matt3sa 0 #1 April 22, 2011 I found a post on this from 2008, so I'm looking for more current recommendations. I've had a Sony HC-21 for several years. It's been a good camera, but I'm looking to step it up to HD and would preferably like something smaller for handcams. The GoPro was initially very appealing me due to the compact size, however I found a few things about them that I didn't care for. For one, no view finder. Honestly, the lack of a viewfinder wasn't a deal breaker, but when I found out that each time you press record/stop, a new file is generated... that's a problem. We're still using old school video boards, so 3 separate files without the ability to pause or use slow mo (via a camera remote) becomes an issue. I'm open to any suggestions. I've considered using a laptop and trying to figure out what video software would be the most efficient, but with a small staff I end up editing a lot of my own videos. Real time stream with on the fly effects (while simultaneously recording) seems to be the fastest way. Any suggestions for small HD cameras with very wide (stock) field of view and/or ability to use a royal lens would be great. Thanks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #2 April 23, 2011 A few points: There is an LCD back for the GP now, but that won't answer your separate files question. Sony CX series has some small options, CX160 etc, but if you can find a CX 100 or 110...you'll likely be happier due to side load cards vs bottom load cards. Bear in mind that the slow mo on the camera vs doing with a computer is different than you're used to with DV, it's a tad more jerky. Adding a Royal, XSeries, or other SD lens to an HD camera is like putting a silver saddle on a donkey. FWIW, you'll have a faster over all flow with a fast computer vs your linear boards, and you'll have more flexibility for delivery, edit, and storage. That said...make do with whatever you have. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matt3sa 0 #3 April 23, 2011 What you mentioned about the lens is interesting me. Are you saying that it's a waste of time to go with the lens? It ruins the quality? Or are you saying that your making the camera (donkey) special because he has a silver saddle? After all, wide is very important for handcams (IMO) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalle 0 #4 April 23, 2011 "Adding a Royal, XSeries, or other SD lens to an HD camera is like putting a silver saddle on a donkey." I think what he means is using a SD lens on a camera the is able to shoot HD will not allow the camera to be used to is fullest potential. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matt3sa 0 #5 April 23, 2011 In that case, I wonder how many TI's are using hd for handcams and furthermore what the majority of them are using for a setup. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #6 April 23, 2011 QuoteWhat you mentioned about the lens is interesting me. Are you saying that it's a waste of time to go with the lens? It ruins the quality? Or are you saying that your making the camera (donkey) special because he has a silver saddle? After all, wide is very important for handcams (IMO) Freefalle clarified it; you won't be allowing the camera to perform to it's fullest ability. Unfortunately for handcam, high resolution wides (.4 and .3 are horribly large, heavy, and spendy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matt3sa 0 #7 April 23, 2011 DSE, I read up on some of the other responses to lenses for HD cameras. I understand the concept of what you're saying. However, am I incorrect to believe that throwing a "non-hd" rated wide angle on a new hd camera will still look far better than an old school hc-21 on tape? I personally don't care if the HD is top notch. We're just shooting handcams. If we stuck with old school they would still buy it. Either way it seems to be an upgrade for them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dokeman 0 #8 April 29, 2011 but an SD lens on a HD camera still looks NOTICEABLE better than a SD lens on a SD camera Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #9 April 29, 2011 Matt, even if you shoot SD on a newer cam, it'll look better/tighter than the old HC21. Putting an SD lens on an HD cam gives a softer edge to edge, but as mentioned, it'll still look better than an SD lens on an SD cam. If you're not delivering HD, and you're still using linear SD boards, you'll get a better image from an HD cam shooting SD than you're getting with your HC21. Unfortunately, a lot of people think it's all about the pixels when it's about glass, resolution, compression, and the end format. In short...you'll be happy you went to a newer cam capable of shooting HD, even if you're delivering SD. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Catwatch 0 #10 April 29, 2011 As for the editing problem. I have found a solution to that. I use a external media player (mine is called "poppstar") to playback the files one after the other. I put the sd card into the mediaplayer use the output of the mediaplayer just like it would come directly from a camera and can therefore use my normal "old school" video editing board as before. The media player creates a small pause between 2 files, however thats not a real problem to me. With the media player I can even slow mo the parts of the files I want to... And everything is done in linear time without rendering or anything just like it did before with my tape camera. works for me...my problem with the gopro is more related to the shake in freefall which I was not yet able to get rid off..but thats not the topic here... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtiflyer 0 #11 April 29, 2011 Quote Sony CX series has some small options, CX160 etc, but if you can find a CX 100 or 110...you'll likely be happier due to side load cards vs bottom load cards. Before you purchase a CX series camera, there is an error in the above statement. The CX110 is a BOTTOM loading camera. However it will take both SD and Sony sticks. The CX100 is side loading but ONLY takes the Sony Memory sticks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #12 April 29, 2011 Argh. Thanks for the catch. Combining two thoughts into one sentence made it come off wrong. The CX100 is my preference because it's side load. CX110 is a great cam in that it takes both cards and has a slightly better compression system...but the bottomload is a PITA (for me). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtiflyer 0 #13 April 29, 2011 QuoteArgh. Thanks for the catch. Combining two thoughts into one sentence made it come off wrong. The CX100 is my preference because it's side load. CX110 is a great cam in that it takes both cards and has a slightly better compression system...but the bottomload is a PITA (for me). agreed. As I only have cx110s' I had to cut a hole in both the cage and the top plate of the vapor pro to get to the card "easily". If only Sony had the side feed with OIS, skydivers' would have a good camera. Until then its just a matter of preference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trunk 0 #14 April 29, 2011 Of course, it would not be difficult to cut a hole in the bottom of the glove to retrieve the card, unlike helmets where you have a mount in the way. Of course, from what it sounds he's going to use linear editing boards anyway so the easier to find CX110/CX150 will work.Trunk's Blog HYPOXIC's Instagram Like HYPOXIC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
