NeonLights 0 #1 June 26, 2013 I have both of the following and my gopro produces much higher quality video than the sony. Am i missing something ? are my settings wrong? for the cx i have an opteka .3 and a different hd lens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #2 June 26, 2013 The CX requires more setup, but the Opteka isn't doing you favors. It's a good lens, but it's also an adapted lens. Set up the camera to underexpose by -1. See if you like it better. The GP3 is a very good contender for the older AVCHD cams, however. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
degeneration 5 #3 June 27, 2013 I use an Opteka 0.43 HD lens on a CX115. While I don't have a comparison to a GP3, does the underexpose by -1 apply to the 115 for better quality too?Sky Switches - Affordable stills camera tongue switches and conversion adaptors, supporting various brands of camera (Canon, Sony, Nikon, Panasonic). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chapman10000 0 #4 June 27, 2013 I had a similiar issue and it was due to the fact that I had record mode in standard def not HD :( Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #5 June 27, 2013 There is that On a chart, the GoPro under exposes a bit. Sony is flat to slightly over. In reality, GoPro's shifting exposure can give you a few challenges due to the knee. Sony is a tad more forgiving. *generally* speaking, underexposing by -1 on the Sony cams that allow it, is a good practice, particularly if you'll be posting the footage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeonLights 0 #6 June 28, 2013 i have mine properly set up with the highest quality settings, the 0.3 lens just looks like shit unless im an inch away from something and without it, the quality is ok but definitely not worth the hassle when i can throw my GP3 on my full face and get better quality. #frustrated Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtiflyer 0 #7 June 28, 2013 degenerationI use an Opteka 0.43 HD lens on a CX115. While I don't have a comparison to a GP3, does the underexpose by -1 apply to the 115 for better quality too? a "HD" lens for under $100? I highly doubt it. Even if Opteka claims it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
degeneration 5 #8 June 28, 2013 I'm happy with the footage it gives me, so even if it isn't HD, it doesn't matter! I get the FOV I want, quality is good enough, so what does the price matter?Sky Switches - Affordable stills camera tongue switches and conversion adaptors, supporting various brands of camera (Canon, Sony, Nikon, Panasonic). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #9 June 28, 2013 somewhere on here, I have a resolve chart from years back. IIRC, the Opteka resolved around 500 lines, or about half-HD, so it's a tad soft by comparison, but the price is very right on these. I use them for student jumps, because they wear out after a few months of daily use (I'm terrible about capping the lens each landing/takeoff). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites