DB Cooper

[skyjack71 0]

Georger, I really wish I was able to down load a bigger picture here. I really want you to see this. I could put it on a disk and send it to Sluggo if he is still alive and he could send it to you.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[georger 247]

Quote

Georger, I really wish I was able to down load a bigger picture here. I really want you to see this. I could put it on a disk and send it to Sluggo if he is still alive and he could send it to you.

I probably will regret this but send it to Sluggo
and he will pass it to me if he is agreeable to this -
whatever this is. How much do you want it enlarged?
Give me some instructions or guidelines to follow...

Sluggo may not be immediately available so be
patient if he doesnt answer until a week from
today ...


G.

[georger 247]

Im going to post this JLGC (Japan Local Govt
Center) link in case it applies to anyone here.
Four people we were seeking are now accounted
for on the JET list.

http://www.jlgc.org/TopicList.aspx?topicCategoryID=20&topicID=156&languageTypeID=1&controlType=Display

another link: jlgc@jlgc.org

.

[377 22]

Interesting post hangdiver. I too thought river pilots would know the Columbia's currents and eddys far better than academics. Trouble is pilots don't publish much. It's the Mark Twain thing. You can learn the river but it can't be taught.

See this post and the attached article.


http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=search_results&search_forum=all&search_string=12332&sb=score&mh=25

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[skyjack71 0]

I am trying to post the highest resolution this thread will take.
I have never shown the full picture of the all dressed up 1971. Well, I found the picture was taken in 1970 and not 1971 and that Duane let his hair grow longer, but that is NOT my reason for posting this.

There is s smudge or spot on this old polaroid I thought was just a defect, but I was looking at the tie and clip from the plane - and noted something I have not notice before.

Look at the plane tie tac (you will have to reference you own images for that). Now look at the spot on the tie Weber has on.
The tie is wider - so that spot is exactly where the Cooper tie tac would sit on a wide tie and if it was clipped from the left - the bar would be under his jacket.

No I am not desperate! Sluggo noted the spot and so did one of the other individual who came to my home....but we thought it was just flaw on the old polaroid (this is the orginal polaroid and not a copy).

I am cleaning up things here and putting affairs in order for storage - when I decided to bare my sole to the mercy of this thread and see what others think.

Hope this thing downloads - if not I will have to do it tomorrow.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[377 22]

It does look like a tie tack Jo, but it's a big hop from there to the back stairs of the NWA 727.

Duane seemed to be a dapper dresser. Would he wear such a dimensionally mismatched combo of wide tie and short tack?

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[georger 247]

Quote

Interesting post hangdiver. I too thought river pilots would know the Columbia's currents and eddys far better than academics. Trouble is pilots don't publish much. It's the Mark Twain thing. You can learn the river but it can't be taught.

See this post and the attached article.


http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=search_results&search_forum=all&search_string=12332&sb=score&mh=25

377

Every academic I know consults with
lay people all the time ... you couldnt be much
of an academic without the link ..

[georger 247]

Quote

I am trying to post the highest resolution this thread will take.
I have never shown the full picture of the all dressed up 1971. Well, I found the picture was taken in 1970 and not 1971 and that Duane let his hair grow longer, but that is NOT my reason for posting this.

There is s smudge or spot on this old polaroid I thought was just a defect, but I was looking at the tie and clip from the plane - and noted something I have not notice before.

Look at the plane tie tac (you will have to reference you own images for that). Now look at the spot on the tie Weber has on.
The tie is wider - so that spot is exactly where the Cooper tie tac would sit on a wide tie and if it was clipped from the left - the bar would be under his jacket.

No I am not desperate! Sluggo noted the spot and so did one of the other individual who came to my home....but we thought it was just flaw on the old polaroid (this is the orginal polaroid and not a copy).

I am cleaning up things here and putting affairs in order for storage - when I decided to bare my sole to the mercy of this thread and see what others think.

Hope this thing downloads - if not I will have to do it tomorrow.

Here is about the limit of what I can do with the
small pic you posted.

[Orange1 0]

i remember lamenting our crash-out of the semis at the world cup so that was four years ago... which makes me realise how long this thread has really been going on!! will we still be arguing over the same old stuff when CWC 2015 comes around?!!

gotta say the cricket has been more exciting than what's going on here, in general
http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/current/story/505775.html

Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

[Farflung 0]

Something went wrong with the link 377 posted. Instead of being about ‘Bar Pilots’, it was about a bunch of tug boats and stuff. Stupid technology is wasting my time or perhaps this is just another example of the government trying to keep me off the Cooper case by redirecting my computer to some other website.

Here is some material that is apropos to the aforementioned subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f1UPl8ANe4

[georger 247]

Quote

Something went wrong with the link 377 posted. Instead of being about ‘Bar Pilots’, it was about a bunch of tug boats and stuff. Stupid technology is wasting my time or perhaps this is just another example of the government trying to keep me off the Cooper case by redirecting my computer to some other website.

Here is some material that is apropos to the aforementioned subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f1UPl8ANe4

77 always comes up with old saws. I have no idea
where 77 comes up with the idea 'academics' live
on one plaine, while the rest of the world is toiling
away on some other less attractive plain, w/o
benefits? That's just not even remotely true where
I come from. Maybe things are different around the
Berkley campus, but Berkley is unique, until you arrive here, or in Oregon.
Snowmman mentioned a number of salvage
people who know the Columbia well, for example.
Anyone can look those posts up, from their couch.

These tug boat and salvage folks, for one, give
an entirely different view of how the Columbia
works, or how different areas of the Columbia
works, as compared with the simplistic explanations
some others I could mention 'stumble on and then
preach about'. Tosaw knew that and took advantage
of it. All of that (what the salvage people say) is
where skepticism in the simplistic Washougal Theory
begins. (Does anyone seriously think that the FBI
didnt talk to these people in 1980? Guess again!)

It might be worth noting that no salvage person,
for example, has ever been cited as having
been consulted or expressing expert testimony in
this case, to date. I wonder why that is? 377 may
have to revise his view of the Ivory Tower in view
of the actual facts of this case? When was the last
time JP was mentioned here at Dropzone - years
later! Not JT. I said JP.

These folks not only know how the river works
during any month of a year, they also remember
what happened in July of 1977 specifically, or in
December of 1974. They know where debris is on
the bottom in every area of the river - its their
business to know such things. These people are
walking history when it comes to Columbia lore
and facts.

Why would 377 suggest "academics" never consulted
these people? To stir up sensationalism I guess.
The reverse is the truth.

Only "book writers and newspaper people and
hermits" seem to avoid these folks. When was
the last time Bruce talked to JP Salvage? I dunno!

There is only one reason for not talking to these
folks and I think anyone can figure out why that
would be. (If you want to pretend to be an expert,
avoid the experts!)

Enough said on this topic. Its another red herring.

Likewise, there are a few ordinary people who have
a few excellent ideas on how progress could be made
in this case, but their phones never ring. I wonder
why that is! ?

[matthewcline 0]

"The Skyjacker that got away" is on National Geographic Channel today. It was produced in 2009.

It discounts both KC and DW as a viable suspect.

KC since there is no actual physical evidence just a relative saying he looked like Dan Cooper.

DW is just one of over 1000 suspects they discounted.

Agent Larry Carr has a profile that neither DW or KC fit.

A Scientist, Tom Cabe (?), explains the found money pretty convincingly. He also has a plausible explanation that the man who posed as Dan Cooper died that night.

Just thought you all may want to know if you had not seen the show.

Matt

An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

[skyjack71 0]

Quote

Snowmman mentioned a number of salvage
people who know the Columbia well, for example.
Anyone can look those posts up, from their couch.

These tug boat and salvage folks, for one, give an entirely different view of how the Columbiaworks, or how different areas of the Columbia works, as compared with the simplistic explanations some others I could mention 'stumble on and then preach about'. Tosaw knew that and took advantage
of it. All of that (what the salvage people say) is where skepticism in the simplistic Washougal Theory begins. (Does anyone seriously think that the FBI didnt talk to these people in 1980? Guess again!)

It might be worth noting that no salvage person, for example, has ever been cited as having
been consulted or expressing expert testimony in this case, to date. I wonder why that is? 377 may have to revise his view of the Ivory Tower in view
of the actual facts of this case? When was the last time JP was mentioned here at Dropzone - years later! Not JT. I said JP.

These folks not only know how the river works during any month of a year, they also remember
what happened in July of 1977 specifically, or in December of 1974. They know where debris is onthe bottom in every area of the river - its their business to know such things. These people are walking history when it comes to Columbia lore
and facts.

Thank you - what you got was about what I saw - but it is odd that mark is right where the tie clasp would be on a wide tie. I was giving things a last look before they are filed and boxed or put in their appropriate place, such as back into the album and in new album for pictures of Duane - his past - that others shared with me and what I have in the way of photos I have used in my exploration of the death bed confession.

Please explain to the old woman with "Dumb Blonde Syndrome" what the post you made about the salvage companies means using what information they had availabe - 1971 to 1980 when the money was found. Was all of this in Tosaw's book? Or is this in conclusion with information you have personally derived at since then. KISS - no I don't want a kiss - but, make an explanation that makes sense to me and others or direct us to the informaiton that caused you to make the post.

Again Thank You,

P.S. Are you aware that Duane's brother and sister-in-law knew Tosaw from Modesto. They belonged to the same organization and John's wife mentiond - Tosaw's wife or sister.
These guys all knew each other.

I was told Tosaw was not married by another party and the reference John and his wife made must have been referring to a sister. This occured in a conversation with the brother and his wife in 2004 while I was in CA for Proton Radiation for my husband at Loma Linda University. At that time the brother and wife lived in a community about 45 minutes from Loma Linda and no longer lived in Modesto.

John asked me if I read Tosaw's book and I told him yes and that I had 2 short conversations with Tosaw. This is when the brother and his wife mentioned their connection to Tosaw. The brother and Tosaw had communicated regarding Duane.
It was about this time we got a phone call that Duane's sister was at the hospital with a heart attack.

The brother and I were supposed to have a private conversation after dinner in his office so we could speak privately and not in front of my then current spouse who had cancer. We NEVER got to have that conversation - the brother was not able to communicate with me over the phone because of his hearing impairment. I will always appreciate the sacrifice my husband made during his journey with caner and the grace he showed in allowing me to meet Duane's brother and my opportunity to finally although briefly connect with Duane's family.

I met the sister that night but very briefly - she said "You are not Jo". I told her I had been trying to tell her on the phone I had NEVER been to CA. The woman she met in 1977 was a prior wife and not me. I never understood why Duane introduced his ex-wife to his sister as me "Jo". I was responsible for Duane being in CA to see the ex-wife, because he talked about her all the time and I was NOT going to commit to a marriage if he was still married to her in his heart.

It was NOT until after Duane died that I found out Duane had gone to see his sister in CA when I put him on that plane to see his ex-wife (Thanksgving 1977). He never told me he went to see the sister with this ex-wife. She and I are different as day and night...similar in appearance, but it ends there.

Remember that Duane's family had disowned him - because of his record and John had NOT seen his brother since 1957 and the date of the conversation was in 2004. Families back in the 50's dis-owned relatives with criminal back-ground. John and his wife were both college graduates and Duane never graduated from high school Two fifferent world. Duane's sister also lived in Modesto and had moved to this community not far from Loma Linda to be near her brother who was the oldest.

The difference in age of Duane and the brother - was 12 yrs with Duane being the baby.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[skyjack71 0]

Quote

It does look like a tie tack Jo, but it's a big hop from there to the back stairs of the NWA 727.

Duane seemed to be a dapper dresser. Would he wear such a dimensionally mismatched combo of wide tie and short tack?

377

All I wanted was for some of you to tell me what you think about - that flaw or tie tac. Only 3 others besides myself have ever seen the orginal (in my possession), I guess I was hoping there might be a miracle out there and some photo expert could enhance this and tell us if it is a flaw or if it was a tie tac. If it is a flaw it is very close in shape and reflective value of the tie tac left on the NWA flight.

Just so much you can do with a polaroid photo taken in 1970 and kept in an album for A LOT of yrs...but WHY did the ex-wife send me this particular photo along with another photo of her holding sun glasses identicial to the ones used on the plane? Her comment in the note with the pictures was so I could see what she looked like with her blonde hair. I will not post the part that exposes her - but if any of you could see this photo - you would wander why she made that statement with this particular photo. The hair was a poor color and frizzy and they (Duane and his wife) were setup at a flea market in Atlanta, Ga - I would have to pull the pic to get the actual date.

You know the letter should be with those 2 pics, but I have never scanned the letter or the backs of the photos.

Her attire suggest mid Fall or early spring and this was NOT a flattering photo - at least it is not something of myself I would have shared with someone - with that particular statement on it.

Both photo were sent to me at the same time. This Photo and the one of Duane with the brown jacket on.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[377 22]

Georger wrote:

Quote

77 always comes up with old saws. I have no idea where 77 comes up with the idea 'academics' live
on one plaine, while the rest of the world is toiling
away on some other less attractive plain, w/o
benefits? That's just not even remotely true where
I come from. Maybe things are different around the Berkley campus, but Berkley is unique...

Georger. Cool down. I am far from being anti intellectual or anti academic. My cynicism isn't universal. Many professors are well connected with the real world, but not all. Commercial fishermen have suffered at the hands off academics hired by the US govt's National Marine Fisheries Service. They have closed seasons due to erroneous models showing species depletion. They have ignored contrary advice and evidence from real fishermen. They have accepted sample trawl data from research vessels run by people who havent a clue how or where to fish effectively. Not all their research is flawed, but some is and it comes from not seeking or ignoring advice and info from experienced watermen.

Many professors conduct research that is useful and 100% in touch with the world outside the ivory tower. I don't paint all profs with the same brush.

I am a huge fan of public universities and especially proud of UC Berkeley which maintains academic excellence in the middle of campus insanity. I put my money where my mouth is and have endowed an undergraduate scholarship there to help poor kids afford to attend. When I went it was nearly free, but those days are over.

In closing, didn't Tom Kayes upstream Cooper loot transport via propellor snag theory raise your eyebrow? He isn't a tenured prof but his "research" illustrates my point about being out of touch.

Tom may have done other work on the Cooper case that is praiseworthy but since he is running silent and deep we don't have the opportunity to appreciate it.

I must have touched a raw nerve. Jo thinks you are a professor. Could she be right?

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[skyjack71 0]

SEE THE PHOTO BELOW!
Added after I made the post - it is getting to be time - 48 pages Exposed?

Quote

'Hello...(hello)...is there anybody IN there...'

Pink Floyd

Blevin your post reminded me of my realtor friend Katleen who died in an automobile accident.
She kept a novelty item on her desk at work.


"Would somebody get me out of here?"
Every time I was at her desk I just had to touch that box and looked high and low for one like it, but never found one.

Basically that Wooden Crate sums up this thread and Cooperism....it is addictive.
Blevins, you just can't walk away from it - can you?

"WOULD SOMEBODY GET ME OUT OF HERE!"
Your suspect KC and a few other suspects ALL have the wrong color eyes - Cooper had DARK BROWN EYES.

In 1971 - they didn't make colored contact lens that a desperate man could afford to buy and Cooper was desperate! 40 yrs ago the may have been available to movie producers - but, NO one has ever presented any conclusive proof that contacts of that kind were available thru your Optician.

If Cooper had contacts the chances of Cooper having been identified within the last 39 yrs would have been likely. Cooper did NOT wear colored contacts - do you KNOW how bad the contacts where in 1971. Jumping with contacts in 1971 and soft lens basically unheard of?

Jumpers - jump in here - did anyone jump with contacts in 1971?

I know you have never claimed KC wore contacts, but this is a claim suggested in this thread and by others over the yrs to support a suspect As for KC the program just throws the Hazel Eyes up in the decription and MOST never see it and it is not mentioned in the program that I only saw one time - that Cooper was described as having Dark Brown Eyes..

This is Dark Brown Piercing Eyes.
Picture added - Oh and this show the sideburns? Several yrs later - Older and grayed"

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[matthewcline 0]

Yet, none of that money has ever been linked to the hijacking. Why? is it not from the hijacking? Did he steal it? or maybe he did save it?

I bet if where that money came from was looked at it could explain it. If it was looked at show it. The FBI apparently did and found no connection, or they would have mentioned it!

The past agent and current Agent in Charge each dismiss KC, why? they find no evidence other than a relative making the claim.

Decoded is a neat show, not new, just neat. It is the same info repackaged in a new wrapper. Remember it is a show based on a fiction writer and his interests. A fiction writer who uses "facts" loosely to create a good story. And that works, look what Mr >brown has done with his books!

In the end of the show last night the Agent made his belief, based on the actual evidence, known. He believed "Dan Cooper" died during the hijacking attempt. He hoped some one watching the shows today (Decoded and others I am sure) would recognize a missing relative from that time and come forward.

But it is great marketing for the Book and TV show. You can never complain about free advertising.

Matt

An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

[matthewcline 0]

Quote

Quote

Yet, none of that money has ever been linked to the hijacking. Why? is it not from the hijacking? Did he steal it? or maybe he did save it?

(Well, he didn't save it, we know that for sure. He made less than $600 from the airline. No one yet, even Duane Weber, has been linked to any of the money from the hijacking.)And that "No One" includes KC.

I bet if where that money came from was looked at it could explain it. If it was looked at show it. The FBI apparently did and found no connection, or they would have mentioned it!

(The first time we brought up the idea of Kenny as a suspect, the FBI refused the book attachment in our emails. The second time, they accepted it. We don't know what they're doing with it. They've had it for six weeks now.)

The past agent and current Agent in Charge each dismiss KC, why? they find no evidence other than a relative making the claim.

(Lyle Christiansen's claim only takes up a miniscule amount of the book. FBI Agent Frederick Gutt said last month that KC has not been eliminated by the Bureau by DNA or anything else. He did say they think some other suspects might be better suspects, but wouldn't mention any names.)

Decoded is a neat show, not new, just neat. It is the same info repackaged in a new wrapper. Remember it is a show based on a fiction writer and his interests. A fiction writer who uses "facts" loosely to create a good story. And that works, look what Mr >brown has done with his books!

(My part in the book was to travel around the Northwest, do the interviews with the witnesses, take pictures, and publish the results. It has nothing to with fiction writing. I'm also the managing editor and co-founder of AB of Seattle) I am talking about the Show and its Narrator here.

In the end of the show last night the Agent made his belief, based on the actual evidence, known. He believed "Dan Cooper" died during the hijacking attempt. He hoped some one watching the shows today (Decoded and others I am sure) would recognize a missing relative from that time and come forward.

(Read the book. People HAVE come forward. Helen Jones, Margie Geestman Miller, Bernie Geestman's sister Dawn, etc.)Send me the book, I will put it on the night stand and get to it.

But it is great marketing for the Book and TV show. You can never complain about free advertising.

(We lost thousands producing the book. We will never get it back. No problem. I knew that was pretty much the way it would end up, right from the start. After 40 years, the Cooper market is rather limited.) I would think that you would start to see some return if Decoded is going to run a Second show about this.

Matt

25 Best Reasons We Believe Kenny Christiansen was DB Cooper:

http://adventurebooks.newsvine.com/_news/2011/01/30/5955262-the-25-best-reasons-we-think-kenny-christiansen-was-skyjacker-db-cooper

This still doesn't address the money, specifically how KC got it and how all other potential ways he got it where eliminated. It is purely circumstantial. I would like some one to be right, your just a as good a person as any, but be right because you asked and answered ALL the questions.

Matt

An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

[Orange1 0]

Quote

He also has a plausible explanation that the man who posed as Dan Cooper died that night.

Matt, can you summarize the explanation? I think I am leaning more and more towards this option.

Blevins... are you trying to tell us that you are now comfortably numb?

Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

[matthewcline 0]

Quote

Quote

He also has a plausible explanation that the man who posed as Dan Cooper died that night.

Matt, can you summarize the explanation? I think I am leaning more and more towards this option.

Blevins... are you trying to tell us that you are now comfortably numb?

The Gentleman said he had two ideas.

One was Cooper pulled high enough that he drifted into the lake, and drowned.

The second idea (the one he favored) was he pulled lower and drifted into the river, and drowned. While in the river his money bag was opened and that is how the cash was deposited on the river bank. He thinks that happened when a river tug may have run over the body in the night. This would put the Cooper body in the ocean, in no time at all, and in parts to small to be found.

He also went and researched the Dredging and found that it stopped 150 feet (or yards?) short of where the money was found. This he said allowed for the money to "wash a shore" and not just be buried by "Cooper" as so many said had to have happened due to the dredging.

But he did add that this would only prove true if "We find a body", which he said was not likely.

I do not believe "Dan Cooper" to be alive.

Matt

An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

[Orange1 0]

Thanks Matt

Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

[matthewcline 0]

Just the messenger.

Matt

An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

[Farflung 0]

I wanted to know more about this dredging business so I decided to do a little research about this industry which is largely a complete mystery to me. Apparently dredging is a sort of way to keep the waterways clear for the transportation of bulk goods and is a near constant affair. The following link has a little info about operations around a small patch of river from a bridge to the Columbia for the Port of Portland.

http://www.portofportland.com/Prj_Mar_DMMP_Home.aspx

That seems like a great deal of material to collect and dispose of every few years, but where does it go?

I could find a couple gravel yards along the Columbia, one near the town of St. Helens and the Fazio operation. Guess the idea of spraying debris along the banks as the dredge operates is not that appealing to most people so there are areas contracted for transfer.

I noticed some large fleets of equipment (dozen or more) like front loaders, belly dump trailers and other big ‘ol Mogambo, stuff that has an unknown function; but it sure makes the people who operate them look cool. It hints of having large volumes of material being handled with so much equipment spread across a large processing yard.

How would one determine where dredging operations ceased via observations from a river bank?

As one can see on the ‘Dredge Report’ the image on the lower right side, has a tailing pile being processed on the North end of the Fazio operation. I can’t tell where these materials were initially dropped nor the total volume or the source or frequency of operations.

Is the 91,000 yard transfer that took six days to complete in 1974 the only spoils deposit received by the Fazio’s’ between 1971 and 1980? For an eight years span this would represent a very small accumulation considering the size of the channel maintained.

Guess I’ll never know enough to operate such equipment and will have to restrict myself to simply watching.

[JerryThomas 0]

Farflung. The beaches along the Columbia river back in 71 was bult by the dredging operation not all of them though. Now the material is collected and deposited on leased land. As for the money being placed there by the dredging operation a simple phone call to the fazios brothers will tell you that the money was deposited there due to a heavy rainfall that washed it to tinas bar from upriver they believe it to have come from the washougal water shed so does most of the old timers that have lived there all there lifes. When Geof Gray interviewed the locals they all told him it was the washougal river that carried the money to the columbia river some said they thought thought the money came down the little washougal river which has tributaries from Livingston , Larch , Spud ,and Silver Star mountain flowing into it.Jone's creek being a main contributer to the little washougal river. The botom of the Columbia river has holes in it as deep or deeper than 90 ft. one wonders what could be found in those holes.Jerry

[skyjack71 0]

Blevins, I have a question as I only saw "Decoded" that one time and that was with friends at their house. We did NOT have anyway to record it.

Perhaps my mind has twisted the show. but wasn't it Bernie Geestman who called you a "liar".
Why would he call you a liar? I haven't been able to clarify in my mind what he meant by that. I have tried to reach Geestman, but all I got was 2 addresses and gave it up

Also did you ever receive a copy of th "Palmer Report" if it could even be called a report. If I remember correctly you claimed to have received it.

Cook and others have received a copy of the "Palmer Report" from the FBI...so I do not undertand why people claim to have this "report" but never make it public! If the FBI sends this out - why hasn't it been posted in this thread or put in your book.

Could it be that the report does NOT support the claims made by the FBI, media and others regarding the money find being in the water for 8 yrs?

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber