marks 0 #26 June 30, 2005 Quote1.8 on a 119 crossfire2 so, ive got family in the uk, plus some skymiles from delta to spend..... will you pick me up at the airport and show me around the local uk dz's... i would like to know you before your in the incident forum..... just so i can make sure the TRUTH! is told.. and no.... dude, i'm serious! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #27 June 30, 2005 Quote so, ive got family in the uk, plus some skymiles from delta to spend..... will you pick me up at the airport and show me around the local uk dz's... i would like to know you before your in the incident forum..... just so i can make sure the TRUTH! is told.. and no.... dude, i'm serious! Quote Im sure you are. The answer is no. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Spizzzarko 0 #28 June 30, 2005 I was going to let someone else say it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks 0 #29 June 30, 2005 well why dont you come out here to the U.S. we could hit up big sky and drop in off some cliffs. after snowboarding, we can evaluate your canopy skills. dude, i just dont want you to get hurt because your ego got in the way. and yes we ALL have ego's, just need to learn how to check it.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Spizzzarko 0 #30 June 30, 2005 That snowboarding stuff is some scary shit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #31 June 30, 2005 Why are you having a go at me saying I have a big ego? I haven't been ranting or anything. Peace Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Spizzzarko 0 #32 June 30, 2005 Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks 0 #33 June 30, 2005 not having a go at you. just understand that there is alot of peeps out there that start talkin like they know what is going on, and get ahead of themself and get SEVERLY hurt. take your time with alot of this stuff, and be carefull what kind of advice you give out."pot meet kettle"... we are all still learning here, but with your expeiance level, you have ALOT to learn.... just be carefull, and im not saying you have a big ego, you really havent acted like you do, so please forgive me for that. everyone has one though, so just relize what you DONT know instead of focusing on what you do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites AndyMan 7 #34 June 30, 2005 Triathlon 190, loaded at 1.1. Double fronts, 90's, and the occaisional 180 sure were fun. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #35 June 30, 2005 OK cool, point taken. I haven't been giving advice though, just giving my oppinion, also haven't been replying to anybody that that doesn't know what they are doing.. Keep it real.. M.J Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #36 July 1, 2005 Quote Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. Quote you mean i listed a rant, rave or ego in there? How come i cant find it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Fast 0 #37 July 1, 2005 QuoteQuote Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. you mean i listed a rant, rave or ego in there? How come i cant find it? Its encoded in the jumps to wing loading ratio. From your register date it shows you haven't been around the site long. Let me just warn you, Low jump numbers + High Wing loading is pretty frowned on around here. I would guess that has a lot to do with this forum where people have to come on here and report that Jumper XYZ just brokekilled himself doing a 270 @ 300 jumps on a velocity 90 (Ok, thats an exageration but not really that far from the truth with some people around here) It comes down to people thinking they know what's up when really they have so little knowledge they can't possibly be accurately measuring their own performance. Now, I am not saying that is you... but that is what comes to mind when someone says 1.8 @ 2xx jumps. People around here read way more into what you say than the words on the surface. For what it's worth, even I think 1.8 @ 250 jumps is a lot and honestly I won't try and say I have been conservative in my canopy flying.~D Where troubles melt like lemon drops Away above the chimney tops That's where you'll find me. Swooping is taking one last poke at the bear before escaping it's cave - davelepka Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Spizzzarko 0 #38 July 1, 2005 whatever dude. You know what is best. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #39 July 1, 2005 hey you said it. I just axed why. if you have something to say..say it. If not then dont. Most people on this forum are adults. Marks has already told me what he feels about the whole thing...and i said point taken. Your comment was tired..and served no purpose to anyone..including yourself. You might get a message across to an audience better if you learn to channel your thoughts to represent a sound thinking process and subsequently communicate appropriately. now back to topic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #40 July 1, 2005 You are quite right there man. I totally respect what you have just said. Good looking out. 1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites AMax 0 #41 July 2, 2005 Oh dear God check this out. He's already on VX 89 loaded at 2.45 Edit to add: I understand that some people will never listen until they get hurt. The question is who sold him the canopy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites matt91078 0 #42 July 2, 2005 haha... and people on my dz freaked when someone went to a 1.4 at 300 jumps Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites bob.dino 1 #43 July 2, 2005 Quote1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. For the record, I've never seen you fly, and I've no idea of your ability, but loading a canopy at 2.45:1 with under 250 jumps would mean that you'd have serious difficulty persuading any dropzone in Australia to let you jump there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites partyboy 0 #44 July 2, 2005 Well, it seems you understand the risks with a WL of 2.0+, and I have to say I respect that. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. I dont swoop, so I cant say anything about that topic, but I have already had too may people tell me I'm all F@ucked in the head for such an "irrratioanl decision". I wish I could post videos of my landings on this site. Is that what they want to see? Up High!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites br0k3n 0 #45 July 4, 2005 Quote. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. Why?----------------------------------------------------------- --+ There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.. --+ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #46 July 4, 2005 Quote Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. Quote Some people get vexed over canopy types listed Some people get vexed over jump numbers listed I have never heard of someone being taken to task over the nick-name on their profiles. Just to make you happy..i have changed it from Swoopmeister to Mary Poppins..now dont go around saying that it implies i think im now a sexy swooper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites bob.dino 1 #47 July 4, 2005 Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . Edit: Sorry if this came across as overly bitchy. I have a bit of sarcastic tongue in my head . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dharma1976 0 #48 July 5, 2005 Quote Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . that was the biggest dig I have seen since I ankled in under a 1.33 loaded semi elliptical with 200 jumps ;) after the fact I realized that yes they were right and upsized for another 200 jumps... sometimes humility comes with pain man, and no one seems to want to listen to our experiences whether personal or from seeing it on others, mostly because they are "different", and they are special, and the rules of physics dont apply to them. oh well Skyjunky Davehttp://www.skyjunky.com CSpenceFLY - I can't believe the number of people willing to bet their life on someone else doing the right thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks 0 #49 July 5, 2005 quit fuckin with the kids! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skinnyshrek 0 #50 July 5, 2005 Dude, you need some serious help on so many levels......http://www.skydivethefarm.com do you realize that when you critisize people you dont know over the internet, you become part of a growing society of twats? ARE YOU ONE OF THEM? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
Spizzzarko 0 #28 June 30, 2005 I was going to let someone else say it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks 0 #29 June 30, 2005 well why dont you come out here to the U.S. we could hit up big sky and drop in off some cliffs. after snowboarding, we can evaluate your canopy skills. dude, i just dont want you to get hurt because your ego got in the way. and yes we ALL have ego's, just need to learn how to check it.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spizzzarko 0 #30 June 30, 2005 That snowboarding stuff is some scary shit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #31 June 30, 2005 Why are you having a go at me saying I have a big ego? I haven't been ranting or anything. Peace Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spizzzarko 0 #32 June 30, 2005 Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks 0 #33 June 30, 2005 not having a go at you. just understand that there is alot of peeps out there that start talkin like they know what is going on, and get ahead of themself and get SEVERLY hurt. take your time with alot of this stuff, and be carefull what kind of advice you give out."pot meet kettle"... we are all still learning here, but with your expeiance level, you have ALOT to learn.... just be carefull, and im not saying you have a big ego, you really havent acted like you do, so please forgive me for that. everyone has one though, so just relize what you DONT know instead of focusing on what you do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #34 June 30, 2005 Triathlon 190, loaded at 1.1. Double fronts, 90's, and the occaisional 180 sure were fun. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #35 June 30, 2005 OK cool, point taken. I haven't been giving advice though, just giving my oppinion, also haven't been replying to anybody that that doesn't know what they are doing.. Keep it real.. M.J Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #36 July 1, 2005 Quote Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. Quote you mean i listed a rant, rave or ego in there? How come i cant find it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Fast 0 #37 July 1, 2005 QuoteQuote Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. you mean i listed a rant, rave or ego in there? How come i cant find it? Its encoded in the jumps to wing loading ratio. From your register date it shows you haven't been around the site long. Let me just warn you, Low jump numbers + High Wing loading is pretty frowned on around here. I would guess that has a lot to do with this forum where people have to come on here and report that Jumper XYZ just brokekilled himself doing a 270 @ 300 jumps on a velocity 90 (Ok, thats an exageration but not really that far from the truth with some people around here) It comes down to people thinking they know what's up when really they have so little knowledge they can't possibly be accurately measuring their own performance. Now, I am not saying that is you... but that is what comes to mind when someone says 1.8 @ 2xx jumps. People around here read way more into what you say than the words on the surface. For what it's worth, even I think 1.8 @ 250 jumps is a lot and honestly I won't try and say I have been conservative in my canopy flying.~D Where troubles melt like lemon drops Away above the chimney tops That's where you'll find me. Swooping is taking one last poke at the bear before escaping it's cave - davelepka Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Spizzzarko 0 #38 July 1, 2005 whatever dude. You know what is best. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #39 July 1, 2005 hey you said it. I just axed why. if you have something to say..say it. If not then dont. Most people on this forum are adults. Marks has already told me what he feels about the whole thing...and i said point taken. Your comment was tired..and served no purpose to anyone..including yourself. You might get a message across to an audience better if you learn to channel your thoughts to represent a sound thinking process and subsequently communicate appropriately. now back to topic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #40 July 1, 2005 You are quite right there man. I totally respect what you have just said. Good looking out. 1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites AMax 0 #41 July 2, 2005 Oh dear God check this out. He's already on VX 89 loaded at 2.45 Edit to add: I understand that some people will never listen until they get hurt. The question is who sold him the canopy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites matt91078 0 #42 July 2, 2005 haha... and people on my dz freaked when someone went to a 1.4 at 300 jumps Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites bob.dino 1 #43 July 2, 2005 Quote1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. For the record, I've never seen you fly, and I've no idea of your ability, but loading a canopy at 2.45:1 with under 250 jumps would mean that you'd have serious difficulty persuading any dropzone in Australia to let you jump there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites partyboy 0 #44 July 2, 2005 Well, it seems you understand the risks with a WL of 2.0+, and I have to say I respect that. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. I dont swoop, so I cant say anything about that topic, but I have already had too may people tell me I'm all F@ucked in the head for such an "irrratioanl decision". I wish I could post videos of my landings on this site. Is that what they want to see? Up High!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites br0k3n 0 #45 July 4, 2005 Quote. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. Why?----------------------------------------------------------- --+ There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.. --+ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rain-man 0 #46 July 4, 2005 Quote Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. Quote Some people get vexed over canopy types listed Some people get vexed over jump numbers listed I have never heard of someone being taken to task over the nick-name on their profiles. Just to make you happy..i have changed it from Swoopmeister to Mary Poppins..now dont go around saying that it implies i think im now a sexy swooper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites bob.dino 1 #47 July 4, 2005 Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . Edit: Sorry if this came across as overly bitchy. I have a bit of sarcastic tongue in my head . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dharma1976 0 #48 July 5, 2005 Quote Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . that was the biggest dig I have seen since I ankled in under a 1.33 loaded semi elliptical with 200 jumps ;) after the fact I realized that yes they were right and upsized for another 200 jumps... sometimes humility comes with pain man, and no one seems to want to listen to our experiences whether personal or from seeing it on others, mostly because they are "different", and they are special, and the rules of physics dont apply to them. oh well Skyjunky Davehttp://www.skyjunky.com CSpenceFLY - I can't believe the number of people willing to bet their life on someone else doing the right thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks 0 #49 July 5, 2005 quit fuckin with the kids! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skinnyshrek 0 #50 July 5, 2005 Dude, you need some serious help on so many levels......http://www.skydivethefarm.com do you realize that when you critisize people you dont know over the internet, you become part of a growing society of twats? ARE YOU ONE OF THEM? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Fast 0 #37 July 1, 2005 QuoteQuote Dude it's your listed jump numbers and your wing loading. you mean i listed a rant, rave or ego in there? How come i cant find it? Its encoded in the jumps to wing loading ratio. From your register date it shows you haven't been around the site long. Let me just warn you, Low jump numbers + High Wing loading is pretty frowned on around here. I would guess that has a lot to do with this forum where people have to come on here and report that Jumper XYZ just brokekilled himself doing a 270 @ 300 jumps on a velocity 90 (Ok, thats an exageration but not really that far from the truth with some people around here) It comes down to people thinking they know what's up when really they have so little knowledge they can't possibly be accurately measuring their own performance. Now, I am not saying that is you... but that is what comes to mind when someone says 1.8 @ 2xx jumps. People around here read way more into what you say than the words on the surface. For what it's worth, even I think 1.8 @ 250 jumps is a lot and honestly I won't try and say I have been conservative in my canopy flying.~D Where troubles melt like lemon drops Away above the chimney tops That's where you'll find me. Swooping is taking one last poke at the bear before escaping it's cave - davelepka Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spizzzarko 0 #38 July 1, 2005 whatever dude. You know what is best. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #39 July 1, 2005 hey you said it. I just axed why. if you have something to say..say it. If not then dont. Most people on this forum are adults. Marks has already told me what he feels about the whole thing...and i said point taken. Your comment was tired..and served no purpose to anyone..including yourself. You might get a message across to an audience better if you learn to channel your thoughts to represent a sound thinking process and subsequently communicate appropriately. now back to topic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #40 July 1, 2005 You are quite right there man. I totally respect what you have just said. Good looking out. 1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AMax 0 #41 July 2, 2005 Oh dear God check this out. He's already on VX 89 loaded at 2.45 Edit to add: I understand that some people will never listen until they get hurt. The question is who sold him the canopy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matt91078 0 #42 July 2, 2005 haha... and people on my dz freaked when someone went to a 1.4 at 300 jumps Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob.dino 1 #43 July 2, 2005 Quote1.8 wing loading at 200 jumps is high yes. No denying it nor saying that im God's gift to anything. Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. For the record, I've never seen you fly, and I've no idea of your ability, but loading a canopy at 2.45:1 with under 250 jumps would mean that you'd have serious difficulty persuading any dropzone in Australia to let you jump there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
partyboy 0 #44 July 2, 2005 Well, it seems you understand the risks with a WL of 2.0+, and I have to say I respect that. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. I dont swoop, so I cant say anything about that topic, but I have already had too may people tell me I'm all F@ucked in the head for such an "irrratioanl decision". I wish I could post videos of my landings on this site. Is that what they want to see? Up High!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
br0k3n 0 #45 July 4, 2005 Quote. I myself am going to be under a Sabre 2 135 with 120 skydives with a WL of about 1.4. Why?----------------------------------------------------------- --+ There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.. --+ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rain-man 0 #46 July 4, 2005 Quote Fair enough. But putting your nickname as SwoopMeister makes it seem as if you do think you're tastier than Marmite. Quote Some people get vexed over canopy types listed Some people get vexed over jump numbers listed I have never heard of someone being taken to task over the nick-name on their profiles. Just to make you happy..i have changed it from Swoopmeister to Mary Poppins..now dont go around saying that it implies i think im now a sexy swooper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites bob.dino 1 #47 July 4, 2005 Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . Edit: Sorry if this came across as overly bitchy. I have a bit of sarcastic tongue in my head . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dharma1976 0 #48 July 5, 2005 Quote Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . that was the biggest dig I have seen since I ankled in under a 1.33 loaded semi elliptical with 200 jumps ;) after the fact I realized that yes they were right and upsized for another 200 jumps... sometimes humility comes with pain man, and no one seems to want to listen to our experiences whether personal or from seeing it on others, mostly because they are "different", and they are special, and the rules of physics dont apply to them. oh well Skyjunky Davehttp://www.skyjunky.com CSpenceFLY - I can't believe the number of people willing to bet their life on someone else doing the right thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks 0 #49 July 5, 2005 quit fuckin with the kids! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skinnyshrek 0 #50 July 5, 2005 Dude, you need some serious help on so many levels......http://www.skydivethefarm.com do you realize that when you critisize people you dont know over the internet, you become part of a growing society of twats? ARE YOU ONE OF THEM? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
bob.dino 1 #47 July 4, 2005 Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . Edit: Sorry if this came across as overly bitchy. I have a bit of sarcastic tongue in my head . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dharma1976 0 #48 July 5, 2005 Quote Humility is always a good thing . Besides, I'm pretty sure Mary Poppins got more distance under her 30sqft roundie than Tagle gets under his Velo . that was the biggest dig I have seen since I ankled in under a 1.33 loaded semi elliptical with 200 jumps ;) after the fact I realized that yes they were right and upsized for another 200 jumps... sometimes humility comes with pain man, and no one seems to want to listen to our experiences whether personal or from seeing it on others, mostly because they are "different", and they are special, and the rules of physics dont apply to them. oh well Skyjunky Davehttp://www.skyjunky.com CSpenceFLY - I can't believe the number of people willing to bet their life on someone else doing the right thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks 0 #49 July 5, 2005 quit fuckin with the kids! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skinnyshrek 0 #50 July 5, 2005 Dude, you need some serious help on so many levels......http://www.skydivethefarm.com do you realize that when you critisize people you dont know over the internet, you become part of a growing society of twats? ARE YOU ONE OF THEM? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
