Sadcat 0 #1 February 2, 2005 What's the advantages and disavantages of the two shapes for swooping with this specifique wing loading. I want technical information. Who is the best choice considering that the skills is not a problem, and I'm not thinking of me of course, it's an hipotetical situation. Thank you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spizzzarko 0 #2 February 2, 2005 9cell at that loading. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bartje 0 #3 February 2, 2005 for swooping: 9 cell for opening: 7 cell for fun: you name it.. A FreeFly Gypsy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrewEckhardt 0 #4 February 2, 2005 Quotefor swooping: 9 cell for opening: 7 cell for fun: you name it.. I tried an FX 104 arround that wing loading. While it did a fine job staying in a dive, it wasn't as responsive and fun to fly as conventional 9-cells the same size. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ccowden 0 #5 February 2, 2005 IMO- you are wasting your money if you buy a crossbraced canopy for that loading. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nicknitro71 0 #6 February 2, 2005 I agree. I jump a X-FX 111 and a H-mod Viper 105 both at 1.62. The Viper is overall a much better canopy at that WL: opening, front riser pressure, it dives better, and has a longer recovery arch. The bottom-end is comparable. So for the money go with a 9.Memento Audere Semper 903 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #7 February 2, 2005 9-cell. I'd take a hard look at the Katana and the Crossfire2 --"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkymonkeyONE 4 #8 February 2, 2005 His very-incomplete profile says he currently jumps a Stilletto 150. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #9 February 2, 2005 Quote His very-incomplete profile says he currently jumps a Stilletto 150. Crap, good point, I forgot to even look at the profile... Ok, that's my fuckup for the month, I can't fuck up again or SM1 will put the smack down. Sorry.--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nicknitro71 0 #10 February 2, 2005 I guess he's looking to go down to a 120.Memento Audere Semper 903 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonto 1 #11 February 3, 2005 QuoteI guess tIt's the year of the Pig. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bartje 0 #12 February 3, 2005 QuoteI tried an FX 104 arround that wing loading. While it did a fine job staying in a dive, it wasn't as responsive and fun to fly as conventional 9-cells the same size. I know, a Fx need a minimum wing load from 1.8 before you can get real good fun with it. Even the differance from 0.06wl can make the differance. I prefer the Fx at 2.0, than you can have real good fun with it. A FreeFly Gypsy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sadcat 0 #13 February 3, 2005 You are right, I have 764 jumps, 5 years in Sport, I fly a stiletto 135 and I don't want do downsize in the near future. Maybe in the next season. I intentionaly did not put my number of jumps because of the moral replies. Sorry. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites