georger 244
QuoteGeorger writes:
Because: unless the found bundles were something
as specific a a group of bundles DC stuffed in his
coat pocket, separated from the rest of the bundles,
then the 3 bundles found are part of some 1000
bundles which existed in a container as DC jumped.
How do only three bundles turn up 9 years later at
Tina Bar vs the 997 other bundles which were not
found?
Georger, It was estimated that the 3 bundles that were found contained approximately $2,000 each. So if each bundle contained $2000, there would only be 97 bundles missing. And those 97 bundles would weigh a total of about 21 or 22 pounds.
SORRY - 97 NOT 997 OR 999999997.
georger 244
QuoteGeorger,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWtCittJyr0
Why not elevate us to the upper division of transport or conveyed in regards to how a mass would be moved down (presumably) a river?
I have been able to follow your thought process thus far and would like to read some more that is not laced with Voodoo science certified with Zombie logic.
Clearly, anyone in possession of a dollar bill and a sink with a stopper could determine that floating is unlikely. Since I don’t have a dollar, a sink or an Airstream window to throw them out of, I have to depend upon empirical data from others.
So help a brother out and continue your thesis on the plausible methods of bulk monetary transport. I would make a call to the Fazio’s to find where the money came from but all the old timers would get mad when I walked to that venue and collected the remaining $194,000. So I hide out in the weeds and just watch and listen and read.
This will all become clear in the fullness of time.
But I HAD to use the moment to wet some appetites.
![:) :)](/uploads/emoticons/smile.png)
Plus, my fractal expert is busy finding her keys!
She only saves people and projects between 8am-
9am. She works and cries a lot the rest of the time ..
and now I have to run from her.,.. literally!
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
.....
and now roses and dinner - the price of my freedom!
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
QuoteJo writes:
When I was in WA in Oct of 2010 this last yr. I had to drive that same road from Washougal to the Bridge of the GODS. I was terrified and I was driving this mountaineous terrain.
Jo, Regardless of whether you were on Interstate 84, on the south side of the Columbia River, or on WA State Highway 14, on the north side of the Columbia River, you really didn't do any mountain driving between Portland/Vancouver and the Bridge of the Gods.
In fact, you were probably not more than 200 feet above seal level at any point on that drive. There are probably places in the Florida panhandle that are more "mountainous" than those roads.
You might NOT consider them mountains but I did. Hwy 14 on the Northside of the Columbia.
I also didn't like the heights going up to Goldendale - but, I enjoyed that - beautiful country.
Along the river on the Oregon side - I went back into something there and it was narrow and scary - forgot the name of it.
Hey!
![:) :)](/uploads/emoticons/smile.png)
Tthe only time I was ever behind the wheel of a car in KY was from the airport to my hometown - and it was all highways. I never drove a car until my husband taught me when I was 2X yrs old and very pregnant. I had my first baby and my first drivers license in the same yr. Even in CO the land did NOT seem hilly to me...We did go to the mountains a few times, but NOT with ME driving.
My husbands always did the driving when we traveled. I drove from Ft. Collins to Denver to shop and that was flat.
![:) :)](/uploads/emoticons/smile.png)
Hwy 14 between Washougal and the Bonneville WAS a Mountain when I am behind the wheel of a car - you would NOT have wanted to be one of the vehicles behind me.
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:) :)](/uploads/emoticons/smile.png)
You DO NOT want to know what I think is heavy traffic!
![:) :)](/uploads/emoticons/smile.png)
Orange1 0
Jo starts a post with ""something everyone needs to understand", which already tells us she thinks this thread is about Jo Weber, not DB Cooper.
Then she goes into another hysterical rant about Jerry, part of which is that she saw a mountain that Jerry said was not there. It is then pointed put to her that there are in fact no mountains there and what does she say? "You call them hills, I call them mountains" as though it is a big joke.
Well, I guess this is where the phrase making mountains out of molehills comes from- people like Jo.
So, Jerry was right. He may well have been right about everything else too, as Jo seems to shift her story again as it suits her.
There's another great example. The hill of a petty criminal becomes, in Jo's mind, the mountain of Cooper. And that's all her case is:wishful thinking, so-called circumstantial evidence which isn't even there, and a load of baloney.
Jo, you threatened to "go public". Please - do so.
QuoteOk, so let's get this straight.
Jo starts a post with ""something everyone needs to understand", which already tells us she thinks this thread is about Jo Weber, not DB Cooper.
Then she goes into another hysterical rant about Jerry, part of which is that she saw a mountain that Jerry said was not there. It is then pointed put to her that there are in fact no mountains there and what does she say? "You call them hills, I call them mountains" as though it is a big joke.
Well, I guess this is where the phrase making mountains out of molehills comes from- people like Jo.
So, Jerry was right. He may well have been right about everything else too, as Jo seems to shift her story again as it suits her.
There's another great example. The hill of a petty criminal becomes, in Jo's mind, the mountain of Cooper. And that's all her case is:wishful thinking, so-called circumstantial evidence which isn't even there, and a load of baloney.
Jo, you threatened to "go public". Please - do so.
You can call them hills they are mountains to this old woman. Sorry I am NOT as SCHOOLED as you and others on the geography of the world and how to judge by height what is a a mountain and what is a hill.
What I am getting ready to do WILL not be in this thread. I had actually hope it would NOT come to my having to take the direction I feel I must at this date.
It would have been preferable if the FBI would have provide me with the information I have requested for yrs regarding Duane Weber. That was their choice. They chose to cease investigating him in 1998 per their letter, yet they collected DNA in 2003 held it till 2007 or 2008 before even testing it. Duane had been dead for 8 yrs when they collected the DNA.
I had remarried and moved - I am a clean clean type of person and since I remarried had kept only what I could put in a suitcase in a hot humid Florida attic. The FBI held that DNA in its warehouse for an additional 5 yrs before testing it.
Now they are stating the DNA they have may not even be Coopers DNA and they only had particial to begin with. YET, they have ignored what they did have.
Thay had a background for Weber that did NOT add up - a background that was devious and suspicious. It was a giant puzzle - and all of the pieces where scattered all over the country. One agent is assigned to do something in each state and NOT one of them actuallly had enough of the pieces to even know what they were putting together. There was NO one person who controlled all of the specifics and had the over all picture and able to remain objective./...the agent turn over the last 16 yrs has been high on this case.
This is just how the world is today - This cold case should have been assigned to a cold case agent yrs and yrs ago - so all of the leads could have been properly investigated. Instead they went to the agent of record and that changed many many time over the yrs and these agents had to deal with active cases. This cold case should not have been handled by frequently rotating agents. ALL of the records on the case should have been consolidated in ONE location - and I mean everything.
Example:
Carr never found the hotel registrations - good grief, the authorities checked all of the hotels around the airport - so what happened to those reports and what happened to the registration card taken from one specific hotel? It was my understanding Carr found NO reports from the hotels. Not his fault - it was the system that was faulted.
377 22
QuoteWhat I am getting ready to do WILL not be in this thread. I had actually hope it would NOT come to my having to take the direction I feel I must at this date.
Would you mind telling us what this next promised blockbuster event is Jo?
If it won't be done here, where should we look and when?
Do you stay on touch with the "Night Clerk"?
Hope his health and yours take a turn for the better.
377
377 22
(FBI SKYDIVING DEPT sweatshirt)
![;) ;)](/uploads/emoticons/wink.png)
377
Orange1 0
Farflung 0
“I had remarried and moved - I am a clean clean type of person and since I remarried had kept only what I could put in a suitcase in a hot humid Florida attic.”
I’m not able to deconstruct this sentence into something that is coherent and this makes me a little bit cry.
“I had remarried and moved…” Somehow getting married and moving are related in some fashion or getting remarried was viewed as a mistake upon which one moved. Either way there is additional marrying occurring with some sort of movement following with or without the new or old spouse since you could have ‘remarried’ the same person.
“I am a clean clean type of person…” OK, here I’m thinking a sterile wedding ceremony in a room with a positive pressure override which explains the double clean inference. Fascinating no matter the context.
“…and since I remarried had kept only what I could put in a suitcase…” This is news to me. No wonder the Gay marriages are having such a difficult time in congress when there is a requirement that a person can only keep what will fit in a suitcase should they remarry. I don’t think this is fair and makes the government appear equally sinister and stupid with such a levy against a person who is already faced with the prospect of moving.
“…in a hot humid Florida attic.” How on Earth is anyone supposed to know what things to put in a hot humid attic? The law has crossed a line with only letting you have a single suitcase in the first place but adding the condition of putting it in a humid Floridian attic is simply too much. What exactly would a person fill such a suitcase with? Shiitake spores are the obvious answer combined with some sort of bat aviary or termite farm.
I’ll just celebrate the simple life I lead with ample closet space for an extra suitcase no matter the contents. I’ll sure avoid that getting remarried notion since the costs are simply too high.
377 22
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/06/nasa-apollo-lunar-landing-sites-photos-video_n_950663.html?ncid=webmail6
It's surprising how many people actually think the moon landings were faked.
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-17/tech/moon.landing.hoax_1_moon-landing-apollo-astronauts-bill-kaysing?_s=PM:TECH
Along those lines I wonder how many people think that the NWA crew was in on the crime and there never was a DB Cooper jump?
377
377 22
QuoteI’ll sure avoid that getting remarried notion since the costs are simply too high.
Reconsider Farflung. If you find the right mate there are ways to manage that risk.
Those unique humor and writing skill genes need to propagate. Hopefully, they already have.
377
Robert99 50
QuoteAlong those lines I wonder how many people think that the NWA crew was in on the crime and there never was a DB Cooper jump?
377
As many as think they can make a buck from such a silly claim.
Amazon 7
QuoteSigh. Now Jo is "not well schooled". A couple of days ago she was mocking Jerry for his spelling and apparent lack of education (according to her) and telling us how well educated she in fact was. Jo, you can't have your cake and eat it. And irrespective of how well schooled you may or may not be you can't change facts. A hill is not a mountain, and you can't blame Jerry for saying there was no mountain when this is just a fact, anymore than Jerry could tell you for example that lying should be spelt lieing. If you can't even see the inconsistency in your own arguments in something as simple and as clearly demonstrable as this then there truly is no hope for you.
What Jo is describing as a mountain does indeed look like a mountain to her since the road she drove on to The Bridge of the Gods is WA HWY 14 in the Columbia River Gorge... which to someone from Florida where the greatest elevation of 345 feet, the road and its surrounding topography does indeed look "mountainous".
QuoteState Route 14 originates in downtown Vancouver at a junction with Interstate 5 just north of the Interstate Bridge. It proceeds east as a freeway for approximately 18 miles (29 km) until it reaches the city of Camas, at which point it becomes a two-lane road. It then continues east along the north bank of the Columbia River (through the Columbia River Gorge) for the remainder of its journey.
Other than the stretch of freeway in Clark County, SR 14 is a two-lane highway which often runs along steep bluffs as high as 800 feet (240 m) through the Columbia Gorge, where frequent high winds can be a driving hazard. At the town of Lyle the forest scenery gives way to arid grasslands in a remarkably rapid transition.
Robert99 50
QuoteQuoteSigh. Now Jo is "not well schooled". A couple of days ago she was mocking Jerry for his spelling and apparent lack of education (according to her) and telling us how well educated she in fact was. Jo, you can't have your cake and eat it. And irrespective of how well schooled you may or may not be you can't change facts. A hill is not a mountain, and you can't blame Jerry for saying there was no mountain when this is just a fact, anymore than Jerry could tell you for example that lying should be spelt lieing. If you can't even see the inconsistency in your own arguments in something as simple and as clearly demonstrable as this then there truly is no hope for you.
What Jo is describing as a mountain does indeed look like a mountain to her since the road she drove on to The Bridge of the Gods is WA HWY 14 in the Columbia River Gorge... which to someone from Florida where the greatest elevation of 345 feet, the road and its surrounding topography does indeed look "mountainous".QuoteState Route 14 originates in downtown Vancouver at a junction with Interstate 5 just north of the Interstate Bridge. It proceeds east as a freeway for approximately 18 miles (29 km) until it reaches the city of Camas, at which point it becomes a two-lane road. It then continues east along the north bank of the Columbia River (through the Columbia River Gorge) for the remainder of its journey.
Other than the stretch of freeway in Clark County, SR 14 is a two-lane highway which often runs along steep bluffs as high as 800 feet (240 m) through the Columbia Gorge, where frequent high winds can be a driving hazard. At the town of Lyle the forest scenery gives way to arid grasslands in a remarkably rapid transition.
Amazon, with all due respect, didn't Jo live in Colorado with Duane for some time? As I recall it, the Rocky Mountains were clearly visible every time I was in that state. And I have driven on roads that were up to 11,400 feet above sea level in Colorado.
Also, didn't Duane take Jo to Portland/Vancouver at one time? Presumably, she noticed the Cascade Mountains based on information in one of her recent posts. And Jo should have also noticed other mountain ranges during that trip.
Admittedly, there are mountains on both sides of the Columbia River gorge in the Bonneville Dam area. But the roads themselves follow close to the river, and are not very high above sea level.
georger 244
What Jo is describing as a mountain does indeed look like a mountain to her since the road she drove on to The Bridge of the Gods is WA HWY 14 in the Columbia River Gorge... which to someone from Florida where the greatest elevation of 345 feet, the road and its surrounding topography does indeed look "mountainous".
.
And Duane looks to her like DB Cooper ?
So what!? Who cares?
It does make this group look damned silly! Being lead around by some crazed old lady who cant tell a mountain from a mole hill.
And Jo GOES HYSTERICAL about the failings of
others?
Gag me with a HIPPOPONTOMOUS!
Now Jo will charge us all being being liars and
misrepresenting her, and being out of touch!
I see a pattern there.
The Jo Weber Enablers meeting will be in the
Ga Ga Nui Room No.27 at 7:00pm tonight as per
the regular schedule.
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
![:D :D](/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png)
When I was in WA in Oct of 2010 this last yr. I had to drive that same road from Washougal to the Bridge of the GODS. I was terrified and I was driving this mountaineous terrain.
Jo, Regardless of whether you were on Interstate 84, on the south side of the Columbia River, or on WA State Highway 14, on the north side of the Columbia River, you really didn't do any mountain driving between Portland/Vancouver and the Bridge of the Gods.
In fact, you were probably not more than 200 feet above seal level at any point on that drive. There are probably places in the Florida panhandle that are more "mountainous" than those roads.