50 50
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

To ignore case studies and empirical data from numerous similar ‘events’ is truly baffling and astonishing. I guess people really do reinvent the wheel with great regularity and with equal impact as all the predecessors, in that their efforts are viewed as superfluous and irrelevant; except for the original discovery of course.

No one even wants to guess how other hijackers selected their alias for some odd reason. The only conclusion (wild assed guess) I can come to is the knowledge that there is a definitive answer to the other examples and Cooper’s can remain an open ended (read parlor game) ‘mystery’ where a bunch of Walter Mittys can speak with faux authority. The latter is relatively easy to cobble together and groups of people can migrate and attend a ‘symposium’ where they will actually act like they want to be taken deadly seriously on open ended subject matter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLrr1-jwwNc

So valued are their opinions that all of them just happen to be authors or owners of websites (code for massive douche bags) with even more evidence you can purchase (Visa, MasterCard, PayPal) and become ever more smarterest than ever on the subject. Gee whiz, I wonder how a ‘Learn to Skydive’ book written by a notorious WHUFFO would go over…. hmmmm…. I just don’t know.

How did the crews know when Heady, McNally and LaPoint jumped their respective planes? Direct observation, pressure bump precisely measured by the FE or the distinct sound of someone yelling Geronimoooooooooo (cough, cough) oooooooooooo complete with fading Doppler Effect? I know what to expect for an answer to that question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg&feature=related

That’s what makes ‘Junk Science’ so fun with GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) ensuring a limitless cornucopia of crap data which can be mutated till it will finally support a predetermined solution (Cooper was a witch) garnished with false modesty and surprise.

So what type and intensity of ‘pressure bump’ did the crews on Flight 239, Flight 800 and Flight 855 experience? I know, I know…………

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYuGRm-6gII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

what interests me is the placement of these engines
relative to the stairs and a drop from those stairs
t1......tn. The jet blast from those engines are
affecting the pressure envelope and air flow at the
rear of the plane in motion (to some extent for
a few seconds even after Cooper separates and
the plane moves ahead).

Keep in mind the wheels are down; a turbulence
zone behind.



Can't help about the flow field of engines running or their impact on overall flow field. I suspect that the impact is modest because: the center engine intake is distant and its exhaust is distant and downstream; the side engine exhausts are about 9' to the side and 9' up from the end of the stairs. Some side-to-side impact from side engines could be cancelled by symmetry.



Hominid, Think of the engine inlets as being sinks for the adjacent airflow and the engine exits as being sources for some of the downstream airflow. Between those inlets and exits, the entering air is highly energized by a magic process known as a turbine engine. Thus the exiting air has much greater energy (velocity, heat, etc.) than the ambient air and this induces the air outside the engine flow field to flow inwards toward the aircraft centerline.

Therefore, the engine exhaust flow field has a major impact on the flow field, including downwash, behind the aircraft. The landing gear's turbulence would be a minor factor compared to the engines.

We have discussed the "dead air" zone behind the fuselage previously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have discussed the "dead air" zone behind the fuselage previously.



OK. Im sorry.

Lets just let Blevins, Airtwardo, and Class Clown and
JT and you set the agenda here. And not post
anything else?

So Robert99, what will Blevins and his mother be
eating on Thanksgiving Day? Give us the inside
story! Did you know Blevins wont be attending the
Ariel Party or the Symposium - did you get that?

Blevins. Post it again. Some may have missed it.

Jet engines on airplanes dont matter nohow -
yepper! ;) YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW!

Dead air zone - dead air zone!

8 days and counting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We have discussed the "dead air" zone behind the fuselage previously.



OK. Im sorry.

Lets just let Blevins, Airtwardo, and Class Clown and JT and you set the agenda here. And not post anything else?

So Robert99, what will Blevins and his mother be
eating on Thanksgiving Day? Give us the inside story! Did you know Blevins wont be attending the Ariel Party or the Symposium - did you get that?

Blevins. Post it again. Some may have missed it.

Engeens on plainz dont matder knowhow - yepper!
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW!

Maybe I'll just point out that immediately behind georgers attached pic you see no turbulence...the rotors are much further behind the aircraft that would be of any consequence to a jumper and those are wing tip vortices and a bit of other random turbulence.

Hey georger...are you making an appearance at the symposium?

I did get that Blevins is going into hiding...throwing the mother-in-law card.

Damn I'm smart...I don't even have a mother-in-law. B|

hangdiver

"Mans got to know his limitations"
Harry Callahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I'll just point out that immediately behind georgers attached pic you see no turbulence...the rotors are much further behind the aircraft that would be of any consequence to a jumper and those are wing tip vortices and a bit of other random turbulence.

Hey georger...are you making an appearance at the symposium?
hangdiver



Not going. I live too far away plus I already have
family pouring in for the holiday.

As 377 pointed out any dead air zone that Coop
passed through would last but a split second before
entering the BLAST (air resistance). Cooper
separates and falls rapidly, t1 ....tn, slows, chute
open (who knows), and by all accounts is clear of
any effect from the plane (at a lower altitude) by
say t+10. Lets call that the standard model, as
documented by experts (here) who have done this.

Still, even if the standard model is correct any
description of the pressure envelope around the
rear of that plane must take engines into account.
Maybe its just a technical point, but I like examining
all variables (just to say I did it).

As Cooper is falling the plane pulls further away.
High pressure air cones from engines grow wider
but lets assume Cooper has fallen below any
possible zone of effect from that expanding
pressure cone widening with distance. That is
unless, the plane tilts up at some critical angle
(seeing pressure guage react = Coop has just
jumped). We will assume Rataczak did not do that
or even if he did it has no effect on Cooper because
he has fallen out of any danger zone from the
engine blast.

I went to several skydiver websites where they
describe bailing from jets (incl the 727) and nobody
reported any problem due to engine blast etc ...
so unless Rat did something intentional to give
Cooper a 'jet blast', we will assume this scenario
has nothing to do with this case.

But, at least it gets mentioned and examined
minimally.

Thanks. Happy Thanksgiving.

G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We have discussed the "dead air" zone behind the fuselage previously.



OK. Im sorry.

Lets just let Blevins, Airtwardo, and Class Clown and
JT and you set the agenda here. And not post
anything else?

So Robert99, what will Blevins and his mother be
eating on Thanksgiving Day? Give us the inside
story! Did you know Blevins wont be attending the
Ariel Party or the Symposium - did you get that?

Blevins. Post it again. Some may have missed it.

Jet engines on airplanes dont matter nohow -
yepper! ;) YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW!

Dead air zone - dead air zone!

8 days and counting.

Okay smarty pants, I'll tell you what the term "dead air" means in this instance.

But first, where did you get that beautiful picture of a two-engine "727" in your attachment? Do you think a three-engine "727" would have a more pronounced downwash and trailing wing tip vortices, other things being equal?

In 377's previous posts about jumping from a DC-9 stairway, he stated that for a few feet after leaving the fuselage exit the air was relatively calm. Then things got extremely turbulent as he hit the free stream air flow. A few seconds after that, 377 would be clear of the downwash and turbulence behind the aircraft and the rest of the freefall would be "normal" (at least after he slowed down to his personal terminal velocity).

The term "dead air" refers to that first few feet of air flow that 377 described. Hominoid and I have also pointed out that the same phenomena of "dead air" can be observed on any car or truck on the free way during rainy weather. That is the behavior of the air that you can see around the rear bumper area.

On the matter of jet engines on airplanes, they do matter if you are interested in getting from Point A to Point B in a reasonable time. If you are not interested in doing that, they don't matter (you just have a sailplane).

I'll leave the other questions to anyone who knows what the answers might be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpw8tgUoAbk

Good catch on the wing vortices hangdiver. I’m pretty sure that those jet engines aren’t counter-rotating but as everyone on this thread knows, those effects would be mitigated by the lack of asymmetric thrust therefore eliminating any concerns about a critical engine.

As Robert99 adroitly pointed out, the turbulence from extended gear at Flight 305’s airspeed would be minimal since velocity is one of those ‘Root Mean Square’ equations that I never understood (too busy being cool). I realize that the drag landing gear produces below 200 knots is minimal but my penis demands a fully retractable system like those on Beech Bonanzas and Cessna Cardinals. Having a retractable plane makes me more manly manish on the macadam. It’s just my way of scent marking others on the airfield and letting them know who the Alpha Male Silverback is in this neck of the woods. Strange how the numbers of people participating in General Aviation for fun, keeps going down, I just can’t figure it out.

Perhaps a better example of aerodynamic drag would be the ubiquitous US Postal Service and FedEx trucks that have the aerodynamics of a brick. Apparently at speeds below 25 MPH there is virtually no advantage to streamlining and these vehicles spend the vast majority of their life well below that.

Where velocity becomes critical here is with the jets that FedEx utilizes to move parcels across the country making deliveries in just one day. Much the same way the Postal Service employees gun down co-workers and fellow citizens in a fit of seething rage barely contained during the decades long fermentation triggered by the realization of a squandered life spent sorting Harriet Carter and Publisher’s Clearing House catalogs while counting down the seconds till retirement and realizing the futility of it all.

At least that’s my understanding of low velocity drag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I went to several skydiver websites where they
describe bailing from jets (incl the 727) and nobody
reported any problem due to engine blast etc ...
so unless Rat did something intentional to give
Cooper a 'jet blast', we will assume this scenario
has nothing to do with this case.



Georger, neither 377 or anyone else jumping from the rear stairs of a 727 in stable level flight is going to hit the engine exhaust. The high pressure and velocities from the engine exhaust are equalized fairly rapidly over a period of several seconds.

But the downwash and the wing tip vortices may require several minutes to completely dissipate. The downwash and vortices are the price for producing lift. And a jumper in a free fall is going to be below those things very fast.

But even a 170 knot blast of wind is going to shake up people jumping into it but it is different from the things mentioned above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpw8tgUoAbk

Good catch on the wing vortices hangdiver. I’m pretty sure that those jet engines aren’t counter-rotating but as everyone on this thread knows, those effects would be mitigated by the lack of asymmetric thrust therefore eliminating any concerns about a critical engine.

As Robert99 adroitly pointed out, the turbulence from extended gear at Flight 305’s airspeed would be minimal since velocity is one of those ‘Root Mean Square’ equations that I never understood (too busy being cool). I realize that the drag landing gear produces below 200 knots is minimal but my penis demands a fully retractable system like those on Beech Bonanzas and Cessna Cardinals. Having a retractable plane makes me more manly manish on the macadam. It’s just my way of scent marking others on the airfield and letting them know who the Alpha Male Silverback is in this neck of the woods. Strange how the numbers of people participating in General Aviation for fun, keeps going down, I just can’t figure it out.

Perhaps a better example of aerodynamic drag would be the ubiquitous US Postal Service and FedEx trucks that have the aerodynamics of a brick. Apparently at speeds below 25 MPH there is virtually no advantage to streamlining and these vehicles spend the vast majority of their life well below that.

Where velocity becomes critical here is with the jets that FedEx utilizes to move parcels across the country making deliveries in just one day. Much the same way the Postal Service employees gun down co-workers and fellow citizens in a fit of seething rage barely contained during the decades long fermentation triggered by the realization of a squandered life spent sorting Harriet Carter and Publisher’s Clearing House catalogs while counting down the seconds till retirement and realizing the futility of it all.

At least that’s my understanding of low velocity drag.



Farflung, I was discussing "turbulence" produced by the landing gear and not "aerodynamic drag". Retractable landing gears are very nice to have even on sailplanes.

On general aviation aircraft, fixed or retractable landing gears are mainly a function of economics only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I realize that the drag landing gear produces below 200 knots is minimal but my penis demands a fully retractable system like those on Beech Bonanzas and Cessna Cardinals.



And for those really 'big Johnsons"....Hang gliders also have retractable gear...:PB|

hangdiver

"Mans got to know his limitations"
Harry Callahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I went to several skydiver websites where they
describe bailing from jets (incl the 727) and nobody
reported any problem due to engine blast etc ...
so unless Rat did something intentional to give
Cooper a 'jet blast', we will assume this scenario
has nothing to do with this case.



Georger, neither 377 or anyone else jumping from the rear stairs of a 727 in stable level flight is going to hit the engine exhaust. The high pressure and velocities from the engine exhaust are equalized fairly rapidly over a period of several seconds.

But the downwash and the wing tip vortices may require several minutes to completely dissipate. The downwash and vortices are the price for producing lift. And a jumper in a free fall is going to be below those things very fast.

But even a 170 knot blast of wind is going to shake up people jumping into it but it is different from the things mentioned above.


Can I point out.. that the jumper is also travelling at 170 Knots....


The human body though is just not as aerodynamic as the fuselage of the aircraft is. ( I have been over 300 MPH in freefall a few times... I know just a bit about this):ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know this will be met with skepticism, but several WFFC jumpers reported that they climbed above the jet after exit by orienting themselves in the direction of flight and hunching their body for max lift.

I thought total BS until I watched a claimant's helmet camera footage. It showed him looking down on the jet from a distance behind as he slowed down to terminal velocity and ended his climb. It looked like he was about 150 ft above the jet. It was done with a high exit speed. Could have been faked but I doubt that it was.

Anyone else heard of this or perhaps witnessed it?

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like I said Robert99, I never fully understood that ‘Root Mean Squared’ thing and simply look at drag and turbulence as ‘relatively proportional’ in my silly, stupid, decision making world. I let others parse everything down to sub-atomic levels where they can convince themselves that having a retractable plane that operates around 200 knots and 100 hours a year makes infinite sense. There is a great deal of demand for the things after all so I must be missing something here, but it’s not an extra three or four grand in insurance premiums and maintenance.

I am willing to bet that those retracts on gliders don’t have any motors, hydraulics, emergency extension systems, manual cranks, relays, switches or even doors. Probably just a Johnson (not the type your thinking of hangdiver) bar and a good pull to retract with minimal weight added, if any. A sensible and rational feature in that case.

I think some ‘sailplanes’ even come with motors, which I call an airplane. Just like categorizing seahorses that carry their young as males; nice try Mother Nature but it’s still a female seahorse. Humans have a similar subset that can be observed wandering malls across America dressed in Old Navy clothing with one of those ‘what the hell happed to me’ stares that conjure both sympathy and rage in a liberated man. I do realize these same Old Navy wearing, mall wanderers will parse what I just wrote to the sub-atomic level where they can feel secure in themselves again. One does what they have to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I went to several skydiver websites where they
describe bailing from jets (incl the 727) and nobody
reported any problem due to engine blast etc ...
so unless Rat did something intentional to give
Cooper a 'jet blast', we will assume this scenario
has nothing to do with this case.



Georger, neither 377 or anyone else jumping from the rear stairs of a 727 in stable level flight is going to hit the engine exhaust. The high pressure and velocities from the engine exhaust are equalized fairly rapidly over a period of several seconds.

But the downwash and the wing tip vortices may require several minutes to completely dissipate. The downwash and vortices are the price for producing lift. And a jumper in a free fall is going to be below those things very fast.

But even a 170 knot blast of wind is going to shake up people jumping into it but it is different from the things mentioned above.


Can I point out.. that the jumper is also travelling at 170 Knots....


The human body though is just not as aerodynamic as the fuselage of the aircraft is. ( I have been over 300 MPH in freefall a few times... I know just a bit about this):ph34r:


Amazon, You may indeed point out that a jumper in an airlplane that is doing 170 knots is also doing 170 knots (assuming he is not moving around inside the airplane).

The 170 knots means that the airplane and jumper are doing 170 knots relative to the free air stream. When the jumper separates from the aircraft, he will be in the free air stream in a few seconds and no longer going quite 170 knots with respect to the free air stream and will continue to decelerate until he has reached the "terminal velocity" for his body position, altitude, etc..

Or he may actually accelerate a bit if his terminal velocity happens to be above 170 knots for the specific conditions that he finds himself in.

On your claim to having been over 300 MPH in a free fall, would you describe the conditions of those jumps (how high were you and how was your speed determined)? Were you above 300 MPH when you jumped? Please provide this information.

In all honesty, I don't think that a human body can accelerate to 300 MPH in a free fall in the lower atmosphere, say below 10 or 15 thousand feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Like I said Robert99, I never fully understood that ‘Root Mean Squared’ thing and simply look at drag and turbulence as ‘relatively proportional’ in my silly, stupid, decision making world. I let others parse everything down to sub-atomic levels where they can convince themselves that having a retractable plane that operates around 200 knots and 100 hours a year makes infinite sense. There is a great deal of demand for the things after all so I must be missing something here, but it’s not an extra three or four grand in insurance premiums and maintenance.

I am willing to bet that those retracts on gliders don’t have any motors, hydraulics, emergency extension systems, manual cranks, relays, switches or even doors. Probably just a Johnson (not the type your thinking of hangdiver) bar and a good pull to retract with minimal weight added, if any. A sensible and rational feature in that case.

I think some ‘sailplanes’ even come with motors, which I call an airplane. Just like categorizing seahorses that carry their young as males; nice try Mother Nature but it’s still a female seahorse. Humans have a similar subset that can be observed wandering malls across America dressed in Old Navy clothing with one of those ‘what the hell happed to me’ stares that conjure both sympathy and rage in a liberated man. I do realize these same Old Navy wearing, mall wanderers will parse what I just wrote to the sub-atomic level where they can feel secure in themselves again. One does what they have to do.



Farflung, On the retractable landing gear for most low speed general aviation aircraft, think "Ego". That is, the one who dies with the most toys wins.

The landing gear in sailplanes generally consist of a single main wheel with a small (maybe two inches in diameter) tail wheel. If the main wheel is retractable, it is usually by a mechanical system using a simple hand lever. The wheel well does have doors and they are spring closed.

In the case of high performance sailplanes (maybe a 50 to 1 lift-to-drag ratio), even lowering the drag by a pound or two, as retracting the landing gear would do, increases the performance by maybe 10 percent or more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I know this will be met with skepticism, but several WFFC jumpers reported that they climbed above the jet after exit by orienting themselves in the direction of flight and hunching their body for max lift.

I thought total BS until I watched a claimant's helmet camera footage. It showed him looking down on the jet from a distance behind as he slowed down to terminal velocity and ended his climb. It looked like he was about 150 ft above the jet. It was done with a high exit speed. Could have been faked but I doubt that it was.

Anyone else heard of this or perhaps witnessed it?

377



377, While I have never heard of this before, it might just be possible for an experienced jumper to do it. As a minimum, he would probably need to have a good visual reference to the horizon (to help maintain the proper body position) and a LOT of speed. And a "winged" jump suit would be very helpful.

Presumably, the jumper you described jumped from the stairway of a DC-9 type aircraft. If anyone tried this with a 727, they would have to go through the exhaust of the center engine and just a relatively short distance behind the engine. In other words, they probably wouldn't be around to try it a second time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robt99
Quote

wroteIn all honesty, I don't think that a human body can accelerate to 300 MPH in a free fall in the lower atmosphere, say below 10 or 15 thousand feet.



Think head down and all tucked in. I got to 185 according to my black box. Others have reportedly hit 300.

377
2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Robt99

Quote

wroteIn all honesty, I don't think that a human body can accelerate to 300 MPH in a free fall in the lower atmosphere, say below 10 or 15 thousand feet.



Think head down and all tucked in. I got to 185 according to my black box. Others have reportedly hit 300.

377



377, The speed is a function of the drag area presented by the jumper and his equipment and the total weight of jumper plus equipment.

There is a finite minimum to the drag area that a jumper can present. However, if he is to accelerate, his weight must exceed the total drag (or else he has reached his terminal velocity or is slowing down).

So in the lower atmosphere, the desired body type for such a jumper would be one that is tall, skinny, has maybe a 100 pounds of lead strapped to his head, and a helmet that has a cone top for streamling purposes.

In the upper atmosphere, say 30 or 40 thousand feet, I think that maybe 300 MPH would be possible. Of course, at 100,000+ feet, supersonic free fall is possible as demonstrated by Joe Kittinger.

Your 185 MPH agrees with everything that I have seen in the parachuting literature for head first free falls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Greetings Everyone,

I thought y'all would be interested in reading my latest correspondence with the FBI, specifically an email I received today from Ayn Dietrich regarding a series of questions I sent to her and Curtis Eng a week or so ago.

I am further pleased to report that Ms. Dietrich has been courteous and timely with me in all my dealings.

****************

FBI, Report from Ayn Dietrich:

Hi, Bruce—

Thanks for your patience in my responding to you. As we discussed on the phone, FBI policy restricts the release of details on a pending investigation unless necessary to further the investigation. For the most part, the questions you asked me delve into details that we cannot discuss because of this policy. For the answers I can provide, please see my comments inserted in your text below. I’d also like to make you aware of the resources that we have shared in the past, considering that information is already out there.

As you may have seen, the FBI published an updated article in 2009: http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2009/march/dbcooper_031709;

We recently added a “Resources” box towards the bottom, on the right-hand side—which contains links to two previous articles, a video, and the FBI Vault with released records;

In the Vault’s DB Cooper archive (http://vault.fbi.gov/D-B-Cooper), you may find the answers you are seeking.

I apologize that this isn’t exactly the assistance you were seeking, but I hope this is still helpful to some degree.

Ayn
From: Bruce Smith [mailto:BruceSmith@rainierconnect.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 7:27 PM
To: Dietrich, Ayn S.
Subject: Mountain News calling

Greetings Ayn Dietrich,

Here are some questions I have for you and Curtis Eng regarding DB Cooper.

I am developing a major piece on the DB Cooper case for the Mountain News http://themountainnewswa.net/category/db-cooper/, and eventual publication in my book: "The Hunt for DB Cooper – The Resurgent Investigation into America’s only Unsolved Skyjacking."

I have a number of points in my research that need clarification or confirmation; hence, I hope you can address them.

Brief responses are fine. I’m not looking for, or expecting, a “white” paper on the Cooper case. I’m just presenting the questions that are at issue for me, and if you can help me sort it out I’d be grateful


1. Confessions:
A reported 922 individuals have confessed to be being DB Cooper. Can you confirm? If this number is incorrect, can you offer an estimate of the number of confessees? Himmelsbach says “it is in the hundreds.”

Any thoughts on why so many?

AD: "I cannot get into details about this matter because it pertains to a pending investigation."

2. Money Find at Tina’s Bar
How many shards of twenty dollar bills were found at Tina’s Bar? Former PIO Dorwin Schroeder says they found “thousands” of shards and put them in plastic baggies. Gray writes in his book that there are a handful in a match box. What is the most accurate characterization in your judgment?

Also, can you share your perspective on where they were found? There is a lot of controversy on this issue. Schroeder says three-feet down in a concentrated area, but the guy on the backhoe digging up the sand, Al Fazio, says “No way!” and that they all washed-up due to tidal action and waves.

AD: "I cannot get into details about this matter because it pertains to a pending investigation."

3. Citizen Research Team
What can you tell me about the Bureau’s response to the Citizen Research Team’s finding that titanium sponge was found on DB Cooper’s tie? The CRT claims that such material could only be present in a handful of machine shops and metal research labs in 1971, and folks are clamoring to know if anyone is investigating this lead.

AD: "I will not comment specifically on its findings, but I can tell you that the team’s findings contribute meaningfully to our investigation. Although this is not an active investigation — in that the FBI is not actively looking for new evidence or witnesses — we do pursue all credible leads accordingly. Understanding everything that the physical evidence has to offer is important in any investigation, including this one."

4. Back Parachutes
The ownership of the back parachutes delivered to Cooper has recently come into question. Can you tell me the true roles of Norman Hayden and Earl Cossey in the Cooper case?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

5. Other Evidence
Can you tell me the status of the eight cigarette butts left by DB Cooper? Also, what is the status of hair strands recovered from the head rest? Are either used as a source of genetic material for DNA comparison?

AD: "I cannot get into details about this matter because it pertains to a pending investigation. However, I can confirm that we do have some degree of DNA from the evidence collected on the plane."

6. Role of Richard McCoy
The role of Richard McCoy in the DB Cooper case is highly controversial in some circles. Do you think McCoy played a part in the Cooper skyjacking?

Former SAC Russ Calame shows convincingly in his book that McCoy was absent from his home in Utah on Thanksgiving, 1971, and was in Las Vegas, Nevada during the hours after the skyjacking, specifically in the environs of McCarran airport. Does any of this play a part in the Cooper case in your judgment?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

7. Role of Ted E Mayfield
Former SA Ralph Himmelsbach writes in his book that Mayfield made invaluable contributions to the FBI’s investigation of DB Cooper. Can you tell me what those contributions were? Both Ralph and Ted refuse to discuss the matter with me, for unknown reasons.

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

8. Role of Jerry Thomas in the investigation
Former SA Ralph Himmelsbach has an extraordinarily close relationship with Jerry Thomas, and Jerry often states publicly that he assists you in the DB Cooper case. Yet, Jerry offers some wacky opinions – and in a very authoritative manner – such as that flight 305 had four flight attendants and that he knew Cooper suspect Richard McCoy in Vietnam. Can you tell me what tangible contributions Mr. Thomas has made to the case or how he has earned such an intimate position in the Bureau’s investigation?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

9. Status of Ted Braden and Sheridan Peterson.
Former Vietnam Green Beret SgtM Ted Braden is widely rumored within military circles to be DB Cooper. In addition, former Marine and Vietnam refugee specialist Sheridan Peterson has been investigated by the Bureau twice in connection with the Cooper case. Can you share your perspective on these suspects, or the possibility that a former Vietnam combat commando could have been Cooper?

Similarly, what’s your perspective on the potential of former airborne troops and CIA combat contractors from the SE Asia Theater to receive the skills necessary to do the Cooper caper as part of their military experience?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

10. Status of Tina Mucklow in the current investigation
Have you visited Tina Mucklow or spoken with her? Do you know why she has undergone such a profound personality change, or why she disappeared for thirty years? Has she made any contributions to the investigation in recent years?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

11. Status of Lee Dormuth
What is the current status of former SA Lee Dormuth in the investigation?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

12. Role of Charlie Farrell
Can you describe or characterize the Cooper investigation that SA Farrell launched in 1971? He hasn’t left any public record of his perspective on the case or evidence of his leadership style. Can you shed any light in this area?

AD: "I cannot get into details about a pending investigation."

14. Your perspective on DB Cooper?
How would you characterize your view of DB Cooper and the case? How are you conducting the case? What do you see as the key issues?

AD: "As far as a “view,” the FBI follows facts and does not make assumptions or draw conclusions. Our investigators are certain not to let their personal viewpoints get in the way of having evidence speak for itself.

"This is an open investigation but not an active one in that we are not still looking for information. That said, when tips come in to us, we assess each one and, if credible, pursue the lead accordingly."

Lastly, any chance that I could review the documents and evidence that Geoffrey Gray, Tom Kaye and others have examined?

AD: "I appreciate your interest but we are not making those materials available to the media or the public at this time."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For all the ‘bleeding hearts’ who have said (over and over and over and over)…. ‘hey, what happened to innocent until proven guilty?’ Or…. those who claim that a person is pure until CONVICTED by a ‘jury of their peers’ - I have a few questions.

WTF?

OK, that was only one question, but if being sloppy with hyperbole while trying to save the world is a crime then I plead hunky, your honor.

So who said the Cooper hijacking was the ONLY unsolved of its species? Hmmmm….????

Let’s look at a couple others, shall we? OK, let’s shall.

On 22 February 1974 an innocent and freedom loving man named Samuel Byck was heinously and mercilessly shot to death (by his own hand) while gingerly holding a loaded pistol which was ALLEGEDLY used to kill the Co-pilot of Flight 523 and an airport security guard. As of 2011, no one has been convicted of air piracy, let alone the murder of two people associated with this flight. Why? The mystery remains UNSOLVED.

OK so that wasn’t from the Seattle area so maybe they forgot or it was not in their jurisdiction. Then how does one explain this?

On 2 June 1972, a Western Airlines flight from Seattle (naturally) was hijacked by Willy Holder (don’t judge) and Catherine Marie Kerkow. That’s right, Catherine Marie Kerkow who was last known to be residing in Cuba and just minding her own business. The FBI knows where she is, yet does nothing about this ‘solved’ hijacking? Puh-lllllleeeeeeeeasssse.

Just a lil ‘ol reality check here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I do believe there are a few in the 300mph club...it's no easy task...ask Bryan Burke...he knows...and I would guess Amazon as well...


hangdiver



I do indeed compete in Speed skydiving

I LOVE going fast... although getting unstable at over 250 MPH... hurts like hell... although you cant buy a better thrill ride when you start tumbling and spinning at those speeds:)
In competitions.... no lead is allowed... no pointy helmets either... although some of the guys do use some rather silly looking vinyl bobsled suits....:)Only standard skydiving equipment is allowed.

Jump altitude is 13500' and the measured Kilometer is from 8900' to 5500' where you pull out of the dive into a track like you cant believe... to decelerate... you get a hell of a lot of lift with the right body position and all that speed translates into some AWSUM tracks across the ground that you can VISIBLY see yourself passing cars going at freeway speeds down I-5:)
Usually I get big out of the track at 3500( go to a normal flat stable position out of the track once I have bled off MOST of the speed.. and deploy at 2500' or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

50 50