Recommended Posts
The point is, yes I fucked up, I've admited that, I'm not trying to blame the canopy and never was. I was just saying that the higher performance you go and the high-wingloading you go, the faster things happen and the quicker everything can go bad, very bad.
hookitt 1
Dave don't worry about the flames. (which I imagine you really aren't too concerned)
We all screw up and you did it big but In the long run, it all worked out. Now you have at least one real life example that didn't, but could have, killed you to share with others. I certainly appreciate the grand effort.
I've kicked out of some pretty severe spinning line twists. I've also cut away with in one spiral as it went for a dive. It was easy to tell it was hopeless.
I'm just happy it worked out for you. What does not kill you makes you stronger.
-
Yoshi 0
just my 2 cents..
-yoshi
this space for rent.
AndyMan 7
QuoteSo you're trying to say that your Tri loaded at 1.2 dropped altitude as quickly as my Heatwave loaded at 1.7? That's pretty hard to believe.
A wing pointed at the ground does not generate vertical lift.
Yes, larger wings have more drag, but vertical lift is the primary "decelerator" in a modern canopy. Larger wings will obviously drop slower because of the higher drag, but the difference is negligible.
Point a wing at the ground, and it will fall. Fast. 747, 182, or Pitts: it won't be pretty.
Not trying to chew your ass, just pointing out that a bigger canopy would not necesarily have changed the outcome by a considerable margin. It would have decreased the odds of you being in the situation in the first place, though.
_Am
You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.
This is not true at all IMHO. Whats wrong with straight in double riser approaches for a hundred jumps?? I did just that from about 150-225 before putting in 15 degree increments into my landing patterns.
I don't think people realize that they can get decent surfs from double fronts...
-- (N.DG) "If all else fails – at least try and look under control." --
QuoteI don't think people realize that they can get decent surfs from double fronts...
People thought I was out of it when I started double fronts at about 75 jumps while they said "I wont hook until I have 1000 jumps". I did some realy cool shit on my 209 and now I feel tons more comfortable on every canopy I fly.
Johnny
--"This ain't no book club, we're all gonna die!"
Mike Rome
Its funny how easily that fact is overlooked. People just want to "look cool" with a turn on final. Do it for yourself not to "look cool".
-- (N.DG) "If all else fails – at least try and look under control." --
sneaky 0
slowly slowly softley gentley monkey
its a big Long learning curve....... take it slow...
and unless you getting 100% out of your canopy you have no need to change ( unless its really bad or not suitable ).For a canopy youre gonna need something reliable and suitable for your weight and experience .Concentrate on Accuracy and your freeflying ( remember for us pros the swoop is the icing on the cake at the End of the skydive ) learn the canopy and how it respond in all conditions when thats perfect,then your ready to take the step to learning your swoop technique..
I didnt start even trying to swoop until about 800 jumps and now these have progressed too 270' long carving riser turns...( But only when its the right conditions.. and I feel up for it..( All the time baby!!! )
I once had my Triathlon loaded at 1.2 spin up. Any canopy can spin up and put you on your back. Yes, it was diving incredibly quickly too. My pro-track didn't notice any change in freefall speed.
You could have just as easily been in that situation under my old Triathlon had you wasted too much time trying to fix it.
_Am
You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites