Recommended Posts
mrshutter45 21
seems to be perfectly fine for KC to be over qualified as a jumper?
seems to be fine that KC's description is way off.
"They cite a poor match to eyewitness physical descriptions, a level
of skydiving expertise above that predicted by their suspect profile,
and an absence of direct incriminating evidence."
someone smoking and drinking bourbon, can't be, in 1971?
here we are a week later and Blevins website still has inaccurate
information on it, but continues to be the one to correct people with
his knowledge?
Robert about his mistakes:
"Mine are many, and some are legend."
I would like to know where he got his information about a cheap suit?
smokin99 0
I'd read about it before and have seen pics but the documentary goes into more detail. Interesting story.
smokin99 0
I personally doubt its either one, quite likely it's someone we've never heard of who is at the bottom of a large body of water.
That said.........
#1. There is a large field between cheap suit and expensive silk. If the tie came from J C Penneys, as I believe you have posited before, hey it's likely the suit might have too. That's the kind of store that my daddy got his suits from and I never thought of him as wearing a "cheap suit". "Cheap suit" changes the description. Words matter sometimes, esp in descriptions and these are people who would have looked at a suit from Penneys or Sears as just being a 'Suit". Not identifying it as expensive does not mean that it was "cheap". Far from it actually --- "sharp-looking business man" (the only description I remember) goes more to defining an expensive suit than a "cheap" one.
As far as nothing he did matching the actions of a military man. That is best answered by pointing you back to my post on McCoy, et al and of those that would have "fit the bill". Read it again and digest.
Be illuminated.
My point - for every criminal that fits a certain profile for this specific, I can show you one that doesn't. Additionally -- look at Wolfgang Gossett's life subsequent to the hijacking ---Is that where you see his military bearing taking him -- Seriously? --this is one dude that seems to have made a life out of breaking from his mold.
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Mr. Gambini?
Vinny Gambini: Yes, sir?
Judge Chamberlain Haller: That is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection.
Vinny Gambini: Thank you, Your Honor.
Judge Chamberlain Haller: [firm tone] Overruled.
smokin99 0
Yes, Anthracite coal -- but Not quite eaten up. I think there were 11 people left in 2007 at the time of the docu. I had read about it before but never really "felt" the story til seeing the video.
If you do not trust me then have Sluggo call me. I do NOT want to put what I just found out in a PM or Email. I need to share it with you or someone who actually cares about this case being solved....and who is knowledgeable of the case.
NO it is NOT about Weber! Just something I was told and matched what Duane told me and filled in the details. The FBI had little contact with this man and with me and was sworn to secrecy back in the 70's. He is very real and the FBI spoke with him many many yrs ago, but everything he ever told them was ignored. He was a jumper.
mrshutter45 21
QuoteGeorger I need for you to open PM's to me briefly. I have NEW information I cannot share with this thread.
If you do not trust me then have Sluggo call me. I do NOT want to put what I just found out in a PM or Email. I need to share it with you or someone who actually cares about this case being solved....and who is knowledgeable of the case.
NO it is NOT about Weber! Just something I was told and matched what Duane told me and filled in the details. The FBI had little contact with this man and with me and was sworn to secrecy back in the 70's. He is very real and the FBI spoke with him many many yrs ago, but everything he ever told them was ignored. He was a jumper.
"NO it is NOT about Weber!"
"Just something I was told and matched what Duane told me and filled in the details"
" He was a jumper"
but not about Duane??? sounds like everything to do with Weber
mrshutter45 21
you need a grenade and pistol to be on "active duty?
did Cooper not threaten to blow up a plane with a bomb?
did you put your application in to the FBI for immediate "active duty" to start clearing up these old cases?
Robert about his mistakes:
"Mine are many, and some are legend."
I'm going to listen to you???
Robert says:
Edit: It could be a trick of the light, maybe...but in the attached pic of Gossett, looks like half of his left eyebrow is missing.
Shutter says:
could be a trick of light, isn't Kenny missing half his hair? might be wrong though.......
smokin99 0
Quotesmokin99 says in part:
Quote'You also have to remember that a GREAT deal of your "evidence" for KC amounts to hearsay...'
Hearsay evidence is when a witness testifies to what ANOTHER person may have said, or did say. Direct testimony is where a witness testifies to what they have seen or known on their own, without quoting a second party. Most of the witnesses on KC's life and actions are direct witnesses, not hearsay witnesses.
Thanks for the law lesson but None - count em Z-E-R-O of your "witnessess" have any direct knowledge of kenny Christiansen as a hijacker. That's zilch, nada.
None of your witnesses lived full time with KC or was direct witness to anything other than they were at a dinner where he didn't show up and the fact that he loaned them money. None of them have any direct knowledge of where his money came from. None of them know what KC did on his layovers. Much, actually, of your testimony is hearsay. Most of the rest is just circumstantial and uncorroborated. Which makes it about as good as hearsay. Let's see someone said that Kenny installed cabinets - why that means he must have made the secret hideaway. No one saw him build it. Did you talk to someone that actually found buried money on his property? I thought not.
Someone says logs are missing - why that must mean that Bernie stole them. I could go on and on - but I won't. You're welcome. Hearsay fits a good portion of your stuff. It may not be the right word for a couple of instances - maybe speculation would fit those - but what you have is definitely not ALL direct testimony.
Vinny Gambini: [opening statements] Uh... everything that guy just said is bullshit... Thank you.
D.A. Jim Trotter: Objection. Counsel's entire opening statement is argumentative.
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Sustained. Counselor's entire opening statement... with the exception of "thank you"... will be stricken from the record.
Vinny Gambini: Your Honor, may I have permission to treat Ms. Vito as a hostile witness?
Mona Lisa Vito: You think I'm hostile now, wait 'til you see me tonight.
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Do you two know each other?
Vinny Gambini: Yeah, she's my fiancée.
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Well, that would certainly explain the hostility.
QuoteQuoteGeorger I need for you to open PM's to me briefly. I have NEW information I cannot share with this thread.
If you do not trust me then have Sluggo call me. I do NOT want to put what I just found out in a PM or Email. I need to share it with you or someone who actually cares about this case being solved....and who is knowledgeable of the case.
NO it is NOT about Weber! Just something I was told and matched what Duane told me and filled in the details. The FBI had little contact with this man and with me and was sworn to secrecy back in the 70's. He is very real and the FBI spoke with him many many yrs ago, but everything he ever told them was ignored. He was a jumper.
"NO it is NOT about Weber!"
"Just something I was told and matched what Duane told me and filled in the details"
" He was a jumper"
but not about Duane??? sounds like everything to do with Weber
CREEP! Why this thread will never solve the case! This is real information and I have already contacted the FBI by phone and email.
mrshutter45 21
name calling comes right behind it! you have a big problem with Criticism.
you constantly come on here like you have the key to the crime and then
state you can not share it on the thread!
next time just PM the person and don't say anything on the thread!
smokin99 0
Quotesmokin99 says in part:
Quote'You also have to remember that a GREAT deal of your "evidence" for KC amounts to hearsay...'
Hearsay evidence is when a witness testifies to what ANOTHER person may have said, or did say. Direct testimony is where a witness testifies to what they have seen or known on their own, without quoting a second party. Most of the witnesses on KC's life and actions are direct witnesses, not hearsay witnesses.Quote'As far as nothing he did matching the actions of a military man. That is best answered by pointing you back to my post on McCoy, et al and of those that would have "fit the bill". Read it again and digest. Be illuminated...'
Didn't McCoy wear a jumpsuit and boots? Didn't he threaten the hell out of people with that fake grenade and pistol? Looks like Mr Military came prepared. The idea of Gossett, a jumper with recent experience and twenty-five years in the military at the time of the hijacking, doing the Cooper Thing is still tough to swallow. Suit, dress shoes, a briefcase with a bomb, no visible weapon, no boots, polite to a fault, and absolutely nothing in conversation or actions that would lead any of the witnesses to think he was active-duty military. 305 does not sound like the work of a lifelong military man, but either an amateur who got lucky or someone with just enough experience jumping to be dangerous. Sorry, but I just can't envision Gossett coming to the biggest party of his life so unprepared.
Edit: It could be a trick of the light, maybe...but in the attached pic of Gossett, looks like half of his left eyebrow is missing.
And your point is...... moot.
I hate to point it out to you ad nauseum that Gossett, based on his entire life, fits the personality profile much more than KC.
The rest of Gossett's life does not fit the profile of a lifelong military man. The mere fact that you have McCoy undertaking this is out of character. I hate to tell you but DB Cooper was not above threatening people with instant death. And you know we don't really know how experienced or prepared Cooper was do we? If he made it seems like he was as experienced and prepared as he needed to be. If he didn't, well shucks, I guess he wasn't.
Your logic doesn't make sense anyway - IF he was an experienced jumper, then he should be wearing a paramilitary outfit waving around grenades and guns?? As opposed to saying - look miss, I have a bomb, then calmly putting on a chute and jumping out???? I'd say cool under pressure accounts for a lot, but that's just me.
Maybe, just maybe whoever pulled it off was smart enough to know that he needed to act out of character.
Oh well - we could be here forever trying to solve the case based on known personality traits. Ain't gonna happen.
Mona Lisa Vito: What?
Vinny Gambini: Nothing. You stick out like a sore thumb around here.
Mona Lisa Vito: Me? What about you?
Vinny Gambini: I fit in better than you. At least I'm wearing cowboy boots.
Mona Lisa Vito: Oh yeah, you blend.
LOL - Seriously now...I'm just putting the information out there. Getting a discussion started cause this thread is so much caca now. LOL...But I accept apologies - even the backhanded ones. It's a southern thing - we generally just accept and bless his heart - he probably just didn't know any better. Meanwhile, the sword is sharpened for the next duel. Life on the lower forty.
According to one SAC - KC didn't fit the profile either --- but let's forget ken -- you said you were tired of talking about KC and I agree. The ground's been covered. Now I'm posting about someone else.
Another excerpt paraphrased from same story......
What many people didn’t know is that Gossett had a dark side, including four failed marriages, five children , making 15,000 and money troubles from gambling. He was an ROTC instructor making $15,000 per year, and newly separated from his wife. Galen Cook said that Gossett chose the date for the heist because he had a week off from his duties.
According to Clyde Lewis he was a smoker - YUP, Raleighs.
Fancy this if you will.....
Richard McCoy was born December 7, 1942, in the town of Kinston, North Carolina, and grew up in nearby Cove City. In 1962 McCoy moved to Provo, Utah, and enrolled at Brigham Young University (BYU) before dropping out to serve a two-year tour of duty in the Army. He served in Vietnam as a demolition expert and pilot and was awarded the Purple Heart in 1964.
In 1965 McCoy returned to BYU, where he met Karen Burns. They married in August 1965 in Raleigh. By 1971 they had two children, Chanti and Richard.
McCoy served another term in the Army on the condition he go to Vietnam, where he was awarded both the Army Commendation Medal and Distinguished Flying Cross. Upon returning to Utah, he served as a warrant officer in the Utah National Guard and was an avid skydiver.
McCoy taught Mormon Sunday school and studied law enforcement at BYU. His purported dream was to become an FBI or CIA agent.
From most accounts, based on his life to that point, McCoy was a most unlikely hijacker.
Point being -- Nothing in McCoy's history seems to jive with him hijacking a plane, escaping from prison and ending up in a shootout either. Hmmmm.....Go figure.
If you're strictly talking persona, the folks that seem "Most likely to hijack and jump from a plane" are guys like Mayfield, Peterson, Braden.
I'm curious - where does it say that the suit was cheap? Not saying it doesn't - I just don't remember that. Hal Williams said he looked like a "sharp looking business man to me" Hate to see another myth turned to reality.
And finally ....cause it was just hanging out there and I couldn't resist.....
"I did not have sex with that woman".....
Former President Bill Clinton to the American Public"
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites