Recommended Posts
loudtom 5
You feel so strong about your dZ you won't even stand up for it in person. And why should he bring his peeps out to a place that treats him like crap. You leave Mark alone you here me.
And you accuse Mark of the same thing your husband does. Why would you do that to him????
Either of them...
lt
MicDon 0
Anyway. Since you are from CSC. Can you tell my why he stopped doing it ??Since it is "blessed by Strong and whoever you guys quoted earlier". This might answer Ron's question on what his attitude is towards this mandatory stop or voluntary stop to this behaviour.
loudtom 5
Those people wouldn't really be important then would they?????????????
Thanks for replying though. At least we can cross you off the csc trrollls list...
yo
loudtom 5
Or my sleeping under the jumpsuits video.
Wouldn't it be cool to do a competition.
We all already have the evidence, lets find some judges and start submitting our vids. Or have the students send in theirs.
What a gas this would be in the winter.
Like a world favorite tandem video on tv.
We could make it a series...
lt
Quotei don't want to see the dz ripped apart i want to see it safe. and i think that anyone who has a safety issue should be heard and the problem addressed. there is alot of unsafe things that go on at alot of dz's that i have been to. i have never been unsafe with a student and followed all guidelines set up by uspa and strong when doing tandems. as far as my solo jumps i haven't been in an unsafe position while jumping since my early days of jumping when andre , the dzo at the time in june of 98, put me staight on those issues. and if you were a currant jumper at csc you would know that . as i said earlier that i have done some things in the past that were stupid but when confronted by some of the dz staff and older jumpers i changed my ways. something that is badly missed and needed at csc again
Well Im glad we clarified that then. Sorry I misunderstood you.
QuoteFact is every organization has said this is a bad idea...From USPA to Strong...Vector has been saying this for years.
I know the TI...He is quite skilled. It is not his skills in question, but his judgement.
A tandem is for the student, not the TI. And we owe it to the student to have as safe a jump as possible for them, not to showboat our personal skills.
Any showboating should be from the student since they are the reason we are there.
How do you respond to TI's that do anything other than poised stable head high to the relative wind exits then?
I know of at least two TI/E's that have encouraged the back layout exit.
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.
Liemberg 0
QuoteSometimes instructors (any jumpers, really) reach a level of competence where they believe they have become invulnerable, or at least more immune to the problems
Unfortunatly, that is true to a certain degree...
Though I don't believe I'm invulnerable, I certainly believe to be more immune to some of the problems someone with (say) 20 or less jumps may encounter. I often jump in weather conditions (wind, visibility, turbulence) where I would insist that other less experienced jumpers stay on the ground, I can get away with smaller landing area's and more obstacles in the vicinity, I jump with a higher wingload than a student, am comfortable with lower exit altitudes or jumping without an AAD etcetera...
Elsewhere in the thread "Andyman" says he offered his opinion about what they were doing and was told that since he's no TI his opinion didn't matter and in general I believe that to be true also, harsh as that may sound...
I do think however that the majority of the 'certified meat haulers' DOES have a problem with loose lower connectors just for the sake of 'better video'.
Since 'better video' is a matter of taste and students tend to get a warm and fuzzy feeling from any footage where they are halfway recognizable whatever else is going on, it is perfectly OK to do as you please - though 'stealing the scene' may not be the nicest or most professional thing to do but it is, as such, NOT a safety issue. Filming the tandempair while looking into the sun also ruins the video but I think we can all agree that we rather have someone do that and be out of our way on opening than make the best footage in the world, right in the students well lit face yet slam into us when we release the drogue.
Jumping with the passengersharness attached in a way that deviates from the guidelines set forth by the manufacturer IS a safety issue...
"Whoever in discussion adduces authority uses not intellect but memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
A thousand words...
Take care, all
Chuck
Ron 10
QuoteHow do you respond to TI's that do anything other than poised stable head high to the relative wind exits then?
I know of at least two TI/E's that have encouraged the back layout exit.
Exits? I don't care as long as the equipment is set correctly and the drouge is out within 10 seconds and not used for stability.
There are exits I don't like and will not do them. But I know people who do them all the time just fine.
But there is a BIG difference between an exit with the gear worn correctly, and using the gear loose so you can do tandem freestyle IMO.
Glenv 0
Cheers
Glen
www.skydivejoburg.co.za
loudtom 5
Look what a good controversy brings out of the woodwork. You are right this one incident doesn't make it a bad dz. Sorry.
lt
Sebazz1 2
alltoe 0
QuoteI bet though had you succeded in getting jackos ratings pulled
According to the rumor mill, it looks like somebody succeeded in getting Jacko's rating pulled. What I haven't heard is whether Strong did it or USPA. I figure with USPA and Bangs, they're going to be impotent, so it probably was Strong. Besides, Strong has a lot more to lose here.
So, can any of the CSC/Hinckley staff that have been posting anomynously please let us know the story?
Andy9o8 2
QuoteQuoteI bet though had you succeded in getting jackos ratings pulled
According to the rumor mill, it looks like somebody succeeded in getting Jacko's rating pulled. What I haven't heard is whether Strong did it or USPA. I figure with USPA and Bangs, they're going to be impotent, so it probably was Strong. Besides, Strong has a lot more to lose here.
So, can any of the CSC/Hinckley staff that have been posting anomynously please let us know the story?
You just created this screenname today, this is your first-ever post, you have Zero info in your profile, you bitch about people posting anonymously, then you proceed to slander Glenn by name while hiding behind the cloak of anonymity.
Very courageous.
vanpilot 0
Is this how USPA deals with dicipline, by creating a lynching mob on DROPZONE.COM. I thought the USPA was there to GOVERN and protect those it serves, not crusify them by slandering reputations and ability on the internet like a bunch of whinning teenagers. I have known Steven Jackson for over 9 years both as an instructor and personally trained him as a commercial pilot. His safety record in both impeccable. His actions as a tandem instructor in both safety and performance are exempelary. He was reprimanded by the DZO and by request ceased to perform the STUNTS. After his compliance this thread continued to snowball attracting the attention of narrowminded naysayers and 500 jump wonders with no iota of skydiving experiance commenting on and judging a safe competant instructor. Does the USPA react this way with all its instructors who commit a misdemeanor. Remember the Regional Directors are elected by the jumpers to represent them. You are not elected to form opinions and orchestrate witch-hunts on the internet.
Jonathan Gordon
Quote... His actions as a tandem instructor in both safety and performance are exempelary.
thats a rather subjective statement. Many more feel that performing these "stunts" (your word) are far from safe. Just because he didnt kill anyone doing something risky doesnt mean he was safe... he was lucky.
Using your logic , allow me to make the following statement: "Evel Knievel is a safe individua."
If go out and juggle chain saws while standing over my infant and nobody gets hurt I am considered a safe person? In your mind do you have to actually get hurt or killed to be "unsafe" even though you were doing things that are considered by the majority to be unsafe?
QuoteIs this how USPA deals with dicipline, by creating a lynching mob on DROPZONE.COM.
Hardly. A good portion of the BOD's don't even look at dz.com.
Quotenot crusify them by slandering reputations and ability on the internet like a bunch of whinning teenagers.
It is the internet.
QuoteHis actions as a tandem instructor in both safety and performance are exempelary.
Have you seen the video's?
QuoteDoes the USPA react this way with all its instructors who commit a misdemeanor.
DId you ask the USPA?
QuoteRemember the Regional Directors are elected by the jumpers to represent them. You are not elected to form opinions and orchestrate witch-hunts on the internet.
Jan is a NATIONAL director. She did not start this thread.
J
Actually, you are wrong on that point. Today, I got an email from a TI that did admit to doing this maneuver and has been reading this thread. When I called him to get some more info, I learned that the DZ had changed its policy on these types of carnival rides several years ago. Jacko did not abide by the new policy. This particular TI also wants to see Jacko's TI rating pulled for at least a year.
Well, I don't have the time to wade thru the realxstream nav system to look at videos. Maybe you can provide some 'hints'.
I think it's more like DZs have told TIs not to do this for several years, but there are some renegades still out there that want to do their thing because they are bored on tandem jumps.
I think it will be quite the opposite. If nothing happens, then USPA will get inundated with emails.
.
Make It Happen
Parachute History
DiveMaker
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites