Bowie 0 #1 February 2, 2010 Does anyone have more info on the lane dimensions. I assume we are going to change the ground course markers again again. "the extra new zone.." New Point spreas in Accuracy including 1 more Scoring zone: 1. Water gate: 21 2. Water gate: 5 3. Water gate: 8 4. Water gate: 16 Zero Zone 1. Scoring Zone: 11 2. 19 3. 27 4. 34 5. 41 6. Zone 46, center 50 7. Zone -17 8. Zone -36Bo Wienberg vimeo.com/bowienberg Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #2 February 2, 2010 Here's what I've been given. IanPerformance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piahenzi 0 #3 February 2, 2010 AAAAAK!!!! .... Here we go again... I feel a looooooong briefing coming on at the pond. I guess we'll meet up at 7 AM ?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WesDes 0 #4 February 2, 2010 This is what I heard is proposed for 2011. Al's gonna need some more noodles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #5 February 3, 2010 Wow. I guess they felt bad after G-dub had a perfect run! This will be another interesting change to train for. Have we had two years in a row of the same rules in ZA?--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frost 1 #6 February 3, 2010 Quote Wow. I guess they felt bad after G-dub had a perfect run! This will be another interesting change to train for. Have we had two years in a row of the same rules in ZA? We all felt bad. It was like: "Hey man, great job!! That was awesome!! ... now our scores are fucked, you fuck!!!" But as far as "training for it" ... We all talked about the last years change, how it would affect things... But it's just a change in the rule regarding scoring... is it really affecting anything in the way you are going to swoop? The goal is still the same, the distance of the course is still the same... Simple concept - swoop all gates, land standing up on the middle, that's it. Sounds easy. What i am saying is - that's what you have to train for, not for a change in the rules. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berchtoldaj 0 #7 February 3, 2010 the lines may be moved around, but the high score is almost in the same place. with that logic you better get out there and train the new speed calcuation as well. I'm gonna try and get the spreadsheets updated for the meet this weekend in z-hills. I'm gonna need a hand measuring out and marking the new accuracy zones on friday if someone can help.************ Watch out for planters. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #8 February 3, 2010 Oh sweet - planning on running the new ZA? Awesome!Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyshimas 0 #9 February 3, 2010 which diagram will be used out of the two attached here so far? The second one has 2 zones to get a perfect score now that's interesting. What everyone thinks about this set up with 2 possibilities for a perfect score? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #10 February 3, 2010 The first one since it matches Wuzi's description. The 2nd one is definitely not right Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #11 February 3, 2010 Quote with that logic you better get out there and train the new speed calcuation as well. Al, you got me this time.--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #12 February 4, 2010 QuoteAAAAAK!!!! Crazy .... Here we go again... I feel a looooooong briefing coming on at the pond. I guess we'll meet up at 7 AM ?? looks pretty simple to me? Same method of performing the round but with different scoring. With that scoring system I would have got much more respectable results in my last comp in the accuracy rounds, but so would everyone else I suppose?"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #13 February 4, 2010 Quote This is what I heard is proposed for 2011. Al's gonna need some more noodles. wow, didn't see that one yet, that is way too complex."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
superstu 0 #14 March 23, 2010 anybody have any new news regarding the possible rule changes to speed and accuracy?Slip Stream Air Sports Do not go softly, do not go quietly, never back down Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #15 March 24, 2010 Stu, My post above is the ZA course. Speed is now 5/3 instead of squared. Blues IanPerformance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
superstu 0 #16 March 24, 2010 that's confirmed?Slip Stream Air Sports Do not go softly, do not go quietly, never back down Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #17 March 24, 2010 Yes. I believe the wording is being finalized, but the rules are confirmed for change.Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
superstu 0 #18 March 24, 2010 cool. p.s. you're an ass jockeySlip Stream Air Sports Do not go softly, do not go quietly, never back down Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #19 March 24, 2010 Only when I'm riding your mom......Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aykay 0 #20 March 24, 2010 QuoteStu, My post above is the ZA course. Speed is now 5/3 instead of squared. Blues Ian What do you mean here? Are you talking about the scoring? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #21 March 24, 2010 Yes. Previously the raw speed scores were squared, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score. Now the scores are multiplied by 5, divided by 3, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score. Blues, IanPerformance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morris 0 #22 March 25, 2010 "Now the scores are multiplied by 5, divided by 3, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score." Are you sure about this? Because this wouldn´t make sense at all, think about it... can you find the mistake...? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenkincb00 0 #23 March 25, 2010 its not taking into account the curviture of the earth nor the gravitational pull of the moon...wtf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #24 March 25, 2010 The RAW scores are now multiplied by 1.666666666666667 instead of squared. Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,563 #25 March 26, 2010 Quote"Now the scores are multiplied by 5, divided by 3, and then calculated as a percentage of the best score." Are you sure about this? Because this wouldn´t make sense at all, think about it... can you find the mistake...? "Well, it's real simple: basically, there's three grabbers, three taggers, five twig-runners, and the player at whack-bat. The center-tagger lights the pine-cone and chucks it over the basket, and the whack-batter tries to hit the cedar-stick off the cross-rock. Then the twig-runners dash back and forth until the pine-cone burns out, and the umpire calls "hot box". Finally, at the end you count up however many score-downs it adds up to and divide that by nine." But yeah, the maths as described does not appear to make sense.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites