spencer 0 #1 May 25, 2012 I have done a few camera jumps in my time, but however, I have this bloody bad habit that I want to get rid off, so all you budding camera guys I need advise. I am tall at 6ft a slim build, I want to fly a little lower and more up right, I have tried some small wings which I found very restrictive and didnt get on with them. But I have been told with my shape I should have a very good range, its easy to say that but alt harder to do. I fly with my arms old school , how I was taught in aff, but have been told to bring my arms in and hands closer together , like there over a beach ball position, which should sit me up a little. So I am practicing this. next week I am doing a half hr slot in the tunnel to try out. Any advice I would be grateful. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #2 May 25, 2012 This is how I fly, see the first attachment. Big wings, keep them closed when needed, and if needed put on some lead. The passenger here was a 16yr old lightweight kid + "normal" weight TM, so I have some wing open. Bringing my elbows in closes the wings for heavier tandem pairs. I was flying a bit flat here for a moment, usually I look up a little more. On opening this is exaggerated, see the second attachment. ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmytavino 16 #3 May 25, 2012 a shot of the drogue certainly helps tell the story and often the tandem pair is highlighted with the drogue waaay above them... Better, however is a point in the skydive where the video person USES those wings and run UP 10 feet or so, to grab a NICE shot of the drogue . Certainly stay well away. but go ahead.. get up, on level with it......Stay for 3 seconds, Then drop back down to the happy tandem. Try to do it while the TM may be doing turns... It adds to the video and also demonstrates the abilities of the 'camera'.. Of course you need to get all the First priority shots...exit, close up, big smiles, deployment etc. and so the extra step that i suggest may not be sensible on cessna jumps... But, if you're getting 13 Five or 14 grand.. it is a nice shot.... and worth dirt diving with the TM about before boarding....The full frame shot of the dancing drogue.... is a nice visual jmy * * such a move is fine & fun with the tandem pair and video person ONLY in the air... extra special consideration needs to apply whenever there are others on the skydive... right??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
linestretch 0 #4 May 25, 2012 Or another thought (and it's much easier on the back) is flying on your back. No need to arch and you can always get the students face in the shot. I use a camera jacket w/ fairly big wings....and I'm not a fatty. I learned by chasing tandems w/ a sweatshirt that had wings on it.my pics & stuff! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #6 May 31, 2012 Flying up to the drogue is nice and all, but it looks to me like you are way too close to it. For a drogue shot you should go up and back ,not just up, that's not safe. ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PharmerPhil 0 #7 May 31, 2012 I've been biting my tongue watching this thread, but the last two pics confirm what I have felt all along. Including the drogue in the shot, particularly from the top, doesn't add anything of value to the customer's product. Maybe people are just trying to impress themselves and other jumpers with their "cool" shots. But you should always keep in mind who is paying for the video and what they want. They want themselves featured first and foremost. Most, if they even see the drogue, are simply confused by it and have to have it explained (how many time have you heard their friends/family ask "the parachute comes out right away?"). Flying up and around the tandem can show varying angles, which I feel can make it interesting and break the monotony of a single angle (ala handcam), but flying so far up that you see the drogue and completely lose the shot of who is jumping doesn't add anything IMHO and wastes valuable shooting time. Flying below to show the drogue is slightly less detracting insofar as you can at least still see the customer's face (given a wide enough angle lens and proper exposure). But shot from the top? Not in my, or most customers' opinions. BTW, that first shot is definitely taken from the death zone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #8 June 1, 2012 Opinions may vary on that... After I get the shots of the passenger's face I'm happy with, I like the TM to turn while I go back and up, to get a dynamic overview shot of the surroundings (in this case, the nice clouds in the background). This only takes a few seconds. I stick to the passenger's face the rest of the 30-45 seconds of freefall. (BTW my photo makes it look like I was much farther away than the video does, it was shot with a 10.5mm fisheye) ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adamT 0 #9 June 1, 2012 If you're jumping from 12k+ then you have more then enough time to get all the shots. The customers will be much happier then 60 secs tight on their flapping face. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalljason 0 #10 June 1, 2012 Quote If you're jumping from 12k+ then you have more then enough time to get all the shots. The customers will be much happier then 60 secs tight on their flapping face. +1 Blue Skies, Jason Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #11 June 1, 2012 QuoteThe customers will be much happier then 60 secs tight on their flapping face. While that might be true, a picture of a drouge is of no interest to anyone but another jumper. 60 seconds of tight face shots might no be the way to go, but keeping the tandem pair the center of attention ceratinly is. In any case, the attached pic of the drouge is downright dangerous, and not a place any camera flyer should be at any point during the jump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalljason 0 #12 June 1, 2012 I guess everyone has their opinion of what the student wants or what makes the perfect tandem video but I agree with others that have said that the up close shot of the students face isn't all of the picture. I remember watching a video that DSE produced with Norman Kent about flying camera and I can't remember Mr. Kent's exact words but it was to the effect of " don't be in such a hurry after exit to get right in the students face. Take some time coming in from above them to convey the visual of the ground below and the vastness of the sky, then get in there and get the close up." I like getting the "pop-up" shot but I completly agree that it needs to be outside of the "cone of death" (which the shot you were referring to WAS NOT). I have lots of students comment that they like that shot. I also completly agree that the video is about the student and not about how awesome the vidiot can head down carve around the tandem pair as a display of his or her "Mad Skillz". Blue Skies, Jason Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mircan 0 #13 June 3, 2012 Quote I remember watching a video that DSE produced with Norman Kent about flying camera and I can't remember Mr. Kent's exact words but it was to the effect of " don't be in such a hurry after exit to get right in the students face. Take some time coming in from above them to convey the visual of the ground below and the vastness of the sky, then get in there and get the close up." I watched that video and I also remember Mr. Kent`s opinion. It`s reasonable and usable. But when all you jump is c182 from 9-10k feet... No time dudeist skydiver #42 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #14 June 4, 2012 QuoteI guess everyone has their opinion of what the student wants or what makes the perfect tandem video but I agree with others that have said that the up close shot of the students face isn't all of the picture. I'm not advocating for that at all, I was saying that shooting the drouge, as the up-close focal point of any shot is not in the interest of the student, even if you ignore the obvious safety issue. I move around quite a bit looking for different shots, and looking to present different points of view to the student. Some of it is based on the background, and some of it is based on the performance of the student. Be it low angle lighting, insteresting clouds on one side or the other, or a giant booger floating out of the students nose, there are a variety of reasons to keep moving, and look for the 'best opportunity'. Whatever that may be, the tandem pair should always be in the center of the frame, with the exception of opening shots, when you can bump them down a notch to get the canopy in the shot as well. QuoteMr. Kent's exact words but it was to the effect of " don't be in such a hurry after exit to get right in the students face. Take some time coming in from above them to convey the visual of the ground below and the vastness of the sky That's a great shot, and one that I really like to include when I can. The problem with that shot is that you can't have it, and the plane flying away in the background of the exit shots, without taking the time to back up and float up to get that angle dropping in from above. If you leave before the tandem, and stay low to keep the plane in the shot as they slide down the hill, you're in the exact opposite slot that the other shot requires. If I stick the exit, and am down there on that line that keeps the plane in the shot, I'll float up to the pair after the drouge is out and do some close-up stuff. Later in the jump, I'll go for an orbit where I pop up to about where a 4-way camera guy would be (not quite as steep), and take a lap around the tandem. It gives some of that perspective. If I'm late on the exit, and not down in the slot to get the plane, I'll pop up on the hill and let them fall away from me so I can drop in on them once the drouge is set. Norman is right, it really does put the whole thing in perspective, and when you can get it with some backlighting from a low sun (or sunset) it's all that much sweeter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #15 June 4, 2012 It's been a while since I shot tandem video as a regular weekend flyer. But, my normal routine was to exit slightly early, Just enough to get the pair and the a/c in the frame. Then, I would allow them the fall below me so I can get the drogue deployment as I carved around on level and in front of them. I settle there until deployment. went to my back as I filmed the opening, and tracked away at the same time. This can be done from 10,000ft if you are familiar with the TM routine. 4-8 seconds of video is A LOT when you the way I described. Once, I settled in front of the pair, I would ALWAYS make faces and geek the student. Most of the time, they do it back and it makes good video. Sometimes I would hi-five them. Doesn't always come out as I would like (I need a 10MM lens. I only have a 15mm)My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spencer 0 #16 June 4, 2012 Sorry I think some of you have miss understood me, When I say getting the drouge in the shot, I meant getting under the tandem, but up nice and close, so you see both there faces and the drouge, The exit when they leave, keeping in real close, and keeping with them. I spent half a hr in the tunnel on my back, which \i found a nightmare to try and keep, and im going back next week for another half hr, I think the shots I am trying to get might involve a little free flying. Practice makes perfect. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMFin 0 #17 June 4, 2012 One solution is to dock on the customer go slightly lower and fly sideways for a vertical composition. http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/260263_10150224618431880_573006879_7170430_2621418_n.jpg Example was taken with 8mm (APS-C body), but it can be done with 10mm also. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spencer 0 #18 June 4, 2012 nice, just needs a little closer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #19 June 4, 2012 Thanks for sharing, but the 3rd and 4th pics you attached are not what you should be doing, or encouraging others to do. A rigging error or equipment failure at that time would be a real problem for all three of you. You well within the 'cone of danger' getting those shots (even more so if you're shooting a 15mm lens), and there's no excuse for intentionally going there on a regular basis. It's simple concept, the further up you go from the tandem pair, the further back you need to be. The ratio should be close to 1 to 1, in that if you go up 10ft, you should also back up 10 ft. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueSBDeath 2 #20 June 6, 2012 Spencer, I get these kind of shots on my back and just in front of the pair, legs and feet at about arm pit area. As you said, just takes some practice :) Have fun and stay safe!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spencer 0 #21 June 6, 2012 Now where talking, thats the shot Im after getting, and yes be safe, and practice, and a little poorer, well alot poorer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gilead1 0 #22 June 7, 2012 Here is mine I'm using a wing and a ringsight to get those shots, You must be very very careful not to get into the "Death zone" Good luck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ishootu 0 #24 June 7, 2012 + 1 no need to be in that position when the main deploys prematurely Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #25 June 10, 2012 Quote Thanks for sharing, but the 3rd and 4th pics you attached are not what you should be doing, or encouraging others to do. A rigging error or equipment failure at that time would be a real problem for all three of you. You well within the 'cone of danger' getting those shots (even more so if you're shooting a 15mm lens), and there's no excuse for intentionally going there on a regular basis. It's simple concept, the further up you go from the tandem pair, the further back you need to be. The ratio should be close to 1 to 1, in that if you go up 10ft, you should also back up 10 ft. Thanks for the tip. I can agree with that.My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites