pj_jumper 0 #51 July 19, 2012 This is one thing I think is critical. Pack your own rig whenever possible is a good policy.Skydiving without a parachute is easy, its skydiving twice without a parachute that is extremely difficult Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pj_jumper 0 #52 July 19, 2012 Ok this obviously makes more sense to approach this than what I said. Live and learn. I didn't mean to be judgemental just spark up a debate more or less.Skydiving without a parachute is easy, its skydiving twice without a parachute that is extremely difficult Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
format 1 #53 July 19, 2012 QuotePack your own rig whenever possible is a good policy. and whoever packed it - don't pull command line through ANYTHINGWhat goes around, comes later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinciflies 0 #54 July 19, 2012 Quote I am new to the sport and I wouldn't have given a second thought to cutting this situation away, but hey, I am serious "chicken shit" when it comes to risk. I have been practicing turning, stalling an flaring on the rears, but I can't see myself trying it for real. That's given more information on which to base your decision to chop it. Good stuff! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GLIDEANGLE 1 #55 July 19, 2012 "Pack your own whenever pissible" Really? Packing had little, if anything, to do with this incident. The paid packers who I know generally pack better than many experienced jumpers. Admittedly, my DZ has high standards for packers. I know lots of jumpers who are better off paying packers than packing for themselves.The choices we make have consequences, for us & for others! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lookoutbelow 0 #56 July 19, 2012 QuoteLooks to me like he did that to himself. At 1:47 you see him pull the toggle through the loop in the excess brake line that had come unstowed (or wasn't stowed properly when it was last packed). If that's what he did, it was an avoidable malfunction. That does seem to be it exactly. When watching the video I was trying to figure out just what exactly happened. It wasn't obvious to this noob. Pulled out my rig and it didn't take me long to reproduce it. I guess I just learned one more thing. I'm sure if the line had become unstowed like that on me before now, it wouldn't have occurred to me how cautious I'd have to be. So regardless of the intent of posting the video, I'm glad it was posted and discussed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
excaza 1 #57 July 19, 2012 I'm kinda glad I saw this video, sometimes I've accidentally pulled out the stow instead of the toggle, I didn't realize it could potentially do something like this! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phoenixlpr 0 #58 July 19, 2012 You'd rather have one more cut-away and reserve ride than regret not having one. He saved his live, job well done! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jacketsdb23 49 #59 July 19, 2012 I had basically the same thing happen (knotted steering line around my RDS grommet - my fault) and I took a wrap on the good toggle to straighten her out and landed on rears. Velo 96 loaded at 2.2. I fly on rears all the time though, and land on them a lot even when I have two good toggles. Never thought about cutting the bad brake line, until someone asked me after why I didn't.Losers make excuses, Winners make it happen God is Good Beer is Great Swoopers are crazy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSpenceFLY 1 #60 July 20, 2012 Quote Quote ***Container: Wonderhog Main: Super Evolution 120 ft² (3.50 lbs/ft²) Reserve: Nova 120 ft² (3.50 lbs/ft²) AAD: FXC Model 12000 You gotta be an old fart. A tid bit of history here: The Nova 7 was an actual reserve canopy that never went into full production. It was in fact, TSO'd and a few were built! Chris Gay had a 77 sq ft model IIRC. Quite the swoop machine BTW! MEL The Nova: The canopy that flew great till it collapsed. They just never figured out how to market that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #61 July 20, 2012 QuoteI fly on rears all the time though, and land on them a lot even when I have two good toggles. Never thought about cutting the bad brake line, until someone asked me after why I didn't. A good reason not to cut the offending brake line is that it's not as simple as it seems. As someone else mentioned, you would need to cut both of them to make a 'symetrical' canopy, because even in full flight the brake lines hold tail in place and in line with the rest of the canopy. Additionally, if you cut both brake lines, and allow the tail to fly free, your rear riser flare will only effect the canopy from the mid-chord to the D-lines, as the tail won't be suspended (or suspend any weight) at all. So your effective flying area will be reduced, and in turn your stall speed will go up, and flare effectiveness will go down. Even when ladning only on rears, the steering lines hold the tail in place and allow it to take some of the load during the plane-out and flare. This is true on any canopy, and BASE jumpers will confirm that even their BASE canopies come in different when they have to toss their toggles to clear a line-over. If you're flying a Velo at 2.2, you should be good enough to compensate for the knotted brake line, and get enough flare out of the rears (or one rear, one toggle) in order to have a 'good' landing. If you're flying a Velo at any loading and don't feel confident in your ability to do that, you're in over your head. This is the prime example for choosing a canopy for the worst case scenario. If this mal had occured below the hard deck, you would be stuck landing the comprimised canopy, and this is where your canopy should be forgiving enough to make up for your lack of skill. If you don't feel like you could land your canopy like the one in the video, you should either be focused on improving your canopy piloting skills as job one, or looking for a bigger or more doclie canopy (or both). I'm not suggesting that everyone should choose to land such a canopy if they're presented with it, much to the contrarty. If you prefer to land a more functional canopy, by all means cutaway. What I'm saying is that not everyone has the luxury of altitude like the jumper in the video, and if you should end up there, you should be ready for that with sufficient canopy piloting skills and a canopy to match. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pj_jumper 0 #62 July 20, 2012 Quote"Pack your own whenever pissible" Really? Packing had little, if anything, to do with this incident. The paid packers who I know generally pack better than many experienced jumpers. Admittedly, my DZ has high standards for packers. I know lots of jumpers who are better off paying packers than packing for themselves. packing was almost no factor. but pack your own rig is a good policy. i believe its part of the sport that you should learn as well as any. this jumper in the video does not. i wish i were rich like himSkydiving without a parachute is easy, its skydiving twice without a parachute that is extremely difficult Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aussiechick 0 #63 July 20, 2012 Don't criticize someone for choosing to chop a malfunctioning main just because YOU think you would have landed it. You'd feel like an even bigger dick if you broke yourself on landing, all the while having a nice unused reserve still in your container. He landed. He was unhurt. It was the right decision for HIM. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #64 July 20, 2012 Quote as the tail won't be suspended (or suspend any weight) at all. I do wonder though, to what degree it is true. Certainly a tail unsupported by brake lines on opening can flip up. Old Bridge day videos show openings that sucked when misrigged brake likes blew and the tail folded upwards initially -- but later the canopy flew without much distortion. The tail should be stiff enough through internal pressure to stay in place when simply rear riser flaring. For example, if one has a swoop canopy, the tail doesn't totally distort just because you have an extra 6" slack in your brake lines. The tail doesn't start to fold upwards. Nor does it flip up in the center section where there are no brake lines to begin with. If you are starting a rear riser flare, the tail is only supported fully in the first place if you're on a canopy with Spectra brake lines that have shrunk to zero slack. So normally, internal pressure will keep the tail reasonably in the right place even under the small additional forces from a rear riser flare. So I'm half way on this: An unsupported tail may distort and add a hazard, but I don't think things will automatically go bad. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpenfool 2 #65 July 20, 2012 I just spent a bunch of time reading this entire thread. PJ_Jumper... If you're afraid to use your researve given ample altitude under these conditions, buy a bowling ball and some striped shoes. You need to have complete confidence in your reserve and the guy or gal (probly not you) who packed it. Good luck in your continued skydiving endevors. Please don't make me update my "Bounce Bingo" cards. @ the guy in the video... Nice cutaway! I'd of done the same thing. In air rigging, even cutting break lines, is not a good idea. Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjosparky 4 #66 July 20, 2012 QuoteCriticize me and my set up? I have taken the advice of dz pros who know me have watched me fly over 90% of my jumps. This canopy and loading may get me flamed for my expirience level but dont worry it is a calculated descision. I do respect your concern. What you are trying to do is convince yourself and us is that you are better at 150 jumps than all the jumpers on this list. Good luck you will need it. Sparky http://www.skydivingfatalities.info/search.asp?MinDate=5%2F8%2F1995&MaxDate=1%2F2%2F2009&Place=&State=&Country=US&Category=LOWT&MinAge=16&MaxAge=78&UnknownAge=on&MinJumps=0&MaxJumps=15000&UnknownJumps=on&AAD=&RSL=&Description=&DescriptionOperator=OR&Lessons=&LessonsOperator=ORMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
format 1 #67 July 20, 2012 In order to convince him you have to jump What goes around, comes later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC1 0 #68 July 20, 2012 Quote Quote Looks to me like he did that to himself. At 1:47 you see him pull the toggle through the loop in the excess brake line that had come unstowed (or wasn't stowed properly when it was last packed). If that's what he did, it was an avoidable malfunction. That does seem to be it exactly. When watching the video I was trying to figure out just what exactly happened. It wasn't obvious to this noob. Pulled out my rig and it didn't take me long to reproduce it. I guess I just learned one more thing. I'm sure if the line had become unstowed like that on me before now, it wouldn't have occurred to me how cautious I'd have to be. So regardless of the intent of posting the video, I'm glad it was posted and discussed. I once had this very problem, except my finger was stuck in the knot, so I had no choice but to land it. The trick is to pay attention as to how you put your fingers in the toggle before you pop the brakes. I also tend to pack with the excess stowed to the inside of the riser so if it comes loose, it's hopefully held away from my fingers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joellercoaster 6 #69 July 20, 2012 QuoteI once had this very problem, except my finger was stuck in the knot]/reply] Yup, me too. I freed it eventually, but it scared 50-jump me to the point where I still always, always look at what I'm doing when I reach for the toggles.-- "I'll tell you how all skydivers are judged, . They are judged by the laws of physics." - kkeenan "You jump out, pull the string and either live or die. What's there to be good at? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites michalm21 2 #70 July 20, 2012 Pretty much identical thing happened to me last weekend. I always pack for myself, couldn't believe I'd stow my brake carelessly like that but it happened. I decided to cut the lower brake line and land on rears but I also thought of cutting away (for too long let me add) I don't think he did a wrong thing. In terms of his other actions it's subjective to judge from this video and description. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Ron 10 #71 July 20, 2012 QuoteBy swooping I only mean attempts at accelerated landings. Be it front riser dives. Or 90s. But always with altitude to spare. Do you think anyone EVER did a turn to final low on purpose? Don't you think they ALL thought they would be fine? Quote I highly doubt much besides altitude, his toggle and damn packers went through his mind The guy had a canopy he didn't feel was safe to land. He made a choice and correctly executed that choice. You may not agree with his choice.... But how many malfunctions have you handled? Me, I have 9 cutaways and 5500+ jumps and I think the guy did the right thing. I might not have done the same thing - but it was not my ass in the saddle, it was his."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Ron 10 #72 July 20, 2012 QuoteI am curious as to why he chose to land in half brake. Could someone share with me the logic of doing this. With the correct sized canopy, landing in half brakes and doing a PLF is a very valid option. If you recall your FJC "go to half brakes and prepare to PLF" was most likely mentioned several times during the emergency landing portion of the course. Was it necessary here? Most likely not, but it didn't hurt anything."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rstanley0312 1 #73 July 20, 2012 Quote In order to convince him you have to jump That was awesome! Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #74 July 20, 2012 QuoteI had basically the same thing happen (knotted steering line around my RDS grommet - my fault) and I took a wrap on the good toggle to straighten her out and landed on rears. Velo 96 loaded at 2.2. I fly on rears all the time though, and land on them a lot even when I have two good toggles. Never thought about cutting the bad brake line, until someone asked me after why I didn't. thanks, I'd do the same thing (wrap the other line to balance, and then fly rears) even if I had my knife - as long as it's not TOO many wraps to balance. That could seriously mess with the riser flare. Also, Dave's note on cutting lines applies, especially for smaller canopies. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,063 #75 July 20, 2012 >Old Bridge day videos show openings that sucked when misrigged brake likes blew >and the tail folded upwards initially -- but later the canopy flew without much >distortion. Depends on the canopy. Several sorts of canopies (Swifts, a Clipper Sprint, a Z-Po) had their tails fold up even during normal flight with released brakes. All older designs; I haven't been to Bridge Day in a while so I don't know if newer canopies have this issue. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 3 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
michalm21 2 #70 July 20, 2012 Pretty much identical thing happened to me last weekend. I always pack for myself, couldn't believe I'd stow my brake carelessly like that but it happened. I decided to cut the lower brake line and land on rears but I also thought of cutting away (for too long let me add) I don't think he did a wrong thing. In terms of his other actions it's subjective to judge from this video and description. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #71 July 20, 2012 QuoteBy swooping I only mean attempts at accelerated landings. Be it front riser dives. Or 90s. But always with altitude to spare. Do you think anyone EVER did a turn to final low on purpose? Don't you think they ALL thought they would be fine? Quote I highly doubt much besides altitude, his toggle and damn packers went through his mind The guy had a canopy he didn't feel was safe to land. He made a choice and correctly executed that choice. You may not agree with his choice.... But how many malfunctions have you handled? Me, I have 9 cutaways and 5500+ jumps and I think the guy did the right thing. I might not have done the same thing - but it was not my ass in the saddle, it was his."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #72 July 20, 2012 QuoteI am curious as to why he chose to land in half brake. Could someone share with me the logic of doing this. With the correct sized canopy, landing in half brakes and doing a PLF is a very valid option. If you recall your FJC "go to half brakes and prepare to PLF" was most likely mentioned several times during the emergency landing portion of the course. Was it necessary here? Most likely not, but it didn't hurt anything."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #73 July 20, 2012 Quote In order to convince him you have to jump That was awesome! Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #74 July 20, 2012 QuoteI had basically the same thing happen (knotted steering line around my RDS grommet - my fault) and I took a wrap on the good toggle to straighten her out and landed on rears. Velo 96 loaded at 2.2. I fly on rears all the time though, and land on them a lot even when I have two good toggles. Never thought about cutting the bad brake line, until someone asked me after why I didn't. thanks, I'd do the same thing (wrap the other line to balance, and then fly rears) even if I had my knife - as long as it's not TOO many wraps to balance. That could seriously mess with the riser flare. Also, Dave's note on cutting lines applies, especially for smaller canopies. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,063 #75 July 20, 2012 >Old Bridge day videos show openings that sucked when misrigged brake likes blew >and the tail folded upwards initially -- but later the canopy flew without much >distortion. Depends on the canopy. Several sorts of canopies (Swifts, a Clipper Sprint, a Z-Po) had their tails fold up even during normal flight with released brakes. All older designs; I haven't been to Bridge Day in a while so I don't know if newer canopies have this issue. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites