Recommended Posts
"The Sigma main closing flap is pretty worthless at staying closed.
You know, all I ever hear about that rig is how "safe" it is compared to older designs, blah, blah. I'm thinking that people need to tell the manufacturer about that."
They have which is why the magnets are on the newest versions.
I have found that with a little care in the packing and closing that the flap will close every time and stay closed till the drogue is set.
One can always place the closing pin cover under the top flap as opposed to in the slot on that flap. This will shorten the reach the pin cover has to make and will help to keep the pin covered till the drogue is set. IMO though this and the magnets are just remedies for poor packing and closing, which usually caused by us T-I's yelling at the packers to hurry it up!

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!
So, start being safe, first!!!
QuoteYou know, all I ever hear about that rig is how "safe" it is compared to older designs, blah, blah. I'm thinking that people need to tell the manufacturer about that. (JP, not you necessarily.)
I have.

I'll trade a floppy flap for the removal of the drogue three ring and it's added malfunction path.

----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.
TROGDOR 0
Here is one that could have turned ugly quick. This was just a few weeks ago. I spent the day hiding from my desk with a camera on Sicily.
The lower guy was suspended head down from the upper guys suspension lines until about 20 feet off the ground, the somehow managed to get it untangled and they both walked away.
http://www.gregbaker.smugmug.com/gallery/6492702_ZFdtB#412293049_qNS9G
The lower guy was suspended head down from the upper guys suspension lines until about 20 feet off the ground, the somehow managed to get it untangled and they both walked away.
http://www.gregbaker.smugmug.com/gallery/6492702_ZFdtB#412293049_qNS9G
skyborne 0
All this talk brings back memories from a distant past. I was in the 1/75 Rangers in GA in 1976-1977. I made some jumps at Bragg in the early '80's with an SF reserve unit.
While I was still in jump school, the Command Sgt Major of the 1/75th and a specialist died in a jump after colliding and entangling with each other on a fun jump day with family watching. Seemed like in those days accidents were not that uncommon, at least in terms of broken legs and tree landings and such. Not due to any lack of concern for safety, but mass tactical jumps were often challenging, and we often had to lug a lot of equipment leaving the aircraft.
Anyway, I recently got into skydiving as a sport and was amazed at how much the equipment has changed. I was impressed how the folks at my DZ in Texas are always concerned and aware of each other, and frequently check each others gear both on the ground and in the plane.
While I was still in jump school, the Command Sgt Major of the 1/75th and a specialist died in a jump after colliding and entangling with each other on a fun jump day with family watching. Seemed like in those days accidents were not that uncommon, at least in terms of broken legs and tree landings and such. Not due to any lack of concern for safety, but mass tactical jumps were often challenging, and we often had to lug a lot of equipment leaving the aircraft.
Anyway, I recently got into skydiving as a sport and was amazed at how much the equipment has changed. I was impressed how the folks at my DZ in Texas are always concerned and aware of each other, and frequently check each others gear both on the ground and in the plane.
cjsitfly 0
I hope this thread has started something for those who want to share their time in the airborne units and also for those who might enjoy the stories . I have many memories of my brief time with the 82nd in the late 70’s and am excited to share them, hopefully you are too. Before I share the next story I certainly want to say that the sport as we know it today is so much safer than it has ever been.
In mid 1980 I made a simulated wartime mass assault into Ft Walton Beach, Florida (I think it was Ft Walton) in what was named “Bold eagle”. Unlike typical assault jumps or fun jumps on Bragg this was intended to be the REAL DEAL. For anyone out there that sat on a plane ready to go to Iran during the failed rescue attempt that went south in the dessert you know how much equipment we had to carry. On this particular jump I had the distinct pleasure of being right in the middle of the stick….not a great place to be. As fast as we would exit it is amazing what the mind and eyes can take in in a split second. As I ran out the door on the man in front of me I was awe struck by the number of C-141’s in the air, much less all the canopies, it seemed like an endless sea of parachutes. Now for all of you who have seem the military videos, or personal videos, of 82nd jumps over the DZ’s at Bragg I am certain you haven’t seen anything like this. When the 82nd does a wartime mass assault training exercise it is usually unannounced and out of state to ensure few to no spectators (at least back then). Our jump altitude was said to be 900 feet AGL, although I swear it seemed lower. It was a minimum of a battalion exercise (I was in the 1st battalion 319th FAR) although it included many others from the division. As I said I piggy backed the man in front of me in an almost fetal position. I had a relatively uneventful opening although a little slow. My feet planted right on his T-10 or MC-1 (I don’t remember) as my own parachute reached deployment. I had been told how to walk off a parachute but never thought I would experience a situation like this. I pulled a hard right riser to slip away and then proceeded to………………………..walk off his canopy. Holy sh#t did I really just do that. Out of the fire and into the furnace….As I slipped right with a slow right body turn I was immediately confront with another canopy. Hum… what now, oh yea spread eagle, which I did and it worked. I bounced off his canopy lines about a body length above him and slid right by. I encountered two more near misses just in time to do a BMA (should be a PLF-Parachutist Landing fall, not BMA-Bust My Ass). As I recovered from my landing I looked to the sky and was absolutely amazed at what I was watching. Parachutes everywhere and many, many entanglements and certainly injuries in the making.
Nonetheless, as I experienced and watched this exercise take place I was humbled by the thought……….what if this was war. Can you imagine what it was like for our troops during real wartime? Bullets flying everywhere! I think about this every time I jump at my home DZ which has a gun club right on final approach. Thanks to all the airborne war vets!
In mid 1980 I made a simulated wartime mass assault into Ft Walton Beach, Florida (I think it was Ft Walton) in what was named “Bold eagle”. Unlike typical assault jumps or fun jumps on Bragg this was intended to be the REAL DEAL. For anyone out there that sat on a plane ready to go to Iran during the failed rescue attempt that went south in the dessert you know how much equipment we had to carry. On this particular jump I had the distinct pleasure of being right in the middle of the stick….not a great place to be. As fast as we would exit it is amazing what the mind and eyes can take in in a split second. As I ran out the door on the man in front of me I was awe struck by the number of C-141’s in the air, much less all the canopies, it seemed like an endless sea of parachutes. Now for all of you who have seem the military videos, or personal videos, of 82nd jumps over the DZ’s at Bragg I am certain you haven’t seen anything like this. When the 82nd does a wartime mass assault training exercise it is usually unannounced and out of state to ensure few to no spectators (at least back then). Our jump altitude was said to be 900 feet AGL, although I swear it seemed lower. It was a minimum of a battalion exercise (I was in the 1st battalion 319th FAR) although it included many others from the division. As I said I piggy backed the man in front of me in an almost fetal position. I had a relatively uneventful opening although a little slow. My feet planted right on his T-10 or MC-1 (I don’t remember) as my own parachute reached deployment. I had been told how to walk off a parachute but never thought I would experience a situation like this. I pulled a hard right riser to slip away and then proceeded to………………………..walk off his canopy. Holy sh#t did I really just do that. Out of the fire and into the furnace….As I slipped right with a slow right body turn I was immediately confront with another canopy. Hum… what now, oh yea spread eagle, which I did and it worked. I bounced off his canopy lines about a body length above him and slid right by. I encountered two more near misses just in time to do a BMA (should be a PLF-Parachutist Landing fall, not BMA-Bust My Ass). As I recovered from my landing I looked to the sky and was absolutely amazed at what I was watching. Parachutes everywhere and many, many entanglements and certainly injuries in the making.
Nonetheless, as I experienced and watched this exercise take place I was humbled by the thought……….what if this was war. Can you imagine what it was like for our troops during real wartime? Bullets flying everywhere! I think about this every time I jump at my home DZ which has a gun club right on final approach. Thanks to all the airborne war vets!
Chris
CDRINF 1
I was an Army Brat in high school living at Fort Bragg when the accident cj mentions happened and was fascinated by all things airborne which eventually led to my skydiving life. I remember our dads talking about this accident. (Note: when your a kid, "My dad is bank president, my Dad's the mayor, my Dad's the richest lawyer in town...etc" can't hold a candle to "My Dad and all oif his best frioends jump out of airplanes in the middle of the night." A friend who's dad commanded 1-505 was one of the first to reach the body on the DZ. When I went to jump school in '85 the blackhats still used it as an example of what not to do in the aircraft in terms of trying to stop a stick. They related that the Air Force loadmaster was the one who tried to stop the stick.
As I recall, there were a number of serious entanglement accidents during this time at Fort Bragg. One was a three-way entaglement that got written up in the Paraglide, if I remember correctly. The MC1-1B was in general use for mass tactical jumps at the time. The speed with which the jumpmasters cleared the aircraft putting jumpers very close together, simultaneous exits from both doors, and steerable canopies that weren't under control for the first few seconds made a bad combination, especially if a jumper had a weak exit. All of this lead to switching back to the old reliable T-10 and slowing down the exit speed to ensure alternating door exits. There were two techniques which were called Alternating Door Exit Procedure Option I and II. This of course was ADEP Option I and ADEP Option II in Army speak which the troop quickly modified to "Ate Up Option I and II".
Moral of the story from a safety standpoint: Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. (In this case use steerable canopies) and don't ever get caught by "we've always done it this way." (In this case, very rapid mass exit procedures).
CDR
As I recall, there were a number of serious entanglement accidents during this time at Fort Bragg. One was a three-way entaglement that got written up in the Paraglide, if I remember correctly. The MC1-1B was in general use for mass tactical jumps at the time. The speed with which the jumpmasters cleared the aircraft putting jumpers very close together, simultaneous exits from both doors, and steerable canopies that weren't under control for the first few seconds made a bad combination, especially if a jumper had a weak exit. All of this lead to switching back to the old reliable T-10 and slowing down the exit speed to ensure alternating door exits. There were two techniques which were called Alternating Door Exit Procedure Option I and II. This of course was ADEP Option I and ADEP Option II in Army speak which the troop quickly modified to "Ate Up Option I and II".
Moral of the story from a safety standpoint: Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. (In this case use steerable canopies) and don't ever get caught by "we've always done it this way." (In this case, very rapid mass exit procedures).
CDR
steve1 5
I haven't been in a lot of mass exit jumps, but I have been in a few. Usually three aircraft were dropping jumpers in formation. What a sight to behold! Green canopies everywhere.
We were always told to wait at least a second when following the guy out in front of you. That way there would be less chance of an entanglement.
I knew several army jumpers who were often scared to jump. They jumped every time though, and you had to have courage to do that.
A buddy of mine didn't like to jump. Since I was a "bad ass" skydiver and army jump master, I would usually jump first, and he would follow me out the door. It made jumping a little easier for him that way.
The only trouble was that he wouldn't wait a second after I jumped. He would be right on my tail going out the door. This was particularly bad when we jumped helicopters.
I'd get canopy, and there would be Bruce. I had to have a heart to heart talk with him after that, to convince him not to follow so close.
When we jumped C-119's there were a lot of jumpers opening close to each other. The reason being that the two side doors were so close together.
I guess that dates me some, to talk about jumping c-119's. I don't know if any of them are still flying.
I've done a lot of skydiving since those army jumps, but I still miss those days.
On completing jump school, I was one proud kid to pin jump wings on my greens, and to wear jump boots for the first time.
I love to try making a mass tactical night jump again, with equipment. I'll bet I could still do it, even though I'm pushing 60...
We were always told to wait at least a second when following the guy out in front of you. That way there would be less chance of an entanglement.
I knew several army jumpers who were often scared to jump. They jumped every time though, and you had to have courage to do that.
A buddy of mine didn't like to jump. Since I was a "bad ass" skydiver and army jump master, I would usually jump first, and he would follow me out the door. It made jumping a little easier for him that way.
The only trouble was that he wouldn't wait a second after I jumped. He would be right on my tail going out the door. This was particularly bad when we jumped helicopters.
I'd get canopy, and there would be Bruce. I had to have a heart to heart talk with him after that, to convince him not to follow so close.
When we jumped C-119's there were a lot of jumpers opening close to each other. The reason being that the two side doors were so close together.
I guess that dates me some, to talk about jumping c-119's. I don't know if any of them are still flying.
I've done a lot of skydiving since those army jumps, but I still miss those days.
On completing jump school, I was one proud kid to pin jump wings on my greens, and to wear jump boots for the first time.
I love to try making a mass tactical night jump again, with equipment. I'll bet I could still do it, even though I'm pushing 60...
steve1 5
Special Forces may have been the first to use steerable canopies in mass exits. In 1969 or so, the army came up with a crude version of a steerable canopy.
In 1970 I jumped a canopy with one big hole in the back of a T-10. Above each (two shot) cape well was a metal fork which held your risers together and prevented them from slipping.
After you got canopy, you would pull both these forks, allowing your risers to slide through a buckle above the capewells. This system was primitive, but it did allow some turning and forward speed.
Later we jumped a t-10 with steering toggles. If I remember right, they were 9-TU's.
I can see how this could increase the likelihood of intanglements.
We were trained to walk off the top of someones canopy, knee deep in nylon. That could be hard if you were loaded down with equipment.
I once jumped a long wooden ammo box, filled with gravel. This was inside a PAE bag. It was hard enough just to stand and make it to the door. I don't know how anyone could walk off someone's canopy with something like that dangling.
We also saw a fair number of Mae West type malfunctions, back then. This was the days before anti-inversion netting. One friend rode a line over malfunction right into the ground. There wasn't time to get his reserve out. He was a tough old bird, and he bought drinks for everyone that night.
I'll bet the new kevlar helmets are a big improvement over the steel pots we used to wear. I'll bet there aren't many soldiers who miss them...
In 1970 I jumped a canopy with one big hole in the back of a T-10. Above each (two shot) cape well was a metal fork which held your risers together and prevented them from slipping.
After you got canopy, you would pull both these forks, allowing your risers to slide through a buckle above the capewells. This system was primitive, but it did allow some turning and forward speed.
Later we jumped a t-10 with steering toggles. If I remember right, they were 9-TU's.
I can see how this could increase the likelihood of intanglements.
We were trained to walk off the top of someones canopy, knee deep in nylon. That could be hard if you were loaded down with equipment.
I once jumped a long wooden ammo box, filled with gravel. This was inside a PAE bag. It was hard enough just to stand and make it to the door. I don't know how anyone could walk off someone's canopy with something like that dangling.
We also saw a fair number of Mae West type malfunctions, back then. This was the days before anti-inversion netting. One friend rode a line over malfunction right into the ground. There wasn't time to get his reserve out. He was a tough old bird, and he bought drinks for everyone that night.
I'll bet the new kevlar helmets are a big improvement over the steel pots we used to wear. I'll bet there aren't many soldiers who miss them...
cjsitfly 0
(Special Forces may have been the first to use steerable canopies in mass exits. In 1969 or so, the army came up with a crude version of a steerable canopy. )
I have been told how to use the quote feature but only twice. It takes me three time to commit things to memory...........pychs say that is normal.
During my time with the 82nd in 77-80 they were phasing in the MC-1 steerable canopy.(please correct me if I am wrong). I say this because through Benning and then the first 6 months on Bragg everything was a T-10. I remember the special traing we received for the MC-1 (I really don't remember what the name of it was but my good buddy Charlie Brown, Golden Knight says so and if charlie says something I go with it.) Nonetheless I do remember the accident rate went sky high when they introduced the steerable canopy. As I mentioned in previous comments most of the guys I knew in the 82nd weren't that into the jumping. Hell, I knew one guy who was terrified of jumping but wanted the extra money. Anyway, someone mentioned herein that the 82nd went back to a T-10 style parachute. I would like to know if that is the case?
PS - did anyone go to Panama for jungle traing? Do you remember the prostitutes that would swing out the windows when the GI's were in town? Prostitution was illegal, imagine that, so they would swing out the windows on ropes to avoid being picked up on the street. It was the funniest thing. Imagine walking down a staright street and seeing all these women swinging in and out of the windows totally nude..............as david Lee Roth would sau...where have all the good times gone
I have been told how to use the quote feature but only twice. It takes me three time to commit things to memory...........pychs say that is normal.
During my time with the 82nd in 77-80 they were phasing in the MC-1 steerable canopy.(please correct me if I am wrong). I say this because through Benning and then the first 6 months on Bragg everything was a T-10. I remember the special traing we received for the MC-1 (I really don't remember what the name of it was but my good buddy Charlie Brown, Golden Knight says so and if charlie says something I go with it.) Nonetheless I do remember the accident rate went sky high when they introduced the steerable canopy. As I mentioned in previous comments most of the guys I knew in the 82nd weren't that into the jumping. Hell, I knew one guy who was terrified of jumping but wanted the extra money. Anyway, someone mentioned herein that the 82nd went back to a T-10 style parachute. I would like to know if that is the case?
PS - did anyone go to Panama for jungle traing? Do you remember the prostitutes that would swing out the windows when the GI's were in town? Prostitution was illegal, imagine that, so they would swing out the windows on ropes to avoid being picked up on the street. It was the funniest thing. Imagine walking down a staright street and seeing all these women swinging in and out of the windows totally nude..............as david Lee Roth would sau...where have all the good times gone
Chris
steve1 5
If I remember right, The MC-1 was the name of one of those steerable parachutes.
I had a few friends who went to jungle school in Panama. I wish I could have gotten that school. You got a really large, cool looking, patch for it also.
Panama sounds like my kind of place.
I had a few friends who went to jungle school in Panama. I wish I could have gotten that school. You got a really large, cool looking, patch for it also.
Panama sounds like my kind of place.
dudeman17 341
" The Sigma main closing flap is pretty worthless at staying closed. "
If you tuck one of the edges of the pin flap under one of the side flaps it stays closed pretty well.
If you tuck one of the edges of the pin flap under one of the side flaps it stays closed pretty well.
The MC1-1B (frequently called the dash one bravo) is still in use, but you can only exit one door at a time with it due the high collision potential presented by the forward movement. Consequently, T-10s are still the norm for a mass tacs in any unit. They were used in every Afghanistan/Iraq mass jump by Ranger Regiment, the 173rd, and Eighty Deuce (yes, a platoon plus did jump into Afghanistan and someone claims to have seen a tracer so they got their mustard stain).
At Bragg, whenever the general would come along, he, his adjutant, RTO, etc. always had to jump the MC1-1Bs, so we could only exit one door till all of them got out. You can guess how much fun that created.
The potential for stopping a stick at Bragg is very high contrary to what an earlier poster said. Sicily, the biggest drop zone, gives 54 seconds of green light assuming no tail wind. Most of the DZs are closer to 30. The generic math is one jumper per door per second. Soooo, if you have 60 jumpers on a C130, then you need 30 seconds of green light to get everyone out assuming that all goes perfectly in the plane. More often than not, if you aren’t jumping Sicily, you’re doing more than one pass. This is usually built into the plan. In a C17 with a 100 jumpers – no option. Current policy is for the jumpmaster to sound off repeatedly with ‘RED LIGHT!’ and put his hand up where the jumpers can see it. No physical effort is made to stop someone probably because of that incident that the OP described.
Sorry for rambling. Former 82nd jumpmaster/air operations planner.
At Bragg, whenever the general would come along, he, his adjutant, RTO, etc. always had to jump the MC1-1Bs, so we could only exit one door till all of them got out. You can guess how much fun that created.
The potential for stopping a stick at Bragg is very high contrary to what an earlier poster said. Sicily, the biggest drop zone, gives 54 seconds of green light assuming no tail wind. Most of the DZs are closer to 30. The generic math is one jumper per door per second. Soooo, if you have 60 jumpers on a C130, then you need 30 seconds of green light to get everyone out assuming that all goes perfectly in the plane. More often than not, if you aren’t jumping Sicily, you’re doing more than one pass. This is usually built into the plan. In a C17 with a 100 jumpers – no option. Current policy is for the jumpmaster to sound off repeatedly with ‘RED LIGHT!’ and put his hand up where the jumpers can see it. No physical effort is made to stop someone probably because of that incident that the OP described.
Sorry for rambling. Former 82nd jumpmaster/air operations planner.
steve1 5
I think the only aircraft I jumped at Bragg were a few 141's, mostly C-130's, and a couple C-119 jumps. Perhaps we had shorter sticks. I've never seen a stick stopped once the green light went on, even on smaller D.Z.'s. But it sounds like this has been done.
This was back in the early 70's before larger aircraft were being jumped. Back then there were rumors that the C-5A might be used for dropping jumpers. I've heard tell that even bigger planes than that are being used today.
I can see how even a big drop zone could be too short for a long stick out of a jet aircraft. Thanks for your thoughts on this.
We always jumped both doors when the MC1's came out. I imagine it took some accidents to change policy on that.....
This was back in the early 70's before larger aircraft were being jumped. Back then there were rumors that the C-5A might be used for dropping jumpers. I've heard tell that even bigger planes than that are being used today.
I can see how even a big drop zone could be too short for a long stick out of a jet aircraft. Thanks for your thoughts on this.
We always jumped both doors when the MC1's came out. I imagine it took some accidents to change policy on that.....
cjsitfly 0
This was back in the early 70's before larger aircraft were being jumped. Back then there were rumors that the C-5A might be used for dropping jumpers. I've heard tell that even bigger planes than that are being used today.
We always jumped both doors when the MC1's came out. I imagine it took some accidents to change policy on that.....
We always jumped both doors when the MC1's came out. I imagine it took some accidents to change policy on that.....
When I was on Bragg we jumped C-141's almost as much as C-130's. I remember many two pass loads in those days. They tried jumping the C-5A while I was there, I was not on one, but they were having problems slowing it down enough to allow a jumper to deploy with damaging his canopy or spanking him into an injury. I spoke with my friend Charlie Brown, golden Knight and 82nd and he said they did eventually jump the C-5A but dropped it as not being an efficient use of the jet.
Indeed when I was at Bragg we jumped both doors with the MC-1. As I mentioned in a previous reply they were phasing them in while I was there so everything was experimental. The thought of staggering jumps between doors never came up. That must have come later after they realized how many people where being injured.
Chris
Things do actually change in the army airborne community albeit slower than macroevolution. I know that keeping a one arm interval with the jumper in front of you is much more strongly stressed now than it was back in the day if it was at all. This has probably increased the time needed for a pass and increased the red light chances. It’s a big deal when you are trying to get your night assistant jumpmaster duty done to get your star and there is only going to be one pass.
I only jumped a 141 in airborne school, and I’ve heard, though I’ve never confirmed or completely believed, that the vortices were far less thereby decreasing the likelihood of high altitude entanglements and making it possible to jump right on top of the guy in front of you. Not sure if I’d stake my life on that.
Me, I was always scared to death of a collision, and was probably more scared in general due to having a skydiving background before I ever started army jumping where you can plainly see people waving to you from their backyards on jump run. It was a great relief when I became a jumpmaster making it possible to go out last and avoid the swarm of 19 year old dirt darts flailing around in the dark with 60lb rucks, machineguns, tripods, mortar base plates, etc. Even as the assistant, I would wait till the PJ’s door was done before I went, usually with a good ‘2 count’ beforehand.
You gotta love how the army deals with accidents – mostly by making sure as few people as possible know about it. As some have already mentioned, the safety focus in the skydiving world is a wonderful thing where incidents have always been published, instantaneously now on the internet, and there is commercial incentive to improve gear.
Not long ago there was a legendary accident at Bragg involving a jumpmaster student. As I’m sure you all know, the reserve ripcord was on the right side of the pack. Now it’s in the middle with the handle pointing up. This particular student was executing a clear to the rear, and the side mounted handle caught on the door, activated his reserve, and pulled him up and out of the bird decapitating him in the process. So someone comes up with this $.10 plastic insert that goes underneath the handle when you’re doing a jumpmaster duty and supposedly makes it resistant to that kind of pressure. Problem solved! We can all sleep easy now!
Incidentally, the handle is now in the middle in the event your right hand is pinned or immobilized, and they added a spring operated pilot chute eliminating a lot of the old heroics required to operate it. Good ideas but should it have taken 50 years to come up with them? You’d have to be one bad mo-fo to be going in with a spinning or total malfunction under 800’ and be able to beat on your reserve, perhaps throw it in the proper direction, and god forbid, reel it back in for another attempt!! Also, the metal grommets that used to close the reserve have been replaced with a ‘soft loop’ system greatly reducing the likelihood of it jamming shut. You know, stuff that has been on civilian rigs since who knows when.
And then there was the whole inversion thing. How many people bit it over that? So they add a few inches of ‘anti-inversion netting’ to the bottom of the canopy. Good to go.
I only jumped a 141 in airborne school, and I’ve heard, though I’ve never confirmed or completely believed, that the vortices were far less thereby decreasing the likelihood of high altitude entanglements and making it possible to jump right on top of the guy in front of you. Not sure if I’d stake my life on that.
Me, I was always scared to death of a collision, and was probably more scared in general due to having a skydiving background before I ever started army jumping where you can plainly see people waving to you from their backyards on jump run. It was a great relief when I became a jumpmaster making it possible to go out last and avoid the swarm of 19 year old dirt darts flailing around in the dark with 60lb rucks, machineguns, tripods, mortar base plates, etc. Even as the assistant, I would wait till the PJ’s door was done before I went, usually with a good ‘2 count’ beforehand.
You gotta love how the army deals with accidents – mostly by making sure as few people as possible know about it. As some have already mentioned, the safety focus in the skydiving world is a wonderful thing where incidents have always been published, instantaneously now on the internet, and there is commercial incentive to improve gear.
Not long ago there was a legendary accident at Bragg involving a jumpmaster student. As I’m sure you all know, the reserve ripcord was on the right side of the pack. Now it’s in the middle with the handle pointing up. This particular student was executing a clear to the rear, and the side mounted handle caught on the door, activated his reserve, and pulled him up and out of the bird decapitating him in the process. So someone comes up with this $.10 plastic insert that goes underneath the handle when you’re doing a jumpmaster duty and supposedly makes it resistant to that kind of pressure. Problem solved! We can all sleep easy now!
Incidentally, the handle is now in the middle in the event your right hand is pinned or immobilized, and they added a spring operated pilot chute eliminating a lot of the old heroics required to operate it. Good ideas but should it have taken 50 years to come up with them? You’d have to be one bad mo-fo to be going in with a spinning or total malfunction under 800’ and be able to beat on your reserve, perhaps throw it in the proper direction, and god forbid, reel it back in for another attempt!! Also, the metal grommets that used to close the reserve have been replaced with a ‘soft loop’ system greatly reducing the likelihood of it jamming shut. You know, stuff that has been on civilian rigs since who knows when.
And then there was the whole inversion thing. How many people bit it over that? So they add a few inches of ‘anti-inversion netting’ to the bottom of the canopy. Good to go.
steve1 5
Sounds like it is safer to be an airborne trooper than ever before. A center pull reserve does make sense.
I always worried about bent pins on the old cone and grommet rigs. They were harder to pull too.
In jumpmaster school, clearing your bundle was important, if you wanted to pass. The guy I was pardnered with didn't look long enough out the door, only giving a quick glance, before telling me to stand in the door.
He was an ex-smoke jumper with tons of jump experience. That didn't mean much to the army though. He was promptly failed from jump master school, (for not clearing his cargo bundle). Army jumpmaster school was easy to flunk out of....
I always worried about bent pins on the old cone and grommet rigs. They were harder to pull too.
In jumpmaster school, clearing your bundle was important, if you wanted to pass. The guy I was pardnered with didn't look long enough out the door, only giving a quick glance, before telling me to stand in the door.
He was an ex-smoke jumper with tons of jump experience. That didn't mean much to the army though. He was promptly failed from jump master school, (for not clearing his cargo bundle). Army jumpmaster school was easy to flunk out of....
What!? JP, say it's not true! (Sounds of drama, strife, etc.) OK, I'll just continue.
You know, all I ever hear about that rig is how "safe" it is compared to older designs, blah, blah. I'm thinking that people need to tell the manufacturer about that. (JP, not you necessarily.)
I understand.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites