For most New Yorkers it's a question of priorities - roads-plowed-and-life-goes-on or some effort at morality via the judicial system. As we all know, waiting to be called as a juror in the latter instance is maddening, and that's where DB Cooper comes in. Guys in the trenches need something to talk about that's not trial-related. As a result, I have a huge potential audience, as does Geoff Gray, who is already tapping into it with his many writings for New York Magazine.
Wish me well; remember, I need a job....
Also. I called Mom today to see how she made out in the latest snow storm. She was taking a bath and seemed unconcerned with the latest record-setting blast from Mother Nature.
georger 244
QuoteQuoteHave you considered that Tina is perfectly fine, but just doesn't want to be pestered about something she really doesn't have a lot to say about?
Believe it or not, some people don't want to be in the spotlight and just want to go about their lives.
I'm pretty sure you'd get pissed if complete strangers kept pestering you about something that happened 40 years ago.Quote
*********************
Yes, Quade, I have considered that Tina is perfectly fine and just doesn't want to deal with pesky guys like me. However, after considering all the information available about Tina, I don't think she is perfectly fine. In one YouTube video of a film clip made shortly after the skyjacking, Tina displays a remarkable ease in front of the camera and a deep, genuine concern of how her passengers fared during the skyjacking. Where has that ease and concern gone? No one is able to tell me, and hence I continue to search.
Also, I think Tina has a lot to say about the skyjacking. At the very least, she is the definitive authority on how DB Cooper looked and acted. Reviewing photos of suspects is not asking too much of someone who cherishes her privacy, in my opinion. Perhaps she could make herself available to the pesky mimions once a year? Maybe NWO would share their publicicst and field questions?
Unless of course, the experience of doing any of that is too unnerving, and if that is the case, then we are back at square one: Is Tina really okay, and can my investigation of what really happened to her be of any help to her in assuaging the residual fears or emotional discord?
and who shall cleans who and inform who of
MKULTRA in thy tabernacle?
for it is written:
40 And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him, If thou wilt, thou canst make me clean, and inform me of thy secrets. 41 And Jesus, moved with compassion, put forth his hand, and touched him, and saith unto him, I will; be thou clean. 42 And as soon as he had spoken, immediately the leprosy departed from him, and he was cleansed. 43 And he straitly charged him, and forthwith sent him away; 44 And saith unto him, See thou say nothing to any man: but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing those things which Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.
45 But he went out, and began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the matter, insomuch that Jesus could no more openly enter into the city, but was without in desert places: and they came to him from every quarter but found him not because of these minions in search of themselves...
377 22
QuoteHey, speaking of stews...my first well, uh...experience was with a stew. It's a cute story, and NWA has a bit part in it: 'Your First Time is Always Memorable - and Here's Mine'. (insert evil laugh here)
http://adventurebooks.newsvine.com/...memorable-heres-mine
Remember the days of Coffee, Tea or Me? Robert sure does.
377
georger 244
QuoteLook, I kind of know what the deal is with Tina Mucklow. You can believe me or not, it's up to you. But before you decide if I'm right, consider this:
I may have been wrong on some things occasionally, but I don't make up stuff regarding the Cooper case. Not intentionally, anyway.
The True Tina Deal As Far As I Know It:
Even if you could see her now, she would tell you she remembers little from the night of the hijacking.
She's had 'issues' over the years. To a degree, you could call them psychological issues. She's NOT crazy. She is doing okay now. And you won't be able to get a single thing out of her. Remember, she's about 62 years old now and a bit different from the wide-eyed stew who dallied with Cooper. There have been changes to her personality and she's a little fragile. This is why her family protects her. And that's all you're getting out of me about it. I have all of this on very good information. You can take it or leave it as you like.
It's a true bummer, since she was the best witness.
Hey, speaking of stews...my first well, uh...experience was with a stew. It's a cute story, and NWA has a bit part in it: 'Your First Time is Always Memorable - and Here's Mine'. (insert evil laugh here)
http://adventurebooks.newsvine.com/_news/2011/01/26/5923241-your-first-time-is-always-memorable-heres-mine
Blevins you have said a lot of dumb things in
this forum: This below is the best so far.
"wide-eyed stew who dallied with Cooper."
Dallied with Cooper? Wide-eyed stew?
Your knowledge of Tina Muckow surpasses
Bruces', surpasses the FBIs', surpasses the
Smithsonians', surpasses Jennifer Anniston's.
As you "dally" here with us stuck between space
and time and the Men's Room.
The telling point which totally escapes you in
life, is Tina Mucklow does not post here, never
has and never will, but you do!
What does that tell you?
BobKnoss 0
Listen to the man, Georger, or move to column 3. He is practicing what the Bible really means. Amen.
georger 244
QuoteQuote'The telling point which totally escapes you in
life, is Tina Mucklow does not post here, never
has and never will, but you do!
What does that tell you?'
I don't know. Skipp Porteous investigated her thoroughly and spoke to some family members. I have spoken to one of Tina's nieces. The whole thing is messed up, and that's too bad. Really. She's the best witness, IMHO. I get bummed thinking about it. That stuff I said previously was true. She should go public with something, if she can, but the truth is I don't know IF SHE CAN.
What precisely, in your opinion, could Tina give
now she didnt already give long ago (several
times over in successive interviws with the FBI)?
What do you know & see that is unique?
What does Tina know now she didnt know before?
What could Tina do today she didnt already do
or could not do before?
Does she have Cooper's dna?
Does she have the Palmer Report?
Does she have the flight path and drop time?
Does she have forensics on the money?
Is Tina dying to have coffee tea and me, with
you!?
Does Tina need your psycholpogical insight/
therapy?
Does Tina need a book from AB?
Does AB need a photo and signature from Tina?
Does anything you and Porteous have about
Tina make any significant contribution to the
Cooper case?
What else is at stake that makes you post about
Tina incessantly that I fail to see?
Will Bruce solve his personal problms through
Tina?
Will Tina make some one some money?
What is it?
BobKnoss 0
Tina can't offer anything, nor should anyone really want to go there. Tina was a victim of some intentionally very cruel people with personal goals, people you cover for. Yes, they are torn up about it, but that does not remove responsibility. Tina is a poster girl of Projects gone wrong, just one life damaged by this incident. There are numerous others. The horror of the story is that it has been perpetuated so long. It is time to stop and clear the air. Pardon the Project, tell half the truth, or ALL of it and move on. You all make me sick.
BobKnoss 0
From Webster's 'Improved' Dictionary:
Project noun (Pro'-jekt) (pra'-jekt)
1. any piece of work that is undertaken or attempted; he prepared
for great undertakings;
2. a planned undertaking
3. a Government term for a secret planned exercise
Norjak noun (Nor'-jak)
1. a Government abbreviation for Northwest air piracy of Flight 305
issued in April, 1968, by the FBI in conjunction with the FAA.
(See Project Norjak, hijacking, air piracy, kidnapping, Nov. 24,
1971, Duane Weber, et. al.)
I have it on good authority (and no, I can’t tell you who) that NWA followed employees and former employees well after the hijack and/or their termination (up to eight years), if they had any contact with the media. I have held the proof in my hands. In my opinion, they were obsessed with controlling all information about the hijacking. Internal memos flew back and forth anytime there was a radio-show or print article that involved an employee (including former employees).
It is not a stretch (for me) to see NWA management putting pressure (BIG pressure) on the witnesses that were or had been in their employ. This would explain certain changes in witness accounts from Rataczak and others. It also explains behaviors from Tina, Flo, Anderson, and Hancock better than just assuming they are exhibiting “media avoidance.”
I have long stated that I think a wealth of information resides at MWA/Delta archives. Why don’t one of you “investigators” try to get the new management (Delta) to allow you access?
Just my two cents worth.
Web Page
Blog
NORJAK Forum
BobKnoss 0
First intelligent post in a long time. But there are far better sources, as you know. They can't speak for fear of incrimination by Judicial definition. FBI definition is a whole 'nuther can of worms. "We just don't see it that way!"
"As some fierce creature replete with too much rage, so I , for the fear of fault, am slowed to speak." "My most true mind thus maketh mine own mind untrue." Sonnets~ Shakespeare. And so they fabricate. Ferbearacate. Fakit. Aw, they just make stuff up. Buffalo 'em in backward technical stuff and bury 'em in BS. Flood 'em with pages of documents and tons of suspects. What a waste of valuable time. "Just pull the brown cord over there, Sweetie, the one with the red tag on it.... You can go now. Thank you."
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites