50 50
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

RobertMBlevins

S. Renee Ewalt, the lawyer out of Okanogan County who handled the $491,000 cash sale of Margie Geestman's ranch to the State of Washington, has a history. This sale was arranged by Ewalt and a bank officer mentioned in the attached PDF's. And they were both sworn to secrecy on the present whereabouts of Margie Geestman...who has testified in six separate interviews that her ex-husband Bernie was an accomplice in the Cooper hijacking. And although Mrs Geestman tried to keep Ken Christiansen's name out of the whole thing, naming others as the possible hijacker, she finally admitted in her last interview that it was indeed Ken who disappeared with her husband during the week the hijacking occurred.

It could be more than coincidence that Margie finally decided to cash out her ranch in Twisp and move to an undisclosed location after the Decoded episode on Cooper and the book on Christiansen was released. She has seen both, of course.

Here at AB, we wonder how much exactly the bank officer and Ewalt profited from the sale of the ranch, and why they agreed to keep Margie's location a secret. Message sent to the board officer listed in the admonishment letter with the same question.

This information has been provided to NPR, as well.

Quote

'Luuuuucy...you got some 'splainin to do...'




So "here at AB" AB's best witness Margie has vanished?

You/AB say her lawyer is a crook.

Are you implying her lawyer or someone else has brought harm
to Margie?

Or is this just one more Blevins/AB straw man, being floated
to see what floats or sticks to a wall?

Should someone call authorities?

Will NPR break the news that Margie has fallen to fowl play
because you passed that info to NPR rather than calling the
cops!?

If 'Luuuuucy...you got some 'splainin to do...' who or what is
Luuuuuuucy .... and are you saying Margie is the victim of foul
play?

Something doesn't make sense here. What are you saying!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins



Here at AB, we wonder how much exactly the bank officer and Ewalt profited from the sale of the ranch, and why they agreed to keep Margie's location a secret.



Blevins, I'll bet that whatever profits Ewalt and the bank officer made were legal. Both of these people were subject to reviews of one kind or another as part of their normal activities.

Now why would Margie be interested in keeping her location a secret? Probably to keep people like RobertMBlevins from kicking down the door to her nursing home room.

Robert99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robert99

***

I don't mean to be hard on people, but let's face it. Some of you deserve it.



The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

Blevins must be a very busy fellow.

Robert99

That would be a mistrial. Lets throw out the DNA, shhhhhhhh.
DB Cooper into the Funnel of Darkness the movie starring Nicolas Cage, Jennifer Anniston and Woody Harrellson... a Jerry Bruckheimer film

Written by Paul Geivett

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robert99

***

I don't mean to be hard on people, but let's face it. Some of you deserve it.



The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

Blevins must be a very busy fellow.

Robert99

Do you see anything of interest in the WHS document, or is it
too early to tell ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"We have a virtual TON of shit stacked up now on Kenny Christiansen"

well, I can agree with that statement......

tracking IP addresses is not a big deal. another thing you act as if no one else can do. join the crowd of millions of others that can do the same thing.
"It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins



Robert99 says in part:

Quote

'Blevins, I'll bet that whatever profits Ewalt and the bank officer made were legal. Both of these people were subject to reviews of one kind or another as part of their normal activities.

Now why would Margie be interested in keeping her location a secret? Probably to keep people like RobertMBlevins from kicking down the door to her nursing home room...'



A lot of assumptions there. Ewalt got that letter of reprimand for selling a client's car to (her) own son. The client was incapacitated at the time, and Ewalt knew doing that was a violation. Margie isn't in a nursing home, either. She bought a condo. And on our last interview, she knew I wouldn't be contacting her further. Ranch sold in May 2012 or so. Last time I ever saw her was in October 2010. Nope. She wasn't trying to dodge me, but something else.



Blevins, Ewalt had the client's car appraised and it was valued at $800. She then advertised the car for sale at that price but didn't have any takers. She then sold the car to her son for the appraised value.

In the disclosure forms she included the fact that the car had been sold at the appraised value but did not mention that the buyer was her son.

If she had mentioned that the buyer was her son, she probably would not have had any problems beyond perhaps a couple of questions. But not mentioning that the buyer was her son, gave at least a basis for claiming that there was an appearance of impropriety.

And Ewalt got the reprimand for the "appearance" of impropriety and not for a criminal act.

Obviously, Washington State is very protective of the people who have guardians. Some other states seem not to give a hoot to hell what the guardians do.

On the matter of Margie Geestman, her mailing address and a phone number through which she can be contacted are given in the first sentence of the "Option to Purchase Lands" document that you posted.

So what is so secret here? I'm not aware of anything in the U.S. Constitution that says RobertMBlevins is entitled to have access to personal information that is none of his business in the first place.

Robert99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
georger

******

I don't mean to be hard on people, but let's face it. Some of you deserve it.



The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

Blevins must be a very busy fellow.

Robert99

Do you see anything of interest in the WHS document, or is it
too early to tell ?

For me at least, it is a bit to early to tell. I have been through it but want to compare it in detail with the other transcripts. But from what I have seen so far, I think it is going to make an excellent contribution to the Cooper database. Hopefully, I will be able to devote more time to this starting Wednesday.

Robert99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robert99

*********

I don't mean to be hard on people, but let's face it. Some of you deserve it.



The Great Blevins, a self styled "Leading Cooper Researcher", has now taken on the duties of Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

Blevins must be a very busy fellow.

Robert99

Do you see anything of interest in the WHS document, or is it
too early to tell ?

For me at least, it is a bit to early to tell. I have been through it but want to compare it in detail with the other transcripts. But from what I have seen so far, I think it is going to make an excellent contribution to the Cooper database. Hopefully, I will be able to devote more time to this starting Wednesday.

Robert99 agree -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not interested in slaming a woman older than myself. I hope Blevins realizes he is in a pile of shit & his employer will go down with him. Of course he has NOTHING of value for anyone to claim, but I expect the person whose private information was made public in all of this will have something to say and perhaps very publically denouce Robert Blevins and the people he works with.

There are certain releases neither Blevin or the publisher requested of the others involved. So - let the crap fly!

As for what Jo is up to - well, that will be made public in the very near future. A book, a movie or just plain old resolution? Whatever - the out come the FBI has some explaining to do. Oh, Lucy Lucy some individuals have a lot of explaining to do.

Keeping secrets is hard to do! Explaining false information will be even harder to do. One thing Jo has never done - is to provide false information about others and Jo's story is based on what her husband told her and how the search finally came to resolution.

What will I do if my venture produces no evidence to link Weber to Cooper?

Tampering of evidence will be the easiest to prove. The bigger question is WHY!

Gernonimo!

All of these yrs I thought this to be shout when the jumper went out the door. I didn't know it was a shout of victory for CIA individuals.

So much is happening and so much is going to be exposed - Lucyyyy You got some explaininnnng to Do!

The CIA - is releasing more information every time you pick up the paper or listen to a TV program.

Morrelie (I hope I spelled his name correctly) made a statement on a program recently that some of the CIA actions & the names of individuals will never be public. I wish I had a dvd of the 60 Minutes program for which he was interviewed

Snowden is being blamed for exposing things, but Snowden did NOT expose anything that would jeoparize the U.S. Some things in the CIA files should have been made public YRS ago....and most were things the public already knew or should have known.

Was the CIA is covering up crimes that had absolutely nothing to do with national security? Was transfering certain information to the CIA done as compensation for "friends" of the government?

Private individuals formed a group to Protect & Do No Harm. Their biggest challenge failed & but they were never exposed. They did more than the CIA did to protect, but their warning went unheeded by the Officials! Why?

Geronimo!

Why bother to correct the past mysteries! It was SAFE within the classified files of the CIA! If one incident is exposed than others get hurt (expect that was the reasoning). Hell, 98% of those involved are already deceased.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins

And Ewalt knew perfectly well she wasn't supposed to dispose of a clients' property to one of her own family members. That's why she got the Letter of Admonishment from Superior in Olympia.

I'm glad you feel confident that the sale of the ranch was handled properly. There is no proof on that of course, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one.



Robert,
I just don't see where you're going with this one. The admonishment does not state or imply that Ms. Ewalt profited or gained from the sale of the truck to her son. She sold it for blue book value. What she didn't do was get permission from the court to do that. Her punishment was deserved -- she should have been aware of that. But, the admonishment is more for sloppiness and the appearance of impropriety than malicious intent.

That alone is enough for you to question where Ms. Ewalt cheated Ms. Geestman?

Even if that were true, what does that have to do with the Cooper case?

You've lost me on this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Greetings Robert B,

I had an interesting email exchange today with a buddy at NPR, an executive producer at "All Things Considered." I mentioned that I had heard the NPR was doing a docu on DB Cooper and he was surprised.

He said he had never heard of such a project and asked me if I knew who's producing it. I said I didn't know, but would ask.

So, is your NPR person willing to come forward? Can you name him / her?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BruceSmith

Greetings Robert B,

I had an interesting email exchange today with a buddy at NPR, an executive producer at "All Things Considered." I mentioned that I had heard the NPR was doing a docu on DB Cooper and he was surprised.

He said he had never heard of such a project and asked me if I knew who's producing it. I said I didn't know, but would ask.

So, is your NPR person willing to come forward? Can you name him / her?



Hmmm. strange isn't it. I've been wondering a while about this. I noticed he hasn't posted the NPR thingy anywhere else, just here? no links to his site, no names....nothing.
"It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The old 400 comments from 2011 come out of the shadows. I'll take a long shot at this one. some of them are from here?

Let me ask this Robert.

why are you here, you don't trust anyone, you tie up the thread with rebuttals. I don't understand why you are here. argument after argument. since you want to use the filthy comments for your reasons not to disclose, I'll take this as false information until some proof comes to the surface. we have now heard from a source who had contact with NPR.

you were so sure Georger made up the email. then he produced it, and you glossed right over it. not a peep.
"It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins



The PO box is no longer valid. That was the old one she had in Twisp. The phone number and name go to the bank officer, who was instructed not to reveal Margie's present location.

I'm glad you feel confident that the sale of the ranch was handled properly. There is no proof on that of course, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one.



Blevins, I don't know why you are so fixated on Margie but it was probably her who told the bank not to give out her address. However, just yesterday you stated that she had moved to a condo which means that you already know where she lives, assuming your statement is correct.

So you have obviously been doing some snooping on your own. How long have you been a Private Investigator in Washington State? Are PIs regulated by the state?

I'll bet that banks in Washington State are heavily regulated by the State and the Federal Government. If you know of any improper actions in the bank's handling of the land transaction why don't you send the Washington State Banking Board a sworn statement to that effect.

Just remember that if your sworn statement doesn't check out, you'll probably get to meet some people with badges and a serious lack of humor about your claims.

Robert99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, if she was the one who rode the horses - she might very well have known Cooper. Perhaps she did not know he was deceased. She may not have read The Oregonian in 2000 or have seen the pictures.

She might have believed he was still alive. I promise you if I had known Duane was Cooper - I would have been afraid of him also. Remember the bar story about Weber in Co.

The bar stood still when Duane came back into the bar with a hugh buldge in his leather dress jacket. That bar went very quiet...at that moment.

No one knew what was going to happen - the individuals with the young man were saying something to him. The music stopped...as the young man walked toward the front where Duane and I were sitting.

THe young man walked up to Duane and told him - that he was sorry he had made his remark to me and told Duane he had had too much to drink and he was going home.

Duane put his hand on the young man's shoulder and told him "I think that is a good idea, son."

After he left Duane pulled the screw driver out of his jacket and put it on the BAR. THE BAR roared - and the man on the steel Guitar started to Play "Don't Take your gun to Town" NOT sure that was the title of the song, but I am sure some of you know the song I speak of. He might have started playing that when Duane came back from the car and sat down at the Stool.

This was a small town in Colorado below Ft. Collins.

I have seen the sides of Duane some never saw - and he could appear to be a giant mean man when it was necessary...although I only saw that side of him when he was angry in 1990 before going on the machine. Shortly after he was released from the 72 hr detention he disappeared for 3 days & went to Omaha...that is why he need the John Collins drivers license.

The frigging FBI never looked at the John Collins drivers license I had in my possession from the found wallet. It was taken out the day before they arrested him (but did not charge him due to his health) - and he used that drivers license about 2 /3 wks later to access a safe deposit box paid forward under that name for 10 yrs.

Duane was smart enough to leave one license office and go to another in another county and was able to use the identification he had. That Fl drivers license under John Collins was an actual FL drivers license and not a counterfeit. He wanted what was in Nebraska and he wanted it bad.

He also made a hugh purchase from an Antique place not far from there. Without looking it up it was around 3k. I even have the name of the Antique store - but the FBI was NEVER curious enough to track Duane's steps and the reason for the driver's license!

Long WAY around to explain why the woman might have greeted Blevins with a Shotgun in hand. Since Blevins did NOT want me to contact Bernie Geestman - I might know why. YOU THINK?

Now this could just be one of Jo's stories. You be the judge - is Jo making this up or could it be true?
Well, Duane definitely pointed out Paradise Park and the Power lines and talked about the BOYS in that area. So maybe they did know each other? Did Geestman ever go to the Dollar's Corner? Sure was not far from there.

The pop-up campers got in there just find and so did campers on pickup truck beds in the 60's...now who told me that? Someone stated NO overnight camping was allowed.
Do not believe everything you are told. The ones telling the stories have motives.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins

***Greetings Robert B,

I had an interesting email exchange today with a buddy at NPR, an executive producer at "All Things Considered." I mentioned that I had heard the NPR was doing a docu on DB Cooper and he was surprised.

He said he had never heard of such a project and asked me if I knew who's producing it. I said I didn't know, but would ask.

So, is your NPR person willing to come forward? Can you name him / her?



Are you kidding? In Cooperland? Not a frickin' chance in hell. Only a very few people are aware, and I'm not naming any of them. Besides, I thought you weren't interested anyway. You have said that.


Not interested? Me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BruceSmith

,

I had an interesting email exchange today with a buddy at NPR, an executive producer at "All Things Considered." I mentioned that I had heard the NPR was doing a docu on DB Cooper and he was surprised.

He said he had never heard of such a project and asked me if I knew who's producing it. I said I didn't know, but would ask.

So, is your NPR person willing to come forward? Can you name him / her?



Blevins is BUSTED!

For some reason that song "Don't take your Guns to Town, Son" Is just running around inside of my head.

Amazing what happens when you let go of something and put it in the hand of someone higher than yourself. Wonder how the FBI is going to explain all of the Crap that is coming down! They ain't talking to me, but they are talking to someone.....
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's the text from a Star-News article, January 12, 1975.

Thanks to a poster on a plane crash site ( Austenp405 ) for sharing this with me...

Note: Where did the FBI think the plane was (in 1975 when they ruled the skull out as Cooper) ?????

why no follow up articles on the search ?? May***ld missing a skydiver?? Skull and parachute obviously connected






Cooper skyjacking still mystery

The "D.B. Cooper" skyjacking case remained as much a mystery as ever Saturday with the latest set of tantalizing possibilities- a weathered skull, clothing remains, and a parachute hanging from a tree- apparently ruled out of contention.

Cooper, one of the first in the nation's series of skyjackings, jumped Thanksgiving Eve, 1971, from a Boeing 727 somewhere south of Woodland, Wash., with $200,00 in $20 bills strapped to his body.

He had seized the Northwest Airlines jet between Portland and Seattle, received the money in Seattle, and ordered the crew to fly to Reno, Nev. En route he disappeared.

The skull, that of a Caucasian in his early 30s, was found Thursday in the Mt. Hood National Forest 10 miles east of Estacada. Near the skull was a parachute hanging high in a fir tree.

The Clackamas County sheriff's office said clothing was found in the area earlier, but it had not been connected with the Cooper case. A spokesman said the parachute was believed to be from a weather balloon.

"I'm satisfied it's not him," said Dr. Larry Lewman of the state medical examiner's office, who studied the skull and checked with the FBI.

Dr. Lewman said the skull was of a person younger than the description of Cooper, who was believed to be in his late 40s or early 50s. Lewman said the plane's flight path was west of Portland and the chute was found east of the city.

Sheriff's deputies said the skull may have been of a hunter or missing pilot. Deputies were unable to thoroughly inspect the area until spring because of three feet of snow covering the ground.

Harold K. Clark, special FBI agent in charge, said his agents are continuing to investigate the Cooper affair, one of the top cases in the Pacific Northwest. But he said, "Nothing's cooking."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very similar to the article I have:


PORTLAND. Ore. (UPI) -- A skull found near a weathered parachute in Mt. Hood National Forest is the newest clue in the three-year search for the infamous skyjacker "D.B. Cooper." A man calling himself by that name parachuted from a low- flying jetliner on Thanksgiving Eve, 1971, with $200,000 in ransom money strapped to his chest. Neither he nor the money was ever seen again. South of the suspected jump area authorities T h u r s d a y found the skull believed to be that of a person in his early 30s. A parachute was in a nearby tree at the site 10 miles east of Estacada, Ore., Dr. Larry Lewman of the state medical examiner's office said. Friday. "That naturally led us to wonder whether the skull might be Cooper's," Lewman said.

HIJACKER'S SKULL?--Dr. Larry Lewman, assistant state medical examiner, holds skull found by Forest Service employes in Mt. Hood National Forest, 10 miles east of Estacada, Ore. FBI and local authorities are investigating find to determine if skull is that of D. B. Cooper, first person to execute hijacking attempt in Nov. 1971, aboard Northwest Orient Airlines flight during which Cooper parachuted from airplane while en route to Reno, Nev. from Seattle. Cooper and $200,000 he got from Northwest Orient were never found. fBI Doubts Connection . . . Skull Revives Wonder Over Skyjacker's Fate

An FBI spokesman said he doubted the man who hijacked a Boeing 727 on a flight from Portland to Seattle, Wash., could have landed where the skull was found. He said the flight pattern and winds on the night of the hijack "seem to rule out" the location. Earlier FBI investigations turned up parachute harnesses and skulls in the suspected jump area. None has helped agents find Cooper or the missing $200,000. Lewman said he put the FBI onto the skull after he heard about the parachute. "I understand that kids in the area have been trying to shoot the parachute out of the tree for about three years," the doctor said. "When the snow melts, we can go up there and find more bones and maybe a billfold that will tell us his name." . Conditions were poor-"for a jump when "Cooper," dressed in oxfords and a business suit, plummeted into the cold air. Investigatorshavesubsequently agreed with the opinion of an FA A regional security chief: "One of these days some hunter in Oregon or Washington is going to find the skeleton of this man screwed into the ground up to the elbows."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Special Agent Fred Gutt had been quoted as stating the DNA test on the tie cannot necessarily rule out a suspect and they didn't know if any of the DNA belonged to Cooper.

There are three different DNA samples on the tie.

Duhh! I do not believe this has EVER been talked about in this thread. Three - fragmented incomplete DNA's?????? That opens up an WHOLE can of worms!
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You came to this thread Oct 24th with a purpose. I suppose they have matched the DNA of the skull to one of the 3 DNA's . HOW convenient considering the things I have learn recently! THE FBI is desparate.

3 partical DNA's makes the circuit round out to be many thousands of individuals...

Uberalles - perhaps you need to ID yourself and announce who and what you are! You think? I would have thought the FBI would have checked the DNA in those BONE Yrs and Yrs Ago! ONE would think!

Another article over the yrs ID'ed one found skull as an indian woman.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertMBlevins

***The old 400 comments from 2011 come out of the shadows. I'll take a long shot at this one. some of them are from here?

Let me ask this Robert.

why are you here, you don't trust anyone, you tie up the thread with rebuttals. I don't understand why you are here. argument after argument. since you want to use the filthy comments for your reasons not to disclose, I'll take this as false information until some proof comes to the surface. we have now heard from a source who had contact with NPR.

you were so sure Georger made up the email. then he produced it, and you glossed right over it. not a peep.



Mainly I questioned the email because Georger claimed it came from an *alleged producer* at Decoded...but refused to name this person. He was either a producer or he wasn't. I think it's total BS all the way. Then the email he produced was redacted worse than a government doc on Roswell or the Kennedy Assassination. Give me a break. It wasn't like I was going to contact this producer you know. But Georger probably figured out pretty quick that IMDB would list the names of ALL cast and crew for every episode of Decoded. So...it would be an easy matter to determine if the email-er was ACTUALLY WITH THE SHOW. That has not been proven of course since no person was named. Besides, I could tell from the wording of the message it was very unlikely to have been created by a producer on the Decoded show. Let him UN-redact the name and if that name appears on the IMDB list, then I will believe him. Otherwise, no.

I already know all the producers and most of the crew from the Cooper episode. Some of us still keep in contact through Facebook. None of them would write a silly message like that one. They all believed that the Cooper episode was the best of the entire series. They could be right. It was the highest-rated one of the season.

I didn't say I don't trust anyone here. I said I don't trust EVERYONE who regularly posts. This is because I know two of them were involved in seriously nasty comments to outside Cooper articles, I mean REALLY bad stuff. But to keep the peace I decided not to name them. But when people do that, well...you know...I have to be cautious on what I say publicly. Comes with the territory in Cooperland I guess. I'm no longer angry about it, just more cautious.

Think we can move on from Blevins/KC stuff now? I'm sure many find it boring. Sometimes even ME. :)

To Robert99: Did I SAY there was impropriety in the sale of Margie's ranch? No. I said I would give the benefit of the doubt on that. Where do you get this stuff anyway? I said I wondered why Margie instructed the bank officer to not reveal her present whereabouts. I just wondered about it. And stop saying it's because of me. I told Margie in October 2010 we were finished with interviews. And I never tried to contact her again. Whatever reason she did that with the bank officer, it wasn't because of me. If I had to take a guess, (and it's strictly a GUESS) I would say maybe her ex-husband. After he kicked down the door the month after Kenny died and stole all that stuff, she actually installed padlocks and hasps on doors INSIDE the house. I was amazed she would feel so threatened as to do that, but she did live a bit off the beaten track. I don't think I put it in the book, but the first time I went to her house, she answered the door with a shotgun in hand. :)
Non-Cooper But Cool: Seattle Seahawks win Monday Night Football on the road, 14-9 against the St. Louis Rams. Hawks QB Russell Wilson sacked SEVEN times. And Hawks win even though they managed only 135 yards of total offense the entire game. That hasn't been done in the NFL (a win with so few yards) in three years. What won the game was the goal line stand by the Hawks D in the fourth quarter. And the fact that the Hawks never gave up a touchdown during the game.

Quote

"How do you like us now..."



It was YOU said it came from a producer AT DECODED!

I never said one syllable about DECODED.

You make shit up every time you open your mouth.

You are a pathological maker-upper!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

50 50