50 50
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

Quote

To me the sketches and the physical description
convey a rather distinctive set of physical traits. It's
a face I would remember. It falls into a catagory
I would remember.

I have struggled to keep this separate from
everything Jo bombards us with. If I thought for a
second Duane matched critical aspects of Cooper's
face I would have said so long ago ... and been in
Jo's corner.



You are ignoring Doug Pasternaks 2 hour interview with the artist who did the composites.

The artist tried to portray the action with the mouth - but, NONE of the witnesses felt it was right - so they used the generic version.

He tired to portray the SLANTING forehead. Depending on the angle one viewed Cooper at - the forehead was different. This is because of the SLANT of the forhead.

Note the SHADING - enlarge the composites to full page size and STUDY them. If the FBI and others continue to ignore what the artist has tried his best to portray with the composites, this crime will never be solved.

When a TV artist tried to do a composite later on - that artist tried to get what the stewardess was explaining...but missed by a boat load.

She was talking about an irregularity in the hair line (small and somewhat like a widow peak), but NOT the composite they used in the TV program that has been compared to Ted. That composited definitely showed a receding hair line - so very very wrong. NO witness EVER said Cooper had a receding hair line.

The only possiblity of anyone stating "receding hair line" would be if that person was much shorter than Cooper. Looking up at Weber or Cooper - the nose would appear smaller and forehead much higher. It is a matter of conception from point of view.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The artist tried to portray the action with the mouth - but, NONE of the witnesses felt it was right - so they used the generic version.

He tired to portray the SLANTING forehead. Depending on the angle one viewed Cooper at - the forehead was different. This is because of the SLANT of the forhead.



Could you elaborate on the exact "action" that was made with his mouth? as well as the "slant" on the forehead?
Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The artist tried to portray the action with the mouth - but, NONE of the witnesses felt it was right - so they used the generic version.

He tired to portray the SLANTING forehead. Depending on the angle one viewed Cooper at - the forehead was different. This is because of the SLANT of the forhead.



Could you elaborate on the exact "action" that was made with his mouth? as well as the "slant" on the forehead?



Action Jo alledges ie Being Angry ................ dont
laugh.

Its another one of Jo's claims and attempts to
invent evidence - see her post below along with her
original photo composite trying to show Duane's
mouth was Cooper's 'surly' mouth and expression.

In fact, Jo is NOT using the mouth from the original
sketch for her demonstration but one she selected
from one of her favorite 'remakes'. Jo always rigs
the deck in her favor when she can ...
I have posted her composite and the original mouth
from the original sketch in a composite below...

The problem is: the original FBI sketch does not
show that angry look Jo claims! The FBI sketch is
neutral. See that original sketch attached.

BTW you can search this thread using the
search box. I used /cooper mouth/ to find Jo's
post.

As for a 2 hour Pasternak interview with the artist?
Never heard of that before. Jo or Sluggo should post
a link, if it exists at all.

Keep in mind: its a fact the FBi has never released
all of the physically defining traits witnesses testified
to. All sketches omit those traits. There also are no
official side views of Cooper which were released.

If anyone has this Pasternak interview with the artist
please post it!

Here's Jo's post-toastie re- mouth/angry/FBI sketch/


skyjack71
Dec 21, 2008, 1:40 AM
Post #6265 of 23409 (4635 views)
Copy Shortcut
Registered: Nov 12, 2006
Posts: 2993

Re: [Orange1] Getty Images: 1971 Cooper Sketch [In reply to] Can't Post

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Reply To

are you saying both Duane and Cooper had some kind of tic?

------------------------------------------------------------
No. What I am saying is that the artist was trying to
depict a action or expression that Cooper made with
his mouth the very same action/expression Duane
did when he was aggravated. Although Cooper was
not nasty he was letting them know that he meant
business and that he was NOT happy with the way
things where going ... Best expressed by a specific
facial action.

Look at the old Rose composite and the Shaffner
composite and a prison photo of Duane on intake in
1960. He was not very happy - the lip comparisons
of those 2 old Composites with the mouth of Duane
11 yrs before.

We can Credit Safecrack for this photo.


(This post was edited by skyjack71 on Dec 21, 2008, 1:44 AM)

Attachments: CooperMouth.jpg (30.5 KB)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Quote

On another tack...
Georger, apart from the ears, if you look at Jo’s frankenweber composite, it seems to me the cheekbones are very different? Could it look that way from smiling or is this a fundamental bone structure thing?



I have explained before how I did that. I used a photo of Duane (his head was slghtly turned - he liked to be posed for photos and did NOT want me to make Straight on pictures).

The composite was straight on.
Yes the angulation of the avatar seems different and the face more narrow due to combining a straight on Composite with an head turned photo.



It's nothing to do with angle, it is to do with the shape of the cheekbones. Just like someone doesn't go from a square jaw to a pointed one just because the angle changes.
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beat it down all you want. The witnesses where adamate that the Crosby composite was NOT right. The FBI used the Crosby composite because they wanted to not because it was the one the witnesses chose. Then came the Ben Gazzara - neutral composite that is used today.
What was has been left out in the FBI presentation is the most important - the OLD Rose composite....although it is an official FBI composite.

I discount the composite done for the witnesses 10 yrs later by a TV artist. I know how these programs are done - they use what they want to use. yet this artist picked up the mouth better as did the old Rose composite. Nothing he did made all of the witnesses happy.

Why don't you contact Doug Pasternac himself and ask him for his notes on the Rose interview and our ensueing conversation afterward when I stop him and told him what the expression was. (No way I could pick this out of the multiple things the artist could have been inferring to Doug). It is a moment I will never forget - with chills from my head to my feet (felt like I could not hold the weight of my own body up).

I have a study that has been done - and it is very large and I will not put in on this forum (too large), but I will let a TV program use it and they have to use it in its entirety with the correct narrative.

Blow up the neutral composite I refer to as the Gazzara and look at the shadowing of the forehead and then take your ass to a portrait artist and tell them to do a portrait of Duane Weber using all of the pictures - pictures you do not have. Do not include composites - watch out for what you will find. This will cost you around $1200. They have to have side views, old pictures with all expressions, everything that can be provided to them - watch what they come up with when they finish drawing Duane Weber without knowing he was Cooper or he was a Cooper subject.

Doug has gone on to a new career and this was just one of many stories he has investigate and written - he may not remember all of it off the top of his head. I feel sure he kept his studies and notes and copies of his interviews, but will not be able to spin them off from memory. Since I met Doug in 1998, his family increased with the birth of 3 children - he has a very very busy life being a dad as well as working an important job with our government.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Beat it down all you want. The witnesses where adamate that the Crosby composite was NOT right. The FBI used the Crosby composite because they wanted to not because it was the one the witnesses chose. Then came the Ben Gazzara - neutral composite that is used today.
What was has been left out in the FBI presentation is the most important - the OLD Rose composite....although it is an official FBI composite.

I discount the composite done for the witnesses 10 yrs later by a TV artist. I know how these programs are done - they use what they want to use. yet this artist picked up the mouth better as did the old Rose composite. Nothing he did made all of the witnesses happy.



So you are saying ALL sketches given by the FBI
are false, and only YOU have the correct description
of Cooper - who by coincidence happens to look
like Duane !

You got your description of Cooper by what method?
Ju Ju board?

And you concocted your comparison of mouths/lips
as a true representation you say is DB Cooper ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This is a generalization, but consider this: Have you ever seen a composite sketch, and then later they catch the guy and his picture shows up in the newspaper? It's usually not an EXACT rendition of the live person. Sometimes it barely resembles the person in custody at all. Just saying.



The fact that criminals often do not look like their sketches has been discussed many times here.
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

This is a generalization, but consider this: Have you ever seen a composite sketch, and then later they catch the guy and his picture shows up in the newspaper? It's usually not an EXACT rendition of the live person. Sometimes it barely resembles the person in custody at all. Just saying.



The fact that criminals often do not look like their sketches has been discussed many times here.



The candidate pushers never fail to bring that arguement up, like all good used car dealers.

Jo even goes so far as to come up with her own
image of Cooper. Duane was Cooper.

Its pointless to even try to talk to these priests!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

This is a generalization, but consider this: Have you ever seen a composite sketch, and then later they catch the guy and his picture shows up in the newspaper? It's usually not an EXACT rendition of the live person. Sometimes it barely resembles the person in custody at all. Just saying.



The fact that criminals often do not look like their sketches has been discussed many times here.



The candidate pushers never fail to bring that arguement up, like all good used car dealers.

Jo even goes so far as to come up with her own
image of Cooper. Duane was Cooper.

Its pointless to even try to talk to these priests!



It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch

(I agree with you of course that Jo does the arguments to a whole new level...)
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This is a generalization, but consider this: Have you ever seen a composite sketch, and then later they catch the guy and his picture shows up in the newspaper? It's usually not an EXACT rendition of the live person. Sometimes it barely resembles the person in custody at all. Just saying.



OTOH...while we're generalizing.....consider the sketches that look just like the guy and they capture him...(John Lutz comes to mind)

Or consider the sketches that look like the composite and then they capture some poor shmuck that looks similar to the composite who the witness then also identifies in a lineup so he spends decades in prison before DNA rescues him.

I'm sure someone on this board has the real stats but I say six one....1/2 dozen the other. Doesn't make the case. Point being....barring a money find in a significantly relevant location, or missing videotape found in a vault somewhere of the actual heist, or other facts of the case that the public has not been invited to be privy to leading to a solve.....what we are left with are descriptions by eye witnesses, characteristics of the criminal's actual reported behavior, (and perhaps less valid, but surely of some import - profiles derived from actual witnessed behavior), and finally, the official composite drawing(s). This is all I see that's left to differentiate one set of circumstantial "evidence" from another. Anything I missed?

No disrespect intended to anyone, but whenever woodwork, oops..I mean peripheral, memories start to connect the dots on all of these candidates, yours included, I always get the little red flag... but that's just me.
but....A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.....Winston Churchill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch



Exactly. And the same goes for the DNA...
1. Please check the DNA. Damn it, why won't they just check the DNA?
2. But the results don't really matter cause the existing DNA is probably compromised.
but....A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.....Winston Churchill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch



Exactly. And the same goes for the DNA...
1. Please check the DNA. Damn it, why won't they just check the DNA?
2. But the results don't really matter cause the existing DNA is probably compromised.


3. Or fingerprints. Check the fingerprints. :)
Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch



Exactly. And the same goes for the DNA...
1. Please check the DNA. Damn it, why won't they just check the DNA?
2. But the results don't really matter cause the existing DNA is probably compromised.



The DNA is more interesting; so far we only have your option 2 to play with. BUT ... if they actually do get a match on a DNA sample... then it's a whole new ball game.

So far on the fingerprint side, am I correct that they have a lot of fingerprint samples but cannot be sure that any of them were Cooper's? So same thing - no fingerprint match is not conclusive but if they find someone whose prints were on the plane it becomes a lot more interesting.

Of course, should we get both some DNA and fingerprint matches, then we are all systems go. Only the completely wilfully blind would continue to deny their pet suspect in the face of such evidence. And yes, a hot $20 in the suspect's possession would be nice too.
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch



Exactly. And the same goes for the DNA...
1. Please check the DNA. Damn it, why won't they just check the DNA?
2. But the results don't really matter cause the existing DNA is probably compromised.


3. Or fingerprints. Check the fingerprints. :)


Vicki's post makes remember another critieria that the FBI put out there (and, if I remember correctly asked citizen public for input)...the elephant in the room....the disappearing man. I hope they didn't give Vicki short shrift when she came forward with what they asked for. All together now.....Check the fingerprints. And the DNA :)
but....A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.....Winston Churchill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

It cuts both ways for the candidate pushers...
1) It's OK if my suspect doesn't look like the sketch, because they seldom do
2) My suspect must be right because he looks 'just' like the sketch



Exactly. And the same goes for the DNA...
1. Please check the DNA. Damn it, why won't they just check the DNA?
2. But the results don't really matter cause the existing DNA is probably compromised.


3. Or fingerprints. Check the fingerprints. :)


Vicki's post makes remember another critieria that the FBI put out there (and, if I remember correctly asked citizen public for input)...the elephant in the room....the disappearing man. I hope they didn't give Vicki short shrift when she came forward with what they asked for. All together now.....Check the fingerprints. And the DNA :)


When speaking to the agent in Seattle, I specifically brought up fingerprints AND gave him the FBI # on the back of Mel's mugshot (returned to me by mistake by Unsolved Mysteries). He ran the number while I was on the phone and said he was in their system. When I spoke to the U.S. Marshal two months prior, he stated the fingerprints were still on cards and not loaded into IAFIS.

I am not going to bombard the Seattle agent with calls or e-mails asking for the status. I understand many others are doing just that and he is already disengaging himself. Hopefully Melvin's file is not sitting off to the side while he answers phone calls all day.

As far as DNA. I have no personal items of Mel's. My brother has a letter he had written (with envelope, he cant remember if it was sealed), but it is somewhere in a crate in storage and they are moving again.
Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OTOH...while we're generalizing.....consider the sketches that look just like the guy and they capture him...(John Lutz comes to mind)

Or consider the sketches that look like the composite and then they capture some poor shmuck that looks similar to the composite who the witness then also identifies in a lineup so he spends decades in prison before DNA rescues him.

I'm sure someone on this board has the real stats but I say six one....1/2 dozen the other. Doesn't make the case. Point being....barring a money find in a significantly relevant location, or missing videotape found in a vault somewhere of the actual heist, or other facts of the case that the public has not been invited to be privy to leading to a solve.....what we are left with are descriptions by eye witnesses, characteristics of the criminal's actual reported behavior, (and perhaps less valid, but surely of some import - profiles derived from actual witnessed behavior), and finally, the official composite drawing(s). This is all I see that's left to differentiate one set of circumstantial "evidence" from another. Anything I missed?



Larry said the odds were better, that the sketches
were a good general description of Cooper based
on highly "consistent" witness agreement, then the
FBI had the artist omit certain specific features
off the sketches. So odds maybe as high as 8-in-10
with specific undisclosed features being held back.

In addition, Larry's remarks about the dna analysis
were specific, especially to an informed ear. He used
the words "partial" and "exclusionary" which under
the 13-loci CODIS system the FBI uses, has specific
meaning. I can almost guess at what loci there may
have been a problem and the implications of that,
especially given other remarks agents have made
(including Gutt's remarks to Blevins).

Blevins and Jo are alike in that they both have a
bias not wanting the FBI to have reliable genetic
data or finger prints, or anything else! In that way
Cooper could be anybody. Both Blevins and Weber
are trying to keep their doors open.

So, look at this from a different point of view.
Reasonably reliable description and sketches,
finger prints, some dna evidence and possibly
more ... and still Cooper escaped. Ponder that
scenario for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So, look at this from a different point of view.
Reasonably reliable description and sketches,
finger prints, some dna evidence ... and still Cooper
escaped. Ponder that scenario for a while.



Not excluding the scenario that the "escape" may have been to the hereafter that very night. Or...out of the country. Both scenarios have been discussed extensively here.
Skydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

So, look at this from a different point of view.
Reasonably reliable description and sketches,
finger prints, some dna evidence ... and still Cooper
escaped. Ponder that scenario for a while.



Not excluding the scenario that the "escape" may have been to the hereafter that very night. Or...out of the country. Both scenarios have been discussed extensively here.

exactly. But the Death Woods and the Big Slurp are convenient excuses
where there is no evidence whatever that happened.
Im saving the rest to last ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question Georger.

I asked you how you obtained the photo of Duane you posted.
The rare smiling photo. If you have ALL the photos taken on THAT SAME DAY - WHY did you use that particular one? Why not these other taken on that SAME day.

I can anwswer that one for you. The other photos look more like the composite - and I will now post 2 more made on that very same day.

Did you notice that Weber seemed to have a scar in the forehead up near the hairline.

A place where the little tuff of hair seemed to be in the Canon City frontal pic and in the 1970 picture of Duane in the Brown Suit and gold shirt and tie (I had "mistakenly" stated that photo was made in 1971, but recently learned it was made in the fall of 1970.)

His wife of the days told me that when she went back to him in Feb of 1972 that he had a gash on his forehead and he was having trouble with his knee and his back. The picture you posted was made AFTER 1971.

Oh and for your information and the information of others - the lips you are using are from the Crosby composite - try the Gazzara Composit Lips below.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Question Georger.

I asked you how you obtained the photo of Duane you posted.
The rare smiling photo. If you have ALL the photos taken on THAT SAME DAY - WHY did you use that particular one? Why not these other taken on that SAME day.

I can anwswer that one for you. The other photos look more like the composite - and I will now post 2 more made on that very same day.

Did you notice that Weber seemed to have a scar in the forehead up near the hairline.

A place where the little tuff of hair seemed to be in the Canon City frontal pic and in the 1970 picture of Duane in the Brown Suit and gold shirt and tie (I had "mistakenly" stated that photo was made in 1971, but recently learned it was made in the fall of 1970.)

His wife of the days told me that when she went back to him in Feb of 1972 that he had a gash on his forehead and he was having trouble with his knee and his back. The picture you posted was made AFTER 1971.

Oh and for your information and the information of others - the lips you are using are from the Crosby composite - try the Gazzara Composit Lips below.



These are nice photos. No doubt about it, Duane
was a good looking man ... some would saay a hunk.

But notice how manly his features are compared with
Cooper. Compare the chin structures, Cooper delicate
lips and nose compared to Duane's (especially in
mid age). Duane was a good looking man and he
knew it, a charmer - he had positive traits as well
as negative. But the features and cranial proportions
are different. No way around it Jo. As I have said
multiple times ... if I thought for a second Duane
was Cooper based on physical traits I would have
said so months ago ... and stuck with that.

Let me also say, we both know Tina described
Cooper as being sad or having a sadness about
him, a sad look perhaps? Look at the original
Cooper sketch. Note the eyes. The artist tried to
convey a note of emotional neutrality or sadness?
That is the reported scenario I have and I think the
artist pulled it off, at least to my eyes. I think the
sketch is a remarkable artifact that will pass down
through the ages. It caught the notice of editors at
LIFE Magazine and that is one reason they
published it - they thought the image was a
statement.

G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Try this picture I have NEVER made public - he was tired and not feeling well. I will have to check the date on this photo, but it was in the 80's.

Ooops! All I have is the eyes. I will have to go into the scans to see what I did with the photo. I believe I didn't use it because of the angle of the picture and the style of the glasses making the nose look much larger than it really was.

Wish there was someway to put the glasses I am enclosing on him in that pic....as the design of the glasses changes the nose appearance. The picture of the glasses was sent to me by the ex-wife. She was holding the glasses and claimed the picture was to show me what she looked like.

She had sent other pictures of herself, but the one with the glasses was a very unflattering picture of her - the hair was over bleached fuzzy blonde. She focused on the glasses with this comment "We both had a pair of these glasses"

I also noted in the same photo under the table was a briefcase...probably just co-incidental. This was with the photos she sent to me of him in the brown suit a yr before the crime. The one that shows what appears to be a tie tac similar to the Cooper item. I just thought it was flaw in the pic - but recently you know I revisited that photo and it looks like a tie tac - centered on the tie...which was wide per the photo.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I never viewed Weber as a hunk.
As the yrs progressed and the kidney enlarged - his abdomen increased. Some of this was due to age, but most of it was the enlargement of this kidneys.

His charm was how protective he was of me and my daughter. He had a mannerism I considered inappropriate, but after I made a comment about this - he quickly corrected the problem.

When he was mad - he was a terror - and the expressions he made - let you know he meant business.

So many times I saw this "Giddy" thing Cooper did on the plane when the money was delivered.
Such as this photo taken in Seattle after he had disappeared that afternoon and we were rushing to get down to the banquet. Yet, he made time to do this ....see the picture.

Remember this picture was in Seattle in Sept or Oct of 1979.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I never viewed Weber as a hunk.
As the yrs progressed and the kidney enlarged - his abdomen increased. Some of this was due to age, but most of it was the enlargement of this kidneys.

His charm was how protective he was of me and my daughter. He had a mannerism I considered inappropriate, but after I made a comment about this - he quickly corrected the problem.

When he was mad - he was a terror - and the expressions he made - let you know he meant business.

So many times I saw this "Giddy" thing Cooper did on the plane when the money was delivered.
Such as this photo taken in Seattle after he had disappeared that afternoon and we were rushing to get down to the banquet. Yet, he made time to do this ....see the picture.

Remember this picture was in Seattle in Sept or Oct of 1979.



Well he was a good looking man, with a good
looking wife - you! This Seattle photo is nice because
it shows his lower denture pattern. You see? Im
about physical evidence, when I can get it. Thanks
for the dental photo!

:)
Have a good evening ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Larry said the odds were better, that the sketches were a good general description of Cooper based on highly "consistent" witness agreement, then the
FBI had the artist omit certain specific features off the sketches. So odds maybe as high as 8-in-10 with specific undisclosed features being held back.



I don't remember Carr stating this " the FBI had the artist omit certain specific features off the sketches" - but, after almost 40 yrs WHY hold back anything if it will help someone ID Cooper.

What specific "features" could they possibly omit in the sketch they would keep a secret after all of these yrs. Such as you mentioning a mole on Duane's cheek...if he had one - he had it removed before I met him. It was stated Cooper had NO tattoos. No mention was made of a watch or a ring or a chain or medallion or key ring or a good description of the knife.

No comment was made about missing teeth and I have often wondered about this because I know that Weber had a bridge when I met him and that was done prior to my meeting him and he NEVER removed it except to clean it....I never saw him with out the bridge.

I told the FBI about the bridge - in fact for DNA evidence I gave the frame to the old bridge to them - and they returned it. It had been clean and put in a pill bottle so I guess there was NO DNA on it. The FBI knew Duane had a bridge prior to my knowing him.

He had the bridge redone, but I don't remember if it was because of the loss of another tooth or exactly why. Again - he kept the old bridge in his mouth. This must have been uncomfortable, but Duane never complained about pain or being sick.

I know he had to have felt pain when he broke ribs, when he fractured his leg and when he was so sick that last yr - but, this man never complained about anything. He did NOT complain about the violent vomiting and diarrhea those last few months. He was NOT a complainer, yet he was bitter about things in his life and his face would get contorted at the mention of the wife prior to me.

The thing with his mother and father he had accepted - the fact that he had been disinherited.

Now I know why, but I never questioned him - I accepted only the parts of his past he wanted to share - we all have secrets.

Duane had this stupid coin he always carried - had a woman on it and the size of quarter, but not a real quarter. A Heads or Tails coin.

Just more trivia - I guess.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You are implying that Bernie G was gay? And that this homophobic-based argument means KC couldn't have done it? Or that sexual orientation determines criminal activity? Off the mark on all points for you. Bernie's been married twice, has kids galore, and is living with a woman right now. He wasn't out with KC over Thanksgiving 1971 to play hide the salami with him, I can assure you.



First off...I'm not gay...not that there's anything wrong with that...
I worked for a couple of gay guys for eight years...yes they paid well...carpentry work...and confidant...I was safe...not gay and didn't repeat anything said in private..
The one owner was divorced with two great kids...grown...and neither one gay.
I am a good listener...I have been paid to listen to these guys talk about there lives...with that said, I was blown away at how many men that were "straight" would have casual sex with other men...and yes they were married with children...so I'm just sayin...
Bernie...?
I'd give you 100/1 odds Blevins...

hangdiver

"Mans got to know his limitations"
Harry Callahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

50 50