0
sinister69

Wing Loading

Recommended Posts

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forums/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=forumsafetytraining&Number=42929&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&part=
;-)
Oh yeah. This one too....
http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forums/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=forumsafetytraining&Number=38299&page=2&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&part=
Justin
My Homepage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wing loading is the amount of weight that a wing is required to support aerodynamically. This is normally expressed (in the U.S. at least) as a ratio of pounds per square foot. For instance 1.3:1 would mean 1.3 pounds of weight is being supported by 1 foot of wing area. You'd speak that ratio as 1 point 3 to 1.
To arrive at these numbers, take the entire weight the wing needs to support, in our case we can use exit weight, and divide that by the area of the wing. A typical example might be a skydiver with an exit weight of 235 pounds. That weight includes EVERYTHING; skydiver, goggles, gloves, lead, rig and even the canopy itself.
If, for instance, that skydiver was planing on deploying a Spectre 190, then he'd have a wingloading of about 1.238:1.
This wingloading number is really only relevant to that particular model and size of canopy and would not give the same performace as a, for instance, Sabre 190. The two canopies would fly COMPLETELY differently even under the same wingloading.
Further, if the skydiver decided to downsize to a Spectre 170, he'd have a wingloading of about 1.382:1 and that canopy would also perform differently than if he'd increased his exit weight on his Spectre 190 to 262.65 pounds to give it the same wingloading.
Wingloading doesn't scale for performance issues.
Wingloading is only ONE factor in performance, however, generally speaking, lighter wingloadings can give softer and slower landings than higher wingloadings on the same model and size canopy.
Canopies are designed with a wingloading range in mind and moving to either extreme of too light or too heavy will degrade performance.
Check the manufacturer's recommendations.
Paul
http://futurecam.com/skydive.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice explanation Paul. Did that make sense Nelson? As paul stated, it's only one method to determine how a parachute "ought" to act over your head. Different parachutes perform differently at the same wingload in most instances, but not so much that you cant use the number as a good benchmark.
Chuck
My webpage HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0