lucky508 0 #1 September 28, 2010 I was wondering what’s the oldest canopy out there that is being jumped occasionally. I know a lot of gear from the 60’s gets aired out pretty often. I have a friend who jumps a 1943 dated T-5 every so often. We put it in a military SL H/C with the dial o death and he static lines it out of a C-47. I was right behind him jumping a MC1-1C and when he landed I must have been at 3-4 hundred feet. He had all the drive of a WDI. Can you say PLF? It’s pretty cool to jump a WWII canopy out of a WWII aircraft but I said “no thanks”. The funny thing is that sometime in the past it had a 7 TU mod done to it and was dyed Pink! Somebody must have set it up for their girlfriend in the 60’s. I’ll find a pic of it and post it when I have time. We call it the pink titty. To put it in perspective this guy’s favorite canopy is a C-9 with a 4 line release. He’s gonna be 3’ shorter soon. ATW, Cael Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #2 September 28, 2010 ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
obelixtim 150 #3 September 28, 2010 We used to have an old British X - type Harness and container with a silk canopy with no mods, which would occassionally get jumped, don't know what happened to it. It was WW2 vintage. It looked good in the air but oscillated like hell from having no mods, landings could be heavy if you caught a downswing.My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lekstrom10k 0 #4 September 28, 2010 I jumped an all silk 28 foot navy with a 5tu cut in it in 1973 .It was actually older than me made in april 1942 me August 8 1942. I told my darling wife to take as many pictures as possible as it would be the only time ever in the air she got one at line collapse on landing. I thought i was going to kiss my ankles on landing. That was beyond firm and was glad I only got out at 3500. It was worth it though .I still have a Golden Knights 1965 PC I jump ocassionally Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #5 September 29, 2010 Quote I jumped an all silk 28 foot navy with a 5tu cut in it in 1973 .It was actually older than me made in april 1942 me August 8 1942. I told my darling wife to take as many pictures as possible as it would be the only time ever in the air she got one at line collapse on landing. I thought i was going to kiss my ankles on landing. That was beyond firm and was glad I only got out at 3500. It was worth it though .I still have a Golden Knights 1965 PC I jump ocassionally I jumped a couple canopys older than me way back when in the 70's.. I do have a 28' all white round in the sewing room with a DOM 1953..that I "might" throw in an old 3 pin container I have and jump it for my 60th dirthday for my SOS jumpIts in really good shape....I am not... that WILL be a water jump.. someplace with warm water. I have a lot of water landings... and I LOVE a big splash over a big THUD any day Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beatnik 2 #6 September 29, 2010 The oldest canopy that I heard of being jumped was from a guy in Arizona who has a Russell Lobe. That parachute has to be over 80. Not sure if it is still being jumped or how often. I doubt it is too regularly because of the rarity of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueSBDeath 2 #7 September 29, 2010 I just jumped a 1975 Sierra, see the thread on this same page. The reserve is a 1984 26 foot navy conical. Good times!! Arvel Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkydiveJack 1 #8 September 29, 2010 QuoteI just jumped a 1975 Sierra, see the thread on this same page. The reserve is a 1984 26 foot navy conical. Good times!! Arvel Cool! I have a question since you mentioned the 1984 reserve. This is probably more directed to riggers. Is there an official life limit to a reserve or is it a decision made by each rigger based on the condition of the canopy? I have heard it both ways depending who I was listening to. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky508 0 #9 September 29, 2010 Beatnik, what is a "Russell Lobe" canopy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likestojump 3 #10 September 29, 2010 QuoteBeatnik, what is a "Russell Lobe" canopy? http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1928/1928%20-%200958.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky508 0 #11 September 29, 2010 Thanks Likestojump. It’s amazing that a silk canopy that has been jumped recently. I’ve only ever seen one silk canopy. I was asked to pack it in a WWII chest reserve for display only. It was damaged and missing most of the lines. The canopy had a very spongy feeling to it. It was faded to a light caramel color. At least I think it was faded. I don’t know what the original color really looked like. Some of the white nylon reserves I’ve seen from the 40’s and 50’s were almost translucent and absolutely beautiful IMO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ParaShoot 0 #12 September 29, 2010 At our yearly Vintage weekend event I jumped a purple silk EFA canopy from 1959. It has a T-mod so steerable. Packed with a long cotton sleeve. For such an old canopy the fabric is still very strong and the landing was like most other round canopies. ** Know what you say but don't say all you know. ** Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beatnik 2 #13 September 29, 2010 QuoteI just jumped a 1975 Sierra, see the thread on this same page. The reserve is a 1984 26 foot navy conical. Good times!! So far the oldest that I have jumped was from 1953. I have quite a few canopies from the 60's that are good to go and have never had a problem with any of them. There is nothing quite like being under a vintage canopy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky508 0 #14 September 30, 2010 I have a Jumbo PC from 72 and a MC-3 MKII PC from 71. both great canopies. I had a 67 MK1 PC that was zippy. It has some steering mods on it that made it turn shaprly with 1" of input from full toggles. I sold it after i got my jumbo. I downwinded that one on a 6mph day once. I did a PLF up one side and down the other and had the bruises to prove it. Cael Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beatnik 2 #15 September 30, 2010 Right now I have four PCs amongst the 48 or so rigs I own. One is a Canadian national team canopy and it is minty. I was told it has 80 jumps on it but I am not even sure it has that. The lines are white and the material is crisp. I have never seen a PC in this day that compares. I never had a really bad landing under a PC but my Para-Sled, that is another story. The first landing I had under it I was told from the spectators on the ground that they could hear the five points of contact in the PLF. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anj4de 0 #16 June 10, 2011 Hi guys.. There is a video on youtube somewhere of a Russian guy jumping a German WWII RZ-20 parachute...at around 2005! Just can't find the link right now. The RZ series parachutes are really scary, I have a RZ-20 here as well...as a collector's item. Very thin webbing material and the canopy is made of some "Ersatz" silk that feels very strange. Blue Skies UweFor once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. -Leonardo da Vinci Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #17 June 10, 2011 Thanks Uwe - here's what I found for the RZ-20 jump: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWEEsoXRCBA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #18 June 12, 2011 "Quote... The RZ series parachutes are really scary, I have a RZ-20 here as well...as a collector's item. Very thin webbing material and the canopy is made of some "Ersatz" silk that feels very strange." ...................................................................... Rayon? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites riggerrob 643 #19 June 15, 2011 QuoteThe oldest canopy that I heard of being jumped was from a guy in Arizona who has a Russell Lobe. That parachute has to be over 80. Not sure if it is still being jumped or how often. I doubt it is too regularly because of the rarity of it. ......................................................................... That was probably Weird Wayne Snider (sp?). About a decade ago, SKYDIVING Magazine published a photo of Wayne jumping an ancient, round silk canopy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites riggerrob 643 #20 June 15, 2011 "Quote... I’ve only ever seen one silk canopy. I was asked to pack it in a WWII chest reserve for display only. It was damaged and missing most of the lines. The canopy had a very spongy feeling to it. It was faded to a light caramel color. At least I think it was faded. I don’t know what the original color really looked like. ..." ....................................................................... Caramel was probably its original colour. I suspect that it was made of "second grade" silk .. strong enough (to meet MIL SPEC), but not perfectly white. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sundevil777 102 #21 June 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteBeatnik, what is a "Russell Lobe" canopy? http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1928/1928%20-%200958.html From the article: QuoteEach sort is entirely manually operated, a jerk on a large release ring freeing the parachute and also ejecting it from the pack. There are no elastics, springs or pilot parachutes involved. Anyone know how that worked?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pchapman 279 #22 June 25, 2011 Poynters: "The ripcord led to cones or wire loops in each corner of the back side of the container; the cover wrapped around the canopy and lines and was secured at each corner. After the ripcord released the corners, it pulled a web strap which aided in removing the cover and then another strap under the top fold of the canopy assisted it into the air." Poynters has a small picture, but it still isn't clear to me just how that works. Possibly the strap inside did a zig zag of sorts through the folded canopy that would tend to move some of the canopy about when yanked. (Rather than just having the strap slide out from between the folds, leaving the canopy undisturbed.) Just guessing. Still it all seems to be a variation of "dump it in the air canopy first". Nice find. Pages 0956 to 0959 of that Flight magazine are about Irvin parachutes and Russell parachutes. P.S.-- Who needs a pilot chute anyway? They seem to be suspicious newfangled things. As quoted in the Irvin part of the report: "One respect in which it differs in design from some other parachutes, is the attachment of the small pilot parachute which springs out sharply when the rip cord ring is pulled during descent and pulls the large canopy out. But it is by no means necessary for safe functioning. The Irvin will open just as well without its pilot chute, which can be described as a sort of extra safety device. When the question as to its necessity was raised in America, the U.S.A. Air Services decided that if it was not absolutely essential it certainly did no harm and they decided definitely that it should remain. It speeds the opening of the parachute rather than retards it and thereby allows for safe jumps from very low altitudes." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites riggerrob 643 #23 June 27, 2011 "Quote ... a jerk on a large release ring freeing the parachute and also ejecting it from the pack. There are no elastics, springs or pilot parachutes involved. Anyone know how that worked?" ........................................................................ Early PEPs just depended upon wind to blow the canopy out of the container. Remember that this was long before Leo Valentine invented the "French frog", belly-to-earth method of free-falling stable. We have subsequently learned that pilot-chutes help round canopies deploy more reliably by holding tension, which helps keep the skirt (lower Lateral Band) level. Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites anj4de 0 #24 August 23, 2011 ..."Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991."... The umbrella type pilot chute is still being used in T-10R reserves over here in Germany as of today (08/2011)! And there is no talk going on right now to change that to an M-1A or a MIRPS anytime soon. There are trials going on for a completely new system but until it hits the troops it will be some time...years? cheers UweFor once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. -Leonardo da Vinci Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites riggerrob 643 #25 August 24, 2011 Quote..."Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991."... The umbrella type pilot chute is still being used in T-10R reserves over here in Germany as of today (08/2011)! And there is no talk going on right now to change that to an M-1A or a MIRPS anytime soon. There are trials going on for a completely new system but until it hits the troops it will be some time...years? cheers Uwe ........................................................................... Hah! Back in 1986 (when I jumped at the Bundeswher Lufttransporte/Luftlande Schule) they could have claimed that they were just waiting to work the bugs out of their trefoil type static-line rig .... but 25 years later, the German Army needs a better excuse for using out-dated reserve pilot chutes. Perhaps the answer is static-line main canopies so reliable that they no longer need reserves. Hint: most of their allies (France, Britain and the USA) have developed static-line main canopies that are 99.99999999 reliable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
riggerrob 643 #19 June 15, 2011 QuoteThe oldest canopy that I heard of being jumped was from a guy in Arizona who has a Russell Lobe. That parachute has to be over 80. Not sure if it is still being jumped or how often. I doubt it is too regularly because of the rarity of it. ......................................................................... That was probably Weird Wayne Snider (sp?). About a decade ago, SKYDIVING Magazine published a photo of Wayne jumping an ancient, round silk canopy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #20 June 15, 2011 "Quote... I’ve only ever seen one silk canopy. I was asked to pack it in a WWII chest reserve for display only. It was damaged and missing most of the lines. The canopy had a very spongy feeling to it. It was faded to a light caramel color. At least I think it was faded. I don’t know what the original color really looked like. ..." ....................................................................... Caramel was probably its original colour. I suspect that it was made of "second grade" silk .. strong enough (to meet MIL SPEC), but not perfectly white. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #21 June 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteBeatnik, what is a "Russell Lobe" canopy? http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1928/1928%20-%200958.html From the article: QuoteEach sort is entirely manually operated, a jerk on a large release ring freeing the parachute and also ejecting it from the pack. There are no elastics, springs or pilot parachutes involved. Anyone know how that worked?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #22 June 25, 2011 Poynters: "The ripcord led to cones or wire loops in each corner of the back side of the container; the cover wrapped around the canopy and lines and was secured at each corner. After the ripcord released the corners, it pulled a web strap which aided in removing the cover and then another strap under the top fold of the canopy assisted it into the air." Poynters has a small picture, but it still isn't clear to me just how that works. Possibly the strap inside did a zig zag of sorts through the folded canopy that would tend to move some of the canopy about when yanked. (Rather than just having the strap slide out from between the folds, leaving the canopy undisturbed.) Just guessing. Still it all seems to be a variation of "dump it in the air canopy first". Nice find. Pages 0956 to 0959 of that Flight magazine are about Irvin parachutes and Russell parachutes. P.S.-- Who needs a pilot chute anyway? They seem to be suspicious newfangled things. As quoted in the Irvin part of the report: "One respect in which it differs in design from some other parachutes, is the attachment of the small pilot parachute which springs out sharply when the rip cord ring is pulled during descent and pulls the large canopy out. But it is by no means necessary for safe functioning. The Irvin will open just as well without its pilot chute, which can be described as a sort of extra safety device. When the question as to its necessity was raised in America, the U.S.A. Air Services decided that if it was not absolutely essential it certainly did no harm and they decided definitely that it should remain. It speeds the opening of the parachute rather than retards it and thereby allows for safe jumps from very low altitudes." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #23 June 27, 2011 "Quote ... a jerk on a large release ring freeing the parachute and also ejecting it from the pack. There are no elastics, springs or pilot parachutes involved. Anyone know how that worked?" ........................................................................ Early PEPs just depended upon wind to blow the canopy out of the container. Remember that this was long before Leo Valentine invented the "French frog", belly-to-earth method of free-falling stable. We have subsequently learned that pilot-chutes help round canopies deploy more reliably by holding tension, which helps keep the skirt (lower Lateral Band) level. Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anj4de 0 #24 August 23, 2011 ..."Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991."... The umbrella type pilot chute is still being used in T-10R reserves over here in Germany as of today (08/2011)! And there is no talk going on right now to change that to an M-1A or a MIRPS anytime soon. There are trials going on for a completely new system but until it hits the troops it will be some time...years? cheers UweFor once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. -Leonardo da Vinci Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #25 August 24, 2011 Quote..."Modern spiral spring pilot-chutes were not invented until the Second World War (George Quilter) and were slow in adoption. For example, the West German Army was still using umbrella type pilot-chutes until 1986 (when I attended their static-line program) and the Chinese Air Force was still buying spring-less pilot-chutes in 1991."... The umbrella type pilot chute is still being used in T-10R reserves over here in Germany as of today (08/2011)! And there is no talk going on right now to change that to an M-1A or a MIRPS anytime soon. There are trials going on for a completely new system but until it hits the troops it will be some time...years? cheers Uwe ........................................................................... Hah! Back in 1986 (when I jumped at the Bundeswher Lufttransporte/Luftlande Schule) they could have claimed that they were just waiting to work the bugs out of their trefoil type static-line rig .... but 25 years later, the German Army needs a better excuse for using out-dated reserve pilot chutes. Perhaps the answer is static-line main canopies so reliable that they no longer need reserves. Hint: most of their allies (France, Britain and the USA) have developed static-line main canopies that are 99.99999999 reliable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites