Recommended Posts
Anyway, this is all for naught anyway, as I believe the original poster brought up the matter because he was being pushed in the "smaller is cooler" direction by the uppity freeflyers on his DZ.
Chuck
rmcvey 0
Quote
Anyway, this is all for naught anyway, as I believe the original poster brought up the matter because he was being pushed in the "smaller is cooler" direction by the uppity freeflyers on his DZ.
Chuck
Hey, i am the uppity freeflyer at my dz!
but seriouslly, i fully understand the evils involved in fashions and peers and how both sometimes come before safety when choosing kit. But if this was the case i would already be jumping the canopy.
Like i said, ill maybe try the 120 in few months.
Now go and get practicing for the next swoop meet Mr."im too modest and humble to care what others think on my 85 surfing the pond infront of hundreds of people"
HEHe!
Safe ones.
QuoteNow go and get practicing for the next swoop meet Mr."im too modest and humble to care what others think on my 85 surfing the pond infront of hundreds of people"
Dude, my "large" main is a 75 (not counting my StarTrac 1 demo rig) . My roommate jumps the 85 now.
QuoteI will agree with Dan on this one. The "feel" will not be altered (in my opinion) on such a lightly loaded canopy. If his canopy were "snapping" him on opening, it would fix that, but he would not get much more benefit out of it at that wingload. The difference between the stock and competiton models really becomes evident at wingloads at 2.0 and higher. The H-mod at about the same level.
Anyway, this is all for naught anyway, as I believe the original poster brought up the matter because he was being pushed in the "smaller is cooler" direction by the uppity freeflyers on his DZ.
Chuck
Ok I was really asking for my greedy self. I have a cobalt 120 @ 1.6 and I'm looking for a little more. Would the H-mod do it while still giving a margin of the standard 120 approach and flare?
No one is pressuring me to downsize. In fact nobody cares but me. A while ago when I was demoing,renting and borrowing any main I could get my paws on in several sizes. I had a dubious flirtation with a cobalt 120 that would do perfect and effortless barrel rolls. I spent a few good days deploying at 13K and just really playing hard with that main and loving it! That canopy was just about new, maybe a handful of jumps.
I have since acquired a cobalt 120 that opens and flys great but it isn't the same. Someone might say its perception and it is all in my head. Other people I have discussed this with say its a result of hand workmanship at Attair, no laser cutting. I do believe it is night and day. Although my new main had about 50 jumps on it when I got it and had its brakes lengthened 1" by its previous owner, I don't think these are reasons enough to account for the difference.
I thought about the H-mod but if it really isn't noticeable on a 120 @1.6 I could just save that cash for more hop& pops from 13K.
I do know its kinda silly to alter a product that performs wonderfully. I may sacrifice one facet to strengthen another. Thanks for indulging the curious.
Glen.
this statement refers to the competition cobalt. the h-mod does not fly quite as fast. i would say the h-mod would be similar to 1/2 size faster.
i have never jumped an h-mod bigger than a 95, but i believe the h-mod on a lightly loaded canopy would be noticable just not as dramatic as on a heavy loaded canopy.
sincerely,
dan<><>
atairaerodynamics.com (sport)
atairaerospace.com (military)
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites