching others, already.
In your relationship to perspective clients which
include Tina Mucklow you are similarly dependent.
In that sense it would be good not to tell your
client she is mentally ill and a danger to herself!
even if you think or feel that. And anyone who would advise a 'psychological approach' of this kind
is an idiot, precisely because they are missing the central issue of 'dependency' and who is in control
of what.
Because in this case the deeper issue at stake between adults is conscience and integrity, and
one's capacity to 'take the needs of the other
person seriously as opposed to servicing only
one's own interests. If you cant do that or even
fake it well, then better not to try at all, because
it is not Tina Mucklow's job or role in life .... to
save or educate you!
If you act like a self-righteous expert but aren't
an expert, you are likely to get yourself into trouble.
Does any of this make sense?
Perhaps not, because I have followed your
methodology for some time, and what I am
talking about is so elementary as to hardly need
mentioning, except in this case and in similar
cases where many people attracted to the DB
Cooper 'thing' seem to have an agenda even
before they arrive - and its obvious.
Quade commented about this almost at the very start of this whole thread, and some people refuse
to even get involved in this case precisely for the
reasons Ive cited here many times.
We all have our own perspectives.
Learning to laugh again.
When we did our first jump course, a friend of mine had his heart rate monitor connected (he is very fit, cycles about 15km each way to work each day and gyms as well, ran a half marathon for fun on the weekend, you get the picture) anyway... we did SL so we only went to 3500', but you can clearly see the heartrate climbing presumably as the plane takes off, levels out a while then a sudden move higher (presumably as the door opened) and then an absolutely massive spike which must have been exit. I can't remember any of the actual numbers though....
Bruce, re Tina "clamming up" - by all accounts she was highly traumatized by the incident. Whatever a pop psychologist might think she "should" do, it's understandable that she just does not want to talk about it. And if you look at it objectively, if she were to decide to open up at some stage, a journalist probably wouldn't be first choice...
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites