Orange1 0
Robert99 50
QuoteThis might be a dumb observation ...but 377's posting of the analysis just seems...well, too analytical for the circumstances. Remember we are talking a bunch of people who - Cooper aside - didn't even know you could lower the stairs in flight. I'm not convinced at all they would have gone through the thought processes outlined? Occam would say that however the stairs were lowered, it wasn't done as a result of thinking through it all like that, surely?
Orange, I think you and Occam are both right on this point.
pek771 0
The basis of the assumed drop zone is based strictly on the perception that the "pressure bump" was in fact Cooper leaving the stairs.
georger 244
QuoteThis might be a dumb observation ...but 377's posting of the analysis just seems...well, too analytical for the circumstances. Remember we are talking a bunch of people who - Cooper aside - didn't even know you could lower the stairs in flight. I'm not convinced at all they would have gone through the thought processes outlined? Occam would say that however the stairs were lowered, it wasn't done as a result of thinking through it all like that, surely?
Great question
Equally dumb question: Why have we always taken
for granted the crew 'didnt' think the stairs could be
lowered in flight. Just because they got advice and
had never taken off with the stairs down or opened
them in flight doesnt mean they didnt assume it
could be done by some means, or in some cases
even happened on its own based on prior reports ?
My bias is: they thought the stairs could be opened
in flight - they didnt know how so got advice. They
thought the stairs needed to be up to take off but
just had never faced the stairs not being up on
takeoff before ... thus got advice.
Because as a matter of fact we know there were
instances of these stairs coming open on their own,
if I remember past posts on this topic ??
What am I missing?
Sorry to complicate things...
Farflung 0
The aft stairs are driven by an electric motor and hydraulic pump which moves the actuators in one of two possible directions. This is for ‘normal’, ‘vanilla’, ‘gee life is great’ days at work.
The choice for the stair operator or hijacker is the mystic ‘UP’ or ‘DOWN’ and nothing more. Which way do you want the stairs to go? That is all. On a normal day the stairs would gently fall in the direction of gravity and stop when hitting the ground.
Now for when you are not having a ‘gee life sure is great’ day:
First you would move the handle to the position you want the stairs to go and that choice would be the one the handle is NOT in when you make that ‘decision’. You see there really isn’t two positions for the handle, rather just the one you must want since you are playing with the aft stairs. Move the handle to the other position and forget about all this reading which will confuse and frighten a hijacker.
Nothing Happens.
There is a handle you can rock fore and aft to assist the stairs ‘DOWN’ if there is an electrical failure and the ‘B’ hydraulics are not present. According to the manual you will need to give it approximately 68 pumps to raise the stairs. Anyone familiar with airframe systems knows about the manual jacks for stairs, cargo doors and landing gear. If Cooper was laden with flight experience he surely would have been giving the old Johnson a few strokes before resorting to any Emergency Procedures (force of habit).
Still Nothing Happens.
This typically occurs in downtown ‘Ahhshit’ when the final arrow in your stair lowering quiver is removed. This autonomous system has a tank of nitrogen (nitro if you want to impress the ladies) which is charged to a ton of pressure and will open the stairs in a similar way to the hydraulic system. It does not explode open but if it makes you happy, by all means imagine this to be the case. There are some ‘shear lugs’ which will be sacrificed during this operation but that assumes you have moved the handle back to ‘UP’ and you are in fact a moron. Gosh Wally, I’ve already got an emergency situation on my hands; should I move the handle from ‘DOWN’ back to ‘UP’?
The analysis took some liberties with information like the lugs being sheared, the nitrogen tank being drained and the handle being in the ‘UP’ detent upon landing in Reno. This is all news to me and I anxiously await the sound of cricket chirps before NOT receiving any source attribution again.
Orange1 0
Quote[Equally dumb question: Why have we always taken
for granted the crew 'didnt' think the stairs could be
lowered in flight. Just because they got advice and
had never taken off with the stairs down or opened
them in flight doesnt mean they didnt assume it
could be done by some means, or in some cases
even happened on its own based on prior reports ?
My bias is: they thought the stairs could be opened
in flight - they didnt know how so got advice. They
thought the stairs needed to be up to take off but
just had never faced the stairs not being up on
takeoff before ... thus got advice.
Because as a matter of fact we know there were
instances of these stairs coming open on their own,
if I remember past posts on this topic ??
What am I missing?
Sorry to complicate things...
Georger - I don't have the transcripts anymore but I clearly remember a lot of to-ing and fro-ing between the cockpit and NWA because not only did they not know the stairs could be lowered in flight, they believed it might be dangerous. Maybe someone who still has the transcripts (and the time, which right now is rather a scarce commodity on my part) would like to go through them to find the exact conversations.
377 22
I like reading aircraft manuals. It has a calming effect as I try to figure out the complex systems.
My favorite is the Convair B 36H. Six 28 cylinder radial engines and four turbojets. Endless dials, gauges, switches and levers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_B-36
and check out its cargo carrying prototype, the XC 99
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_XC-99
377
pek771 0
One other little thing about the mysterious yet entertaining stairs. There are two separate control locations for the stairs; top of the stairs and outside under the (starboard?) engine. Do they have to be lever-positionally coordinated by the ground crew? ie, is it like a room with two light switches for the same light? This may be a stupid statement at this moment, but what I do have for schematics, I left at work.
Farflung 0
I must have had another dumb attack by not posting a source (see attach).
The ‘A’ and ‘B’ system is brilliantly separated by using two differing sources of drive for the hydraulic pump. That is engines and aircraft electric which takes advantage of the differing power sources thus separating a failure in one. Obviously an electric source would be needed for the most dire of civil jet failures which would be a ‘dead stick’ landing from some catastrophic failure or fuel starvation.
The ‘B’ system is driven by electric motors and further upstream than the diagrams which 377 had posted. None the less, the hydraulics are a study in how the separated redundancy is designed into aircraft.
The aft stairs had hydraulics which were powered by an electric motor but were likely used only to raise the stairs. Then is the manual pump (jack and Johnson bar). Last is energizing the nitro (easy ladies, easy) tank.
As far as the handles (see 2nd attach) with my monkey X-Ray (but can’t see people on the aft stairs in flight) eyes, there appears to be an interlocking device that moves the handles together. That’s all I got.
georger 244
I sure understand your position and yes, lots of
to-ing and fro-ing. I think the transcripts are still
available at Sluggo's site if you need one?
But Hominid suggests(a) lots more communication
btwn crew and Cooper than previously stated. This
was a task Cooper could not have performed on his
own without help?
and (b) it goes to Cooper's skills and knowledge.
377 22
377
Mr.Green 0
QuoteThe PDF to Blast has been made available to the FBI, to reporters, to TV guys, etc. So this is not a real big deal, but if you'd like to have a copy (its an exact rendition of the interior of the book, including the pictures) you have until Wednesday night, 8PM Seattle time to download it from our DB Cooper page at AB.
The easiest way is to right-click on the link at the AB page and do 'Save Target As', then save it to a folder on your computer. A couple of the pictures look a little strange, but none of the important ones. That's because the actual print file ran nearly 35mb and this PDF is in Standard Resolution for emailing purposes and goes maybe 3mb I think. Gayla Prociv says I can leave up the link until Wednesday. It's mostly a question of bandwidth. The file is being heavily downloaded.
Here's something: If you are going to complain about the book, you should at least see it first. (*smiles*)
Yes, that was a joke.
EDIT: I attached a picture of Gayla and I working out details on something or other. You wish YOUR woman looked this good at age 52. And other things that I won't discuss here. Pic is from 2008 I think. Although I have the last word on content, she has the last word on policy.
Thanks for the download Blevins
Really think you guys are over working the aft stairs - it was NOT as complicated as you think. I understand that NOT all of the planes had an Aft way they had to control from the pilots arena. There was a light that let them know it was up and locked in place or if it was down.
Bill'S wife and himself are struggling right now to enjoy their life or I would contact him. You guys are really trying to complicate this effort regarding the Aft way.
You guy are really going to hate me in NOV. But I figure what the hell do I have to loose. The world already thinks I am a crazy loo loo who was out for 15 minutes of fame. If that was true then why have I hidden behind a thread? Hoping my health holds long enough for me to finish my project. I has to be done RIGHT or NOT at all.
Just wish I had enough money to do it right - but my poor folks way will have to do. All it is going to SHAKE UP the FBI and cause them to SCRAMBLE. Well, they could have been incontact with me and have really have studied the information I have acquired these last few yrs. That has been their choice.
Right now trying to find as many front pages as we can run this on and as many programs - all of this have to hit at the same time.
WAS DUANE REALLY DISLUSIONAL DURING THOSE LAST FEW DAY HE LIVED? SORRY, 377. AFRAID YOU WILL HAVE TO SETTLE FOR COOPER BUT I SUPPOSE THE AUTHORITIES COULD HAVE HAD HIM STRIPING PLANES IN TX AND ARIZONEL....ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS look! RIGHT there in TX they were stipping planes...to make moves carring equipent and men for secret missions.
Duane did NOT have to be jumper - just part of what was going on and enough guts or fear to go thur with it. If you have already recieved a death notice - the choice is pretty easy.
pek771 0
To the point of egress...I suppose if you want to go "down", you push the down lever. The lever pusher does not care how the hell the stairs go down, that was Boeing's area of expertise.
I still want to know what the ground crew found in Reno. Then again, since there was one hijacking every 5.6 days during the 69-73 or so time frame, maybe post flight inspection wasn't a big deal.
377 22
see: https://sites.google.com/site/boeing727172airstairs/
377
georger 244
Is there anything about the Reno search in Gray's
book?
Oscillations, bump, Coop bails?, but stairs are
back down when plane landed in Reno. If the stairs
slammed shut creating the pressure spike, they
obviously did not lock (perhaps due to damage from
the Emergency procedure) because, the stairs were
down at landing at Reno and by all accounts the
stairs were locked and not flopping as 305 landed
and rolled to a stop? Does this confirm the
emergency procedure was used and where the
handle had to be?
Just one set of oscillation-bump reported in the
Transcripts. No other reference to the door and
stairs ...
377 22
QuoteIf the stairs
slammed shut creating the pressure spike, how do
they get back down as per the landing at Reno?
Good question. Is it possible that their extension angle was determined by airspeed? When the plane came to a halt on the ground they had no slipstream pushing them upwards.
In the FBI sled test photos (taken from the chase aircraft) the unloaded and loaded stair deflection angles should be visible. I sure wish Ckret had been able to post the video of the sled test.
377
pek771 0
QuoteQuoteIf the stairs
slammed shut creating the pressure spike, how do
they get back down as per the landing at Reno?
Good question. Is it possible that their extension angle was determined by airspeed? When the plane came to a halt on the ground they had no slipstream pushing them upwards.
In the FBI sled test photos (taken from the chase aircraft) the unloaded and loaded stair deflection angles should be visible. I sure wish Ckret had been able to post the video of the sled test.
377
If airspeed is the determining factor of stair position (relative to up or down), who is to say Cooper didn't jump when N467 was on approach to Reno? Lower airspeed would have lessened the possibility of a pressure bump.
But, then there is that money thing in the river...
QuoteQuoteIf the stairs
slammed shut creating the pressure spike, how do
they get back down as per the landing at Reno?
Good question. Is it possible that their extension angle was determined by airspeed? When the plane came to a halt on the ground they had no slipstream pushing them upwards.
In the FBI sled test photos (taken from the chase aircraft) the unloaded and loaded stair deflection angles should be visible. I sure wish Ckret had been able to post the video of the sled test.
377
What is available of the sled test was in one of the old old documentaries. I doubt Carr had additional tapes or film of that.
You guys are sure creating some myths lately. Not all of these Boeing were equip in the same way. Why don't one of you BRAVE souls who wants to REALLY know the truth - contact the only man alive who can tell you the truth about that aft stairway on that particular plane.
Only the speed of the plane and the rebound after Cooper jumped - the stairway was particially open till they got to Reno and then when the planes speed slowed down the aft stair drop and that is how the damage happened the aft door way - it was NOT major damage.
Do all the research you want and create all of the myths you want, but you guys are deliberately for some reason over thinking and over researching this aft stairway. Yes, there was a way to lock it down - but Cooper did NOT lock it down nor did the crew!
Instead of intervening in the co-pilot's life at this time - WRITE a letter and give him your phone number and REAL name along with verifiable information about yourself. He just might call you back - when he is not bogged down with private issues. He is a very very nice man and extremely polite, but do NOT get him upset the way XXXX did...by calling him repeatedly and slipping around in his area with a conspiracy theorist.
All of that slipping around cost a certain writer an interview with the co-pilot - your's truely (Jo Weber) was chosen to give the writer a message "Tell him NOT to call me again".
I don't know all of the technical stuff and do not know enough about it to even ask the co-pilot about this. If any of you are interested enough in contacting him - write the letter and I will send it to him...if you are NOT BRAVE enough to do it yourself.
In other words - all of this research is absolutely worthless unless he verifies it.
Considering his circumstances - a letter is the best and most unobtrusive way to go...and the most likely to receive a response.
Getting old - what is the rule about I before E?
P.S. Blevins I just read the post you made while I was doing this one - and you definitely did an interview with the Co-pilot. I do not know what you put in your book, but I do know some of the things others have claimed after they supposedly interviewed the co-pilot. Your statement is exactly the same kind of simple answers he has always provided.
I have a feeling when the technical questions are asked by a pilot and someone very very experienced with the Boeings - he might remember some other little detail. The answers are going to depend on the knowledge of the person asking the question...amazing what one can remember when a trigger is pulled.
If I interpret this correctly one result would be
far more communication and direct action (by some
means) between Cooper and the cockpit possibly
thru Tina? None of this interplay is made explicit in
the transcripts. Gray's book develops some of it -
We know he got out of the plane, by some means.
We also know a reporter on the scene at Reno
reported 'some damage' to the air stairs after
landing - whether this damage is consistent with
Homonid's speculation is uncertain ?
Does it follow, that getting the door open and stairs
down relied more on the crew than on Cooper or
Cooper's knowledge or skills personally than
previously thought - because we know Cooper had
trouble and we now know crew intervention was
required. ?
A couple of dumb questions. With the above scenario, what light (if any) on the Flight Engineer's panel would illuminate (as was claimed by the flight crew) when the stairway slammed shut momentarily after Cooper jumped?
In the FBI re-enactment using the very same airplane, how did they put the stairway down and did the same light on the FE's panel illuminate when they dropped the weights and the door reportedly slammed shut just as it did when Cooper jumped?
An additional question for bonus points. Does the flight crew and/or the FBI have some further explaining to do on this matter?